https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118805
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
That said, it probably is ifcombine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118805
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118805
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
-fdisable-tree-ifcombine works, but I haven't checked if it's doing something
wrong (given we're disabling a bunch of other passes, it might not be to blame;
possible it unlocks something later that the others w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118805
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118805
Bug ID: 118805
Summary: wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-ccp
-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre"
on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118804
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(e)VRP can handle the non-constant case already too:
```
bool bar (int x, int y, int z) {
if (x == y)
return true;
if (x == z)
if (y == z)
return true;
return f(x,y);
}
```
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118804
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118804
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118804
Bug ID: 118804
Summary: redundant if (x == CST && y == CST) not removed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118803
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118803
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |driver
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118061
Yunbo Ni changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yunboni at smail dot nju.edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118803
Bug ID: 118803
Summary: cannot pass parameter `--save-temps` to `collect2`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118146
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] ICE: in |[14 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118146
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9576353454e6c2a20a9742e2f29f17830766cd8a
commit r15-7448-g9576353454e6c2a20a9742e2f29f17830766cd8a
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Feb 8 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103173
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105690
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106020
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107473
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108860
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Summary|[12/13/1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108860
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109561
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109832
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110620
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110645
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114253
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114592
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114960
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114430
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114360
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114991
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114969
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118801
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note you might also want to use -fno-checking for the trunk.
For me:
[apinski@xeond2 upstream-gcc-isel]$ time ~/upstream-gcc-isel/bin/gcc t.c -S -g
-O3 -fno-var-tracking -fno-checking
real0m10.142s
u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117430
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Where we resolve the data transfer statement the variable c_ptr is derived, It
has an attribute of private_comp. The interop_kind is 0. The gdb in resolve.cc
shows:
11745 derived = ts->u.derived;
(g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118785
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118785
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60431|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118146
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Thanks Sam. Same problem, same fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116508
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116604
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116623
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116994
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117204
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118785
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60431
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60431&action=edit
single file testcase still need LTO
`g++ t0.cc -fPIC -flto -O3 -Wl,--version-script=libmfx-gen.map -shared -w`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118795
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118795
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] ICE in |[15 Regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118795
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-source
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118796
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-source
Summary|[15 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118802
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I only hit this on one machine and at first I was suspicious of HW failure or
something but it's consistent. Not tried to repro it manually yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118802
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60430
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60430&action=edit
gcc-118802.tar.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118802
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
The differences are odd.
```
$ diffoscope
./work/build/stage2-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/32/libphobos/libdruntime/core/internal/gc/impl/conservative/gc.o
./work/build/stage3-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/32/libphobos/libdruntim
le-host-pie
--enable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes
--with-build-config=bootstrap-cet
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.1 20250208 (experimental)
5753f459444fa61a93d23325cd59467dc1838eef (Gento
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118764
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c7109abf215975f4b30a696c15541184f75d637
commit r15-7446-g0c7109abf215975f4b30a696c15541184f75d637
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98533
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 118797 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118797
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118800
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118797
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118797
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60429
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60429&action=edit
multitextparameterdefinition.cpp.ii.xz
$ g++ multitextparameterdefinition.cpp.ii -c -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118797
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Nevermind, I got it. I forgot that some type verification is gated on -g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118797
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118146
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118146
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
This seems to show up when building coreutils-9.6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118801
Bug ID: 118801
Summary: Excessive compile time with -g -O2 -fpeel-loops
-fno-var-tracking
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107067
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107067
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5753f459444fa61a93d23325cd59467dc1838eef
commit r15-7445-g5753f459444fa61a93d23325cd59467dc1838eef
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118685
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118685
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06e5b0b4a244090abfea333d91fc5963292cb41d
commit r15-7444-g06e5b0b4a244090abfea333d91fc5963292cb41d
Author: Dimitry Andric
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Petazzoni ---
(In reply to Michael Eager from comment #14)
> There is no reproducible test case in this bug report. A report that
> buildroot has a build error is not a test case.
I'm not sure how to provide a repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118798
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118800
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
--- Comment #14 from Michael Eager ---
There is no reproducible test case in this bug report. A report that buildroot
has a build error is not a test case.
Creating a patch which only addressed the build failure would be problematic:
there wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24878
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Petazzoni ---
(In reply to Michael Eager from comment #12)
> If you have a patch, please send it to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
Hm, I'm sorry, but I don't have a patch. My previous comment should have said
"Is there any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118800
Bug ID: 118800
Summary: [13.3.1 regression] aarch64 -mcpu=native ICEs since
PR113257 backport
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118799
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118799
Bug ID: 118799
Summary: [15 Regression] [modules] error on typedefs in
anonymous namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118798
Bug ID: 118798
Summary: Ambiguous mangling of NTTP pointers to polymorphic
objects
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118772
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e90276a4831553268f3dd4917d7b6ae9c08dbf0f
commit r15-7440-ge90276a4831553268f3dd4917d7b6ae9c08dbf0f
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117991
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Malcomson ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #1)
> Still occurring on the trunk. In my case I saw them in a native build &
> test scenario.
Ah -- apologies I missed when this was raised -- will look into t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100155
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108357
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118797
Bug ID: 118797
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE; ‘verify_type’ failed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118796
Bug ID: 118796
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at
tree-ssa-sccvn.cc:1109
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118795
Bug ID: 118795
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2, at
expr.cc:10975
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118782
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #77 from Thomas Koenig ---
Just wondering... has this been fixed in the meantime?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253
Jan Schultke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janschultke at googlemail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118574
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> Unfortunately, it looks like the fixes weren't enough and the crashes are
> back when dropping -fno-range-for-ext-temps.
Can you bisect to one TU using -f{,no-}rang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 regression]|[12/13/14 regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118574
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> Unfortunately, it looks like the fixes weren't enough and the crashes are
> back when dropping -fno-range-for-ext-temps.
ack
does https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64d8ea056a5c339700118a412dea1c44a57acf55
commit r15-7437-g64d8ea056a5c339700118a412dea1c44a57acf55
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
91 matches
Mail list logo