https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118778
Bug ID: 118778
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in print_type (c-objc-common.cc:239) OR
unrecognizable insn: (set (reg:SF ...) (mem/c:SF ...))
with -mgeneral-regs-only and "float"
Pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118706
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118601
Jin Ma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-07
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
r15-7400-gd3ff498c478ace gave
$ cat x.c
int f (int);
int
advance (int dz)
{
if (dz > 0)
return (dz + dz) * dz;
else
return dz * f (dz);
}
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 pr111673]$ make x.o
/export/build/gnu/tools-bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #16 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> r15-7400-gd3ff498c478ace gave
>
> $ cat x.c
> int f (int);
> int
> advance (int dz)
> {
> if (dz > 0)
> return (dz + dz) * dz;
> else
> return dz * f (dz)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #14 from Hongtao Liu ---
> can be sinked to else branch(as sub + mov). When jle .L2 is not taken,
> it can save one push instruction. And that's why 511.povray_r is improved.
plus one pop instruction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #13 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> > > > Created attachment 60350 [d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118777
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118497
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118753
Bug 118753 depends on bug 117081, which changed state.
Bug 117081 Summary: [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c since
r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118753
Bug 118753 depends on bug 117082, which changed state.
Bug 117082 Summary: [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-17.c
since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116829
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115932
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111673
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118771
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
I'll try get back to bisecting this in the week. It's hard to reproduce in some
environments.
richi/jakub: can we make this P1 for now? it doesn't have to really block the
release if it comes down to it, but I'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117036
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118775
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
I suppose we need something like
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -2909,6 +2909,11 @@ cxx_eval_call_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree
t,
gcc_assert (arg0);
if (new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Maybe
--- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2025-01-23 11:10:47.842729956 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2025-02-07 00:08:47.985933719 +0100
@@ -17703,12 +17703,12 @@
})
(define_expand "3_mask"
- [(set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67771
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Various glibc functions work around this using FIX_INT_FP_CONVERT_ZERO, I
suppose the new log10f implementation taken from CORE-MATH needs such a
workaround as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60407
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60407&action=edit
New testcase that shows happens all the way back to GCC 12.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The reduced one started with
r14-1412-g45466eecf5ef669164c0922e5be8fd288b144886
Again, latent before that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.1.0, 14.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r15-3509-gd34cda720988674bcf8a24267c9e1ec61335d6de
But guess is a backend bug rather than middle-end, so it was latent before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60406
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60406&action=edit
testcase without LTO
`-O2 -march=tigerlake` is enough
tps://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60405&action=edit
MRE to produce dangling reference warning
gcc version 15.0.1 20250206 (experimental)
(Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-9a409f5c862c5b2625c4b94145031394ef28-binutils-2.42)
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20250206/configure
--prefix=/opt/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Not killed LTO yet.
bitstream.i:
```
typedef struct {
int quant_type;
short *mpeg_quant_matrices
} DECODER;
char BitstreamReadHeaders_matrix[];
void set_intra_matrix();
void BitstreamReadHeaders(struct leng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
bitstream.i:
```
typedef struct {
int quant_type;
short *mpeg_quant_matrices
} DECODER;
char BitstreamReadHeaders_matrix[];
void set_intra_matrix();
void BitstreamReadHeaders(struct length *bs, DECODER *dec)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59252
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #9)
> (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #8)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> > > Created attachment 60350 [details]
> > > ira: Don't increase callee-saved regi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
--- Comment #36 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #35)
> It is not a good idea to CSE address that refers to virtual stack vars to a
> temporary. This defeats stack/frame pointer detection, mentioned in Comment
> #33, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note if you change the linker script to just export decoder_decode you can
remove xvid.i file from what is needed to reduce it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60403
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60403&action=edit
xvid-118776.tar.xz
`x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -m32 decoder.i xvid.i bitstream.i quant_matrix.i -o
/dev/null -shared
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Bug ID: 118776
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building xvid-1.3.7 with LTO
(extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108454
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
--- Comment #35 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #34)
> The problematic code is expanded from:
>
> ;; Generating RTL for gimple basic block 5
>
> ;; __builtin_memset (&k, 0, 40);
>
> (insn 21 20 22 (parallel [
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
--- Comment #34 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The problematic code is expanded from:
;; Generating RTL for gimple basic block 5
;; __builtin_memset (&k, 0, 40);
(insn 21 20 22 (parallel [
(set (reg:DI 107)
(plus:DI (reg/f:D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
--- Comment #33 from Uroš Bizjak ---
FTR, ix86_find_max_used_stack_alignment increases alignment only when stack
