https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski ---
One thing unrelated to the unrolling I Noticed is:
```
if (_221 != 0)
goto ; [50.00%]
else
goto ; [50.00%]
[local count: 163152564]:
_212 = _218 - s_202;
goto ; [100.00%]
[local count
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 100643 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104447
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103725
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101958
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100801
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100623
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100554
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86899
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86689
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression] Some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110027
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #11)
> Calling it a 11..14 regression as we know 14 is bad and 7.5 is OK, but I
> can't test 11/12 on an avx512 machine right now.
I can't reproduce that with 11/12, but w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 regression] |[11/12/13/14 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100354
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 regression]|[11/12/13 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100533
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95351
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31ce2e993d09dcad1ce139a2848a28de5931056d
commit r14-9422-g31ce2e993d09dcad1ce139a2848a28de5931056d
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99795
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression]
|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99706
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99469
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99332
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99199
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11 Regression] Very large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98662
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111822
--- Comment #16 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> > The easiest fix would be to refuse applying STV to a insn that
> > can_throw_internal () (that's an insn that has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67739
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57664
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57664&action=edit
Better testcase
With the original testcase, the stores to sincosf were optimized away and no
longer did the sin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106190
chenxiaolong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chenxiaolong at loongson dot cn
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41639
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41639
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh*-*
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114298
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kenzel ---
I just learned that this was apparently only added in C++23 (P2711 [1]), so I
was likely a bit too quick to open this issue…
[1]: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2711r1.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-04-10 00:00:00 |2024-3-10
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98356
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97972
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97968
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11 Regression] Unnecessary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114301
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-10
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114301
Bug ID: 114301
Summary: gimple_can_duplicate_bb_p check for returns twice can
be moved to the check of the last statement
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] internal|internal error in ICF pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 94335, which changed state.
Bug 94335 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] False positive -Wstringop-overflow
warning with -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113777
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93930
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113777
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This works with __attribute__((may_alias)) though, so what's special with
> __attribute__((__hardbool__)) ?
Replying myself: this creates an enumeration type under the hood, so this is a
duplicate of PR d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93631
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114300
Bug ID: 114300
Summary: Bug box when compiling a program that instantiates a
package with a nested ghost package.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113081
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
> If I recall correctly, this trick is not guaranteed to work (for a
> drtbegin.o and drtend.o object), as there really no control over where in
> the TLS section the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113081
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
It could be moved to drtstuff.o to avoid it being in the library, but unless
there's an equivalent function available there'll be crashes caused by the GC
free'ing live objects as it did not scan all TLS varia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472
--- Comment #34 from Дилян Палаузов ---
Created attachment 57662
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57662&action=edit
Proposed patch
This fixes the problem.
I do not understand the build system to say, that this is the best a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114293
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114293
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112290
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112285
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112285
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec3a01024dd86c51d1e563df9395123765cf548d
commit r12-10202-gec3a01024dd86c51d1e563df9395123765cf548d
Author: Iain Buclaw
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112290
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec3a01024dd86c51d1e563df9395123765cf548d
commit r12-10202-gec3a01024dd86c51d1e563df9395123765cf548d
Author: Iain Buclaw
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Component|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114299
Bug ID: 114299
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV: in dyn_cast
(is-a.h:282) with -mgeneral-regs-only and __bf16
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: err
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112285
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:025ff57c19efae6c8d76df6b93e7d9827017acc9
commit r13-8415-g025ff57c19efae6c8d76df6b93e7d9827017acc9
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112290
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:025ff57c19efae6c8d76df6b93e7d9827017acc9
commit r13-8415-g025ff57c19efae6c8d76df6b93e7d9827017acc9
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114297
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114297
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Yet more problems with |[14 Regression] Yet more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112285
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a84b98c62d90bf9e8b01038f624a62725e6a44db
commit r14-9420-ga84b98c62d90bf9e8b01038f624a62725e6a44db
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sun M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112290
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a84b98c62d90bf9e8b01038f624a62725e6a44db
commit r14-9420-ga84b98c62d90bf9e8b01038f624a62725e6a44db
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sun M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110199
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8fe27ed193d60f6cd8b34761858a720c95eabbdb
commit r14-9419-g8fe27ed193d60f6cd8b34761858a720c95eabbdb
Author: jlaw
Date: Sun Mar 10 11:5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Henlich from comment #6)
--- snip ---
> Just some thoughts:
>
> Have you tried "%LA" for long double?
>
> Have you tried quadmath_snprintf
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libquadmath/q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114298
Bug ID: 114298
Summary: std::lazy_split_view constructor is currently not
explicit
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2024-03-10 12:15 a.m., law at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> Aren't we compiling for PA2.0? If s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114297
Bug ID: 114297
Summary: Yet more problems with "definition in block does not
dominate use in block"
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110501
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[13/14 regression] Invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106716
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
The reason why GIMPLE_PREDICT is ignored is that it is never used after ipa-icf
and gets removed at the very beggining of late optimizations.
GIMPLE_PREDICT is consumed by profile_generate pass which is run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
veronica alphonso changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||verodeving at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57660&action=edit
reduced.c
Bit smaller.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114296
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-10
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114296
Bug ID: 114296
Summary: ICE when attempting to create a constant set with a
variable element
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114195
--- Comment #4 from Li Pan ---
Hi Patrick,
Could you please help to double-check if upstream has this problem? As well as
PR114198.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111822
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Preloading stuff is simply loading from the same DImode address, so I'd
> think that EH_NOTE should be moved from the original insn to the new insn
> without much problems.
Old reload and LRA need to do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114295
Bug ID: 114295
Summary: incorrect error location if attempting to compile
implementation module without a definition module
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114294
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-10
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114294
Bug ID: 114294
Summary: expression causes ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Henlich ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #5)
> I have been studying this a bit by looking at the 2023 std and functionality
> of printf().
> Specifically printf() provides the 'A' descriptor which can be used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|[14 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114293
Bug ID: 114293
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in verify_range, at
value-range.cc:1132 at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-val
87 matches
Mail list logo
