https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119905
Bug ID: 119905
Summary: [OpenMP] Fortran deep mapping of allocatable
components: Recursive types and FIRSTPRIVATE/PRIVATE
not handled
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119904
Bug ID: 119904
Summary: [OpenMP] wrong code as map item sorting does not work
- fails with: libgomp: Pointer target of array section
wasn't mapped
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932
--- Comment #28 from Tianyang Chou ---
Very helpful, thanks for your time.
Best regards,Tianyang.Chou
Replied Message
From
tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org[1]
Date
4/20/2025 19:46
To
[2]
Subject
[Bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61173
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61173&action=edit
The gimple fold hack
This is the gimple fold hack which I was talking about. I didn't add a testcase
though be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903
Bug ID: 119903
Summary: [13/14/15/16 Regression] non-call exception vs traping
comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: EH, wrong-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114020
--- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #0)
> > Found with the Fujitsu testsuite. Reduced testcase.
> > Note, if the use of ENTRY is replace with an actual
> > fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119902
Bug ID: 119902
Summary: open-coded scatter/gather should not account
vec_to_scalar cost
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889
--- Comment #8 from Jürgen Reuter ---
>
> Hi Harald,
> as I reported this to NAG and Intel as well, I got the following reply from
> Malcolm Cohen from NAG:
> "I note that there is an error in your example at line 56: it has
> procedure(dlsym)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
One of the EDG developers points out that the difference is not with CWG2273
but rather that in other compilers the base template is not brought in by the
derived template. Before P1787 only the parameters
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114020
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #0)
> Found with the Fujitsu testsuite. Reduced testcase.
> Note, if the use of ENTRY is replace with an actual
> function, ie., 'function kmr_fixfun() result(zz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#nonbugs_cxx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119327
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b62cf555b5446cb02fc471519cf1afa09e1a108
commit r16-88-g4b62cf555b5446cb02fc471519cf1afa09e1a108
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/adl
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument-dependent_name_lookup
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8111677/what-is-argument-dependent-lookup-aka-adl-or-koenig-loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93407
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This might be handled by r7-5965-g7c9560a578a061 or now by
r16-25-g800b3977031dd4 .
usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --enable-libsanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20250422125234-r16-87-g49e79b86936373-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250422 (exper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119895
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119656
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104175
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119656
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42f05565a6dcd8db1c0829a1301e8849a4f9cb04
commit r12-11065-g42f05565a6dcd8db1c0829a1301e8849a4f9cb04
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119656
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec237e7644a4509d3bc8c5cfe4b34060c9a665fe
commit r13-9557-gec237e7644a4509d3bc8c5cfe4b34060c9a665fe
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119622
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889
--- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #5)
> > as I reported this to NAG and Intel as well, I got the following reply from
> > Malcolm Cohen from NAG:
> > "I note that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #17)
> Fixed on 16-trunk for far without fallout, so adjusting summary.
>
> Do we need to ping the RM for backport permission?
I have pinged.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63bda370eddf091c456cea3df82e0e5aa9a1fa97
commit r15-9572-g63bda370eddf091c456cea3df82e0e5aa9a1fa97
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49e79b86936373fc70c3bdea3b2d8353cf8957b1
commit r16-87-g49e79b86936373fc70c3bdea3b2d8353cf8957b1
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unfinished testcase, with -Wunused-but-set-variable=1 this warns just about i
in foo,
with -Wunused-but-set-variable=2 about a, b, c, d, i and with
-Wunused-but-set-variable=3 about a, b, c, d, e, i. No war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61171&action=edit
gcc16-pr44677-wip.patch
So, I tried to implement this partially, so far in the C FE.
As we've been implementin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] |[15 Regression] Elemental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |16.0
--- Comment #6 from anl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119900
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119900
Bug ID: 119900
Summary: regression if imagick with -Ofast -march=native
-fprofile-use between g:b986ed16c2546674 and
g:e1098c7b08d9e601
Product: gcc
Version: 16.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The question should std::ref be in the std namespace and participate in ADL
with std namespace.
I think so.
