https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13 Regression] Missed Dead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110538
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] Dead |[14 Regression] Dead Code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115500
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117798
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle ---
--- snip ---
> In iso-c-binding.def, one finds
>
> NAMED_CHARKNDCST (ISOCBINDING_CHAR, "c_char",gfc_default_character_kind)
>
> so kind('a') == kind(c_char_'a') on all targets.
This implies that is_c_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116715
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116720
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|cmuellner at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116986
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|law at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117953
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100358
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430
Bug 107430 depends on bug 106221, which changed state.
Bug 106221 Summary: lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not
always work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430
Bug 107430 depends on bug 110680, which changed state.
Bug 110680 Summary: erroneous error "non-template type 'C' used as a template"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110680
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106821
Bug 106821 depends on bug 106221, which changed state.
Bug 106221 Summary: lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not
always work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110680
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 100358, which changed state.
Bug 100358 Summary: [modules] Not all filesystems support posix_fallocate()
(e.g. ZFS)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100358
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84aa7065deec49bab9fb0b085cd0a0dcc42cc479
commit r15-6454-g84aa7065deec49bab9fb0b085cd0a0dcc42cc479
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115008, which changed state.
Bug 115008 Summary: ICE with modules on amd64-freebsd*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110680
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce81cd2eac686dc0f1c91adac779add550b0
commit r15-6453-gce81cd2eac686dc0f1c91adac779add550b0
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100358
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84aa7065deec49bab9fb0b085cd0a0dcc42cc479
commit r15-6454-g84aa7065deec49bab9fb0b085cd0a0dcc42cc479
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce81cd2eac686dc0f1c91adac779add550b0
commit r15-6453-gce81cd2eac686dc0f1c91adac779add550b0
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89579
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117951
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Jeff removed himself from CC list, so I presume he thinks this
is not a gcse bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103470
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 115849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115849
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118179
--- Comment #8 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 59993 [details]
> > Reproducer
>
> Thanks for the reproducer. I can confirm the ICE after r15-6408,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103923
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||one.last.kiss at outlook dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118153
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90345
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-04-10 00:00:00 |2024-12-28
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116308
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 118197 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118197
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118197
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118170
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118231
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118231
Bug ID: 118231
Summary: _Decimal32 datatype fails with 'cannot mix operands',
where _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 hold,
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #27 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
On 12/28/24 11:49, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
>
> --- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> Why not set it in gfc_resolve_expr near
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230
--- Comment #2 from shynur ---
> The error is because the static_assert is evaluated while the class is
> still being defined.
Thank you! But why...
> The workaround is to un-comment the "/* -> std::size_t */".
I found it does work. If this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Why not set it in gfc_resolve_expr near the top before any other actions?
also
Are there any systems where c_char is not equal to 1? If not then BT_CHARACTER
and KIND==1 is always C interoperable. ??
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I clearly see where my logic was incorrect. I do wonder if there is a resolve
string expr that would allow us to set the interop for all cases of kind=1
BT_CHARACTER.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118179
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #6)
> Created attachment 59993 [details]
> Reproducer
Thanks for the reproducer. I can confirm the ICE after r15-6408, but
it is fixed for me with r15-642
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230
Bug ID: 118230
Summary: `std::is_invocable` gives wrong result when the tested
function returns `auto`
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #24 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #22)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #21)
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc
> > index 580f8c8407d..759eb99a645 100644
> > -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88284
--- Comment #8 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #7)
> While Intel has revived the "Altera" name, the Nios II processor is still
> listed as discontinued. I see they are offering ARM-based FPGA products
> again instead.
>
Arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #23 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #19)
> > (In reply to kargls from comment #17)
> > > I suppose the error in check.cc(gfc_check_f_c_string) that sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229
--- Comment #5 from Edison Chen ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72700965/bug-in-c-g-preprocessor-with-
> line-macro
Oh, I never found this post when I was searching lol. I'm sorry that I sti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118220
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Optimization of malloc/free |[15 regression]
|Produces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118207
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65c8fd7b017482c6d6bd0c7a7c6e296f016e38d0
commit r15-6452-g65c8fd7b017482c6d6bd0c7a7c6e296f016e38d0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note line most likely should not be used here anyways since line could be the
same between two different uses of these macros. __COUNTER__ is the better
macro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Hmm
> https://github.com/boostorg/concept_check/blob/develop/include/boost/
> concept_check/general.hpp. says the file has less than 93 lines ...
Looking at the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm
https://github.com/boostorg/concept_check/blob/develop/include/boost/concept_check/general.hpp.
says the file has less than 93 lines ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72700965/bug-in-c-g-preprocessor-with-line-macro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229
Bug ID: 118229
Summary: __LINE__ value incorrect in long expanded macro
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118228
Bug ID: 118228
Summary: GCC allows instantiation of union with field class
having private constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118223
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
-MP Generate phony targets for all headers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117875
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> I saw this on LNT testers too. Unforutnately hmmer was not working for a
> while, so there is relatively big interval about when this can happen.
So looking into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118227
--- Comment #2 from James Touton ---
I missed the prior bug in my search, sorry for the noise! Thanks for the quick
response!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117875
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
For aarch64, it is between r15-5312-g9676da9fc26c9b and
r15-5729-g56029c91dcadcf .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115296
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bekenn at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118227
Bug ID: 118227
Summary: Hard error on unsupported array size when generating
deduction guides for an alias template
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117875
--- Comment #14 from chenglulu ---
On LoongArch, r15-5894-gaf9a3fe6a52974 compared to r15-5315-g5cf7ffe047681d,
the performance of 456.hmmer drops by 27.8%.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118226
Bug ID: 118226
Summary: packed index out of range error message could be
improved
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
66 matches
Mail list logo