https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115255
--- Comment #7 from Andi Kleen ---
The patch can be even more minimized. The thumb2_reorg change is not needed
because nothing does df_verify() after it (I just noticed it because I added
some extra for debugging). So even though thumb2_reorg br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115255
--- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen ---
Created attachment 58324
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58324&action=edit
patch to fix arm sibcalls with -O0
Better patch that uses the existing cfun flag for tail calls.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115255
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The question comes is musttail going to always work at -O0 or should it just
fail at -O0 with an error message. Or rather is musttail is just a hack in
itself and should never be implemented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115255
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
Created attachment 58323
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58323&action=edit
hack patch to fix arm sibcalls at -O0
The attached patch makes the test case pass on arm.
- Some of the sibcall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115273
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note ubsan can detect (correctly) a different undefined behavior since GCC 13
(since r13-4988-g8692b15ae7c05e; aka PR108256) but the undefinedness of passing
0 to ctz is still not detected and that is a dup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115127
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-05-18 00:00:00 |2024-06-02
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115127
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 115273 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115273
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
```
int f(int a)
{
return __builtin_ctz(a) == 0;
}
int main(void)
{
__builtin_printf("%d\n", f(0));
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115060
--- Comment #3 from Feng Xue ---
Linaro reported a regression:
https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1226
Actually, this is not, but exposes a new bug in
vect_look_through_possible_promotion. The function fails to figure out root
definition i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115319
Bug ID: 115319
Summary: ICE when mutating a captured parameter in an
explicit-this lambda if a capture is not trivially
copyable
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
matoro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105888
Bug 105888 depends on bug 106203, which changed state.
Bug 106203 Summary: Allow to emit diagnostics at return edges for the exit
point as well as the call site
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106203
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106203
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Type of the `auto` template |auto template parameter has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106203
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b0a7fe3abfbd47081f714a0a1263afe00c5cfd9
commit r15-969-g2b0a7fe3abfbd47081f714a0a1263afe00c5cfd9
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103562
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91507
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115318
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115315
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115310
--- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #4)
> No. Specifically in openSUSE, -Werror=return-type is part of the
> default compiler flags. We would like to silence the new errors such
> as implicit-int in p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115310
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> In such environments, you don't need an explicit
> -Werror=return-type.
I agree I don't need it but it is there.
> So, you're asking presumably about testing with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115307
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78100
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Puetz ---
The godbolt recipe also nails down the other end of the version range - 5.4
produced something weirder still (a single DW_TAG_variable with
DW_AT_external=true, but also with DW_AT_location and DW_AT_upper_bou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115318
Bug ID: 115318
Summary: decltype(lambda) with some templates causes ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #14 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2024-05-29 8:17 a.m., ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
>
> --- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78100
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91507
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugs at dima dot
secretsauce.ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115317
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115307
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c57d73f4cd5ca61327406fc2521a2235dd49d12e
commit r13-8817-gc57d73f4cd5ca61327406fc2521a2235dd49d12e
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115317
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b45d7281c1b4eb2cf61280b9f7064229b7ca7581
commit r13-8816-gb45d7281c1b4eb2cf61280b9f7064229b7ca7581
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115317
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7f42794d94e5a26f396253b1698ea1930337df3
commit r14-10268-gd7f42794d94e5a26f396253b1698ea1930337df3
Author: Georg-Johan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115317
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f12454278dc725fec3520a5d870e967d79292ee6
commit r15-968-gf12454278dc725fec3520a5d870e967d79292ee6
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115317
Bug ID: 115317
Summary: [avr] isinf should return -1 for -Inf
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115316
Bug ID: 115316
Summary: valgrind error in insert_parameter_exprs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105258
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115315
Bug ID: 115315
Summary: valgrind error in gfc_simplify_expr
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107141
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
Bit more detail from valgrind:
/Lower/derived-type-finalization.f90
==687074== Invalid read of size 8
==687074==at 0x856D97: gfc_class_len_get(tree_node*) (trans-expr.cc:273)
==687074==by 0x86F37B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115269
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115269
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b792e0159f7076e5901972be751333006e2ea83
commit r11-11460-g9b792e0159f7076e5901972be751333006e2ea83
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115269
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26fa081ad4b7299a33b5ff4525bce8858a1b0dd2
commit r12-10483-g26fa081ad4b7299a33b5ff4525bce8858a1b0dd2
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115269
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3687dcfabfaae566f4b42aa8a805869b809e6247
commit r13-8815-g3687dcfabfaae566f4b42aa8a805869b809e6247
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115269
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f097c0b3f76b50d96895158b2d80024252cfbd0
commit r14-10267-g2f097c0b3f76b50d96895158b2d80024252cfbd0
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115269
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b460ede64f9471589822831e04eecff4a3dbecf2
commit r15-967-gb460ede64f9471589822831e04eecff4a3dbecf2
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115307
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> The issue is that we probably fold isinff early. On x86 I see already in
> .original:
>
> return !(ABS_EXPR u<= 3.4028234663852885981170418348451692544e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115311
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115307
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
The isinf part is fixied in v14.2+, but there is also isnan etc. which don't
currently habe an optabs entry, so defining a failing expander won't work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115307
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d08c55f7c99329f4289ad3a4157c2d8d8a78d8c
commit r14-10266-g9d08c55f7c99329f4289ad3a4157c2d8d8a78d8c
Author: Georg-Johan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115307
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fabb545026f714b7d1cbe586f4c5bbf6430bdde3
commit r15-966-gfabb545026f714b7d1cbe586f4c5bbf6430bdde3
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Date
51 matches
Mail list logo
