https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116595
--- Comment #5 from Kito Cheng ---
GCC 14 with enable checking will trigger that as well, thanks for remind that
detail, I forgot trunk will enable checking by default but release branch isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116595
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Kito Cheng from comment #2)
> Hmmm, it's not well defined in the rvv intrinsic doc, but I suppose this
> should at least work (compile-able) without crash, also it seems works fine
> on GCC 14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116595
--- Comment #2 from Kito Cheng ---
Hmmm, it's not well defined in the rvv intrinsic doc, but I suppose this should
at least work (compile-able) without crash, also it seems works fine on GCC 14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116592
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cmuellner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115910
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dbd0eb39c690f80e7a9bb7697aaa3f85ff4dbadd
commit r15-3440-gdbd0eb39c690f80e7a9bb7697aaa3f85ff4dbadd
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116591
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Filed PR 116595 for the ICE in to_constant since it also happens with SVE code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|default-initialization of |default-initialization of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116595
Bug ID: 116595
Summary: default-initialization of vfloat32m1x4_t causes ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116591
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The to_constant issue happens with -march=rv64gcv so filing it seperately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116590
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116594
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
All known brokeness of xtheadvector .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116594
Bug ID: 116594
Summary: [meta-bug] xtheadvector brokeness
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116592
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think it is time to remove xtheadvector support it is just broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116593
Bug ID: 116593
Summary: internal compiler error: in get_attr_type, at
config/riscv/riscv.md:28048 with -O2 -O3 when
compiling for risc-v xtheadvector
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116592
Bug ID: 116592
Summary: illegal operands th.vsetvli zero,0,e32,m8 with -O2 -O3
when compiling for risc-v xtheadvector
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116590
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
To me xtheadvector support Should never have been added.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116590
--- Comment #2 from nihui ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> What version of binutils are you using?
binutils master branch
commit 5cca20f614694ba6af3c10ca5bb93c32cdb9522b (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: GD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116591
Bug ID: 116591
Summary: internal compiler error: in to_constant or
extract_insn when compiling for risc-v xtheadvector
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116590
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116590
Bug ID: 116590
Summary: unrecognized opcode th.vmv8r.v th.vfrec7.v when
compiling for risc-v xtheadvector
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #229 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #228)
> I'll have a go at Ada now.
Ada still fails in subreg1:
mkdir -p ada/libgnat/
/srv/glaubitz/gcc/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/srv/glaubitz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589
--- Comment #5 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thank you for the quick analysis and the testcase fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115910
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116358
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/vec_bool_cmp_1.c and gcc.target/aarch64/sve/ptest_1.c
looks like the same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8bc31d973d2ab3fabb5e85e7c4354ffb2283512
commit r15-3437-gd8bc31d973d2ab3fabb5e85e7c4354ffb2283512
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589
Bug ID: 116589
Summary: [15 regression] vectorization regressions on aarch64
since gcc-15-1575-gea8061f46a30
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> Fixed.
I should mention this is not worth fixing on the release branches. Nobody else
noticed this until I found it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94274
Bug 94274 depends on bug 112402, which changed state.
Bug 112402 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] Path splitting causes
if-conversion miss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64700
Bug 64700 depends on bug 112402, which changed state.
Bug 112402 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] Path splitting causes
if-conversion miss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2b20b277988ab9ddb6ea82141075147b7b98f74
commit r15-3436-gb2b20b277988ab9ddb6ea82141075147b7b98f74
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #27 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #26)
>
> With -O1 -fenable-tree-thread1 (no threadfull):
> dominator optimization : 127.76 ( 7%) 0.57 ( 7%) 128.58 (
> 7%) 236M ( 9%)
> back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101898
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #228 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #227)
> (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #226)
> > Created attachment 59044 [details]
> > a patch to fix patch 59034
> >
> > Looks t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96097
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97624
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080
ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fad396dd467326251572811b703e788e62a2588
commit r15-3432-g1fad396dd467326251572811b703e788e62a2588
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Mon Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108620
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102217
--- Comment #11 from Arsen Arsenović ---
(In reply to John Eivind Helset from comment #9)
> Hit this as well on master (9d5c500c4fa) in something like `co_return
> co_await f(a, b ? c : d);`, if I lift the conditional out of await it seems
> ok.
epo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r15-3427-20240903182055-gf0ab3de6ec0-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20240903 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79371
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109283
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
Bug ID: 116587
Summary: ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1868
(unable to find a register to spill)
{*andndi3_doubleword_bmi} with custom flags
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114840
Bug 114840 depends on bug 109095, which changed state.
Bug 109095 Summary: ICE when specializing a template with an auto nontype
template template parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109095
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109095
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109095
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f3a6e26aab16a792176b33fbee1456a91aaebf2
commit r15-3428-g5f3a6e26aab16a792176b33fbee1456a91aaebf2
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116585
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113108
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116003
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116585
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.5.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
void foo ();
template
void bar ()
{
decltype(auto) v = ({ foo (); 3; });
}
doesn't need -O1 nor -g to trigger the error, and can be reproduced with
-std=c++14 and higher. Still started with that commit,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104277
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> > Can't reproduce either, tried GCC 11, 12, 13, 14, trunk, -O1 -std=c++20 or
> > -O1 -std=c++23.
>
> Oh it is with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116572
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase:
long v;
template struct A;
template , typename = C>
class B;
template <>
struct A
{
static int foo(char *s, const char *t, long n) { return __builtin_memcmp(s,
t, n); }
};
template
stru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106973
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113663
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Fixed on trunk. I'd like to backport this too though, so I'll keep the
> ticket open.
N.B. r15-3424-g71b1639c67b915 needs to be backported too, to fix a reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104788
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107522
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116549
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:819deae0a5bee079a7d5582fafaa098c26144ae8
commit r15-3423-g819deae0a5bee079a7d5582fafaa098c26144ae8
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116567
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116572
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116586
Bug ID: 116586
Summary: All uses of absolute timeouts should correctly handle
negative times
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116584
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-03
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116585
Bug ID: 116585
Summary: SSA corruption with -O3,-fvect-cost-model=very-cheap
cures the failure
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116460
--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024, ales.astone at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116460
>
> --- Comment #25 from Alessandro Astone ---
> Thanks!
>
> What's the process f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116410
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #13)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #11)
> > > We plan to adopt -ffat-lto-objects ourselves soon for at least a subset of
> > > packages, so this was good timing. :)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116460
--- Comment #25 from Alessandro Astone ---
Thanks!
What's the process for getting this to the stable branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116529
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I opened https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4144 for the unique_ptr
case and https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4148 for the dangling reference
case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116529
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's what this does:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h
@@ -379,8 +379,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116535
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> We treat first partition somewhat specially in other code too, so I
> guess we could a test if the streamed partition is first one instad of
> relying on free to h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116410
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #11)
> > We plan to adopt -ffat-lto-objects ourselves soon for at least a subset of
> > packages, so this was good timing. :)
> Note that -ffat-lto-objects has various issu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116582
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> Just for completeness the codegen for parest sparse matrix multiply is:
>
> 0.31 │320: kmovb %k1,%k4
> 0.25 │ kmovb %k1,%k5
> 0.28
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116410
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f1689ea8e631ebb4ff3720d56ef0362f5898ff6
commit r15-3416-g2f1689ea8e631ebb4ff3720d56ef0362f5898ff6
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Aug 27 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116535
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115921
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4371f656288f461335c47e98b8c038937a89764a
commit r15-3415-g4371f656288f461335c47e98b8c038937a89764a
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Tue Sep 3 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116584
Bug ID: 116584
Summary: Type/value mismatch confuses error recovery
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Bug ID: 116583
Summary: vectorizable_slp_permutation cannot handle even/odd
extract from VLA vector
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116582
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Just for completeness the codegen for parest sparse matrix multiply is:
0.31 │320: kmovb %k1,%k4
0.25 │ kmovb %k1,%k5
0.28 │ vmovdqu32 (%rcx,%rax,1),%zmm0
0.32 │
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116582
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
it is mysterious. I was looking into why in some cases the gather is a win in
micro-benchmark and loss in real benchmark. Indeed distribution of indices
makes difference.
If I make indices random then the pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116582
Bug ID: 116582
Summary: gather is a win in some cases on zen CPUs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116535
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
> void
> output_offload_tables (void)
> {
> ...
>
> /* In WHOPR mode during the WPA stage the joint offload tables need to be
> streamed to one partition only. That's why we free offload_funcs and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116410
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
> We plan to adopt -ffat-lto-objects ourselves soon for at least a subset of
> packages, so this was good timing. :)
Note that -ffat-lto-objects has various issues, especially with library
archives. The prob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116581
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
And the warnings disappear if I change 1 to 1.0 in the testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116581
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
I forgot: gcc-snapshot is currently:
gcc (Debian 20240829-1) 15.0.0 20240829 (experimental) [master
r15-3282-g4ff4875a79c]
This bug was still present in GCC 8.4.0 (same messages). With GCC 4.9, 5 and 6,
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116581
Bug ID: 116581
Summary: incorrect -Wfloat-conversion warnings for int to
_Decimal64
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