pointer or frame pointer are explicitly mentioned in :
/* Find the maximum stack alignment. */
sub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118763
--- Comment #4 from Valentin Tolmer ---
I noticed that the standard (or at least cppreference) says that "The call to
the allocation function (operator new) is sequenced before(since C++17) the
evaluation of the constructor arguments in a new ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118775
Bug ID: 118775
Summary: ICE in tree_to_uhwi
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108454
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca652aebd30132b2a9afbc07c664a35b5e443350
commit r14-11276-gca652aebd30132b2a9afbc07c664a35b5e443350
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
--- Comment #32 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #31)
> #c29 works since r15-571-g1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
That means it most likely went latent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117036
Stefanos Kornilios Mitsis Poiitidis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skmp at emudev dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67771
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
This regression causes two testsuite failures in glibc on 32-bit PowerPC:
FAIL: math/test-float-log10
FAIL: math/test-float32-log10
See:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118770
--- Comment #4 from ymity.me at gmail dot com ---
I would expect it to take longer in such a case, it's almost instant on my
laptop, and quite random on my tower pc. If i modify it just a little bit it
would continue endlessly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116829
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118770
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to ymity.me from comment #2)
> Pretty sure recursion doesn't result in crash normally, i don't quite see
> why it should be marked as dup.
The crash is because of not detecting of a recursion afte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118608
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118770
--- Comment #2 from ymity.me at gmail dot com ---
Pretty sure recursion doesn't result in crash normally, i don't quite see why
it should be marked as dup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
--- Comment #29 from Sam James ---
```
char a;
static int b, c, f;
char *d = &a;
static char *e = &a;
void g(int h, int i) {
int j = 1;
for (; c != -3; c = c - 1) {
int k[10];
f = 0;
for (; f < 10; f++)
k[f] = 0;
*d = k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110345
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7169ee08203878ba351eedf206df7ff43014d634
commit r15-7391-g7169ee08203878ba351eedf206df7ff43014d634
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118756
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118756
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d19fbb2be487f19ed1c48699e17cafe19520525
commit r15-7395-g8d19fbb2be487f19ed1c48699e17cafe19520525
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I am thinking to backport this as it cleans up some output with garbage in it.
Any thoughts?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfed99751c1a3b93ca66451eb1b62271e682f927
commit r15-7394-gcfed99751c1a3b93ca66451eb1b62271e682f927
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85481
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110345
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 110345, which changed state.
Bug 110345 Summary: [C++26] P2552R3 - On the ignorability of standard attributes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110345
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110345
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6305c46fad5ae9b3b94b069c040cdd0c67e6e49e
commit r15-7393-g6305c46fad5ae9b3b94b069c040cdd0c67e6e49e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110345
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:122b946cc632e472ee6d828f8adf05567cfaa831
commit r15-7392-g122b946cc632e472ee6d828f8adf05567cfaa831
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118771
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118771
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] aarch64 |[15 regression] aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118764
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118764
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb27337f9f4956e6eb634b26a7999ea68063f58a
commit r15-7390-gcb27337f9f4956e6eb634b26a7999ea68063f58a
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102647
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118769
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118774
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106767
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ymity.me at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118770
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118774
Bug ID: 118774
Summary: Tab skips miscalculated with 'stream' write
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118750
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a03303b4d5b2ca58e5750a4d5bd735d85a091273
commit r15-7389-ga03303b4d5b2ca58e5750a4d5bd735d85a091273
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
There's 3 patches all in this same area that we're still sorting through.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709
--- Comment #28 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 60399
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60399&action=edit
Patch
Fixes fma testcases on hppa.
This is a glibc bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60399|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100570
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
I can't reproduce this.
> g++ -c -x c++ test.cpp -I /usr/local/include/qt5 -I
> /usr/local/include/qt5/QtCore -g2 -gdwarf-2 -Wall -Wswitch
> -W"no-deprecated-declarations" -W"empty-body" -Wconversion -W"r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102116
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118750
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60396|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118773
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 60398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60398&action=edit
gcc15-pr118773.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118773
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118773
Bug ID: 118773
Summary: [15 Regression] Invalid rejection of attribute with
dependent argument since r15-3046
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118772
--- Comment #1 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
Hello Thomas.
I can confirm it is ok to get check_effective_target_exceptions to return 0 for
bpf-*-* targets. Thanks!
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
