[Bug c++/120271] typename T not allowed in sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120271 Tymi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120271] typename T not allowed in sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120271 --- Comment #1 from Tymi --- never mind, gcc parses it correctly

[Bug c++/120272] New: ICE in get_local_decls, at cp/name-lookup.c:4594 since 13.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120272 Bug ID: 120272 Summary: ICE in get_local_decls, at cp/name-lookup.c:4594 since 13.3 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/120271] New: typename T not allowed in sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120271 Bug ID: 120271 Summary: typename T not allowed in sizeof Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/120243] [15/16 Regression] Exception rethrown from coroutine promise type unhandled_exception not caught under -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- we synthesise the same code, but the revised builder uses start_preparsed_function()/finish_function() and the latter introduces an extra try block. Investigating.

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O3 -fwrapv on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (-floop-interchange)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Summary|wrong code at -O3 o

[Bug target/119628] Need better mechanisms to manage register saves in callee for tail calls (inc. preserve_none for x86_64?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #16 from Sam James --- h

[Bug target/79748] [Enhancement] no_callee_saved_registers function attribute (on x86)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79748 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #4 from F

[Bug target/103771] [12/13/14 Regression] Missed vectorization under -mavx512f -mavx512vl after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771 --- Comment #45 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3385fed3fc61ac505fb5c1ffa09758a6f2489eb commit r16-605-ge3385fed3fc61ac505fb5c1ffa09758a6f2489eb Author: liuhongt Date: Mon Apr

[Bug target/120215] [16 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr78794.c scan-assembler pandn by r16-517-g993aa0bd28722c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120215 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/120270] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE with -O1 in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.cc:5668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Build|x86_64-pc-linux-gn

[Bug middle-end/120270] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE with -O1 in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.cc:5668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.4.0 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/120270] ICE with -O1 in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.cc:5668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end URL|https://g

[Bug target/118257] [SH] libgcc: Missing exceptions and rounding mode for soft-fp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118257 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug rtl-optimization/120270] New: ICE with -O1 in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.cc:5668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120270 Bug ID: 120270 Summary: ICE with -O1 in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.cc:5668 Product: gcc Version: unknown URL: https://godbolt.org/z/M3dTTzoWc St

[Bug target/118257] [SH] libgcc: Missing exceptions and rounding mode for soft-fp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118257 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- Is there anything that needs to be addressed for this one?

[Bug c/120269] ICE: tree check: expected class type, have exceptional (error_mark) in c_parser_generic_selection, at c/c-parser.cc:9270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120269 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/120269] ICE: tree check: expected class type, have exceptional (error_mark) in c_parser_generic_selection, at c/c-parser.cc:9270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120269 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||15.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c/120269] ICE: tree check: expected class type, have exceptional (error_mark) in c_parser_generic_selection, at c/c-parser.cc:9270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120269 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- If fuzzing, please ideally use releases/gcc-13 rather than 13.1.0.

[Bug c/120269] New: ICE: tree check: expected class type, have exceptional (error_mark) in c_parser_generic_selection, at c/c-parser.cc:9270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120269 Bug ID: 120269 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class type, have exceptional (error_mark) in c_parser_generic_selection, at c/c-parser.cc:9270 Product: gcc Ver

[Bug c++/120267] incorrectly ambiguous lookup depending on base class order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120267 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from Andre

[Bug c++/46687] Class member lookup ambiguity w/ overloaded static members and using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46687 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|fabien at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/120268] Missed removing loop of setting zero when dereference pointer (memset) at -O3 -fallow-store-data-races

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120268 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-14 Summary|Missed re

[Bug tree-optimization/120268] Missed removing loop of setting zero when dereference pointer (memset)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120268 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is only valid with -fallow-store-data-races. Otherwise you can introduce a race condition according to the C/C++11 memory model.

[Bug tree-optimization/120268] Missed removing loop of setting zero when dereference pointer (memset)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120268 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/113413] ATAND(Y,X) is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113413 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug fortran/108577] [meta-bug] Fortran 2023 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108577 Bug 108577 depends on bug 113413, which changed state. Bug 113413 Summary: ATAND(Y,X) is unsupported https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113413 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/113413] ATAND(Y,X) is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113413 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abe8cd9ba6bf8581fd4e4f23c75a15eec276cc00 commit r16-603-gabe8cd9ba6bf8581fd4e4f23c75a15eec276cc00 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: We

[Bug fortran/113413] ATAND(Y,X) is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113413 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b239e9cf98ca9238e61e01864ab4dbb5c7f57ce2 commit r16-602-gb239e9cf98ca9238e61e01864ab4dbb5c7f57ce2 Author: Yuao Ma Date: Mon May

[Bug tree-optimization/120268] New: Missed removing loop of setting zero when dereference pointer (memset)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120268 Bug ID: 120268 Summary: Missed removing loop of setting zero when dereference pointer (memset) Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/120267] New: incorrectly ambiguous lookup depending on base class order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120267 Bug ID: 120267 Summary: incorrectly ambiguous lookup depending on base class order Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/58091] Non-ambiguous member lookup rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58091 S. Davis Herring changed: What|Removed |Added CC||herring at lanl dot gov --- Comment #

[Bug modula2/120253] Error message column numbers should start at 1 not 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120253 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug modula2/120253] Error message column numbers should start at 1 not 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120253 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a485b83e177cb742be17faf20ac5cc7db14fee3 commit r16-601-g9a485b83e177cb742be17faf20ac5cc7db14fee3 Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Tue

[Bug target/120242] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A.

[Bug target/120242] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-13 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/111873] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] runtime Segmentation fault with '-O3 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre' since r12-434-g93f8cb4965cebe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873 --- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor --- *** Bug 120044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ipa/120044] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above with "-fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre -fno-code-hoisting" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120044 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/111873] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] runtime Segmentation fault with '-O3 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre' since r12-434-g93f8cb4965cebe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873 --- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a patch on the mailing list: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6h61oyzn1@virgil.suse.cz/T/#u

[Bug libstdc++/67990] compare() does not sort null characters in locale collation order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67990 --- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong --- POSIX.1-2024 has added a note permitting POSIX interfaces to exhibit "unusual behavior" for locales where does not have the lowest primary weight in the collation ordering: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepub

[Bug libstdc++/120266] newly introduced problems when using lto'ed libstdc++-v3 in a static link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120266 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I suspect without a testcase it is going to be hard to reproduce this. We did have one accidently ABI change with -std=c++20 but I don't think that is the issue here. (see PR 120012; it is only fixed in GCC

[Bug libstdc++/120266] New: newly introduced problems when using lto'ed libstdc++-v3 in a static link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120266 Bug ID: 120266 Summary: newly introduced problems when using lto'ed libstdc++-v3 in a static link Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/120265] Optimize modular counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120265 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is basically what PR 20231 is asking for with a non-constant value even :).

[Bug tree-optimization/120265] Optimize modular counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120265 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|

[Bug middle-end/120264] Optimize modulus when the divisor is a small Mersenne number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120264 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-13 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/120265] New: Optimize modular counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120265 Bug ID: 120265 Summary: Optimize modular counters Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/120264] Optimize modulus when the divisor is a small Mersenne number.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120264 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|

[Bug c++/120261] GCC rejects valid constexpr value initialization with private members (with one member has NSDMI)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120261 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- MSVC rejected it until v19.27 (circa 2019, I think?) so I think it's a much more recent change.

[Bug middle-end/120264] New: Optimize modulus when the divisor is a small Mersenne number.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120264 Bug ID: 120264 Summary: Optimize modulus when the divisor is a small Mersenne number. Product: gcc Version: 15.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/120261] GCC rejects valid constexpr value initialization with private members (with one member has NSDMI)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120261 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > EDG rejects it for the same reason as GCC. > > Clang 17 rejected it too, but Clang 18 accepts it. > > I suspect this is a Core DR but I'm not sure which one.

[Bug libstdc++/120190] Definition of the primary template of std::format_kind seems IFNDR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120190 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2

[Bug fortran/120163] [15 Regression] Can not import module containig call to pure routine via abstract interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/120163] [15 Regression] Can not import module containig call to pure routine via abstract interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a3eed34d75ce8fe13e3cdc28c42849ada26c316f commit r15-9678-ga3eed34d75ce8fe13e3cdc28c42849ada26c316f Author: Thomas Koenig

[Bug c++/120261] GCC rejects valid constexpr value initialization with private members (with one member has NSDMI)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120261 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- EDG rejects it for the same reason as GCC. Clang 17 rejected it too, but Clang 18 accepts it. I suspect this is a Core DR but I'm not sure which one.

[Bug c++/120262] internal compiler error: in remap_type_1 since version 12.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120262 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61418 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61418&action=edit Reduced testcase

[Bug c++/120126] ICE in GCC with pack-dependent decltype in lambda: cp_type_quals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120126 Simon Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-13 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/120263] RISC-V: FRM not restored if clobbered via inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120263 Vineet Gupta changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug modula2/120117] ICE when attempting to obtain the MAX of an aliased set type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120117 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61fada934e894c7fb4a1f1626ea0d0f1f1f1d2f4 commit r15-9677-g61fada934e894c7fb4a1f1626ea0d0f1f1f1d2f4 Author: Gaius Mulley Da

[Bug c++/120262] internal compiler error: in remap_type_1 since version 12.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120262 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug modula2/115276] libgm2 wraptime.InitTM returns NIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug modula2/119915] Sprintf1 repeats the entire format string if it starts with a directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119915 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/120263] New: RISC-V: FRM not restored if clobbered via inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120263 Bug ID: 120263 Summary: RISC-V: FRM not restored if clobbered via inline asm Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug modula2/115276] libgm2 wraptime.InitTM returns NIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a10dd5c46aa41e108b04f2494ffb00c6cab50c75 commit r15-9676-ga10dd5c46aa41e108b04f2494ffb00c6cab50c75 Author: Gaius Mulley Da

[Bug c++/120262] New: internal compiler error: in remap_type_1 since version 12.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120262 Bug ID: 120262 Summary: internal compiler error: in remap_type_1 since version 12.1 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/119903] [13/14/15/16 Regression] non-call exception vs traping comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|13.4

