[Bug target/112868] GCC passes -many to the assembler for --enable-checking=release builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- The behavior shouldn't change dependent on --enable-checking. Can't we make sure to pass -mno-any (if that exists...) during bootstrap and testsuite instead?

[Bug c++/112867] [11/12/13/14 Regression] extern function declaration inside a generic (templated) lambda inside a template function goes wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112867 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |13.2.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/112843] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV in ranger_cache::range_of_expr (gimple-range-cache.cc:1204) with _BitInt() at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112843 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/112303] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed since r14-3459-g0c78240fd7d519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/112830] internal compiler error: in convert_memory_address_addr_space_1, at explow.cc:302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112830 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #15) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > > The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68d32d02035fc081384

[Bug tree-optimization/112843] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV in ranger_cache::range_of_expr (gimple-range-cache.cc:1204) with _BitInt() at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112843 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52f8092f54cf338c19d44e06b35612d15c96faf4 commit r14-6206-g52f8092f54cf338c19d44e06b35612d15c96faf4 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug debug/112875] New: ICE: in lra_eliminate_regs_1, at lra-eliminations.cc:670 with -Oz -frounding-math -fno-dce -fno-trapping-math -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112875 Bug ID: 112875 Summary: ICE: in lra_eliminate_regs_1, at lra-eliminations.cc:670 with -Oz -frounding-math -fno-dce -fno-trapping-math -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse -

[Bug c++/112874] New: low quality diagnostic for overload resolution failure when taking address of overloaded function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112874 Bug ID: 112874 Summary: low quality diagnostic for overload resolution failure when taking address of overloaded function Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/112419] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/Wnonnull-4.c excess error for 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112419 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d51e17791c7876396ed0f6cc51bf103e518877d commit r14-6203-g0d51e17791c7876396ed0f6cc51bf103e518877d Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson

[Bug libstdc++/111948] subrange modifies a const size object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111948 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08448dc146b6dd32383d64ab491a594d41f62aaa commit r14-6200-g08448dc146b6dd32383d64ab491a594d41f62aaa Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug target/112852] [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: vsetvl pass: in partial_subreg_p, at rtl.h:3187 on rv64gcv_zvl512b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112852 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e7abd09621a4401d44f4513adf126bce4b4828b commit r14-6197-g2e7abd09621a4401d44f4513adf126bce4b4828b Author: Juzhe-Zhong Date: Tue Dec 5

[Bug target/112851] [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: vsetvl pass: in partial_subreg_p, at rtl.h:3187 on rv32gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112851 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e7abd09621a4401d44f4513adf126bce4b4828b commit r14-6197-g2e7abd09621a4401d44f4513adf126bce4b4828b Author: Juzhe-Zhong Date: Tue Dec 5

[Bug libstdc++/112858] [14 Regression] nvptx: 'unresolved symbol __cxa_thread_atexit_impl'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112858 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target|nvptx |nvptx, powerpc-ibm-aix* Last reconfi

[Bug fortran/112873] F2023 degree trig functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/112873] F2023 degree trig functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Possible ChangeLog (although I don't know the git world requirements). * intrinsic.cc(add_functions): Update the standard that the various degree trigonometric functions have been described in.

[Bug fortran/112873] New: F2023 degree trig functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873 Bug ID: 112873 Summary: F2023 degree trig functions Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran As

[Bug libstdc++/109536] Failure to compile constexpr std::vector with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109536 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/111735] incorrect BTF representation of forward-declared enums

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111735 David Faust changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.faust at oracle dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/112303] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed since r14-3459-g0c78240fd7d519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/110682] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110682 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.4 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/112303] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed since r14-3459-g0c78240fd7d519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #6 from And

[Bug bootstrap/112534] [14 regression] build failure after r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534 --- Comment #8 from Arsen Arsenović --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Exporting say CC or CXX to the host CC/CXX in stage1 and previous-stage/xgcc > -B previous-stage/ and similar is obviously required, otherwise bootstrap > woul

[Bug tree-optimization/111478] [12/13/14 regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:250

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > I can't reproduce either of the testcases here any more . I should say on the trunk.

[Bug target/112868] GCC passes -many to the assembler for --enable-checking=release builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- Narrowing the ISA dialect range accepted by the assembler is good in theory to catch problems. We need to ensure that this doesn't break a lot of existing code and make POWER more tedious. Most people wan

[Bug tree-optimization/111478] [12/13/14 regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:250

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I can't reproduce either of the testcases here any more .

[Bug c++/112795] [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for GCC 14.1+ (better way) and 13.3+ (just the ICE) for now.

[Bug bootstrap/112534] [14 regression] build failure after r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #6) > yes, that seems doable but I am curious about why the flag propagation via > export is necessary. would each configure not already have the appropriate > flag

[Bug bootstrap/112534] [14 regression] build failure after r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534 --- Comment #6 from Arsen Arsenović --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > The problem is that the toplevel configure (which is autoconf 2.69 as pretty > much everything in gcc) uses the older AC_PROG_CC, which only checks for > -std=

[Bug target/112872] [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: in store_integral_bit_field, at expmed.cc:1049 with -03 rv64gcv_zvl1024b --param=riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112872 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] RISCV ICE: |[14 Regression] RISCV ICE:

[Bug debug/112849] btf: wrong BTF_KIND_DATSEC entries for extern variables without known section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112849 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Faust : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8cf266f4ca4ff89704b190c827abf9ea7e7b5bf commit r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff89704b190c827abf9ea7e7b5bf Author: David Faust Date: Mon D

[Bug target/112872] New: [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: in store_integral_bit_field, at expmed.cc:1049 with -03 rv64gcv_zvl1024b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112872 Bug ID: 112872 Summary: [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: in store_integral_bit_field, at expmed.cc:1049 with -03 rv64gcv_zvl1024b Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug debug/112849] btf: wrong BTF_KIND_DATSEC entries for extern variables without known section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112849 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- I think its also a good idea to propose a patch to btf.rst upstream to clearly state something to the like of: - What variables have an associated BTF_KIND_DATASEC entry - In "2.2.15 BTF_KIND_DATASEC"

[Bug c++/112795] [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59be79fd596ec8f8fbdf1479bc99e6aba9c52778 commit r14-6193-g59be79fd596ec8f8fbdf1479bc99e6aba9c52778 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug target/112871] New: [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 (unrecognizable insn) with -03 rv32gc_zicond

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112871 Bug ID: 112871 Summary: [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 (unrecognizable insn) with -03 rv32gc_zicond Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug c++/112838] Compiler is unable to show the exact error location when calling copy ctor for a non-copyable object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112838 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Ahmad Nour from comment #7) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > (In reply to Ahmad Nour from comment #2) > > > > > > Thanks for confirmation. > > > I tried with clang-12 -Wall -We

[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/112830] internal compiler error: in convert_memory_address_addr_space_1, at explow.cc:302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112830 --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68d32d02035fc081384ec6d6fd275e49ffa5d016 > > commit r14-6182-g68d32d0203

[Bug target/112606] [14 Regression] powerpc64le-linux-gnu: 'FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-fp.c scan-assembler xsnabsdp'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112606 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58d5546af901364f85588fe668559d76f09e6df9 commit r14-6192-g58d5546af901364f85588fe668559d76f09e6df9 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug fortran/105543] Function returning a class array with contiguous attribute rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105543 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug tree-optimization/112859] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112859 --- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su --- > Thanks for these testcases btw. Happy to be of help, Richard. And thanks to you folks for the incredible work and dedication!

[Bug libstdc++/112858] [14 Regression] nvptx: 'unresolved symbol __cxa_thread_atexit_impl'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112858 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |libstdc++ Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/112870] incorrect jmp when using goto on a function, causing infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112870 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- What you are doing is all not allowed with this extension. Yes the documentation should be a little clearier on this but at least the part where it says: `You may not use this mechanism to jump to code in a

[Bug fortran/94660] Wrong subroutine called at runtime than the one called in the source code with deferred subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94660 Jeff Hole changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnu.gcc.detection675@passma

[Bug c/112870] incorrect jmp when using goto on a function, causing infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112870 --- Comment #2 from Grant Wittman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > This is all undefined behavior. > > > Please read > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Labels-as-Values.html . > > Specifically: > You may not use

[Bug c++/112869] [14 Regression] ICE at gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17531 on libopenmpt-0.7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112869 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- This should fix it: --- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc @@ -1177,13 +1177,9 @@ cp_fold_immediate_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtrees, void *data_) ? tf_error : tf_none

[Bug target/112855] [14] RISC-V vector: vsetivli clobbers variable value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112855 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14] RISC-V vector: Appears |[14] RISC-V vector:

[Bug c/112870] incorrect jmp when using goto on a function, causing infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112870 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/112870] New: incorrect jmp when using goto on a function, causing infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112870 Bug ID: 112870 Summary: incorrect jmp when using goto on a function, causing infinite loop Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/112869] [14 Regression] ICE at gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17531 on libopenmpt-0.7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112869 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org P

[Bug c/112866] error: compound literal qualified by address-space qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112866 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c/84163] [avr] Allow address space qualifier for compound literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84163 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 112866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/112782] [14 Regression] stage2/3 differs when compiled with -mfix-r5900 on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112782 --- Comment #7 from Immolo --- Just to document my findings which pretty much confirms what Pinski has said here. I have gone back and doubled checked what I found and noticed portage was removing the -mfix-r5900 option since the start and I ju

[Bug c++/112869] [14 regression] ICE at gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17531 on libopenmpt-0.7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112869 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/112869] New: [14 regression] ICE at gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17531 on libopenmpt-0.7.3

LAGS='-O1 -g0' Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 14.0.0 20231205 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/112868] GCC passes -many to the assembler for --enable-checking=release builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-05 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/112868] New: GCC passes -many to the assembler for --enable-checking=release builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868 Bug ID: 112868 Summary: GCC passes -many to the assembler for --enable-checking=release builds Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/110606] ICE output_operand: '%&' used without any local dynamic TLS references on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110606 --- Comment #9 from Jeevitha --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8) > What does "dead at sched2" mean? Are they dead when sched2 starts, or made > dead > by it? Well it must be the former; what pass does make it dead, then? > sp

[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c3a880feecf81c310b4ade210fbd7004c9aece7 commit r14-6191-g9c3a880feecf81c310b4ade210fbd7004c9aece7 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: M

[Bug c++/112867] [11/12/13/14 Regression] extern function declaration inside a generic (templated) lambda inside a template function goes wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112867 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- This worked in GCC 7. GCC 8 started ICEing with r8-2720-gf44a8dd56f5bfb commit f44a8dd56f5bfbd0596c39693e268ef880c06221 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tue Aug 29 16:37:15 2017 -0400 Reimplement handli

[Bug tree-optimization/112809] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in limb_access_type, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:563 at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112809 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/112867] [11/12/13/14 Regression] extern function declaration inside a generic (templated) lambda inside a template function goes wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112867 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||c++-lambda Summary|[11/12/13

[Bug c++/112867] [11/12/13/14 Regression] extern function declaration in function scope behaves differently in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112867 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|extern function declaration |[11/12/13/14 Regression]

[Bug c++/112867] extern function declaration in function scope behaves differently in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112867 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5

[Bug c++/112867] New: extern function declaration in function scope behaves differently in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112867 Bug ID: 112867 Summary: extern function declaration in function scope behaves differently in template Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug c++/16333] More array vs ptr stuff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dad3df1e7f3fd73f157f88561ef424b6853d960 commit r14-6190-g1dad3df1e7f3fd73f157f88561ef424b6853d960 Author: Richard Sandiford Dat

[Bug c/107348] documentation: __builtin_classify_type() undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107348 Alejandro Colomar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 --- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13) > (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #12) > > I'll note that you don't always > > get an assembler error, since gcc still passes -many to the assembler

[Bug target/110606] ICE output_operand: '%&' used without any local dynamic TLS references on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110606 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- What does "dead at sched2" mean? Are they dead when sched2 starts, or made dead by it? Well it must be the former; what pass does make it dead, then? split3 apparently? Why is this not done in split

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- DR now implemented for GCC 12 (but gnu::no_reorder support for namespace scope asms would be more work; I think we don't reorder toplevel asms anyway).

[Bug target/112837] [12 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have 'e' (rtx plus) in ix86_elim_entry_set_got, at config/i386/i386.cc:8612 with -fcompare-elim -fpie -fprofile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112837 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE: RTL |[12 Regression] ICE: RTL

[Bug target/112845] [11/12 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 with -Os -fcf-protection -c since r8-3504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112845 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE: |[11/12 Regression] ICE: in

[Bug target/112816] [11/12 Regression] ICE unrecognizable_insn with __builtin_signbit and returning struct with int[4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/111967] [12 Regression] during GIMPLE pass: evrp ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:910 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop -fdump-tree-evrp-all since r12-4694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] during |[12 Regression] during

[Bug libstdc++/112832] [std::format] Broken non-SFINAE-friendly `set_debug_format()` for `const char *` formatter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112832 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cd73543a1122d3c81409e3e9a26c3e94c3d324f commit r14-6189-g3cd73543a1122d3c81409e3e9a26c3e94c3d324f Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libgcc/109289] Conflicting types for built-in functions in libgcc/emutls.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109289 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge --- Created attachment 56805 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56805&action=edit '0001-WIP-GCC-PR109289-Conflicting-types-for-built-in-func.patch' Attaching my current WIP patch. I may lat

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5153e7d63b4cd9a3df490809c4f3fe1e94d3d37 commit r14-6187-ge5153e7d63b4cd9a3df490809c4f3fe1e94d3d37 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/112845] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 with -Os -fcf-protection -c since r8-3504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112845 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d057d1f1fe5bf20d32912bc65ad620810583107 commit r13-8127-g8d057d1f1fe5bf20d32912bc65ad620810583107 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/112837] [12/13 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have 'e' (rtx plus) in ix86_elim_entry_set_got, at config/i386/i386.cc:8612 with -fcompare-elim -fpie -fprofile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112837 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:918877a0b8e68b2f56c88d54dd6399bbfdb89155 commit r13-8126-g918877a0b8e68b2f56c88d54dd6399bbfdb89155 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/112816] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE unrecognizable_insn with __builtin_signbit and returning struct with int[4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05d8dec0f9f9660b1f437d52252852a2f86d3ac8 commit r13-8125-g05d8dec0f9f9660b1f437d52252852a2f86d3ac8 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/112795] [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b651cf6bf1903dd3a4a5ce8c2a95d0e76ee0089 commit r13-8124-g5b651cf6bf1903dd3a4a5ce8c2a95d0e76ee0089 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/111967] [12/13 Regression] during GIMPLE pass: evrp ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:910 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop -fdump-tree-evrp-all since r12-4694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80bf483565a11a34239be47012d0b6990dec6690 commit r13-8121-g80bf483565a11a34239be47012d0b6990dec6690 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/111408] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-2866-ge68a31549d9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111408 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0dd097f6a0951c386233fc0b96584ebe4144ea65 commit r13-8122-g0dd097f6a0951c386233fc0b96584ebe4144ea65 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/112339] ICE with clang::no_sanitize and -fsanitize=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef88041a578644b8e4f964903b2fbbcf0f1d7ce8 commit r13-8120-gef88041a578644b8e4f964903b2fbbcf0f1d7ce8 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libgomp/111413] libgomp >= 13 segfault on loading if environ is NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111413 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c128ad8e830e90a429eaeccc3fb000a73fd6779c commit r13-8118-gc128ad8e830e90a429eaeccc3fb000a73fd6779c Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/110606] ICE output_operand: '%&' used without any local dynamic TLS references on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110606 --- Comment #7 from Jeevitha --- The following insns are dead at sched2, but not removed until pass_final, If these instruction are removed there will be no ICE. (insn 80 110 111 3 (set (reg:DI 28 28 [145]) (high:DI (unspec:DI [

[Bug target/112817] RISC-V: RVV: provide a preprocessor macro for VLS codegen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112817 Kito Cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 fro

[Bug target/112860] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.cc:10620 with -O0 -fgimple -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/101057] [gimplefe] GIMPLE frontend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101057 Bug 101057 depends on bug 112860, which changed state. Bug 112860 Summary: ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.cc:10620 with -O0 -fgimple -mavx512f https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112860 What|Removed

[Bug target/112860] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.cc:10620 with -O0 -fgimple -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112860 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9403153f925c71ceab655af7ed040966f2b4c9c commit r14-6186-gd9403153f925c71ceab655af7ed040966f2b4c9c Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug modula2/112865] IM and RE fails to skip type equivalences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112865 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug modula2/112865] IM and RE fails to skip type equivalences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112865 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:805be8fbeab351dc3109aaa17fcc8cc6f74c8caa commit r14-6185-g805be8fbeab351dc3109aaa17fcc8cc6f74c8caa Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Tue

[Bug target/112853] RISC-V: RVV: SPEC2017 525.x264 regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112853 --- Comment #7 from Robin Dapp --- Ah, forgot three tests: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-cond-1.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr101668.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr101668.c execution test On vlen=5

[Bug target/112853] RISC-V: RVV: SPEC2017 525.x264 regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112853 --- Comment #6 from Robin Dapp --- I indeed see more failures with _zvl128b, vlen=256 (than with _zvl128b, vlen=128): FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr66251.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr66251.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vec

[Bug libstdc++/88264] Support glibc-style tunables for libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88264 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Another tunable idea: disable exceptions from the runtime. We use _GLIBCXX_THROW_OR_ABORT so that throwing an exception will abort instead when -fno-exceptions is defined. However, this only works when the

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 110485, which changed state. Bug 110485 Summary: vectorizing simd clone calls without loop masking applied https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110485 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/110485] vectorizing simd clone calls without loop masking applied

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110485 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Resolution|---

[Bug c/112866] error: compound literal qualified by address-space qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112866 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Occurs with all versions that support address-spaces (v4.7 and up).

[Bug c/112866] New: error: compound literal qualified by address-space qualifier

-with-dwarf2 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --disable-shared --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: single Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 14.0.0 20231205 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #12) > I'll note that you don't always > get an assembler error, since gcc still passes -many to the assembler for > non --enable-checking gcc builds, which caus

  1   2   >