https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116614
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've been testing
2024-09-05 Jakub Jelinek
PR lto/116614
* simple-object-elf.c (SHN_COMMON): Align comment with neighbouring
comments.
(SHN_HIRESERVE): Use uppercase hex d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116623
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Note this now mostly controls early and gimple-time optimization, the expansion
to RTL will use BRANCH_COST and friends to decide whether if (a | b) is
expanded into one or two branches.
LOGICAL_OP_NON_SH
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116614
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
If that now works I'd say go ahead (an you re-check PR93117 then?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116611
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
There'll be a bunch of FAILs that can be attributed to this "bug" after I'll
merge the next SLP enablement patches. There is definitely heuristic at
the vectorizers side at play here and the "old" heuristi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thank you for the explanation! I must confess that most of it went over my
head...
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> So yes this is just a testcase issue. Just needs a small testcase ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116627
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Summary|armv6l: ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116627
Jiri Slaby changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.3.1
--- Comment #2 from Jiri Slaby ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116617
--- Comment #4 from Haochen Jiang ---
Proposed patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662455.html
I would commit this next Monday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116627
--- Comment #1 from Jiri Slaby ---
Created attachment 59058
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59058&action=edit
preprocessed source (compressed as it is 4.4M)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116627
Bug ID: 116627
Summary: armv6l: ICE in kernel's net/ipv4/ipmr.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-06
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Since the difference is in main, I suspect if the function was named
> differently there would be no difference. That is main is known to be called
> on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116624
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116626
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116626
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks duplicate of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116569
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116626
Bug ID: 116626
Summary: ICE while VLA vectorisation
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116624
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
It might be just the case that Older hwasan is broken with some kernels.
Also the output of the program happens right before the failure.
So we need that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116624
--- Comment #4 from 王淳洋 ---
I also observed that the failures of these test cases have a certain
randomness; I might get different results after two consecutive full tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116624
--- Comment #3 from 王淳洋 ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> what page sizes are you using?
> Before GCC 14, it is known that hwasan does not work with non-4k pages (see
> PR 102144).
>
> Also what kernel version are you using?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116624
--- Comment #2 from 王淳洋 ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> what page sizes are you using?
> Before GCC 14, it is known that hwasan does not work with non-4k pages (see
> PR 102144).
>
> Also what kernel version are you using?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Since the difference is in main, I suspect if the function was named
differently there would be no difference. That is main is known to be called
once so the frequence of this is being taken into account.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625
Bug ID: 116625
Summary: [15 regression] regressions on arm-eabi since
r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116617
--- Comment #3 from Haochen Jiang ---
We will not add doc previously if the option is only an alias to another
platform, which is similar for meteorlake and raptorlake.
Lunarlake is actually the alias for arrowlake-s. That is why we don't add i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116624
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |sanitizer
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116624
Bug ID: 116624
Summary: large-aligned-1.c dejatest fails on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 12.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101070
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46457
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1914ca8791ce4e0ba821e818cb6f86c76afdb6f2
commit r15-3500-g1914ca8791ce4e0ba821e818cb6f86c76afdb6f2
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81665
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1914ca8791ce4e0ba821e818cb6f86c76afdb6f2
commit r15-3500-g1914ca8791ce4e0ba821e818cb6f86c76afdb6f2
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116617
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116614
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93117
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hmm, we now can parse the extened section stuff but simply
> removing the check
>
> if (new_i - 1 >= SHN_LORESERVE)
> {
> *err = ENOTSUP;
> return "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115517
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a51f2fc0d80869ab079a93cc3858f24a1fd28237
commit r15-3498-ga51f2fc0d80869ab079a93cc3858f24a1fd28237
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116623
Bug ID: 116623
Summary: [15 regression] regressions on arm-linux-gnueabihf
since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116622
Bug ID: 116622
Summary: Invalid character/string literals incorrectly accepted
in C++ during preprocessing after P2621R2.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116606
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe668633f6b5819ba04d80f13343ee7f5bba1c5b
commit r14-10648-gfe668633f6b5819ba04d80f13343ee7f5bba1c5b
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116621
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
Andrew Waterman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116614
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116614
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, I remembered there was some changes in how lto sections were done so get
around the limitation of macho but maybe it was only done for macho (darwin).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #231 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #230)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #229)
> > Will try other languages now.
>
> Building with Fortran, Objective-C an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102594
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
--- Comment #5 from Stephane ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am 99% sure we don't want to have this implemented. There has been other
> requests about this before but I can't find them.
I'm receptive to reasoned arguments, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
--- Comment #4 from Stephane ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2008-July/178284.html
This is indeed the prior mentions I found and the only objection I read in the
thread was in https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f462b5072a5e82c35921f7e3bdf3959c4a49dc9
commit r15-3494-g1f462b5072a5e82c35921f7e3bdf3959c4a49dc9
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116606
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116606
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116606
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9d34f9a91371dea4bab0b54b2d7f762a6cc23e0
commit r15-3493-gd9d34f9a91371dea4bab0b54b2d7f762a6cc23e0
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2008-July/178284.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this is called compressed pointers .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
--- Comment #9 from Palmer Dabbelt ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3)
> FYI on LoongArch it's claimed LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT=0 mostly helps FP
> benchmarks, something like
>
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -ffast-math -fdump-tree-gimple"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116621
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection, wrong-code
Last reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
--- Comment #8 from Palmer Dabbelt ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> History on LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT being able to defined differently
> from BRANCH_COST. It was originally added for powerpc (2002/2003ish) which
> had exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luigighiron at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 116619, which changed state.
Bug 116619 Summary: Invalid null pointer constant accepted in the initializer
of a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116619
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116621
Bug ID: 116621
Summary: x86_64: Crash when fetching va_arg of type union
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
Bug ID: 116620
Summary: Feature request: type attribute to control storage
size of pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116619
Bug ID: 116619
Summary: Invalid null pointer constant accepted in the
initializer of a pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113063
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37977343ff4f9dcb047d966d8cbaa222964763f9
commit r15-3491-g37977343ff4f9dcb047d966d8cbaa222964763f9
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116618
Bug ID: 116618
Summary: Useful to have the ability to include all dependencies
with -fm2-dump
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112985
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> But LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT=0 is
> really not a good thing (see PR116166 where it slows down bootstrapping GCC).
It may be true for both loongarch and ris
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116616
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I had mentioned before we maybe should inling popcount for targets which don't
implement the optab.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83171#c3 (and I know there is
another reference too).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116616
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116617
Bug ID: 116617
Summary: x86_64: arch lunarlake not documented
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||internal-improvement,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #35 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #34)
> Btw, if we simply remove the call to that function, with -O1
> -fenable-tree-thread1 I see:
>
> backwards jump threading : 14.36 ( 3%) 0.39 (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112985
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
FWIW the issue goes latent after r14-8446 enabled
LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT=0. But LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT=0 is really
not a good thing (see PR116166 where it slows down bootstrapping GCC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116606
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-05
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #34 from Andrew Macleod ---
Btw, if we simply remove the call to that function, with -O1
-fenable-tree-thread1 I see:
backwards jump threading : 14.36 ( 3%) 0.39 ( 5%) 14.68 ( 3%)
238M ( 9%)
which is a notable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3)
> I'm really not a fan of the change because without -ffast-math (which should
> really not be used for 99.9% real-life code) the FP comparision isn't
> allowed to be sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3)
> FYI on LoongArch ... ...
Note that I don't know if things are same or not on RISC-V.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109329
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Jeevitha from comment #1)
> > > This test case requires a Power7 or above due to the ieeelongdo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116239
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116239
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d44cae2d9310660e3e47f15202e86e4f73f15b37
commit r15-3489-gd44cae2d9310660e3e47f15202e86e4f73f15b37
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116410
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116410
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42d4aa02c6016cc8efd896f627f692896e68c914
commit r12-10699-g42d4aa02c6016cc8efd896f627f692896e68c914
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
Palmer Dabbelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116611
--- Comment #1 from Robin Dapp ---
For the record, with the default -march=rv64gcv I don't see any LOAD_LANES,
with -march=rv64gcv -mrvv-vector-bits=zvl I do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116410
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e83df98c8142235cda0bcd538907a4693e420c92
commit r13-9006-ge83df98c8142235cda0bcd538907a4693e420c92
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116616
--- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl ---
Created attachment 59053
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59053&action=edit
Preprocessed source file in question
In case it is of interest, I attach the preprocessed source file in questio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109367
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116616
Bug ID: 116616
Summary: Linux kernel fails to build on aarch64 due to
r15-3256-g1c4b9826bd0d5a
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116361
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116410
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6abedee0d4c8d40d412a358a3f6cb6090772d286
commit r14-10647-g6abedee0d4c8d40d412a358a3f6cb6090772d286
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
Bug ID: 116615
Summary: Investigate LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT for RISC-V
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116614
Bug ID: 116614
Summary: lto-wrapper: fatal error: Too many copied sections:
Operation not supported
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
