https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117104
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Reduced testcase:
For this only `-O2 -mavx -fno-vect-cost-model` is needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117104
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
vect__69.1299_108 = MAX_EXPR <_110, { 0, 0 }>;
...
_9 = .REDUC_IOR (vect__69.1299_108);
_71 = _9;
if (_71 == 0)
Most likely:
/* MIN (X, Y) == X -> X <= Y */
/* MIN (X, Y) < X -> X > Y */
/* MIN (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117104
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
_110 = {left_59, _61};
if (_110 <= { 0, 0 })
goto ; [34.00%]
else
goto ; [66.00%]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117104
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
It's funny that we have mogrify in here as I associate it with IM :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117104
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59327
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59327&action=edit
bytearrayobject.i.xz
xincludes
--with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241011 (experimental)
3b095ac8477f09cccbc9002dde888bd0ad9a73fb (Gentoo Hardened 15.0. p, commit
9a259e1746b11f94c3ccdeacb33bcc9ccfeb3f5f)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116808
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116808
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59325|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||109934
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> > Simplified a bit:
>
> Just some debug:
>
> When we create one of the unswitch_predicate for the second switch, we h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> Simplified a bit:
Just some debug:
When we create one of the unswitch_predicate for the second switch, we have:
true_range:
[irange] int [4, 4][6, 6][8, 8] NONZER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Simplified a bit:
```
int a;
int c (int f) {
int d = 1;
for (int e = 0; e < 3; e++) {
switch (f) {
case 1:
d = 0;
case 2:
a = 1;
break;
case 3:
__built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117103
--- Comment #3 from Davide Italiano ---
> Note if you are doing code size comparison, then looking at the # of
> instructions for a target like x86 is not the way to go. You need to actually
> look at the assembled instruction output.
Oops, m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117103
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note if you are doing code size comparison, then looking at the # of
instructions for a target like x86 is not the way to go. You need to actually
look at the assembled instruction output.
In the case of us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117103
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117103
Bug ID: 117103
Summary: GCC trunk emits push + pop at -Oz when a mov could
suffice
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59325
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59325&action=edit
Patch which might fix the issue
Can you test this patch? It might fix the issue by using an allocated array of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117101
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
Bug ID: 117102
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: accessed elt 2 of
'tree_vec' with 1 elts in unify, at cp/pt.cc:24866
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116887
--- Comment #27 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #26)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #23)
> > Anyway I'd like to know more info about PR47610 and PR52999. In the old
> > days people didn't write rationales in Change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Version|15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117101
Bug ID: 117101
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault for
operator new
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(FWIW, the bisect result makes no sense to me, but I did revert it on
releases/13 and it worked?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.3.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
The testcase works for me with 12+14+15, but the issue might be latent.
13.3 was the first bad release, bisected to r13-7841-g70639014a69cf5 (for
PR110315, cherrypick of PR109695).
14 was never broken so I cou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117100
Bug ID: 117100
Summary: [13 regression] ImageMagick miscompiled with -O1
-funswitch-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117099
Bug ID: 117099
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in
finalize_nrv(tree_node*, tree_node*)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117098
Bug ID: 117098
Summary: Tail call doesn't work for x32
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117097
Bug ID: 117097
Summary: [15 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr63527.c
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #18 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #16)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #14)
[...snip...]
>
> > Does the above support all your use-cases?
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117096
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59324
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59324&action=edit
The first patch
This is the first patch which I am testing. Will handle the factor one
afterwards. Note the ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
--- Comment #4 from Steven Munroe ---
Created attachment 59323
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59323&action=edit
Examples doe Vector DW int constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113798
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
I'm not sure if it's my bug or one of the decltype-in-lambda PRs, but x5 should
be deduced to int but we deduce it to int& :(. x6 works fine.
```
void
fn1 ()
{
int i = 0;
[&i](auto... pack) {
declt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117096
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is one just for match_simplify_replacement/empty_bb_or_one_feeding_into_p:
```
struct s1{
unsigned b = 0;
};
int f(signed a, int c)
{
signed b = 0;
if (a < 0)
{
s1();
b = a;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #4 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here's a patch that enables the slow switch conversions only at -O2.
With that the test case builds reasonably quickly.
diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
index 12b25ff486de..4af7a94fea42
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66207
Michael Cree changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcree at orcon dot net.nz
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116743
--- Comment #13 from Eugene Rozenfeld ---
Hi Rama. Sorry for the delay. I hope I'll have time to review your repro in the
next couple of weeks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117096
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116743
--- Comment #12 from Rama Malladi ---
Hi Eugene, checking in again. Can you please review this issue and a fix?
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117096
Bug ID: 117096
Summary: Clobbers sometimes gets in the way of phiopt
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113299
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bit_test_cluster takes |switch clustering takes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #60 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #59)
> (In reply to Julian Waters from comment #57)
> > Just a heads up, the minimal reproducer seems to be getting garbage movabsq
> > instructions emitted again with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #59 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Julian Waters from comment #57)
> Just a heads up, the minimal reproducer seems to be getting garbage movabsq
> instructions emitted again with the first stage gcc in the bootstrap phase
You prob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #2 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Minimum patch. Only enable the clustering at -O2.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc
index 00426d46..468b15f1c461 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-11
Summary|co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
Julian Waters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59319|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #57 from Julian Waters ---
Just a heads up, the minimal reproducer seems to be getting garbage movabsq
instructions emitted again with the first stage gcc in the bootstrap phase
.file "tls.c"
.text
.section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117089
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117092
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117095
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117095
Bug ID: 117095
Summary: [13/14/15 Regression] Wrong code since
r13-5103-g7c9f20fcfdc2d8
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117093
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
t_4 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
a_5 = VEC_PERM_EXPR <_1, _1, { 1, 1, 2, 3 }>;
a_6 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR ;
t_7 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
_2 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
a_8 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR ;
a_9 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR ;
IIRC th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116945
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Thanks for the reference. But this does seem to be a bit of a circular
> definition. It says the 'Valid attribute can be used to check whether the
> value has a valid representation, and an invalid repres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117087
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117087
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b095ac8477f09cccbc9002dde888bd0ad9a73fb
commit r15-4272-g3b095ac8477f09cccbc9002dde888bd0ad9a73fb
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b095ac8477f09cccbc9002dde888bd0ad9a73fb
commit r15-4272-g3b095ac8477f09cccbc9002dde888bd0ad9a73fb
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117087
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86710
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(Set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117094
Bug ID: 117094
Summary: ranges::fill misses std::move for output_iterator
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #56 from Julian Waters ---
Ah, I see. I had been under the impression that gcc would see the parallel and
realize that the 2 loads could be done at the same time. Since it can see that
without the parallel anyway, and doing so allows
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117093
Bug ID: 117093
Summary: Missing detection of REV64 vector permute
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117092
Bug ID: 117092
Summary: [15 regression] gcc.target/aarch64/pr109072_1.c
check-function-bodies s16x4_2 fail
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117048
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117048
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dcc6a1a67165a469d4cd9b6b39514c46cc656ad
commit r15-4270-g1dcc6a1a67165a469d4cd9b6b39514c46cc656ad
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117048
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70566e719f0710323251e8e9190b322f4de8faeb
commit r15-4269-g70566e719f0710323251e8e9190b322f4de8faeb
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117089
--- Comment #1 from Ryan ---
This can likely be closed.
AARCH64 / ARM64 has a similar issue.
Instead of every 10th file causing a crash, it's every 1000th for that arch.
So it appeared to build fine last night, by luck, then this morning
it se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116988
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86710
Jennifer Schmitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116826
Jennifer Schmitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86710
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jennifer Schmitz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4be7d2d340a013d01a47c43d2feb6826d1b67af0
commit r15-4267-g4be7d2d340a013d01a47c43d2feb6826d1b67af0
Author: Jennifer Schmitz
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116826
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jennifer Schmitz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4be7d2d340a013d01a47c43d2feb6826d1b67af0
commit r15-4267-g4be7d2d340a013d01a47c43d2feb6826d1b67af0
Author: Jennifer Schmitz
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117085
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ad697bb7f1aad252e1398c6f13eed3fa6d0ca5b
commit r15-4265-g4ad697bb7f1aad252e1398c6f13eed3fa6d0ca5b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
Bug ID: 117091
Summary: Severe Performance Regression in GCC Trunk vs GCC 6.1
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98623
--- Comment #3 from Martin Uecker ---
PATCH https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/657253.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115444
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117090
--- Comment #2 from Shahzad MUZAFFAR ---
Created attachment 59321
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59321&action=edit
Second PGO profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117090
--- Comment #1 from Shahzad MUZAFFAR ---
Created attachment 59320
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59320&action=edit
First PGO profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117090
Bug ID: 117090
Summary: gcov-tool ICE when merging two profiles
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111396
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
Julian Waters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59318|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117087
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 117080, which changed state.
Bug 117080 Summary: [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-2b.c and
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-2c.c since r15-3509-gd34cda72098867
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117080
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117080
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f74d79afbf54d0e47905de755f41d95e46f178f
commit r15-4263-g9f74d79afbf54d0e47905de755f41d95e46f178f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114817
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117089
Bug ID: 117089
Summary: GCC Segmentation Fault internal compiler error on
PPC64EL running with QEMU + chroot
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117088
Bug ID: 117088
Summary: [15 regression] 548.exchange_r regressed by 10% with
-O2 -march=x86-64-v3 after enhance O2 vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117072
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9)
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117072
> >
> > --- Comment #8 from Hongtao Liu -
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
