https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111670
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111670
Bug ID: 111670
Summary: H8/300 SX uses incorrect code sequences
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111669
Bug ID: 111669
Summary: bogus -Wnonnull in conditionally executed code
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111282
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Note we will need to detect both `a & (b ^ ~a)` and `a & ~(a ^ b)` since a
> might be comparison too.
Well and that will handle:
```
int f0(int a, int b)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111654
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Summary|vrp2 (match and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111506
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> In our case the int64_t -> int32_t conversion is implementation defined when
> the source doesn't fit the target.
GCC doc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|vrp2 introduces invalid |vrp2 (match and simplify)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82335
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-02
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668
Bug ID: 111668
Summary: vrp2 introduces invalid wide Boolean values
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111050
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Francois Dumont
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6d26b141bf03a0348b51e4778c79d44dc760eed
commit r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a0348b51e4778c79d44dc760eed
Author: Tim Song
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111050
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Francois Dumont
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1be57348229666c54954f1e5937cae00e113f7f1
commit r12-9903-g1be57348229666c54954f1e5937cae00e113f7f1
Author: Tim Song
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111050
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Francois Dumont
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50ace1f8a784d08a72edb8cb4044101fdabcc072
commit r11-11028-g50ace1f8a784d08a72edb8cb4044101fdabcc072
Author: Tim Song
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> On x86_64 this seems to have started with r14-2852-gf5fb9ff2396fd4
I was expecting it was one of the loop splitting patches due to the ir changes
I saw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111647
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36887
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I installed gawk on the machine where it failed and the build works now. So
definitely mawk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111659
--- Comment #3 from Cristian Rodríguez ---
Example code that emits no warning (in case if there is of any interest)
curl -LO https://www.netlib.org/fp/dtoa.c
gcc-14 -Og -c -Warray-bounds -fstrict-flex-arrays -Werror=strict-flex-arrays
-DIEEE_8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111506
--- Comment #5 from Robin Dapp ---
Ah, thanks Joseph, so this at least means that we do not need
!flag_trapping_math here.
However, the vectorizer emulates the 64-bit integer to _Float16 conversion via
an intermediate int32_t and now the riscv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111667
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-02
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111667
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111667
Bug ID: 111667
Summary: [C++23] Implement P1132R8, out_ptr - a scalable output
pointer abstraction
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111665
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111666
Bug ID: 111666
Summary: [OpenMP] Fortran FE creates too many temporaries for
clauses / 'omp target'+'omp team' #teams/#threads
optimize_target_teams optimization fails
Prod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111665
Bug ID: 111665
Summary: internal compiler error: in
c_objc_common_truthvalue_conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janschultke at googlemail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111662
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111506
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Conversion from 64-bit integers for _Float16 is fully defined, it produces
the correctly rounded result according to the current rounding direction
(round-to-nearest may be assumed in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #22 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
>
> --- Comment #20 from Paul Eggert ---
> (In reply to jos...@codes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90400
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paboyle at ph dot ed.ac.uk
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91517
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109227
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56031
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56031&action=edit
More reduced testcase from the dup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redboltz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110913
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111644
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111649
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110951
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
The root cause of the problem was that we were moving files between containers
after the build before the testsuite run and forgot to preserve the symlinks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
Bug ID: 111664
Summary: [14 regression] error in gcc/opt-read.awk after
r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111235
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111235
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0731889c026bfe8d55c4851422ca5ec9d037f7a0
commit r14-4365-g0731889c026bfe8d55c4851422ca5ec9d037f7a0
Author: Wilco Dijkstra
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
For the sake of other potential readers: Patches should be submitted to
gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org and reviewers do not review patches in bugzilla.
Nevertheless, it is a good idea to add the link to the ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111654
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Julian Waters from comment #2)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
> Yeah, I did try submitting it to gcc-patches, but it simply went ignored for
> forever, so I decided to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111663
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Proposed the change as
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/631790.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111663
Bug ID: 111663
Summary: profiledbootstrap fails on master:
gcc/genmodes.cc:2152:1: error:
‘gcc/build/genmodes.gcda’ profile count data file not
found [-Werror=miss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111662
--- Comment #2 from Jan Schultke ---
Bug was originally discovered here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77214665/problem-creating-template-function-alias-with-const-value-template-arguments/77215223#77215223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111662
--- Comment #1 from Jan Schultke ---
See https://godbolt.org/z/Kaf7jETaY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111662
Bug ID: 111662
Summary: Rejects valid: cv-qualifiers are not removed from
function parameters of variadic templated function
types
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
Eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
--- Comment #69 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19610580d49f3d2d8d511fba55b39efa0764dfc2
commit r14-4361-g19610580d49f3d2d8d511fba55b39efa0764dfc2
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111661
Bug ID: 111661
Summary: [OpenACC] Detach+Attach of DT component gives libgomp:
[0x405140,96] is not mapped
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111654
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
It would be worth mentioning that then.
Anyway:
*
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/cap2b4gmq7btqtequuuok7ojt8p3kdbdvpudrmo_nt95wumw...@mail.gmail.com/
*
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/cap2b4gm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111654
--- Comment #2 from Julian Waters ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
> (In reply to Julian Waters from comment #0)
> > Created attachment 56022 [details]
> > Patch to add invalid-noreturn to gcc
>
> Patches should be submitte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111654
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111657
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
I have tried to compile with -mtune=nocona that has:
static stringop_algs nocona_memcpy[2] = {
{libcall, {{12, loop_1_byte, false}, {-1, rep_prefix_4_byte, false}}},
{libcall, {{32, loop, false}, {2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111657
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111651
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note it is not designated initializers which is causing the issue but rather a
vector strings initialized from an array.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110913
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110913
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56029
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56029&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110913
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yunus at ayar dot eu
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111651
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56028
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56028&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111506
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment
73 matches
Mail list logo
