https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115101
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
Hongyu Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #4 from Natalie Perlin ---
Created attachment 58216
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58216&action=edit
Log file from the build of the software
Log file from the build of the software (ufs-weather-model)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115116
Bug ID: 115116
Summary: [x86] rtx_cost is overestimated for big size memory.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115101
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[wrong code] with -O1 |[11/12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54174
Hu Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lin1.hu at intel dot com
--- Comment #4 from Hu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115069
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115029
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114514
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114514
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:090714e6cf8029f4ff8883dce687200024adbaeb
commit r15-530-g090714e6cf8029f4ff8883dce687200024adbaeb
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed May 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114514
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cc0956b3bb8bcbc9196075b9073a227d799e042
commit r15-529-g0cc0956b3bb8bcbc9196075b9073a227d799e042
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue May 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115102
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114899
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114899
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1779e22150b917e28e959623c819ef943fab02df
commit r15-526-g1779e22150b917e28e959623c819ef943fab02df
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I might also have overzealously extracted simplified example from
highway-1.0.7: `gcc-14` (or older) do not fail on unmodified highway-1.0.7
testsuite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So from a point of view of float to int conversion, both are valid for out of
range values.
Now it might that we are lowering it to a float to int conversion and then
constant folding that way. If so the is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
If I understand the test correctly it uses 2^63 floating point value and
converts it to uint32_t (or int32_t?).
gcc's constant-fold saturates it to 2^63-1 while CPU keeps it at 2^63 (as if it
was uint3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115
Bug ID: 115115
Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] highway-1.0.7 wrong
_mm_cvttps_epi32() constant fold
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80182
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #20)
> (I also cannot prevent myself from ranting a little that it would
> really help if all the ranger (helper) classes and functions were
> better documented.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80182
--- Comment #6 from Peter Damianov ---
Unfortuantely, this patch fails to bootstrap on linaro CI, but it bootstraps
fine on my machine. All my attempts to reproduce this failed, and I am really
not sure what to do from here.
https://patchwork.so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115114
Bug ID: 115114
Summary: aggregate initialization with parens fails when there
is a base class
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor ---
The IL we generate the jump function from is:
_1 = cclauses_2(D) != 0B;
c_parser_omp_all_clauses (_1);
Which translates to the expected jump function:
callsite void c_parser_omp_teams(int**)/3 ->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115113
Bug ID: 115113
Summary: [15 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails for i686-darwin.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115112
Bug ID: 115112
Summary: Incorrect line debugging information occurs during INC
builtin.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115111
Bug ID: 115111
Summary: Incorrect line debugging locations at start of WHILE
loop.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115105
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
Can you please try the 14-release like the other reporter, or the upcoming
13.3 release next week?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
Bug ID: 115110
Summary: [15 regression] several failures after
r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114854
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a05332bbac98a4c002bef3fb45a3ad9d56b3a71
commit r15-523-g1a05332bbac98a4c002bef3fb45a3ad9d56b3a71
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113760
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 113760, which changed state.
Bug 113760 Summary: [DR1693] gcc rejects valid empty-declaration in pedantic
mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113760
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113760
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b3eac4b54a52bf206b88743d1e987badc97cff4
commit r15-522-g0b3eac4b54a52bf206b88743d1e987badc97cff4
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115102
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115109
Bug ID: 115109
Summary: Incorrect type of enumeration constant in
redeclaration of enumeration constant (C23)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115108
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 115108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114902
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] wrong|[14 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
Bug ID: 115107
Summary: f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115108
Bug ID: 115108
Summary: f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115103
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #36 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ad7ca1bb905736c0f57688e93e9e77cbc71a325
commit r15-521-g6ad7ca1bb905736c0f57688e93e9e77cbc71a325
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114902
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b93a0ae153ef70a82ff63e67926a01fdab9956b
commit r15-520-g0b93a0ae153ef70a82ff63e67926a01fdab9956b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115092
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b93a0ae153ef70a82ff63e67926a01fdab9956b
commit r15-520-g0b93a0ae153ef70a82ff63e67926a01fdab9956b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115103
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fdbefc575c24881356b5f4091fa57b5f7166a90
commit r15-519-g7fdbefc575c24881356b5f4091fa57b5f7166a90
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79958
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63185
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.5.0, 13.2.1, 14.1.0
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103503
--- Comment #7 from H. Peter Anvin ---
Note: this is now implemented for x86, but it affects other targets as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105863
--- Comment #8 from H. Peter Anvin ---
Well, _Embed() would be an extension and it doesn't seem unreasonable to say
that _Embed() would be expanded after token pasting. After all, as has been
discussed in the C committee is that if #embed cannot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Eric, gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c XPASSes on 64-bit SPARC since
>
> commit ffabce849033e57ebaf60029822b81e981681c21
> Author: Eric Botcazou
> Date: Tue Nov 29 11:43:32 2022 +0100
>
> Couple of test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114589
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114589
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99b1daae18c095d6c94d32efb77442838e11cbfb
commit r15-518-g99b1daae18c095d6c94d32efb77442838e11cbfb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111422
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab25eef36400e8c1d28e3ed059c5f95a38b45f17
commit r15-517-gab25eef36400e8c1d28e3ed059c5f95a38b45f17
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114931
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d89cb43943e77d0bbb48fd5a58a352bdd3d82c7
commit r14-10211-g1d89cb43943e77d0bbb48fd5a58a352bdd3d82c7
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114931
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:573e1df0ec8428e564c97af7c237a5e0c98c59bd
commit r14-10210-g573e1df0ec8428e564c97af7c237a5e0c98c59bd
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115057
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115057
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:680af0e1e90d4b80260d173636dfe15654fd470d
commit r15-516-g680af0e1e90d4b80260d173636dfe15654fd470d
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115058
--- Comment #8 from xiaoyong yan ---
ok, thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105863
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115091
--- Comment #2 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:23:27AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115091
>
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> maybe represent th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com
--- Comm
: i386-pc-solaris2.11
Build: i386-pc-solaris2.11
Between 20240514 (0a99ad5c52caa06c113b1889bbe6634812b89be5) and 20240515
(5609d77e683944439fae38323ecabc44a1eb4671),
Ada bootstrap broke in stage 3 on Solaris/x86:
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115104
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Relevant CI issue:
https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/issues/895
Commit Range:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/compare/ec1cdad89afed4d5fc8617c3de3c1950ca55ba7e...bed6ec161be8c5ca2f2419590
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115057
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 58214
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58214&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is a proposed fix - which I'll commit (if/when) a full bootstrap
completes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115104
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 80% sure this was exposed by the combine patch which will be fixed but not
in combine. I am not sure the time frame of the improvement though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115105
Bug ID: 115105
Summary: Document "Reimplement GNU threads library on native
Windows" change on GCC 13 changes list
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
Tavian Barnes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tavianator at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115093
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115104
--- Comment #2 from Robin Dapp ---
Thanks, I was just about to open a PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115104
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
I wonder whether RIVOS CI already found which commit cause this regression ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115104
Bug ID: 115104
Summary: RISC-V: GCC-14 can combine vsext+vadd -> vwadd but
Trunk GCC (GCC 15) Failed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109335
--- Comment #4 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Here's a smaller reproducer:
$ cat pass.c
#include
void my_free(char *p);
[[gnu::malloc(my_free)]] char *my_malloc(void);
int main(void)
{
char *p;
p = my_malloc();
my_free(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112616
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2183e5b5aa3a080624cb95a06993e34dedd09cb2
commit r12-10443-g2183e5b5aa3a080624cb95a06993e34dedd09cb2
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114247
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113757
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2183e5b5aa3a080624cb95a06993e34dedd09cb2
commit r12-10443-g2183e5b5aa3a080624cb95a06993e34dedd09cb2
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2183e5b5aa3a080624cb95a06993e34dedd09cb2
commit r12-10443-g2183e5b5aa3a080624cb95a06993e34dedd09cb2
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114247
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44191982c6bd41db1c9d126ea2f15febec3c1f81
commit r12-10442-g44191982c6bd41db1c9d126ea2f15febec3c1f81
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113964
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44191982c6bd41db1c9d126ea2f15febec3c1f81
commit r12-10442-g44191982c6bd41db1c9d126ea2f15febec3c1f81
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115092
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Still okay :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113920
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Now targeting GCC 16.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115103
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115103
Bug ID: 115103
Summary: No diagnostics for grainsize used together with
num_tasks clause or for fortran for nogroup with
reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115089
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|-Wanalyzer-use-of-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo