https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114791
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Interesting, with -O0, there is a warning but that can be turned into a false
positive if you enable the "missing:" section.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114791
--- Comment #3 from Urs Janßen ---
Comment on attachment 57998
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57998
minimal test case
>#include
>#include
>#include
>#include
>
>int main(void);
>
>int main(void) {
>FILE *fp = (FILE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114791
--- Comment #1 from Urs Janßen ---
Created attachment 57999
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57999&action=edit
preprocessed example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114791
Bug ID: 114791
Summary: analyzer: file-leak not detected
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114768
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab3b83afc149edda11fa3c7cbb3815606731003b
commit r13-8636-gab3b83afc149edda11fa3c7cbb3815606731003b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114753
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10f689596ad1633f4f5de1852c8f82a993fe948e
commit r13-8635-g10f689596ad1633f4f5de1852c8f82a993fe948e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110027
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a16d90ec302e588dab5d7d31ccdd7b3fd5c6214e
commit r13-8630-ga16d90ec302e588dab5d7d31ccdd7b3fd5c6214e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114580
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae3b6dea0445f9650cf1a684527efac06497f1b4
commit r13-8629-gae3b6dea0445f9650cf1a684527efac06497f1b4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114566
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38af0d59043da4cc07cd62c17da599e43668e3be
commit r13-8628-g38af0d59043da4cc07cd62c17da599e43668e3be
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114691
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed7be7ba6f125cfda7ad07263213cbe02b7e7ced
commit r13-8632-ged7be7ba6f125cfda7ad07263213cbe02b7e7ced
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114780
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e802786436851b1f5efca21a14d4f41c83c83f4f
commit r13-8637-ge802786436851b1f5efca21a14d4f41c83c83f4f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114572
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:910fa4d9df8f72d16279324cca2bf1f2649aa68b
commit r13-8627-g910fa4d9df8f72d16279324cca2bf1f2649aa68b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114687
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a1a52934a2ab9ac9205a3a4d5b82a672fefba7e
commit r13-8631-g7a1a52934a2ab9ac9205a3a4d5b82a672fefba7e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114743
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd8e2137462d9ae1723fa193b6062ec65d164457
commit r13-8634-gcd8e2137462d9ae1723fa193b6062ec65d164457
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114634
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c85e8def0efd4b0d9d312a1f0cbbee332b4e0d1
commit r13-8633-g2c85e8def0efd4b0d9d312a1f0cbbee332b4e0d1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114537
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a297f9bbb9611414fe48f6d61a8829bf5808bd2c
commit r13-8626-ga297f9bbb9611414fe48f6d61a8829bf5808bd2c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114552
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba6fd407891fd83648ad803c85b607dc09e23be4
commit r13-8624-gba6fd407891fd83648ad803c85b607dc09e23be4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc39bd532d4de1ba0b2785246fb6fdd63ec2e92c
commit r13-8625-gcc39bd532d4de1ba0b2785246fb6fdd63ec2e92c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472
--- Comment #39 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb277dea557aaa25fdced201f7c45c753c709dfa
commit r13-8623-gcb277dea557aaa25fdced201f7c45c753c709dfa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114790
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
I'm going to kick off a reduction but don't count on me either, as I hate doing
LTO ones.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114790
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57997
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57997&action=edit
tracing_copy_imp.cpp.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114790
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57996&action=edit
tracing_device_imp.cpp.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114790
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57995
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57995&action=edit
tracing_imp.cpp.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114790
Bug ID: 114790
Summary: ICE when building intel-compute-runtime (error: direct
call to ... speculative call sequence has no
speculative flag)
Product: gcc
Versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114787
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> The first difference (in GCC 13) with/without -fdump-tree-all-all comes from
> cunroll:
I should note that -fdump-tree-cunroll-all still produces the correct c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114787
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The first difference (in GCC 13) with/without -fdump-tree-all-all comes from
cunroll:
Broken:
```
Loop 3 iterates 2 times.
Loop 3 iterates at most 1 times.
Loop 3 likely iterates at most 1 times.
Analyzin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114787
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114787
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #3 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114787
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Component|tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114789
Bug ID: 114789
Summary: False positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
-trunk/configure --disable-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.1 20240420 (experimental) (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114710
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114766
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #1)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #0)
> > The documentation for ^ states:
>
> If it works for you, we could try to use the patch (although it needs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114708
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114708
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114708
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
This appears to be sufficient:
diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb
index 04d114694ab..71cfdd718e0 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb
@@ -6549,6 +6549,7 @@ pack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on 'elsif' with complex |ICE on elsif part of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104042
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2cb625eb141cacd0bee6c6ce5888d673ac38ca4
commit r12-10361-gc2cb625eb141cacd0bee6c6ce5888d673ac38ca4
Author: Francois-Xavie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
This appears to be sufficient:
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb
index e7b759c4e88..c06377ab4c9 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb
@@ -6696,8 +6696,12 @@ pac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Actual does not match |actual does not match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114787
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112893
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112893
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9a48fe7032d9894e88d0d121ba6f75b08ea5dcb
commit r14-10053-gf9a48fe7032d9894e88d0d121ba6f75b08ea5dcb
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114764
--- Comment #7 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
I get it :)
If you wanted an actual use-case (rather than a synthetic testcase), we
stumbled upon this bug from implementing a friend operator==:
```
class S {
bool comparesEqual(S, S) noexcept; //
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114787
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |14.0
Last reconfirmed|
=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.1 20240420 (experimental) (GCC)
[664] %
[664] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
[665
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101139
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57993
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57993&action=edit
Patch but it does not work for the code in this testcase
I have to look into why it is not working for the tes
51 matches
Mail list logo
