https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116278
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And the other case is (subreg:SI (reg:TF) 12). No great surprise that the bit
position is problematical for that. Should be an easy fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116278
--- Comment #11 from Li Pan ---
Thanks for suggestion, will move run test to
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute and only leave asm check under riscv.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116278
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116278
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8f31f4f58f0fcf1716fc1d9ee003fbcdda600c3
commit r15-2979-ge8f31f4f58f0fcf1716fc1d9ee003fbcdda600c3
Author: Pan Li
Date: Fri Aug 9 10:26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116404
Bug ID: 116404
Summary: nodiscard is not warned on casts (non void)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116403
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116403
Bug ID: 116403
Summary: [modules] Deduction guides not reachable across
transitive non-exported imports
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
At least part of these are coming from the use-side processing of TImode
operations in carry_backpropagate. The right thing to do in that case is just
return the mode mask indicating all the chunks are po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116389
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Sorry should have written "is _not_ a reasonable assessment" in my prior
message.
RA does assess validity and there's nothing special about avr here and
paradoxicals, unless the backend is doing something
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110367
Hana Dusíková changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hanicka at hanicka dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116389
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #4)
> "IRA doesn't understand the impact of paradoxical subreg" is a
> reasonable assessment.
RA should either assess the validity of a paradoxical subreg in the m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
On 8/17/24 2:37 PM, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
>
> Georg-Johann Lay changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116389
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'm pretty confident IRA knows the basics of paradoxicals. The concept of
paradoxicals has been around since the gcc-1 era and Vlad is well aware of how
paradoxicals work.
So while there may be a bug, I d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116389
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #2)
> or a backend bug with avr.
I don't see what the avr backend is doing wrong. I played around with
avr_hard_regno_mode_ok etc. and denied SImode for R30, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94893
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > Note we also don't optimize:
> >
> > inline int sign1(int x)
> > {
> > return (x < 0 ? -1 : 0) | (x > 0 ? 1 :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116147
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
WRT the question in c#1. A paradoxical subreg is the canonical way to say I
want to view this pseudo (or expression) in a mode wider than its native mode
and I don't care about the state of the bits outsid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116282
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116282
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7aed8dedeb9613925930447bf2457c3fd9972d91
commit r15-2971-g7aed8dedeb9613925930447bf2457c3fd9972d91
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Aug 17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116402
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116402
Bug ID: 116402
Summary: [LRA] Improve hook documentation for reload -> LRA
transition
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116147
David Dudley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116280
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116280
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06ae7bc1345a31a5f23dc86b348a1bef59bb3cc1
commit r15-2969-g06ae7bc1345a31a5f23dc86b348a1bef59bb3cc1
Author: Pan Li
Date: Sat Aug 17 09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 58946
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58946&action=edit
patch under test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116389
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yes, a paradoxical is precisely what we expect and want here. This sounds like
either a reload bug (definitely possible, I'm still chasing one of these over
on the m68k) or a backend bug with avr.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116325
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 58945
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58945&action=edit
C++ test case from libstdc++v3
This is a test case from libstdc++v3. Compile with
$ avr-g++ pr116389.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116378
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #12)
> Created attachment 58943 [details]
> Proposed fix v8
>
> Here is a proposed patch for PR 116181, I was wondering how this patch
> affects darwin? git master + t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114529
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Detlef Vollmann from comment #5)
> Thanks for your patch.
> It solves the segfault ICE for -O2.
> But unfortunately it doesn't solve the build for -O3 or -O4.
> It still produces the same er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116389
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
Detlef Vollmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116401
Bug ID: 116401
Summary: [modules] Header units can contain definitions of
non-inline decls with external linkage
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3d9c120a1959c5b094001516c1e5cb4ba6f4080
commit r14-10597-gf3d9c120a1959c5b094001516c1e5cb4ba6f4080
Author: Georg-Johan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400
Bug ID: 116400
Summary: [15 Regression] Regenerated files are no longer
written to the source directory
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113773
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4065d163151b07b274241377e71dad028576db88
commit r15-2963-g4065d163151b07b274241377e71dad028576db88
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87440
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
patch is posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660611.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114146
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Summary|[ext_dce][avr][15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116399
Bug ID: 116399
Summary: C++26 text_encoding::aliases_view is not
default-constructible
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
44 matches
Mail list logo