https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120441
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120441
Bug ID: 120441
Summary: [avr] exp returns Inf for x>=512 and 0 for x<=-512 in
libgcc/libf7
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120428
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Xu ---
Shorter reproduction:
// https://godbolt.org/z/z8z4Ye4rq
#include
#include
#include
#include
void permute(std::array& data) {
static constexpr std::array order{0, 1};
std::array buffer{};
for (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120428
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Xu ---
Seems to only matter when -mavx or -mavx512f is on. Otherwise the generated
assemblies are identical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #1 from Sam Jam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
ix=/tmp/gcc-pfx
--enable-languages=c,c++,ada CFLAGS='-O2 -march=znver3' CXXFLAGS='-O2
-march=znver3' 'BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -march=znver3' 'BOOT_CXXFLAGS=-O2
-march=znver3'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250526 (experimental) (GCC)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120431
--- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
The following diff "fixes" the problem. Or, I should say it would fix
the problem if I could regenerate the c files from the m4 file. For
whatever reason, --enable-maintainer-mode no longer rege
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120438
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120438
--- Comment #4 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
> gmake[3]: Entering directory '/home/kargl/gcc/obj/lto-plugin'
> cd ../../gcc/lto-plugin && /bin/sh /home/kargl/gcc/gcc/missing
> automake-1.15 --foreign
> configure.ac:4: error: your implement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120434
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If we wanted to do it in some GIMPLE pass (e.g. VRP or whatever other suitable
late GIMPLE pass which uses the ranger), we'd need a target hook to choose
preference of sign or zero extension and then probabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120439
Bug ID: 120439
Summary: RVV: wrong tail/mask-policy when source and
destination overlap with different EEW
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120438
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120438
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like configure is looking for automake-1.15 exactly rather than automake.
Can you provide the output of `ls -l $HOME/work/bin/automake*`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120438
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
from aclocal.m4 in lto-plugin:
AC_DEFUN([AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION],
[am__api_version='1.15'
dnl Some users find AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION and mistake it for a way to
dnl require some minimum version. Point them to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120438
Bug ID: 120438
Summary: --enable-maintainer-mode is broken
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61475|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120434
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120434
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Kang-Che Sung from comment #5)
> Note that I only report this as a bug for x86-64 targets. I've also tested
> an RISC-V (64-bit) and on that target the zero-extension would make larger
> code.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120268
--- Comment #5 from Kael Franco ---
(In reply to Kael Franco from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > This is only valid with -fallow-store-data-races. Otherwise you can
> > introduce a race condition according to the C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118694
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d390c7e5bd03490485a0b036add096e2e8b811b9
commit r15-9731-gd390c7e5bd03490485a0b036add096e2e8b811b9
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118694
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d6ed6d604ff949b650e48fa4eaed3ec8b6489c1
commit r16-883-g5d6ed6d604ff949b650e48fa4eaed3ec8b6489c1
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120413
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c8e20a8425f123abd54261d03af5a956d4d01c6
commit r15-9729-g9c8e20a8425f123abd54261d03af5a956d4d01c6
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120413
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
ICE FIXED so far for mainline (GCC 16) and GCC 15.
* * *
Reading:
> There is also BIND_EXPR_VARS, dunno if that should be walked instead
> or in addition.
The current code is about adding map clauses for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118694
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf619d4a366ad428421fdb7ad617b4749799cf93
commit r15-9730-gcf619d4a366ad428421fdb7ad617b4749799cf93
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113976
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] explicit |[12 Regression] explicit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 regression] |[12 regression] Miscompile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] wrong |[12 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117358
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE: |[12 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 13.4 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116636
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] Deprecation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110676
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] strlen |[12 Regression] strlen of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117358
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65724317b26eb16a3cd7279aacd68f4c85b355c0
commit r13-9693-g65724317b26eb16a3cd7279aacd68f4c85b355c0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120268
--- Comment #4 from Kael Franco ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is only valid with -fallow-store-data-races. Otherwise you can
> introduce a race condition according to the C/C++11 memory model.
I don't think -fallow-stor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119152
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97e8cd9295dadad32fb5866e96cb7e403c1d993d
commit r16-882-g97e8cd9295dadad32fb5866e96cb7e403c1d993d
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116799
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1e55bcc1075aa74bebd7e1bb87d3939da2e498b
commit r13-9692-gc1e55bcc1075aa74bebd7e1bb87d3939da2e498b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120413
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45b849d05b733a25ec7ce612229084b8f4b86d3d
commit r16-881-g45b849d05b733a25ec7ce612229084b8f4b86d3d
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116606
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0f2b0711f24238c5daefc97448d2f1b3a856359
commit r13-9690-gd0f2b0711f24238c5daefc97448d2f1b3a856359
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118819
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0502fbcee2a4eaf070f26201829478d8df51423
commit r13-9696-gb0502fbcee2a4eaf070f26201829478d8df51423
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117239
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffac0a49a88e0e366d35739d97fced2b01bfcf89
commit r13-9695-gffac0a49a88e0e366d35739d97fced2b01bfcf89
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117239
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af5d43648bd942a9c273218432b2cd0c446a9f04
commit r13-9694-gaf5d43648bd942a9c273218432b2cd0c446a9f04
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113976
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e72938390fb49549a38e5800b2c635c061b07d8
commit r13-9698-g5e72938390fb49549a38e5800b2c635c061b07d8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118623
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b70fba168fb3b11998a80e21cec0eb7fa7a42da7
commit r13-9697-gb70fba168fb3b11998a80e21cec0eb7fa7a42da7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110676
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c884148d3cb440fca6692452aabb42c340b987a9
commit r13-9689-gc884148d3cb440fca6692452aabb42c340b987a9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1e55bcc1075aa74bebd7e1bb87d3939da2e498b
commit r13-9692-gc1e55bcc1075aa74bebd7e1bb87d3939da2e498b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116636
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17dcde03ec2fcc1856b9026f8479f57495c949ae
commit r13-9691-g17dcde03ec2fcc1856b9026f8479f57495c949ae
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120400
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> Created attachment 61520 [details]
> updated fix
>
> Here's a better version of the patch, also sent to gcc-patches.
replied on-list, this also resolves the is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120400
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61500|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61493|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
On hppa-linux, I don't see any difference in g++ and libstdc++ test results
with or without patch added in comment #9 (i.e., I don't see any regressions
with patch).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117814
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
While we could adjust the test to avoid the warning, this would hide a bug: we
should not really emit a warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab ---
$ echo 'int main () {}' > empty.c
$ echo '#pragma riscv intrinsic "vector"
void v () { __riscv_vsetvl_e8m8 (0); }' > vector.c
$ gcc -flto -c empty.c
$ gcc -flto -c -march=rv64gcv vector.c
$ gcc empty.o ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120434
--- Comment #5 from Kang-Che Sung ---
Note that I only report this as a bug for x86-64 targets. I've also tested an
RISC-V (64-bit) and on that target the zero-extension would make larger code.
So I can say such an optimization would be target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119152
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:caf804b1795575d7714c62dd45b649831598055e
commit r16-878-gcaf804b1795575d7714c62dd45b649831598055e
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab ---
$ lto-dump -list vector.o
lto-dump: fatal error: target specific builtin not available
compilation terminated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bde3ca83ffe99088718198ea643bed7c4b22bbf1
commit r13-9687-gbde3ca83ffe99088718198ea643bed7c4b22bbf1
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95298
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
I'm reluctant to backport mangling fixes, and the PR says this was broken as
far back as GCC 7, so I lean toward not backporting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
That patch also introduced PR120385, so we shouldn't just backport it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94264
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
This caused PR120385.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106783
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113673
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d034c8d5c31811b0c12a4c1ffad89f8f8b086053
commit r13-9686-gd034c8d5c31811b0c12a4c1ffad89f8f8b086053
Author: Roger Sayle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116055
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1067dd74239aa3efd3489cf8c6216fb9787031ca
commit r13-9685-g1067dd74239aa3efd3489cf8c6216fb9787031ca
Author: Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120436
Bug ID: 120436
Summary: division-by-zero when calling some RVV intrinsics
without the V extension
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98991
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113976
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
still needs bisection of what fixed it, the IL looks the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120435
Bug ID: 120435
Summary: [New INSN][GCN] Add half-cycle trigonometric INSNs
pattern (sinpi, cospi, …)
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119126
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkaminsk at gcc dot gnu.org
R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110339
Bug 110339 depends on bug 119126, which changed state.
Bug 119126 Summary: [C++26] Implement P0792R14 function_ref: a type-erased
callable reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119126
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95298
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdc47838cba79380bb5caa8f3934aabf2b44a7d5
commit r13-9684-gcdc47838cba79380bb5caa8f3934aabf2b44a7d5
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119057
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:876083c5e7a8863ce87d8da9e3a43927aee7e02b
commit r13-9681-g876083c5e7a8863ce87d8da9e3a43927aee7e02b
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail|13.3.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119119
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a855127604e4df40afb25326a449b066c4a3527
commit r13-9682-g5a855127604e4df40afb25326a449b066c4a3527
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117979
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e6b9bbe9aadbfec4130c442ace9cabab50400c2
commit r13-9680-g6e6b9bbe9aadbfec4130c442ace9cabab50400c2
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b98de795c7f57ad15155ed1223c25c094ff27d16
commit r13-9679-gb98de795c7f57ad15155ed1223c25c094ff27d16
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e7c7e567704bd12d65b01246a655d8628bb521d
commit r13-9683-g9e7c7e567704bd12d65b01246a655d8628bb521d
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d02be6073d902925510736855e7f044eb8755aa4
commit r13-9678-gd02be6073d902925510736855e7f044eb8755aa4
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b73dffc733524f05634ab0321a6978fc798d1384
commit r13-9677-gb73dffc733524f05634ab0321a6978fc798d1384
Author: Jennifer Schm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa2089e8dd1632e4597d61230e33375628368fc1
commit r13-9676-gfa2089e8dd1632e4597d61230e33375628368fc1
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> The testcase still FAILs for me on the gcc-13 branch on x86_64-linux:
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr109345.f90 -O0 execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr109345.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to James K. Lowden from comment #13)
> A few uses of getenv(3) are still in the parser for debugging. I will
> remove them.
>
> > simply "moving" LICENSE from the FE to libgcobol
>
> Is this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119126
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:545433e9bd32e965726956cb238d53b39844b85c
commit r16-877-g545433e9bd32e965726956cb238d53b39844b85c
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118694
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
STATUS:
* 'target teams' handles the target part differently, depending whether
a 'teams' follows or not. Thus, the host (launching the offload kernel)
has to know whether a 'teams' follows or not.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93226
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 61519
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61519&action=edit
Draft patch for 'acc_memcpy_device' - (only) missing are testcases (and
possibly a bit cleanup/testing)
This is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120427
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118819
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b9f2877e334b4108c33259753acfdd27820b4f5
commit r14-11810-g4b9f2877e334b4108c33259753acfdd27820b4f5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417
--- Comment #9 from Simon Sobisch ---
Checked -fstack-reuse=none - same abort.
The main issue here is the language this C code has to cover: COBOL allows for
any trailing arguments to be "left out".
If the COBOL compiler knows about the paramet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120425
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117239
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5499c332a60a6928274796af0667d40719bf0715
commit r14-11809-g5499c332a60a6928274796af0667d40719bf0715
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117239
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfd7c674139097d12546d034f7869e272457aa56
commit r14-11808-gcfd7c674139097d12546d034f7869e272457aa56
Author: Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