[Bug tree-optimization/119903] [13/14/15/16 Regression] non-call exception vs traping comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eaee2df409ae40ab4a0c557839d6f64b9c6b936d commit r16-600-geaee2df409ae40ab4a0c557839d6f64b9c6b936d Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tue

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---

[Bug modula2/119915] Sprintf1 repeats the entire format string if it starts with a directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119915 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07c5d7ce0daccc8110953a8e65861ffc17ed92aa commit r15-9675-g07c5d7ce0daccc8110953a8e65861ffc17ed92aa Author: Gaius Mulley Da

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61416|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > gcc -fsanitize=undefined -o pr120254{,.c}; ./pr120254 > pr120254.c:20:32: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -804068425 + > -2004610352 cannot be represente

[Bug c++/120247] __builtin_assoc_barrier and binding to a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120247 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/120247] __builtin_assoc_barrier and binding to a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120247 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Perhaps __builtin_assoc_barrier should lower to NON_LVALUE_EXPR (PAREN_EXPR > (expr)) > or PAREN_EXPR (NON_LVALUE_EXPR (expr)) for C++? > Of course, a big questi

[Bug c++/120247] __builtin_assoc_barrier and binding to a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120247 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps __builtin_assoc_barrier should lower to NON_LVALUE_EXPR (PAREN_EXPR (expr)) or PAREN_EXPR (NON_LVALUE_EXPR (expr)) for C++? Of course, a big question is what the builtin should do for class types (if

[Bug modula2/119914] Passing a constant to the unbounded array compiles and causes a.out to dump core

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119914 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8032bec831a4a48636e7ffd771e76efc1ff27ea commit r15-9674-gb8032bec831a4a48636e7ffd771e76efc1ff27ea Author: Gaius Mulley Da

[Bug rtl-optimization/120258] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14/15/16 |[12/13/14/15/16 regression]

[Bug c++/120247] __builtin_assoc_barrier and binding to a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120247 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/120258] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.5.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Bie

[Bug c++/120257] ICE (Segfault) when expanding deeply nested macros with constructor calls (std::string) since 15.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120257 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >any modification in the code leads to the expected behaviour, which is "Killed >- processing time exceeded" That is just a timeout, because gotbolt has a timeout because they don't want over run programs.

[Bug c++/120257] ICE (Segfault) when expanding deeply nested macros with constructor calls (std::string) since 15.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120257 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/120247] __builtin_assoc_barrier and binding to a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120247 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > PAREN_EXPR should behave like NON_LVALUE_EXPR, aka it produces an rvalue. Right that is what I expected. The C front-end rejects it correctly but the C++ front

[Bug c++/120261] GCC rejects valid constexpr value initialization with private memembers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120261 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/120255] C++ template member class parameter name should shadow member name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120255 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c12443e824cf96311db7a1be82b3626909c8ceeb commit r14-11770-gc12443e824cf96311db7a1be82b3626909c8ceeb Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libfortran/120196] In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:627d83c2b196340cccaee8bb4032fade7ad6 commit r14-11773-g627d83c2b196340cccaee8bb4032fade7ad6 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/120261] New: GCC rejects valid constexpr value initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120261 Bug ID: 120261 Summary: GCC rejects valid constexpr value initialization Product: gcc Version: 15.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug modula2/120188] documented example does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug modula2/120188] documented example does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c220b8e7b422ed04b6aaa1b9243b550df913f476 commit r15-9673-gc220b8e7b422ed04b6aaa1b9243b550df913f476 Author: Gaius Mulley D

[Bug modula2/120188] documented example does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df1407f2122ec6e670d700c090e765d0a06859ee commit r15-9672-gdf1407f2122ec6e670d700c090e765d0a06859ee Author: Gaius Mulley D

[Bug middle-end/118443] [Meta bug] Bugs triggered by and blocking more smtgcc testing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118443 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/119852] The output of -fdump-ipa-clones can contain "(null)" as the suffix/reason for cloning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119852 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:168ce6032dd582e39f9ddadcc195fc73f364c4dd commit r13-9654-g168ce6032dd582e39f9ddadcc195fc73f364c4dd Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug libstdc++/67990] compare() does not sort null characters in locale collation order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67990 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-13 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/120260] dyld runtime error for gfortran code on Mac OS X Sequoia 15.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120260 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/697494

[Bug libfortran/120196] In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/118868] __builtin_assoc_barrier with pointers cause ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/118868] __builtin_assoc_barrier with pointers cause ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4fb1b435a65f505b0172b4f0213483c3a07adbf commit r16-599-ge4fb1b435a65f505b0172b4f0213483c3a07adbf Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mon

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a79e30dabb6b3edc29f2656b7d480076a1f4d3bd commit r14-11772-ga79e30dabb6b3edc29f2656b7d480076a1f4d3bd Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87c7061cc0acc99c8f580d5e76eba288db341807 commit r14-11771-g87c7061cc0acc99c8f580d5e76eba288db341807 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/119852] The output of -fdump-ipa-clones can contain "(null)" as the suffix/reason for cloning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119852 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >