[Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13 Regression] Missed Dead

[Bug tree-optimization/110538] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since r14-368-ge1366a7e4ce

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110538 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 Regression] Dead |[14 Regression] Dead Code

[Bug target/115500] RISC-V: Performance regression on 1bit test

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115500 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/117798] Audit intrinsic subprograms with scalar INTENT(OUT) character strings

2024-12-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117798 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle --- --- snip --- > In iso-c-binding.def, one finds > > NAMED_CHARKNDCST (ISOCBINDING_CHAR, "c_char",gfc_default_character_kind) > > so kind('a') == kind(c_char_'a') on all targets. This implies that is_c_in

[Bug target/116715] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O2 with -march=rv64id_zbs

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116715 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/116720] [13/14/15 Regression] RISC-V: Unrecognizable insn with xtheadmemidx on rv32

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116720 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|cmuellner at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug testsuite/116986] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr115387-2.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116986 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC|law at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A.

[Bug target/117953] [15 Regression] GCC miscompile rvv intrinsics at `-O2` and `-O3`, missing `csrwi` to modify `vxrm`

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117953 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/106221] lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not always work

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c++/100358] [modules] Not all filesystems support posix_fallocate() (e.g. ZFS)

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100358 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107430] [meta-bug] lambda in decltype

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430 Bug 107430 depends on bug 106221, which changed state. Bug 106221 Summary: lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not always work https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/107430] [meta-bug] lambda in decltype

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430 Bug 107430 depends on bug 110680, which changed state. Bug 110680 Summary: erroneous error "non-template type 'C' used as a template" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110680 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/106821] Incorrect behavior when using type alias template containing unevaluated lambda expression in a template context

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106821 Bug 106821 depends on bug 106221, which changed state. Bug 106221 Summary: lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not always work https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/110680] erroneous error "non-template type 'C' used as a template"

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110680 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 100358, which changed state. Bug 100358 Summary: [modules] Not all filesystems support posix_fallocate() (e.g. ZFS) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100358 What|Removed |A

[Bug c++/115008] ICE with modules on amd64-freebsd*

2024-12-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84aa7065deec49bab9fb0b085cd0a0dcc42cc479 commit r15-6454-g84aa7065deec49bab9fb0b085cd0a0dcc42cc479 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 115008, which changed state. Bug 115008 Summary: ICE with modules on amd64-freebsd* https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/110680] erroneous error "non-template type 'C' used as a template"

2024-12-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110680 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce81cd2eac686dc0f1c91adac779add550b0 commit r15-6453-gce81cd2eac686dc0f1c91adac779add550b0 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/115008] ICE with modules on amd64-freebsd*

2024-12-28 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/100358] [modules] Not all filesystems support posix_fallocate() (e.g. ZFS)

2024-12-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100358 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84aa7065deec49bab9fb0b085cd0a0dcc42cc479 commit r15-6454-g84aa7065deec49bab9fb0b085cd0a0dcc42cc479 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/106221] lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not always work

2024-12-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce81cd2eac686dc0f1c91adac779add550b0 commit r15-6453-gce81cd2eac686dc0f1c91adac779add550b0 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/89579] -Wclobbered warning false positive when compiling with -Og

2024-12-28 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89579 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/117951] FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117951 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- Jeff removed himself from CC list, so I presume he thinks this is not a gcse bug.

[Bug target/103470] GNU-stack section not emitted on MIPS hard-float targets with MUSL

2024-12-28 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103470 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.1.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/110748] RISC-V: optimize store of DF 0.0

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 115849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/115849] RISC-V should improve handling of -0.0 when -fno-signed-zeros is enabled

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115849 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/118179] [15 regression] ICE in gimplify

2024-12-28 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118179 --- Comment #8 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #7) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #6) > > Created attachment 59993 [details] > > Reproducer > > Thanks for the reproducer. I can confirm the ICE after r15-6408,

[Bug c++/118230] `std::is_invocable` gives wrong result when the tested function returns `auto`

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/103923] is_invocable inexplicably fails

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103923 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||one.last.kiss at outlook dot com --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/118153] Wrong code generated due to selective scheduler on RISC-V target

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118153 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug tree-optimization/90345] too pessimistic check whether pointer may alias a local variable

2024-12-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90345 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2024-04-10 00:00:00 |2024-12-28 CC|

[Bug target/116308] ICE while compiling _Atomic _Float16 for riscv64

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116308 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 118197 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/118197] ICE: SIGSEGV in emit_move_insn (expr.cc:4635) at -O1 and above

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118197 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey

[Bug target/118197] ICE: SIGSEGV in emit_move_insn (expr.cc:4635) at -O1 and above

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118197 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/118170] ICE: in riscv_sched_variable_issue, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:9790 with -mcpu=tt-ascalon-d8 and _Float16

2024-12-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118170 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug c/118231] _Decimal32 datatype fails with 'cannot mix operands', where _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 hold,

2024-12-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118231 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/118231] New: _Decimal32 datatype fails with 'cannot mix operands', where _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 hold,

2024-12-28 Thread newbie-02 at gmx dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118231 Bug ID: 118231 Summary: _Decimal32 datatype fails with 'cannot mix operands', where _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 hold, Product: gcc Version: 13.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-28 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #27 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 12/28/24 11:49, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 > > --- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle --- > Why not set it in gfc_resolve_expr near

[Bug c++/118230] `std::is_invocable` gives wrong result when the tested function returns `auto`

2024-12-28 Thread one.last.kiss at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230 --- Comment #2 from shynur --- > The error is because the static_assert is evaluated while the class is > still being defined. Thank you! But why... > The workaround is to un-comment the "/* -> std::size_t */". I found it does work. If this

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle --- Why not set it in gfc_resolve_expr near the top before any other actions? also Are there any systems where c_char is not equal to 1? If not then BT_CHARACTER and KIND==1 is always C interoperable. ??

[Bug c++/118230] `std::is_invocable` gives wrong result when the tested function returns `auto`

2024-12-28 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle --- I clearly see where my logic was incorrect. I do wonder if there is a resolve string expr that would allow us to set the interop for all cases of kind=1 BT_CHARACTER.

[Bug fortran/118179] [15 regression] ICE in gimplify

2024-12-28 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118179 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #6) > Created attachment 59993 [details] > Reproducer Thanks for the reproducer. I can confirm the ICE after r15-6408, but it is fixed for me with r15-642

[Bug c++/118230] New: `std::is_invocable` gives wrong result when the tested function returns `auto`

2024-12-28 Thread one.last.kiss at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230 Bug ID: 118230 Summary: `std::is_invocable` gives wrong result when the tested function returns `auto` Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-28 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #24 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #22) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #21) > > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc > > index 580f8c8407d..759eb99a645 100644 > > -

[Bug target/88284] nios2: pessimistic ldw-to-stwio scheduling

2024-12-28 Thread already5chosen at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88284 --- Comment #8 from Michael_S --- (In reply to sandra from comment #7) > While Intel has revived the "Altera" name, the Nios II processor is still > listed as discontinued. I see they are offering ARM-based FPGA products > again instead. > Arm

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-28 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #23 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #20) > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #19) > > (In reply to kargls from comment #17) > > > I suppose the error in check.cc(gfc_check_f_c_string) that sta

[Bug preprocessor/118229] __LINE__ value incorrect in long expanded macro

2024-12-28 Thread edisonhello at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229 --- Comment #5 from Edison Chen --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72700965/bug-in-c-g-preprocessor-with- > line-macro Oh, I never found this post when I was searching lol. I'm sorry that I sti

[Bug tree-optimization/118220] [15 regression] Optimization of malloc/free Produces Undefined Behavior

2024-12-28 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118220 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Optimization of malloc/free |[15 regression] |Produces

[Bug tree-optimization/118207] [15 regression] ICE when building dosbox-staging-0.82.0 (in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2779) since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2024-12-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118207 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65c8fd7b017482c6d6bd0c7a7c6e296f016e38d0 commit r15-6452-g65c8fd7b017482c6d6bd0c7a7c6e296f016e38d0 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug preprocessor/118229] __LINE__ value incorrect in long expanded macro

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Note line most likely should not be used here anyways since line could be the same between two different uses of these macros. __COUNTER__ is the better macro.

[Bug preprocessor/118229] __LINE__ value incorrect in long expanded macro

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Hmm > https://github.com/boostorg/concept_check/blob/develop/include/boost/ > concept_check/general.hpp. says the file has less than 93 lines ... Looking at the

[Bug preprocessor/118229] __LINE__ value incorrect in long expanded macro

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm https://github.com/boostorg/concept_check/blob/develop/include/boost/concept_check/general.hpp. says the file has less than 93 lines ...

[Bug preprocessor/118229] __LINE__ value incorrect in long expanded macro

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72700965/bug-in-c-g-preprocessor-with-line-macro

[Bug preprocessor/118229] New: __LINE__ value incorrect in long expanded macro

2024-12-28 Thread edisonhello at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118229 Bug ID: 118229 Summary: __LINE__ value incorrect in long expanded macro Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/118228] New: GCC allows instantiation of union with field class having private constructor

2024-12-28 Thread wangbopku15 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118228 Bug ID: 118228 Summary: GCC allows instantiation of union with field class having private constructor Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/118223] Improve autodependency generation to avoid full product build

2024-12-28 Thread schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118223 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- -MP Generate phony targets for all headers.

[Bug tree-optimization/117875] [15 Regression] 28% regression for 456.hmmer on Zen4 with -Ofast -march=native

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117875 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > I saw this on LNT testers too. Unforutnately hmmer was not working for a > while, so there is relatively big interval about when this can happen. So looking into

[Bug c++/118227] Hard error on unsupported array size when generating deduction guides for an alias template

2024-12-28 Thread bekenn at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118227 --- Comment #2 from James Touton --- I missed the prior bug in my search, sorry for the noise! Thanks for the quick response!

[Bug tree-optimization/117875] [15 Regression] 28% regression for 456.hmmer on Zen4 with -Ofast -march=native

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117875 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- For aarch64, it is between r15-5312-g9676da9fc26c9b and r15-5729-g56029c91dcadcf .

[Bug c++/115296] CTAD fails

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115296 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bekenn at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/118227] Hard error on unsupported array size when generating deduction guides for an alias template

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118227 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/118227] New: Hard error on unsupported array size when generating deduction guides for an alias template

2024-12-28 Thread bekenn at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118227 Bug ID: 118227 Summary: Hard error on unsupported array size when generating deduction guides for an alias template Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/117875] [15 Regression] 28% regression for 456.hmmer on Zen4 with -Ofast -march=native

2024-12-28 Thread chenglulu at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117875 --- Comment #14 from chenglulu --- On LoongArch, r15-5894-gaf9a3fe6a52974 compared to r15-5315-g5cf7ffe047681d, the performance of 456.hmmer drops by 27.8%.

[Bug c++/118226] New: packed index out of range error message could be improved

2024-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118226 Bug ID: 118226 Summary: packed index out of range error message could be improved Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic