https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71258
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #4 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, the nodiscard warnings must be silenced with a cast to void. They can't be
"stronger" than that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71258
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57722
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57722&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66003
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am not 100% sure if we record where the typedef is located but it might be
useful to print those out too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114373
Bug ID: 114373
Summary: BLOCK construct not correctly analyzed with -fopenmp
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372
Bug ID: 114372
Summary: Confusing ODR warning with different typedefs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114371
Bug ID: 114371
Summary: [meta-bug] issues related to strict-volatile-bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91861
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
> But NLT_UQ does not exist for non-VEX encoded
Right, one needs to compare integers and check for NaN. Like noted in the
description. Also implemented in the std::experimental::simd overloads:
https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587
--- Comment #16 from Kaz Kylheku ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
> C++17 adds nodiscard attribute which can be placed on class/struct types,
> functions, constructors and others and then you get a warning if you ignore
> the valu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587
--- Comment #15 from Kaz Kylheku ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #13)
> (In reply to Kaz Kylheku from comment #11)
> > I deployed that change to large team of developers, and the toolchain with
> > that change went to customers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114320
--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #2)
> Sorry about that. I've not been able to work out what configure flags I need
> to pass to cause this to error in the first place (I don't normally develop
> for po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #17 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114334
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114334
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:942d470a5a4fb1baeff943127a81b441dffaa543
commit r14-9512-g942d470a5a4fb1baeff943127a81b441dffaa543
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66862
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao Liu ---
> Now, it seems AVX512BW (and AVX512VL in some cases) has the needed
> instructions,
> in particular VMOVDQU{8,16}, but it is not reflected in maskload and
> maskstore expanders. CCing Kyrill and Uros on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #54 from John David Anglin ---
The f-m-o issue is probably fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48026
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tellowkrinkle at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114370
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #53 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0fda1aff0b752e4182c009c5526b9306bd35f7c
commit r14-9511-gf0fda1aff0b752e4182c009c5526b9306bd35f7c
Author: John David Anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114370
Bug ID: 114370
Summary: _mm_srli_si128 fails to compile with PCH that uses
pragma GCC optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63719
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114364
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
The diff looks good to me. Untested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f3f0b7ee8022776d69ecaed1375e1559716f226
commit r14-9509-g3f3f0b7ee8022776d69ecaed1375e1559716f226
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40130
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> BTW: Since you are looking in this area, can you add
> __attribute__((noinline)) to the tests? Some of them are too easy to
> optimize for recent optimizing passes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
Bug 89180 depends on bug 56457, which changed state.
Bug 56457 Summary: Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused
variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756
Bug 44756 depends on bug 56457, which changed state.
Bug 56457 Summary: Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused
variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90113
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57720
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57720&action=edit
more complete list of tests in gfortran.dg/ that contain dg-options that has -O
in it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114369
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42818
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57971
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69443
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-fsanitize=address should |-fsanitize=address should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114369
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114369
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The gcc altivec.h defines it as a function-like macro, so not a problem.
So perhaps a clang bug for not defining it as a function-like macro only?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114369
Bug ID: 114369
Summary: tree-vect-loop.cc uses vec_step which is also an
altivec intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109681
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114368
Bug ID: 114368
Summary: FAIL:
25_algorithms/pstl/alg_sorting/set_symmetric_differenc
e.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114316
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Francois Dumont
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1f57ff40738bbce9902ea25865ed6d729b10127
commit r13-8460-gc1f57ff40738bbce9902ea25865ed6d729b10127
Author: François Dumo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113402
--- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Warning is fixed on hppa.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114316
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Francois Dumont :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07fad7a7fc245369989e9ca746728ea78b924715
commit r14-9507-g07fad7a7fc245369989e9ca746728ea78b924715
Author: François Dumont
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114296
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114296
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f065c582d9c8e0a4fee7ee563c584ee3b1975bea
commit r14-9506-gf065c582d9c8e0a4fee7ee563c584ee3b1975bea
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80012
Anuj Mohite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anujmohite001 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66034
--- Comment #3 from Avi Kivity ---
Yes, this is relevant to user-level threads, not coroutines.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114155
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Fix to format hexstrings as big endian has been committed from upstream merge.
r14-9505
This should be resolved now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|riscv, loongarch, x86_64|riscv, loongarch, x86_64,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494
--- Comment #32 from Piotr Kubaj ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #31)
> what is the current situation with this
> - what input are we waiting for?
> - is the problem now cleared for powerpc64-freebsd?
Probably not, but FreeBSD now us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114367
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yeah this needs to use construct_at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114275
--- Comment #4 from Nathaniel Shead ---
I suspect there are a number of issues tied together here. Some of the things
I've discovered so far:
- 'tsubst_friend_class' calls 'lookup_name', which when called from a module
that doesn't export the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66034
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
C++ coroutines are allocated on the heap though.
https://wg21.link/p0876 is more relevant here, but not approved yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66034
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60528
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|GCC puts out floati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64457
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64053
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63297
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
68 matches
Mail list logo