[Bug fortran/119905] New: [OpenMP] Fortran deep mapping of allocatable components: Recursive types and FIRSTPRIVATE/PRIVATE not handled

2025-04-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119905 Bug ID: 119905 Summary: [OpenMP] Fortran deep mapping of allocatable components: Recursive types and FIRSTPRIVATE/PRIVATE not handled Product: gcc Version: 15.0

[Bug fortran/119904] New: [OpenMP] wrong code as map item sorting does not work - fails with: libgomp: Pointer target of array section wasn't mapped

2025-04-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119904 Bug ID: 119904 Summary: [OpenMP] wrong code as map item sorting does not work - fails with: libgomp: Pointer target of array section wasn't mapped Product: gcc V

[Bug tree-optimization/118605] gcc/tree-assume.cc:108: dangling field problem

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118605 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/114932] IVopts inefficient handling of signed IV used for addressing.

2025-04-22 Thread tianyang.chou at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932 --- Comment #28 from Tianyang Chou --- Very helpful, thanks for your time. Best regards,Tianyang.Chou Replied Message From tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org[1] Date 4/20/2025 19:46 To [2] Subject [Bug

[Bug tree-optimization/119903] [13/14/15/16 Regression] non-call exception vs traping comparison

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61173 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61173&action=edit The gimple fold hack This is the gimple fold hack which I was talking about. I didn't add a testcase though be

[Bug tree-optimization/119903] [13/14/15/16 Regression] non-call exception vs traping comparison

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/119903] New: [13/14/15/16 Regression] non-call exception vs traping comparison

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903 Bug ID: 119903 Summary: [13/14/15/16 Regression] non-call exception vs traping comparison Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: EH, wrong-co

[Bug fortran/114020] ENTRY and procedure pointer leads to ICE

2025-04-22 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114020 --- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > (In reply to kargls from comment #0) > > Found with the Fujitsu testsuite. Reduced testcase. > > Note, if the use of ENTRY is replace with an actual > > fu

[Bug tree-optimization/119902] New: open-coded scatter/gather should not account vec_to_scalar cost

2025-04-22 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119902 Bug ID: 119902 Summary: open-coded scatter/gather should not account vec_to_scalar cost Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/119889] Internal compiler error using bind(C) functionality

2025-04-22 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889 --- Comment #8 from Jürgen Reuter --- > > Hi Harald, > as I reported this to NAG and Intel as well, I got the following reply from > Malcolm Cohen from NAG: > "I note that there is an error in your example at line 56: it has > procedure(dlsym)

[Bug c++/119859] [15/16 Regression][CWG2273] template member function overload with base class

2025-04-22 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- One of the EDG developers points out that the difference is not with CWG2273 but rather that in other compilers the base template is not brought in by the derived template. Before P1787 only the parameters

[Bug fortran/114020] ENTRY and procedure pointer leads to ICE

2025-04-22 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114020 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargls from comment #0) > Found with the Fujitsu testsuite. Reduced testcase. > Note, if the use of ENTRY is replace with an actual > function, ie., 'function kmr_fixfun() result(zz

[Bug libstdc++/119899] Custom invoke has name collision with std::invoke, without using namespace std

2025-04-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- And https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#nonbugs_cxx

[Bug rtl-optimization/119901] wrong code with -O -favoid-store-forwarding -mprefer-vector-width=none -mavx2

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119901 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-22 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/119327] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] -Os breaks inlining: raw_hash_set.h: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline': target specific option mismatch since r12-5920

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119327 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b62cf555b5446cb02fc471519cf1afa09e1a108 commit r16-88-g4b62cf555b5446cb02fc471519cf1afa09e1a108 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug libstdc++/119899] Custom invoke has name collision with std::invoke, without using namespace std

2025-04-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/adl https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument-dependent_name_lookup http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8111677/what-is-argument-dependent-lookup-aka-adl-or-koenig-loo

[Bug tree-optimization/93407] Dead partial memset not optimized away (clang does that)

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93407 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug tree-optimization/93407] Dead partial memset not optimized away (clang does that)

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93407 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This might be handled by r7-5965-g7c9560a578a061 or now by r16-25-g800b3977031dd4 .

[Bug rtl-optimization/119901] New: wrong code with -O -favoid-store-forwarding -mprefer-vector-width=none -mavx2

2025-04-22 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --enable-libsanitizer --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20250422125234-r16-87-g49e79b86936373-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 16.0.0 20250422 (exper

[Bug c++/119895] List initialization of bitfield enum class member fails

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119895 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119656] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with impure elemental subroutine and interface

2025-04-22 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119656 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug c++/104175] Enum Class Bit Fields Brace-enclosed Initializer List fails to compile

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104175 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com ---

[Bug fortran/119656] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with impure elemental subroutine and interface

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119656 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42f05565a6dcd8db1c0829a1301e8849a4f9cb04 commit r12-11065-g42f05565a6dcd8db1c0829a1301e8849a4f9cb04 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/119656] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with impure elemental subroutine and interface

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119656 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec237e7644a4509d3bc8c5cfe4b34060c9a665fe commit r13-9557-gec237e7644a4509d3bc8c5cfe4b34060c9a665fe Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug modula2/119622] runtime libraries are not installed after "make install"

2025-04-22 Thread bruno at clisp dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119622 Bruno Haible changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/119889] Internal compiler error using bind(C) functionality

2025-04-22 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889 --- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #6) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #5) > > as I reported this to NAG and Intel as well, I got the following reply from > > Malcolm Cohen from NAG: > > "I note that

[Bug libstdc++/119888] [15/16 Regression] std::projected is no longer a class for C++20/23

2025-04-22 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/119836] [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-22 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #17) > Fixed on 16-trunk for far without fallout, so adjusting summary. > > Do we need to ping the RM for backport permission? I have pinged.

[Bug libstdc++/119888] [15/16 Regression] std::projected is no longer a class for C++20/23

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63bda370eddf091c456cea3df82e0e5aa9a1fa97 commit r15-9572-g63bda370eddf091c456cea3df82e0e5aa9a1fa97 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug libstdc++/119888] [15/16 Regression] std::projected is no longer a class for C++20/23

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49e79b86936373fc70c3bdea3b2d8353cf8957b1 commit r16-87-g49e79b86936373fc70c3bdea3b2d8353cf8957b1 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug c/44677] Warn for variables incremented but not used (+=, ++)

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Unfinished testcase, with -Wunused-but-set-variable=1 this warns just about i in foo, with -Wunused-but-set-variable=2 about a, b, c, d, i and with -Wunused-but-set-variable=3 about a, b, c, d, e, i. No war

[Bug c/44677] Warn for variables incremented but not used (+=, ++)

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61171 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61171&action=edit gcc16-pr44677-wip.patch So, I tried to implement this partially, so far in the C FE. As we've been implementin

[Bug fortran/119836] [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-22 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15/16 Regression] |[15 Regression] Elemental

[Bug fortran/119889] Internal compiler error using bind(C) functionality

2025-04-22 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |16.0 --- Comment #6 from anl

[Bug target/119900] [16 regression] imagick with -Ofast -march=native -fprofile-use between g:b986ed16c2546674 and g:e1098c7b08d9e601

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119900 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Summary|

[Bug target/119900] New: regression if imagick with -Ofast -march=native -fprofile-use between g:b986ed16c2546674 and g:e1098c7b08d9e601

2025-04-22 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119900 Bug ID: 119900 Summary: regression if imagick with -Ofast -march=native -fprofile-use between g:b986ed16c2546674 and g:e1098c7b08d9e601 Product: gcc Version: 16.

[Bug libstdc++/119899] Custom invoke has name collision with std::invoke, without using namespace std

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/119899] Custom invoke has name collision with std::invoke, without using namespace std

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The question should std::ref be in the std namespace and participate in ADL with std namespace. I think so. The "workaround" works as then invoke becomes qualified and ADL no longer comes into play.

[Bug libgcc/119899] New: Custom invoke has name collision with std::invoke, without using namespace std

2025-04-22 Thread frederik.hofe at pm dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899 Bug ID: 119899 Summary: Custom invoke has name collision with std::invoke, without using namespace std Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/119899] Custom invoke has name collision with std::invoke, without using namespace std

2025-04-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119899 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libgcc |libstdc++ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi

[Bug target/117013] aarch64 should define spaceship4 optab

2025-04-22 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117013 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/119880] fwide must be called before and after std::wcout to change wide orientation to allow std::cout works

2025-04-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119880 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Maybe they do the same as libc++ and convert all wide strings to narrow before writing to a byte-oriented stream, or vice versa. Or maybe they don't use stdio for std::cout at all.

[Bug target/117013] aarch64 should define spaceship4 optab

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117013 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fabbf99fc8ae26f0d87ff0c8619b4fc3bb4a5da2 commit r16-83-gfabbf99fc8ae26f0d87ff0c8619b4fc3bb4a5da2 Author: Spencer Abson Date: Th

[Bug fortran/119889] Internal compiler error using bind(C) functionality

2025-04-22 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889 --- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > It fails for all gfortran versions since at least 7. > > NAG says: > > Panic: pr119889.f90, line 59: Impossible no interface > Internal Error -- please report this bu

[Bug fortran/119889] Internal compiler error using bind(C) functionality

2025-04-22 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119889 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug tree-optimization/119706] [12/13 regression] ICE in gimple pass 'dom' for -O3 -mcpu=grace --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=sve-only

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7b5fe3400cf15150ae18d522859cafcdd6a9315 commit r14-11676-gd7b5fe3400cf15150ae18d522859cafcdd6a9315 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug c++/97913] -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks not working properly with constexpr

2025-04-22 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/119898] constexpr expansion of array null pointer check fails with `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks`

2025-04-22 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119898 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/119898] New: constexpr expansion of array null pointer check fails with `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks`

2025-04-22 Thread vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119898 Bug ID: 119898 Summary: constexpr expansion of array null pointer check fails with `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/119897] New: Conversion to any integer type succeeds, when should be ambiguous

2025-04-22 Thread barry.revzin at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119897 Bug ID: 119897 Summary: Conversion to any integer type succeeds, when should be ambiguous Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/119706] [12/13 regression] ICE in gimple pass 'dom' for -O3 -mcpu=grace --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=sve-only

2025-04-22 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10) > The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bb4a431eace7e77562e686ecc9c9504045da003 > > commit r1

[Bug libstdc++/119880] fwide must be called before and after std::wcout to change wide orientation to allow std::cout works

2025-04-22 Thread nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119880 qingzhe huang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug libstdc++/119888] [15/16 Regression] std::projected is no longer a class for C++20/23

2025-04-22 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888 --- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > And r15-3091-g51761c50f843d5 . > > Patrick, please take a look. I think the above commit caused this change i

[Bug tree-optimization/118407] [15/16 Regression] tree-ssa/predcom-8.c fails with invalid sum after g:68326d5d1a593dc0bf098c03aac25916168bc5a9

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118407 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d88bbce5757db4e268122805957a932786b46fc2 commit r15-9570-gd88bbce5757db4e268122805957a932786b46fc2 Author: Richard San

[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119200 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #1 from Andre V

[Bug target/119549] [14 Regression] SSE4 code inlined into no-sse4 function

2025-04-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119549 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.2.1 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119896] Assertion failed: e->type == SymField, function cbl_field_of

2025-04-22 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119896 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0

[Bug tree-optimization/119706] [12/13/14 regression] ICE in gimple pass 'dom' for -O3 -mcpu=grace --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=sve-only

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bb4a431eace7e77562e686ecc9c9504045da003 commit r14-11674-g2bb4a431eace7e77562e686ecc9c9504045da003 Author: Jennifer Sch

[Bug tree-optimization/119778] [13/14 regression] -Wuninitialized crashed with longjmp/setjmp since r13-2500

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4108c75ea13c2f76d6aeef498d70379f8f826be9 commit r14-11675-g4108c75ea13c2f76d6aeef498d70379f8f826be9 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/119706] [12/13/14 regression] ICE in gimple pass 'dom' for -O3 -mcpu=grace --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=sve-only

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119706 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8fe937b4ed5bcb93d6ae6ccdd497a55f1337dae commit r14-11673-gc8fe937b4ed5bcb93d6ae6ccdd497a55f1337dae Author: Richard Biene

[Bug target/119549] [14 Regression] SSE4 code inlined into no-sse4 function

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119549 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a27f6a420c61f35d44bf33561b8312e1dbd012c8 commit r14-11672-ga27f6a420c61f35d44bf33561b8312e1dbd012c8 Author: Richard Biene

[Bug tree-optimization/119534] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE when building libaom-3.10.0 since r12-5392

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97dde4260ca1bf841be0e7565962670a30d45fd2 commit r14-11671-g97dde4260ca1bf841be0e7565962670a30d45fd2 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug cobol/119896] New: Assertion failed: e->type == SymField, function cbl_field_of

2025-04-22 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119896 Bug ID: 119896 Summary: Assertion failed: e->type == SymField, function cbl_field_of Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/119737] GCN/C++ vs. 'as': 'LLVM ERROR: Size expression must be absolute.'

2025-04-22 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119737 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug rtl-optimization/117836] [meta-bug] favoid-store-forwarding issues

2025-04-22 Thread ptomsich at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117836 --- Comment #1 from ptomsich at gcc dot gnu.org --- We'll continue using this meta-bug to track issues that should be addressed before we enabled favoid-store-forwarding by default at O2.

[Bug c++/119895] New: List initialization of bitfield enum class member fails

2025-04-22 Thread vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119895 Bug ID: 119895 Summary: List initialization of bitfield enum class member fails Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug cobol/119217] cobol: build broken on non-linux by unguarded use of Linux-specific facilities.

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05941b93dfc19686d6b9c9ca5aecf3a6b28a15a5 commit r15-9569-g05941b93dfc19686d6b9c9ca5aecf3a6b28a15a5 Author: Rainer Orth Dat

[Bug cobol/119217] cobol: build broken on non-linux by unguarded use of Linux-specific facilities.

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6390fc86995fbd5239497cb9e1797a3af51d3936 commit r16-81-g6390fc86995fbd5239497cb9e1797a3af51d3936 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Tue Ap

[Bug target/119894] -fno-PIC -Os on loongarch creates code incompatible with plts

2025-04-22 Thread phcoder at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119894 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko --- What is a long stub? Stub for calling outside of 2MiB range? If so then, looks like it.

[Bug middle-end/119808] wrong code with _BitInt() and -ftree-coalesce-vars -fstack-protector-strong

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 14.3 as well, though the #c7 case still needs to be analyzed.

[Bug tree-optimization/119722] wrong code with _BitInt(), __builtin_stdc_rotate_left() at -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119722 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/119707] wrong code with _BitInt() mask and shift at -O1

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119707 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libgcc/119796] Atomic Operations Can Deadlock Without Hardware Support

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103796] form-team-spec-list is unsupported

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 87326, which changed state. Bug 87326 Summary: [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/88960] [F18] ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: add INITIAL_TEAM, PARENT_TEAM, and CURRENT_TEAM

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66681] [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug rtl-optimization/119785] [12/13 Regression] UBSAN errors in machmode.h on sparc

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119785 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] UBSAN |[12/13 Regression] UBSAN

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 87939, which changed state. Bug 87939 Summary: [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 66681, which changed state. Bug 66681 Summary: [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 What|Removed |Add

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 103796, which changed state. Bug 103796 Summary: form-team-spec-list is unsupported https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug rtl-optimization/119291] [12/13 regression] wrong code at -O{2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14 regression] wrong |[12/13 regression] wrong

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103001] missing simplify of (CAF) get_team

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/97210] Intrinsic function get_team() does not work

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87556] FORM TEAM statement team-number argument interpreted incorrectly when function

2025-04-22 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/97210] Intrinsic function get_team() does not work

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7 commit r16-76-g621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7 Author: Andre Vehreschild Date

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7 commit r16-76-g621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7 Author: Andre Vehreschild Date

[Bug fortran/103001] missing simplify of (CAF) get_team

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7 commit r16-76-g621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7 Author: Andre Vehreschild Dat

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ebd7c3b978dba986c44cbc61f94cd97f381cc62 commit r16-77-g9ebd7c3b978dba986c44cbc61f94cd97f381cc62 Author: Andre Vehreschild Dat

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2 commit r16-75-g8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2 Author: Andre Vehreschild Date

[Bug fortran/88960] [F18] ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: add INITIAL_TEAM, PARENT_TEAM, and CURRENT_TEAM

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7 commit r16-76-g621fe931be1e0220854e4d3c49cf2ce05cf735f7 Author: Andre Vehreschild Date

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2 commit r16-75-g8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2 Author: Andre Vehreschild Dat

[Bug fortran/87556] FORM TEAM statement team-number argument interpreted incorrectly when function

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2 commit r16-75-g8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2 Author: Andre Vehreschild Date

[Bug fortran/103796] form-team-spec-list is unsupported

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2 commit r16-75-g8f4ee36bd5248cd244f65282167e3a13a3c98bc2 Author: Andre Vehreschild Da

[Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements

2025-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1be1970f97d05a07851cd826132fcf466827ebe5 commit r16-74-g1be1970f97d05a07851cd826132fcf466827ebe5 Author: Andre Vehreschild Date

[Bug rtl-optimization/119884] [16 Regression] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4636 with -O2 -fno-dse -favoid-store-forwarding since r16-15

2025-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119884 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Summary|[16 Regression] ICE

  1   2   >