https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111392
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111392
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04b2fb5bb644f172879a02e8374ad50b669e3d6d
commit r14-4167-g04b2fb5bb644f172879a02e8374ad50b669e3d6d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90293
--- Comment #4 from Zev Weiss ---
I have no idea about the relative ease of implementation, but might it at least
partially suffice for the compiler to propagate the information provided by
__builtin_expect() beyond the expression it appears in?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111488
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Lehua Ding :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d024a31a09d18d2586769602205a60ff3afe568c
commit r14-4166-gd024a31a09d18d2586769602205a60ff3afe568c
Author: Lehua Ding
Date: Wed Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111409
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80048aa13a6b55d2be485000840a4e1c8b57d8e7
commit r14-4165-g80048aa13a6b55d2be485000840a4e1c8b57d8e7
Author: Omar Sandoval
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111486
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |MOVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111464
--- Comment #3 from John Wehle ---
Originally I simply eyeballed the gcc 13.2 source code, however I have
since then duplicated the problem using gcc 13.2. The compiler bootstraps
fine, however building gdb fails while linking in the same fashi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111490
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.3.0, 13.2.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111490
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55946
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55946&action=edit
Reduced testcase
This is as far as reduced testcase as I could get it without invoking undefined
behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482
--- Comment #7 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
This is caused by missing to check a vr's "undefine_p".
In the pattern "(X + C) / N",
(if (exact_mod (c)
...
&& range_op_handler (PLUS_EXPR).overflow_free_p (vr0, vr1)
...)
(plus (op @0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482
--- Comment #6 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
I reproduced these issue PR11148 and PR111355 on ppc64le too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111492
Bug ID: 111492
Summary: RISC-V: Dynamic LMUL picking incorrect LMUL
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482
--- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Thanks a lot for reporting this!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111491
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111491
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111490
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |ipa
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111491
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55945
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55945&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111491
Bug ID: 111491
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110071
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Surya Kumari Jangala
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:677249a23243b5b51832611767366d6eb199bdc7
commit r14-4162-g677249a23243b5b51832611767366d6eb199bdc7
Author: Surya Kumari Jang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111490
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55943
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55943&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111490
Bug ID: 111490
Summary: Segmentation fault with '-O3 -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce
-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-sink'
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55941
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55941&action=edit
testcase for easier access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
159 -> 58: one_pred = NOT (iftmp.32_490 != 0)
((NOT (iftmp.32_490 != 0)))
After normalization [USE]:
_419 = (int) pg_version_168;
is conditional on:
((NOT (iftmp.32_490 != 0)))
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
Bug ID: 111489
Summary: Incorrect "-Wmaybe-uninitialized" warning from GCC
13.2.0
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111488
--- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Thanks for filing the PR Robin!
More info about the testsuite failures on the mailing list:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/92113a4b-eba7-c63c-9ee3-f11be30d9...@rivosinc.com/
CI listing the new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111488
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111488
Bug ID: 111488
Summary: ICE ion riscv gcc.dg/vect/vect-126.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-09-19
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111487
Bug ID: 111487
Summary: (a OP CST1) & (a == CST0) could be simplified down to
(CST OP CST1) & (a == CST0)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111461
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111461
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick O'Neill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b554c559d0103bfc1a68777907945ec3035a2bd
commit r14-4154-g5b554c559d0103bfc1a68777907945ec3035a2bd
Author: Patrick O'Neill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96809
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95215
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.1, 12.3.1
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51820
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109873
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
that commit looks to have just exposed it though as designed, the issue was
latent before I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] ICE when|[14 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
ith-as=/usr/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-as --disable-multilib
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-4143-20230919174842-gd2f53a601a2-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-riscv64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20230919 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108143
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108143
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81d5ca0b9b8431f1bd7a5ec8a2c94f04bb0cf032
commit r14-4149-g81d5ca0b9b8431f1bd7a5ec8a2c94f04bb0cf032
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111485
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0, 12.3.0, 13.2.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15acabb80f91b12836bcf4ffcb92ea10fe4e8272
commit r14-4147-g15acabb80f91b12836bcf4ffcb92ea10fe4e8272
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The ICE was fixed by r14-4140-g6851e3423c2b5e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111485
Bug ID: 111485
Summary: Constraint mismatch on template template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80454
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
To fix this, we have to somehow propagate the flag constructor_zeroinit up in
pop_init_level.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111484
Bug ID: 111484
Summary: bogus "error: inconsistent deduction for auto return
type" in if-constexpr branches
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 55937
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55937&action=edit
partially reduced C++ source code
After an hour of reduction, I have the attached C++ file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111367
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@the-meissners.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111483
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-09-19
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111471
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111483
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55936
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55936&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111483
Bug ID: 111483
Summary: ICE in to_sreal, at profile-count.cc:472
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
K
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20230919 (experimental) (GCC)
[512] %
[512] % gcctk -O1 small.c
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:3:23: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
3 | return b ? 1 << --b / 0 : 0;
| ^
during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111377
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111377
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2f53a601a23925b795ac162f7936163c3461b2c
commit r14-4143-gd2f53a601a23925b795ac162f7936163c3461b2c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482
Bug ID: 111482
Summary: ice in lower_bound with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #4)
> > Since r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471 bootstrap fails on s390 with
> >
> > /devel/gcc/bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111367
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> > There really should be a comment why one alternative needs the %U{n} and the
> > other can
> > ignore it, btw. Nothing new there, but a head-scratcher :-)
>
> OK, something like: "prefixed load/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111395
Jeremy Bennett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111391
Jeremy Bennett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93917
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
Note a slight change in expectation as a result of commit
r14-4141-gbf6b107e2a342319b3787ec960fc8014ef3aff91 for PR 110080
Due to a memory load in the second case, we do not remove the unreachable call
now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110249
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110080
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111481
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org ---
A fix for the Ada issue is to link with the classic linker:
$ gnatmake hello -largs -Wl,-ld_classic
gcc -c hello.adb
gnatbind -x hello.ali
gnatlink hello.ali -Wl,-ld_classic
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111481
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
The -macosx_version_min issue appears to have been resolved in GCC 14.0.0
20230820.
The Ada linking issue remains.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110249
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf6b107e2a342319b3787ec960fc8014ef3aff91
commit r14-4141-gbf6b107e2a342319b3787ec960fc8014ef3aff91
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110080
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf6b107e2a342319b3787ec960fc8014ef3aff91
commit r14-4141-gbf6b107e2a342319b3787ec960fc8014ef3aff91
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111481
Bug ID: 111481
Summary: MacOS, linker issues with Xcode 15
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #4)
> Since r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471 bootstrap fails on s390 with
>
> /devel/gcc/build/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/devel/gcc/build/./prev-gcc/
> -B/devel/gcc/ds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111480
Bug ID: 111480
Summary: new test case g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111458
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> This issue is still latent in the forward threader. The backward threader
> calls this function from back_threader_profitability::profitable_path_p,
> so bef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
cvise just finished for me, `gcc -c util.i -O3`:
```
int ruby_strtod_c, ruby_strtod_nd;
double ruby_strtod_rv_0;
void ruby_strtod() {
int i, nz, z;
if (ruby_strtod_nd) {
nz = 0;
goto have_dig;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefansf at linux dot ibm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108143
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55773|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111468
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Fixed on trunk.
Sweet. Thanks so much. This really helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478
--- Comment #1 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
see also bug 111479
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111479
Bug ID: 111479
Summary: [12/13 regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in
compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:248
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478
Bug ID: 111478
Summary: [12/13/14 regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in
compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:250
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111477
Bug ID: 111477
Summary: Procedure as actual argument fails against procedure
pointer dummy argument
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111468
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f25960b03834712f312d46fed9a021df36f89f22
commit r14-4139-gf25960b03834712f312d46fed9a021df36f89f22
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111419
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b510b83aad52adf94d52a6ae3a3b332946e947a1
commit r14-4138-gb510b83aad52adf94d52a6ae3a3b332946e947a1
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 55932
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55932&action=edit
Define std::ranges::to for C++23 (P1206R7)
Untested patch for the additions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
RTL documents no specific behavior for 'div' but says 'ss_div' "ensures that an
out-of-bounds result saturates to the maximum or minimum signed value".
I'm not sure we want target specific semantics for th
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo