[Bug tree-optimization/116643] PHI_RESULT vs gimple_phi_result/gimple_phi_result_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116643 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b4497d61d47420a625240a117175a707bddb8fc commit r15-3559-g1b4497d61d47420a625240a117175a707bddb8fc Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mo

[Bug middle-end/116658] [15 regression] ICE in vect_is_slp_load_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116658 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 59083 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59083&action=edit Reduced slightly more

[Bug target/116587] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1868 (unable to find a register to spill) {*andndi3_doubleword_bmi} with custom flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > For the m vs. o, there are quite a few (grepped just for the :TI cases > because :DI doesn't necessarily mean double-word): > grep 'match_operand:TI . ([^)]*).*m'

[Bug middle-end/116658] [15 regression] ICE in vect_is_slp_load_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116658 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/116658] New: [GCC15 regression] ICE in vect_is_slp_load_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116658 Bug ID: 116658 Summary: [GCC15 regression] ICE in vect_is_slp_load_node Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/116656] Nested pointer assignment is causing a SIGBUS error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116656 --- Comment #4 from kargls at comcast dot net --- valgrind --leak-check=full ./z ==99899== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==99899== Copyright (C) 2002-2024, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==99899== Using Valgrind-3.23.0 and LibVEX; rer

[Bug other/116603] SARIF schema URL gives 404 not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116603 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-09-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/116657] tzdata 2024b causing timezone parsing issues in std::chrono

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116657 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug libstdc++/116657] New: tzdata 2024b causing timezone parsing issues in std::chrono

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116657 Bug ID: 116657 Summary: tzdata 2024b causing timezone parsing issues in std::chrono Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/116603] SARIF schema URL gives 404 not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116603 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38dc2c64710aa0e6a03c0c1201477e3e75b1a0b0 commit r15-3553-g38dc2c64710aa0e6a03c0c1201477e3e75b1a0b0 Author: David Malcolm Date: M

[Bug other/116613] RFE: support outputting diagnostics in *multiple* formats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19363bf5564ffbe992265a1e69a0d99a0d29f016 commit r15-3554-g19363bf5564ffbe992265a1e69a0d99a0d29f016 Author: David Malcolm Date: M

[Bug fortran/116656] Nested pointer assignment is causing a SIGBUS error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116656 --- Comment #3 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > >Apple M1 Pro. > > Considering the aarch64 darwin port has not been upstreamed yet, this should > be reported to where you got gfortran. The issue e

[Bug fortran/116656] Nested pointer assignment is causing a SIGBUS error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116656 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >Apple M1 Pro. Considering the aarch64 darwin port has not been upstreamed yet, this should be reported to where you got gfortran.

[Bug fortran/116656] Nested pointer assignment is causing a SIGBUS error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116656 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug fortran/116656] New: Nested pointer assignment is causing a SIGBUS error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116656 Bug ID: 116656 Summary: Nested pointer assignment is causing a SIGBUS error. Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug analyzer/116173] [15 regression] analyzer/call-summary.cc:727:28: warning: unused variable ‘summary_cast_reg’ [-Wunused-variable] since r15-1108-g70f26314b62e2d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116173 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Thanks

[Bug analyzer/116173] [15 regression] analyzer/call-summary.cc:727:28: warning: unused variable ‘summary_cast_reg’ [-Wunused-variable] since r15-1108-g70f26314b62e2d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116173 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/116655] New: RISC-V: ICE with -mrvv-max-lmul=dynamic in compute_nregs_for_mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116655 Bug ID: 116655 Summary: RISC-V: ICE with -mrvv-max-lmul=dynamic in compute_nregs_for_mode Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/116654] [15 regression] many vector test case failures after r15-3509-gd34cda72098867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116654 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Some of this might be expected, according to the commit message and will most likely fixed later on.

[Bug tree-optimization/116654] [15 regression] many vector test case failures after r15-3509-gd34cda72098867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116654 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization,

[Bug testsuite/116653] new test case gfortran.dg/unsigned_21.f90 from r15-3526-g113a6da9bf91c5 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116653 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug other/116654] New: [15 regression] many vector test case failures after r15-3509-gd34cda72098867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116654 Bug ID: 116654 Summary: [15 regression] many vector test case failures after r15-3509-gd34cda72098867 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/116653] New: new test case gfortran.dg/unsigned_21.f90 from r15-3526-g113a6da9bf91c5 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116653 Bug ID: 116653 Summary: new test case gfortran.dg/unsigned_21.f90 from r15-3526-g113a6da9bf91c5 fails Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/116652] No instance of constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116652 --- Comment #3 from Cliff Burdick --- Thank you Andrew. Sorry for misclassifying it; I was going by the changes in gcc only.

[Bug c++/116652] No instance of constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116652 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/116652] No instance of constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116652 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/116652] New: No instance of constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116652 Bug ID: 116652 Summary: No instance of constructor Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assig

[Bug c++/114840] [meta-bug] template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114840 Bug 114840 depends on bug 98500, which changed state. Bug 98500 Summary: ICE template template parameter with default parameter lambda https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98500 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 98500, which changed state. Bug 98500 Summary: ICE template template parameter with default parameter lambda https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98500 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/98500] ICE template template parameter with default parameter lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98500 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/109442] Dead local copy of std::vector not removed from function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109442 --- Comment #22 from Xi Ruoyao --- *** Bug 116651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/116651] Memory allocation elision for std::vector like cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116651 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug c/116642] miscompilation involving vfork child.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116642 --- Comment #33 from Joshua --- Florin wrote: > It's quite brittle and requires constant maintenance as the compiler > changes. We've simplified the code significantly of the past few years > and may finally be able to properly fix it, as far

[Bug tree-optimization/90693] Missing popcount simplifications

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90693 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90693] Missing popcount simplifications

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90693 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75a4143d69a842d691c14a477b0ba277d8708fc7 commit r15-3550-g75a4143d69a842d691c14a477b0ba277d8708fc7 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Th

[Bug target/105782] emission of inefficient movxtod/movdtox with -mvis3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105782 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc

[Bug c++/116646] Compilation of code inside if constexpr with failed condition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116646 --- Comment #4 from Craig Schroeder --- Thank you for taking the time to explain this. I understand why the code snippet does not work now.

[Bug c++/110137] implement clang -fassume-sane-operator-new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #17 from Sam James --- (

[Bug c/116642] miscompilation involving vfork child.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116642 --- Comment #32 from Joshua --- >> Build your program as a static PIE and use assembly >> (or a very limited C subset) to relocate itself on startup. > All other implementations (Glibc, Musl, and Linux kernel > with KASLR enabled on modern arch

[Bug c/116642] miscompilation involving vfork child.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116642 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/116651] Memory allocation elision for std::vector like cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116651 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||110137 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan W

[Bug middle-end/116651] New: Memory allocation elision for std::vector like cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116651 Bug ID: 116651 Summary: Memory allocation elision for std::vector like cases Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: norma

[Bug c++/116514] known pointer alignment is not used for constant propagation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/116514] known pointer alignment is not used for constant propagation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116514 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7d5b9aa021f6fc32810670b18ffabe543262775 commit r15-3548-ge7d5b9aa021f6fc32810670b18ffabe543262775 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 116370, which changed state. Bug 116370 Summary: UBSAN issue in fortran/trans-expr.cc in arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary - enum value out of range https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116370 What|

[Bug fortran/116370] UBSAN issue in fortran/trans-expr.cc in arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary - enum value out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116370 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/116601] [12/13/14 Regression] during GIMPLE pass: fab ICE: verify_gimple failed: statement marked for throw, but doesn't with -O -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|15.0| Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regres

[Bug tree-optimization/116647] [15 Regression] Internal compiler error in operator[], at vec.h:910

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116647 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/116647] [15 Regression] Internal compiler error in operator[], at vec.h:910

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116647 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:898e3e95a6acf542baf03be95ce5bf7b3ad04276 commit r15-3547-g898e3e95a6acf542baf03be95ce5bf7b3ad04276 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug ada/115250] [15 regression] gnat.dg/opt58.adb FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115250 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/115246] [15 regression] gnat.dg/alignment14.adb FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115246 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/115250] [15 regression] gnat.dg/opt58.adb FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115250 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0171793aca4c0d4e9c8020c539bb4d3abfb91da7 commit r15-3546-g0171793aca4c0d4e9c8020c539bb4d3abfb91da7 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: M

[Bug ada/115246] [15 regression] gnat.dg/alignment14.adb FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115246 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4645aa79a6dfe39cb58d21ee251bfde59a6b27d4 commit r15-3545-g4645aa79a6dfe39cb58d21ee251bfde59a6b27d4 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: M

[Bug ada/116644] Warnings in generic code don't report column number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116644 --- Comment #2 from Iru Cai --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1) > Why is that insufficient exactly? 256 is clearly not in range of My_Byte. I mean the warning messages don't have the information pointing out which code in this line

[Bug ada/115250] [15 regression] gnat.dg/opt58.adb FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115250 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug ada/115246] [15 regression] gnat.dg/alignment14.adb FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115246 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-09-09 CC|

[Bug ada/116551] internal error on bit-packed array type with Volatile_Full_Access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116551 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/116551] internal error on bit-packed array type with Volatile_Full_Access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116551 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-09-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ada/116644] Warnings in generic code don't report column number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116644 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-09-09 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/116647] [15 Regression] Internal compiler error in operator[], at vec.h:910

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116647 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- So first of all we classify something as double reduction that isn't. Adding a check to that fixes the issue.

[Bug ada/116498] infinite loop on MSP430 with -mlarge flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116498 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/116498] gnat enters busy wait trying to compile for msp430-none-elf with -mlarge flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116498 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/116430] Crash "Assert_Failure nlists.adb:674" while compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116430 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-09-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/116648] unswitch does not handle `if (a & b)` where a is invariant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116648 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/116650] New: Regrename creates conflict with register pair

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116650 Bug ID: 116650 Summary: Regrename creates conflict with register pair Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rt

[Bug target/116587] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1868 (unable to find a register to spill) {*andndi3_doubleword_bmi} with custom flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > For the :DI !TARGET_64BIT, perhaps *insvdi_lowpart_1, > *adddi3_doubleword_zext, *adddi3_doubleword_concat, > *adddi3_doubleword_concat_zext *_concat_* should be

[Bug tree-optimization/116226] ICE when building exp_aggr.adb with -Warray-bounds (tree check: expected integer_cst, have ssa_name in get_len, at ree.h:6509)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116226 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/116645] [13/14/15 regression] Huge performance loss after 13.2.0 compiler upgrade; reload CSE regs has scalability issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116645 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > I'm checking if it was fixed by r15-2218-g44e065a52fa606 Nope. The profile is still Samples: 93K of event 'cycles:Pu', Event count (approx.): 122100166487

[Bug ada/116190] wrong finalization of anonymous array aggregate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116190 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/116587] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1868 (unable to find a register to spill) {*andndi3_doubleword_bmi} with custom flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ubizjak at gmail d

[Bug ada/116190] raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access with array of unbounded strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116190 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/116643] PHI_RESULT vs gimple_phi_result/gimple_phi_result_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116643 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/116646] Compilation of code inside if constexpr with failed condition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116646 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think since it is not dependent, it gets resolved right away. Right. A discarded statement (i.e. an untaken if-constexpr branch) is not instantiated in a te

[Bug tree-optimization/116643] PHI_RESULT vs gimple_phi_result/gimple_phi_result_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116643 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Remove the AllCaps interfaces (there's similar issues with many of the SSA and stmt operand accessors). Please don't use references, lvalue uses should be very seldom and _obvious_.

[Bug tree-optimization/116647] [15 Regression] Internal compiler error in operator[], at vec.h:910

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116647 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/116647] [15 Regression] Internal compiler error in operator[], at vec.h:910

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116647 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > I'm checking if it was fixed by r15-2218-g44e065a52fa606 Err, wrong bug.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116645] [13/14/15 regression] Huge performance loss after 13.2.0 compiler upgrade; reload CSE regs has scalability issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116645 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- I'm checking if it was fixed by r15-2218-g44e065a52fa606

[Bug tree-optimization/116647] [15 Regression] Internal compiler error in operator[], at vec.h:910

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116647 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I'm checking if it was fixed by r15-2218-g44e065a52fa606

[Bug rtl-optimization/116645] [13/14/15 regression] Huge performance loss after 13.2.0 compiler upgrade; reload CSE regs has scalability issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116645 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 59080 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59080&action=edit unincluded testcase This testcase works with all GCCs from 11.4 to trunk.

[Bug tree-optimization/116601] [12/13/14/15 Regression] during GIMPLE pass: fab ICE: verify_gimple failed: statement marked for throw, but doesn't with -O -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2067df800df930dd13aa20a826373bb27cfdd420 commit r15-3544-g2067df800df930dd13aa20a826373bb27cfdd420 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/116645] [13/14/15 regression] Huge performance loss after 13.2.0 compiler upgrade; reload CSE regs has scalability issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116645 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/116649] New: PPC: Suboptimal code for __builtin_bcdadd_ovf on Power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116649 Bug ID: 116649 Summary: PPC: Suboptimal code for __builtin_bcdadd_ovf on Power10 Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/116636] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Deprecation warning/unavailable error when overriding member of virtual base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116636 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5

[Bug testsuite/116635] new test case gcc.dg/opt-ordered-and-nonequal-1.c from r15-3463-g91421e21e8f0f0 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116635 --- Comment #7 from Hu Lin --- Thanks for the explanation.

[Bug target/116576] `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116576 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/116588] [14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre --param=vrp-block-limit=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116588 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:765875e2c18b8f4c346b754a19e287efaec531a5 commit r15-3542-g765875e2c18b8f4c346b754a19e287efaec531a5 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: M

[Bug testsuite/116635] new test case gcc.dg/opt-ordered-and-nonequal-1.c from r15-3463-g91421e21e8f0f0 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116635 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Summary|new test

[Bug ada/116089] GNATprove raises Program_Error for loop frame condition when calling function with Side_Effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116089 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug testsuite/116635] new test case cc.dg/opt-ordered-and-nonequal-1.c from r15-3463-g91421e21e8f0f0 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116635 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00b35424cbdd0985e87e6de2c381ee3c3f7fdc21 commit r15-3541-g00b35424cbdd0985e87e6de2c381ee3c3f7fdc21 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/116588] [14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre --param=vrp-block-limit=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116588 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #6) > Is the -DDEBUG in dg-options correct? I think the testcase won't fail at > runtime when -DDEBUG is used. It is not. main body should be just if (foo (0))

[Bug tree-optimization/116588] [14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre --param=vrp-block-limit=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116588 --- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka --- Is the -DDEBUG in dg-options correct? I think the testcase won't fail at runtime when -DDEBUG is used.

[Bug testsuite/116635] new test case cc.dg/opt-ordered-and-nonequal-1.c from r15-3463-g91421e21e8f0f0 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116635 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the reason why setting LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT works is because combineif rejects trapping condition early but it tries to use match-and-simplify and with LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT set, the opti

[Bug testsuite/116635] new test case cc.dg/opt-ordered-and-nonequal-1.c from r15-3463-g91421e21e8f0f0 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116635 --- Comment #3 from Hu Lin --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #2) > > "Match: Fix ordered and nonequal: Fix 'gcc.dg/opt-ordered-and-nonequal-1.c' > re 'LOGICAL_OP_N

[Bug target/116617] x86_64: arch lunarlake not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116617 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/116617] x86_64: arch lunarlake not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116617 --- Comment #8 from Haochen Jiang --- Fixed on trunk, GCC14, GCC13.