https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82955
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93874
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mingw.android at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-08-25 00:00:00 |2024-3-24
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68010
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.1.2
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pawel_sikora at zoho dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44102
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #3)
> This fix is wrong.
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=159495)
>
> There is a check at the start of cleanup_cfg to always set the
> CLEANUP_CF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39457
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30640
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-25
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20357
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just for reference here is the ICE that is produced:
```
:10:1: error: Two symbols with same comdat_group are not linked by the
same_comdat_group list.
10 | }
| ^
_ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC1Ev/8 (X::X() [wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Alexandre.BUSTICO at enac dot
fr
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114451
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114451
Bug ID: 114451
Summary: regression : ICE on switch over enum class
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114450
--- Comment #4 from Olof Gullnäs ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Reduced testcase:
> ```
>
> template
> void foreach(F f) {f(1);}
>
> void g ()
> {
> static constexpr auto lambda_2 = [](int) { };
> auto lambda_1 = []
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111289
--- Comment #6 from Bruno Haible ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #5)
> Don't include on hpux to avoid conflicting type declarations
> for mode_t. This fixes test on houx.
Why not entirely remove the '#include '? There is noth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> Created attachment 57805 [details]
> t1.cc
~/upstream-gcc-match/bin/g++ -flto t1.cc t2.cc -O1 -std=c++20
I attached the reduced testcase from the reduced tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57805
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57805&action=edit
t1.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57804
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57804&action=edit
t2.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57803
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57803&action=edit
t.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57802
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57802&action=edit
src_data_test_QualityValues.cpp.ii.orig.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57801
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57801&action=edit
src_data_test_MappedRead.cpp.ii.orig.xz
Attaching the originals..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #9)
> ```
> $ gcc -std=c++20 -flto src_data_test_MappedRead.cpp.ii
> src_data_test_QualityValues.cpp.ii -O1
> lto1: error: Alias and target’s comdat groups differs
> _ZNS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114424
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
But s-osprim__posix2008.adb dies not use gettimeofday, does it ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111289
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 57800
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57800&action=edit
Patch
Don't include on hpux to avoid conflicting type declarations
for mode_t. This fixes test on houx.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114424
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
something did change with Nicolas example:
date '+Expected: %s'; ./foo
Expected: 1711306699
local : 1711306700. 1362
System.OS_Primitives:-6017917000.119493888
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114448
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57799
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57799&action=edit
Full testcase
Please next time attach or put inline the full testcase and not just a link to
godbolt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114424
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
still seen, when both posix2008 files are used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114450
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
```
template
void foreach(F f) {f(1);}
void g ()
{
static constexpr auto lambda_2 = [](int) { };
auto lambda_1 = [](auto id) { lambda_2(id); };
foreach(lambda_1);
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] lto1: |[14 Regression] lto1:
|er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114450
--- Comment #1 from Olof Gullnäs ---
This is observed on a Suse Linux X86 system
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114450
Bug ID: 114450
Summary: -Wunused-but-set-variable false positive in lambda
using another static auto lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108866
--- Comment #9 from Pali Rohár ---
(In reply to peter0x44 from comment #7)
> 5) windres --help has this list of "supported targets":
> x86_64-w64-mingw32-windres: supported targets: pe-x86-64 pei-x86-64
> pe-bigobj-x86-64 elf64-x86-64 pe-i386 pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114449
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114449
--- Comment #3 from Pali Rohár ---
Note that clang optimizes it just with -O2 and does not require any special
pragma.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114449
--- Comment #2 from Pali Rohár ---
Interesting... I was expecting that some -O3 or better -Ofast option tells gcc
to optimize the code as much as possible.
I added that pragma before for-loop in the first example and then gcc really
optimized t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114449
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114431
--- Comment #4 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
Created attachment 57797
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57797&action=edit
restrict-fs-.bpf.unstripped.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114431
--- Comment #3 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
Created attachment 57796
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57796&action=edit
restrict-ifaces.bpf.unstripped.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114431
--- Comment #2 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
Created attachment 57795
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57795&action=edit
socket-bind.bpf.unstripped.i
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114449
Bug ID: 114449
Summary: bswap64 not optimized
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114439
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
To me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57792|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57791|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114448
Bug ID: 114448
Summary: Roundup not optimized
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
```
$ gcc -std=c++20 -flto src_data_test_MappedRead.cpp.ii
src_data_test_QualityValues.cpp.ii -O1
lto1: error: Alias and target’s comdat groups differs
_ZNSt6vectorIN6PacBio4Data12QualityValueESaIS2_EEC2ERKS4_/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57792
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57792&action=edit
src_data_test_QualityValues.cpp.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57791
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57791&action=edit
src_data_test_MappedRead.cpp.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114441
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
My reading is that the ABI has overlooked this case though, so it is up to the
implementation to make its opinion. That of the vendor's compiler is probably
more in line with the spirit of the calling conve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114431
--- Comment #1 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
$ bpf-gcc --version
bpf-gcc (14-20240127-1+1) 14.0.1 20240127 (experimental) [master
r14-8465-g5200ef26ac1]
Copyright (C) 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for cop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114447
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm common.opt has:
```
fstack-protector
Common Var(flag_stack_protect, 1) Init(-1) Optimization
Use propolice as a stack protection method.
fstack-protector-all
Common RejectNegative Var(flag_stack_protect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114447
Bug ID: 114447
Summary: -fstack-protector-explicit ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114424
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Any file whose name contain "posix2008" should be used in lieu of the simple
"posix" variant, but that apparently makes only two of them.
61 matches
Mail list logo