https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56747&action=edit
another cvised testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112787
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I think you should make sure to not use VLA vectors in lowering since lowering
doesn't really support using those (much similar to BB SLP).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112753
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a2e428591dc97d573cf5c1789c84c8a3884b364
commit r14-6040-g8a2e428591dc97d573cf5c1789c84c8a3884b364
Author: Juergen Christ
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108476
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112725
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28944a016bb5eef9a99691b3c55b124882375180
commit r14-6039-g28944a016bb5eef9a99691b3c55b124882375180
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Bug 96284 depends on bug 91093, which changed state.
Bug 91093 Summary: Error on implicit int by default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Bug 96284 depends on bug 106416, which changed state.
Bug 106416 Summary: -Wint-conversion should be an error, not a pedwarn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ecfa6c4a9df19b364cbdf6d9de5f0b98c22bd8f
commit r14-6036-g4ecfa6c4a9df19b364cbdf6d9de5f0b98c22bd8f
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff9efa3fc48baa1dee7ed376c25ecfcfbc28d35c
commit r14-6038-gff9efa3fc48baa1dee7ed376c25ecfcfbc28d35c
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9715c545d33b3a32ddc1ae817ba9356ade1fb9df
commit r14-6037-g9715c545d33b3a32ddc1ae817ba9356ade1fb9df
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532
commit r14-6034-g4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55e94561e97ed0bce4774aa1c6b5d5d82209a379
commit r14-6033-g55e94561e97ed0bce4774aa1c6b5d5d82209a379
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532
commit r14-6034-g4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55e94561e97ed0bce4774aa1c6b5d5d82209a379
commit r14-6033-g55e94561e97ed0bce4774aa1c6b5d5d82209a379
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3db94d9fd07681f8806dae93d555779ff4dfb1
commit r14-6032-g2c3db94d9fd07681f8806dae93d555779ff4dfb1
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3db94d9fd07681f8806dae93d555779ff4dfb1
commit r14-6032-g2c3db94d9fd07681f8806dae93d555779ff4dfb1
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112776
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112776
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Lehua Ding :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:923a67f17badcbe6e2b2e5d3570a265443258c8e
commit r14-6027-g923a67f17badcbe6e2b2e5d3570a265443258c8e
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Fri Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112778
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56746
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56746&action=edit
Delta reduced testcase
This one is slightly less reduced than the other one but this is a delta based
reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #18 from Julian Waters ---
Oops, I meant warning: 'no_reorder' attribute ignored [-Wattributes] in my
above comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #17 from Julian Waters ---
Looking at the source of the C++ parser it doesn't seem like asm (""); is
considered a statement but rather is correctly parsed as a declaration, see
cp_parser_block_declaration and cp_parser_declaration_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #16 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #15)
> Alright, this is a C++ issue and I mistakenly assumed it was C.
Note that in C++ we have some inconsistency with the standard. In the standard
asm(...) are "declarat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Attributes cannot be|Attributes cannot be
|app
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #14 from Xi Ruoyao ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Attributes cannot be|Attributes cannot be
|app
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112764
--- Comment #10 from martin ---
Thanks for the speedy fix! I just thought about a variation, which should now
with the fix work as well (was not yet able to compile current dev branch, so
cannot check myself):
program assoc_ptr_in
implicit no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105118
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|SUSPENDED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Juniper/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112803
Bug ID: 112803
Summary: : to(Args&&... args) is missing Mandates
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #12 from Julian Waters ---
Will do, will save the new attribute for gcc 15 and just fix the attribute
specifier sequence here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56744|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112786
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Pet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112802
Bug ID: 112802
Summary: : _ToClosure::operator() has no constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
e.g. r[8 * 2] is r[16] and 16 >= 16 :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> Created attachment 56744 [details]
> reduced.ii
Note this reduced testcase has undefined code in it ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56744
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56744&action=edit
reduced.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112801
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
Known issue for a long time.
I realized that 2 years ago:
https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain/issues/1075
when I developed the first version of RVV GCC (rvv-next).
I don't think it is seriou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112801
Bug ID: 112801
Summary: [14] RISC-V vector: failure to mask top bits during
type conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773
--- Comment #7 from JuzheZhong ---
Here is the compiler explorer for reference and easily see the issue:
https://godbolt.org/z/8v1dsKG3f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773
--- Comment #6 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #3)
> I see. I didn't reproduce the ICE since I didn't enable gcc_assert_checking.
>
> Could you tell me how to enable it ?
I didn't explicitly enable checking. The f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773
--- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong ---
Besides, the mask type is:
vector([4,4])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773
--- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
After reproducing the ICE.
I confirm the root cause is because we enable vec_extract for mask:
;; -
;; This extracts a bit (via QImode)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
I see. I didn't reproduce the ICE since I didn't enable gcc_assert_checking.
Could you tell me how to enable it ?
I hack the codes as follows:
diff --git a/gcc/poly-int.h b/gcc/poly-int.h
index 828714ee910.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112640
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112798
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
See also:
rv64gcv_zve64d: pr112797
rv64gcv_zve32f: pr112798
rv32gcv_zve64d: pr112799
rv32gcv_zve32f: pr112800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112799
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
See also:
rv64gcv_zve64d: pr112797
rv64gcv_zve32f: pr112798
rv32gcv_zve64d: pr112799
rv32gcv_zve32f: pr112800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112800
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
See also:
rv64gcv_zve64d: pr112797
rv64gcv_zve32f: pr112798
rv32gcv_zve64d: pr112799
rv32gcv_zve32f: pr112800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112797
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
See also:
rv64gcv_zve64d: pr112797
rv64gcv_zve32f: pr112798
rv32gcv_zve64d: pr112799
rv32gcv_zve32f: pr112800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112800
Bug ID: 112800
Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve32f
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112799
Bug ID: 112799
Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv32gcv_zve64d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112798
Bug ID: 112798
Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve32f
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112797
Bug ID: 112797
Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zve64d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795
--- Comment #1 from Magnus Hokland Hegdahl ---
Full output:
// Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
// Configured with: /build/gcc/src/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=ada,c,c++,d,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-bootstrap
--prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112796
Bug ID: 112796
Summary: header implicitly includes
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
URL: https://godbolt.org/z/Pra17xczj
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795
Bug ID: 112795
Summary: [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n)
cxx_eval_constant_expression
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112794
Bug ID: 112794
Summary: [contracts] modifying return value fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
With s/__builtin_ctzs/__builtin_ctzg/ and `-O3 -march=skylake-avx512`, I can
reproduce it with an unmodified trunk GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Does gentoo has a patch which adds __builtin_ctzs ?
No, nothing like that. Here's what this one was built with:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gcc-patches.git/tree/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does gentoo has a patch which adds __builtin_ctzs ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm __builtin_ctzs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
Bug ID: 112793
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal
compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at
tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #30 from Sam James ---
afaik the best we have so far is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112613#c0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this was exposed by r14-3350-g47b833a9abe19d which changed the original IR
From:
_4 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_3, { -1 }, { 0 }>;
_5 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(_4);
_6 = _5 == { 0 };
_7 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_6, { -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|pinskia at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #7 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Veclower -O0 produces
c.0_6 = c_5(D);
_2 = (__int128 unsigned) c.0_6;
_1 = {_2};
_10 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<__int128 unsigned>(v_7(D));
_11 = _10 >= _2; // 1 true
_12 = (int128_t) _11; // 1
_13 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725c68c54c265fe7f6fc7babff7139f3161bdfa6
commit r14-6024-g725c68c54c265fe7f6fc7babff7139f3161bdfa6
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112792
Bug ID: 112792
Summary: -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds seen on Linux kernel with
certain unions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112791
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112698
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
OK, I can follow that reasoning. It's still a breaking change for everyone that
was using int up to this point. I guess the argument is that using int was
wrong in the first place and it just happened
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112764
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112791
Bug ID: 112791
Summary: error: 'TYPE_CANONICAL' is not compatible
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff96ddf43bcfe5c37a85118a68dcac87ce33c8d9
commit r13-8111-gff96ddf43bcfe5c37a85118a68dcac87ce33c8d9
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112764
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd5d399fc16ebe7a1a2b13ae8cb888d619af695c
commit r13-8110-gdd5d399fc16ebe7a1a2b13ae8cb888d619af695c
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
So just for future reference __builtin_c[lt]zs is for short.
But with GCC 14 (trunk) added __builtin_ct[lt]g, there is no need to add
__builtin_c[lt]zs to GCC.
You could just do:
#if __has_builtin(__built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112790
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112790
Bug ID: 112790
Summary: -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in
Linux kernel due to inlining
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #29 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28)
> So, what is the state here? Andrew, are you going to post the #c18 patch?
> Do we have a reduced testcase?
I was hoping someone else would take over since th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, what is the state here? Andrew, are you going to post the #c18 patch?
Do we have a reduced testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also clang does not even document __builtin_ctzs anywhere ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112772
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
