https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96340
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
was this also fixed by r14-6416-gf5fc001a84a7db ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112939
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112444
Bug 112444 depends on bug 112939, which changed state.
Bug 112939 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed with -O
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112939
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112939
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5f33b44b5dd4c41ae335445ae3f06b1ca3cfbcb
commit r14-6448-gf5f33b44b5dd4c41ae335445ae3f06b1ca3cfbcb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112970
--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> With -mexplicit-relocs=auto the generated code is sub-optimal as well:
I mean "always", not "auto".
> pcalau12i $r12,%pc_hi20(.LANCHOR0)
> addi.d $r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112970
--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao ---
With -mexplicit-relocs=auto the generated code is sub-optimal as well:
pcalau12i $r12,%pc_hi20(.LANCHOR0)
addi.d $r12,$r12,%pc_lo12(.LANCHOR0)
ld.wu $r5,$r12,4
addi.d $
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112929
--- Comment #18 from Li Pan ---
I see, thanks all, will have a try with variadic function call.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112978
--- Comment #2 from Raymond Chang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I doubt this is fixable really because the number of expansions is huge.
Thanks, I think this is a pretty uncommon situtation anyways. I figured I'd
report it a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112978
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
--- Comment #1 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112978
Bug ID: 112978
Summary: Five minute long error message when OpenMP pragma is
erroneously placed in macro
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112891
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc62716fe8d1d60a9f1c6906e5a4845b3331b828
commit r14-6447-gfc62716fe8d1d60a9f1c6906e5a4845b3331b828
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112334
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112334
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d96533559e26dd0c86f0708fa46eef65c35f7b90
commit r14-6446-gd96533559e26dd0c86f0708fa46eef65c35f7b90
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |MOVED
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
yancheng.li at foxmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100942
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56860
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56860&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
Patch which I am testing. Will be doing some benchmarking too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112943
Hongyu Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112943
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07dcb39e08aa52f166e8d74420364757002ad756
commit r14-6445-g07dcb39e08aa52f166e8d74420364757002ad756
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date: Mon D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107247
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111972
--- Comment #20 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #19)
> Fixed.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112943
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112938
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/640252.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112977
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 56859
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56859&action=edit
Reduced reproducer (needs adding to plugin.exp)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112977
Bug ID: 112977
Summary: -Wanalyzer-tainted-offset false positive seen on Linux
kernel's drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112919
--- Comment #5 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> Lulu: can you help to run some other benchmarks like SPEC (I don't have an
> access to it) and update these values for LA464 and LA664?
No problem, this is what I shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112737
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Created attachment 56858
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56858&action=edit
untested fix
Changing CLASS_PLACEHOLDER_TEMPLATE of a CTAD placeholder that names a ttp to
point to the ttp's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100942
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112976
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112976
Bug ID: 112976
Summary: expand_gimple_stmt_1 vs
gimple_assign_nontemporal_move_p vs SSA_NAME on lhs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60979215517629400902938b1c5666f97d0653cf
commit r13-8147-g60979215517629400902938b1c5666f97d0653cf
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110106
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d44830a1364cf8cb726d59e91298a5b3077a86d9
commit r13-8148-gd44830a1364cf8cb726d59e91298a5b3077a86d9
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08f4496aa619f9b0e8dbb459452dd96edb870236
commit r13-8146-g08f4496aa619f9b0e8dbb459452dd96edb870236
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112975
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 56857
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56857&action=edit
Reduced reproducer (needs adding to plugin.exp)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112975
Bug ID: 112975
Summary: -Wanalyzer-tainted-allocation-size false positive seen
in Linux kernel's drivers/xen/privcmd.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56795|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56794|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112974
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 56854
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56854&action=edit
Patch adding reduced reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112974
Bug ID: 112974
Summary: -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index false positive seen on
Linux kernel
drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_c
ore.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #21)
> Any chance of having it fixed in gcc14?
It is too late to be included in GCC 14, GCC is in stage 3 already, that is no
new features can be included that was n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
--- Comment #21 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20)
>
> I recently brought my patches forward from GCC-5 => GCC-10 (easier to avoid
> the .c => .cc file renaming). Since we now face some problems with
> sanitiser
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112963
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've already started testing the:
2023-12-11 Jakub Jelinek
PR libquadmath/112963
* configure.ac (LIBM): Readd AC_CHECK_LIBM-like check without doing
AC_CHECK_LIB in it.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112963
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> BTW, yet another option would be to just
> LIBM=
> case $host in
> *-*-beos* | *-*-cegcc* | *-*-cygwin* | *-*-haiku* | *-*-pw32* | *-*-darwin*)
> # These syst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112972
Stephan Stiller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112972
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112973
Bug ID: 112973
Summary: Documentation for __builtin_preserve_access_index is
not wrapped in extend.texi
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112972
Bug ID: 112972
Summary: ambiguity in specification for cast to union types
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37239
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
lsplit reports:
Found potential split point: if (maxIdx_171 <= qty_7)
{ i_6 * 2 + I*-2 } le_expr qty_7
But nothing else ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112488
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cf9654c3b06c076502a39a3bfdd6e43b73b
commit r14-6436-g6cf9654c3b06c076502a39a3bfdd6e43b73b
Author: Martin Uecker
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112971
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
I think it is the same issue that I asked Robin to take care of.
Robin, could you confirm whether they are same issue (infinite loop due to
SUBREG)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56793|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60512
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
nable-multilib --with-abi=lp64d --with-arch=rv64imafdc
--with-tune=rocket --with-isa-spec=20191213 'CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-O2
-mcmodel=medlow' 'CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-O2-mcmodel=medlow'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112955
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112955
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6008b80b25d71827fb26ce49f49aae02b645bb12
commit r14-6434-g6008b80b25d71827fb26ce49f49aae02b645bb12
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 07:53:01PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
>
> --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> (In reply to anlauf from comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112970
Bug ID: 112970
Summary: LoongArch: Suboptimal code when the address and the
value of an array element are both used
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112967
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112964
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||98138
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112969
Bug ID: 112969
Summary: -Wanalyzer-exposure-through-uninit-copy false positive
seen on Linux kernel's
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Note to myself to fix this.
Comparing the documentation of the degree trigonometric intrinsics with
F2023, I see that these need only support real argumen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56792|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112822
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #7)
> This fixes the ICE on the large original test case and the smaller test
> cases. I'll bootstrap and regtest it and report back on the results.
I did a normal b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Jerry or myself can do the commit later.
>
> Looking at my addition again, I think that this change to invoke.texi:
>
> "... These functions are now GNU extensions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112929
--- Comment #17 from Patrick O'Neill ---
I also tried making m an array and printing every element to try to detect the
overwriting that way. Once m gets too large (~10 elements) the issue
disappears.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112929
--- Comment #16 from Patrick O'Neill ---
This version with printf reproduces the problem on both the old and new
versions of QEMU:
int printf(char *, ...);
int a, l, i, p, q, t, n, o;
int *volatile c;
static int j;
static struct pack_1_struct d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #11)
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 09:45:33PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > The flag -fdec-math now seems fully dysfunctional, i.e. it does nothing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112929
--- Comment #15 from Robin Dapp ---
I think we need to make sure that we're not writing out of bounds. In that
case anything might happen and if we just don't happen to overwrite this
variable we might hit another one but the test can still pas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112968
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The above listed failures are all FAILs in libstdc++, except for a couple of
compilation timed out ones (caused by valgrind being too slow and the box being
busy).
So yes, it is just -std=c++26.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112968
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is the failure only with -std=gnu++26 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112778
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112784
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112804
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Fixed. Thanks for the notes and testing, Andrew, here and in the mailing list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112968
Bug ID: 112968
Summary: Valgrind error on
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/comparisons/object/9
3479.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112967
Bug ID: 112967
Summary: Valgrind error on gfortran.dg/unexpected_interface.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112966
Bug ID: 112966
Summary: Valgrind errors on gfortran.dg/finalize_*.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112784
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8a3d832e609501002dee54150abfd96a28fe532
commit r14-6431-ga8a3d832e609501002dee54150abfd96a28fe532
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112804
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76ca5ab4ef95c41c1ed67edfb34a1a455a602192
commit r14-6429-g76ca5ab4ef95c41c1ed67edfb34a1a455a602192
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112778
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e2ea685bdea9aa65da2bf4137264d14f38a6f0b
commit r14-6430-g1e2ea685bdea9aa65da2bf4137264d14f38a6f0b
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112965
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-leak-pr108252.c, gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-macros.c,
gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-4.c, gcc.dg/analyzer/named-constants-Wunused-macros.c etc.
fail the same.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112965
Bug ID: 112965
Summary: Valgrind error on gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-dup-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112822
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #5)
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.cc b/gcc/tree-sra.cc
> index 3bd0c7a9af0..99a1b0a6d17 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-sra.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-sra.cc
> @@ -4219,11 +4219,15 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112737
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112822
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #5)
> The following should fix it. I'll try a bit more to come up with a testcase
> that would not require __builtin_vec_vsx_st but so far my simple attempts
> failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64002
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112929
--- Comment #14 from Patrick O'Neill ---
I've reproduced the same failure on tip-of-tree using an old QEMU but cannot
reproduce with a freshly built QEMU:
GCC hash: eea25179d8d1406685b8b0995ba841605f895283 (tip-of-tree)
Qemu hash: 78385bc738108a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:624e274ca3a4405a55662fa72d1163120df0e03d
commit r14-6424-g624e274ca3a4405a55662fa72d1163120df0e03d
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112932
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112580
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
All mentioned except g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header_b.C -std=c++2b (test for
excess errors) seem to be fixed. Thanks!
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo