[Bug debug/112703] [13/14 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112703 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug preprocessor/112701] wrong type inference for ternary operator with `0/0u` in preprocessing context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112701 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Heh, I didn't know ?: is valid as preprocessor conditional.

[Bug c/112720] New: ICE: Segmentation fault during IPA pass: tmipa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112720 Bug ID: 112720 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault during IPA pass: tmipa Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/110062] missed vectorization in graphicsmagick

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110062 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #11) > trunk -O3 -flto -march=native -fopenmp > Operation: Sharpen: > 257 > 256 > 256 > > Average: 256 Iterations Per Minute > GCC13 -

[Bug ipa/110334] [13/14 Regresssion] unused functions not eliminated before LTO streaming

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #26) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20) > > Unfortunately there isn't a knob to diagnose late inlined always-inline > > functions. > > Is there a separ

[Bug middle-end/112653] PTA should handle correctly escape information of values returned by a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112653 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/112653] PTA should handle correctly escape information of values returned by a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112653 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112653 > > --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- > On ARM32 and other targets methods returns

[Bug target/112719] New: [14 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 with -O -msse4 and __builtin_popcountl()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112719 Bug ID: 112719 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 with -O -msse4 and __builtin_popcountl() Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/112718] New: [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.cc:4501 with -g -fdebug-types-section -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112718 Bug ID: 112718 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.cc:4501 with -g -fdebug-types-section -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin Product: gcc

[Bug target/107844] error: argument is not a field access for __builtin_preserve_field_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107844 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112675] [14 Regression] r14-5385-g0a140730c97087 caused regression on testcases for i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112675 Haochen Jiang changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/112689] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-[237].c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112689 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Wait -3 was caused by g:41aacdea55c5d795a7aa195357d966645845d00e : https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638207.html So maybe all 3 were.

[Bug target/112598] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl512b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598 --- Comment #10 from Li Pan --- Link to one similar issue as below. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110237

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 --- Comment #7 from Christopher Fore --- Created attachment 56691 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56691&action=edit build log of the original compile

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Fore --- The original example in the wild was with -mcpu=7450 -O2 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -pipe, plus the flags the build system added, then I minimised it to the attachment above, where I only needed: -O3 -ffast-

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Fore --- It's a PowerPC 7447A and the assembler version is: GNU assembler version 2.40.0 (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) using BFD version (Gentoo 2.40 p5) 2.40.0

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 HaoChen Gui changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug gcov-profile/112717] .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- My suggestion is only do profiling build right before release. And never store the files in a repo at all. Any changes to the source base will cause the profile to be wrong. Maybe do it as part of a CI inst

[Bug gcov-profile/112717] .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Zaitsev --- > I thought this was documented but I don't see. There is no guarantee for > forward or backwards compatibility at all. In fact iirc there is a version > stored in the files to make sure the correct ve

[Bug gcov-profile/112717] .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug gcov-profile/112717] .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I thought this was documented but I don't see. There is no guarantee for forward or backwards compatibility at all. In fact iirc there is a version stored in the files to make sure the correct version is use

[Bug gcov-profile/112717] New: .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717 Bug ID: 112717 Summary: .gcda profiles compatibility guarantees between GCC versions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/112454] csinc (csel is though) is not being used when there is matches twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112454 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- So it looks like this is not only a cost issue. I have to look into forwprop to see if it can handle this. Note the cost issue does need to be fixed anyways since it will be needed there; otherwise forwprop

[Bug tree-optimization/112661] [14] RISC-V ICE: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025 with maxval_char_3.f90 vlen256b since r14-5101-g60034ecf25597b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112661 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/111601] [14 Regression] profilebootstrap fails in stagestrain in libcody on x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111601 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- With the above commands, r14-4258 ICEs in libcody build, r14-4650 builds ok, r14-4846, r14-5043, r14-5829 ICE during the PCH libstdc++ compilation, will continue bisecting that.

[Bug fortran/100651] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Bad handling of optional, allocatable character argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #12) > Created attachment 56690 [details] > Draft patch Regtests cleanly btw.

[Bug fortran/100651] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Bad handling of optional, allocatable character argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.1,

[Bug fortran/100651] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Bad handling of optional, allocatable character argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 56690 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56690&action=edit Draft patch Very rough patch that fixes this PR and also pr93762. Need more thorough testing.

[Bug fortran/90608] Inline non-scalar minloc/maxloc calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608 --- Comment #17 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #16) > This missed the gcc stage 1 deadline, but I'm still working on it. I always thought that the Fortran FE does not fall under this rule. Why don't you

[Bug fortran/111880] [11/12/13/14] False positive warning of obsolescent COMMON block with Fortran submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9d029ba2ceb435e31492c1f3f0fd3edf0e386be commit r14-5859-gc9d029ba2ceb435e31492c1f3f0fd3edf0e386be Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug fortran/90608] Inline non-scalar minloc/maxloc calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug lto/112716] LTO optimization with struct of variable ssize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- No warning from -Wlto-type-mismatch.

[Bug lto/112716] LTO optimization with struct of variable ssize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug lto/112716] LTO optimization with struct of variable ssize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug lto/112716] New: LTO optimization with struct of variable ssize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716 Bug ID: 112716 Summary: LTO optimization with struct of variable ssize Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: l

[Bug target/112712] Crash when compiling g++ -m68020-60 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112712 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/91029] missed optimization regarding value of modulo operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/106326] _m and _z version of SVE instrinsics not optimized to predicate-free version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106326 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec84a1e7a18f65858a1b129ff80cb32e64cf151b commit r14-5851-gec84a1e7a18f65858a1b129ff80cb32e64cf151b Author: Juzhe-Zhong Date: Sun Nov 26