The "workaround" works as then invoke becomes qualified and ADL no longer comes
into play.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899
Bug ID: 119899
Summary: Custom invoke has name collision with std::invoke,
without using namespace std
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgcc |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117013
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119880
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe they do the same as libc++ and convert all wide strings to narrow before
writing to a byte-oriented stream, or vice versa. Or maybe they don't use stdio
for std::cout at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117013
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fabbf99fc8ae26f0d87ff0c8619b4fc3bb4a5da2
commit r16-83-gfabbf99fc8ae26f0d87ff0c8619b4fc3bb4a5da2
Author: Spencer Abson
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889
--- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> It fails for all gfortran versions since at least 7.
>
> NAG says:
>
> Panic: pr119889.f90, line 59: Impossible no interface
> Internal Error -- please report this bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7b5fe3400cf15150ae18d522859cafcdd6a9315
commit r14-11676-gd7b5fe3400cf15150ae18d522859cafcdd6a9315
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot
com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119898
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119898
Bug ID: 119898
Summary: constexpr expansion of array null pointer check fails
with `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks`
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119897
Bug ID: 119897
Summary: Conversion to any integer type succeeds, when should
be ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10)
> The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bb4a431eace7e77562e686ecc9c9504045da003
>
> commit r1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119880
qingzhe huang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > And r15-3091-g51761c50f843d5 .
>
> Patrick, please take a look. I think the above commit caused this change i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118407
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d88bbce5757db4e268122805957a932786b46fc2
commit r15-9570-gd88bbce5757db4e268122805957a932786b46fc2
Author: Richard San
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119200
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Andre V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.2.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119896
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bb4a431eace7e77562e686ecc9c9504045da003
commit r14-11674-g2bb4a431eace7e77562e686ecc9c9504045da003
Author: Jennifer Sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4108c75ea13c2f76d6aeef498d70379f8f826be9
commit r14-11675-g4108c75ea13c2f76d6aeef498d70379f8f826be9
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8fe937b4ed5bcb93d6ae6ccdd497a55f1337dae
commit r14-11673-gc8fe937b4ed5bcb93d6ae6ccdd497a55f1337dae
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119549
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a27f6a420c61f35d44bf33561b8312e1dbd012c8
commit r14-11672-ga27f6a420c61f35d44bf33561b8312e1dbd012c8
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97dde4260ca1bf841be0e7565962670a30d45fd2
commit r14-11671-g97dde4260ca1bf841be0e7565962670a30d45fd2
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119896
Bug ID: 119896
Summary: Assertion failed: e->type == SymField, function
cbl_field_of
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119737
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117836
--- Comment #1 from ptomsich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We'll continue using this meta-bug to track issues that should be addressed
before we enabled favoid-store-forwarding by default at O2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119895
Bug ID: 119895
Summary: List initialization of bitfield enum class member
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05941b93dfc19686d6b9c9ca5aecf3a6b28a15a5
commit r15-9569-g05941b93dfc19686d6b9c9ca5aecf3a6b28a15a5
Author: Rainer Orth
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6390fc86995fbd5239497cb9e1797a3af51d3936
commit r16-81-g6390fc86995fbd5239497cb9e1797a3af51d3936
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Tue Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119894
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko ---
What is a long stub? Stub for calling outside of 2MiB range? If so then, looks
like it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 14.3 as well, though the #c7 case still needs to be analyzed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119707
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 87326, which changed state.
Bug 87326 Summary: [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM
statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] UBSAN |[12/13 Regression] UBSAN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 87939, which changed state.
Bug 87939 Summary: [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and
TEAM statements
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 66681, which changed state.
Bug 66681 Summary: [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a
complex coarray
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 103796, which changed state.
Bug 103796 Summary: form-team-spec-list is unsupported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] wrong |[12/13 regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7
commit r16-76-g621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7
commit r16-76-g621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7
commit r16-76-g621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ebd7c3b978dba986c44cbc61f94cd97f381cc62
commit r16-77-g9ebd7c3b978dba986c44cbc61f94cd97f381cc62
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2
commit r16-75-g8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7
commit r16-76-g621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2
commit r16-75-g8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2
commit r16-75-g8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2
commit r16-75-g8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1be1970f97d05a07851cd826132fcf466827ebe5
commit r16-74-g1be1970f97d05a07851cd826132fcf466827ebe5
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119884
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[16 Regression] ICE
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo