https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51
Bug ID: 51
Summary: [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O0 on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> duplicate of PR28?
Yes. Fixed in this morning's compiler, that has your fix for that
bug in it.
Also, the git range I specified contains the same probab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-25
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50
Bug ID: 50
Summary: (vec CMP vec) != (vec CMP vec) should just produce
(vec CMP vec) ^ (vec CMP vec)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111064
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
The loop is like
doublefoo (double* a, unsigned* b, double* c, int n)
{
double sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i != n; i++)
{
sum += a[i] * c[b[i]];
}
return sum;
}
After disab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
Hi, Richi.
It faild at RISC-V scatter store cases:
When trying to generate gimple build:
...
.MASK_LEN_SCATTER_STORE (vectp_y.28_130, { 0, 2, 4, ... }, 1, vect__25.27_127,
mask__26.20_117, _135, 0);
...
ICE
On 2023-08-25 03:06, libreknight wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I have come across erroneous behavior whilst comparing optimizations
> performed by different compilers. Said behavior persists through
> different versions of GCC and flags. The output from GCC is incorrect
> and diverges from all compilers
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 8:06 PM libreknight via Gcc-bugs
wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> I have come across erroneous behavior whilst comparing optimizations
> performed by different compilers. Said behavior persists through
> different versions of GCC and flags. The output from GCC is incorrect
> and d
Greetings.
I have come across erroneous behavior whilst comparing optimizations
performed by different compilers. Said behavior persists through
different versions of GCC and flags. The output from GCC is incorrect
and diverges from all compilers.
In order to reproduce aforementioned behavior, co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Summary|bool0 !=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49
Bug ID: 49
Summary: bool0 != bool1 should be convert into bool0 ^ bool1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhanc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48
Bug ID: 48
Summary: Missing boolean optimizations due to comparisons
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhanceme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-25
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47
Bug ID: 47
Summary: bitwise_inverted_equal_p can be used in the `(x | y) &
(~x ^ y)` pattern to catch more
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
Bug ID: 46
Summary: Some patterns in match.pd are no longer needed
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8)
> > patch posted
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628231.html
>
> Yay! I stand re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27
Hongyu Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb791011b39813bc7b6fdd0d9831247ace199615
commit r13-7758-gbb791011b39813bc7b6fdd0d9831247ace199615
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e62fe74e5af913079ba296c74759cd74c0759e8e
commit r14-3473-ge62fe74e5af913079ba296c74759cd74c0759e8e
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date: Thu A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to john.harper from comment #5)
Thanks John, I had a moment to look at this. I know where to do the
implementation but I have not decided how yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
> I see, we can add an alternative like "noavx2,avx2" to generate
> vmaskmovps/pd when avx2 is not available for integer.
It's better to change assmeble output as
27423 if (TARGET_AVX2)
27424return "vma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110823
--- Comment #5 from Paul Eggert ---
Also see bug 43 for a related performance issue, which is perhaps more
important given the current state of bleeding-edge GNU diffutils.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80770
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
For aarch64 we get this from combine:
```
Trying 8, 10 -> 12:
8: r92:SI=r96:QI#0&0x1
10: r93:SI=r92:SI^0x1
REG_DEAD r92:SI
12: zero_extract(r99:QI#0,0x1,0)=r93:SI
REG_DEAD r93:SI
Failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105369
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
See also bug 6906 and bug 57612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35095
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45
Bug ID: 45
Summary: istream::operator>>(streambuf*) does not set gcount
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think we should improve the toplevel configure to error out if including
errno.h fails.
So instead of:
```
echo "int main () { return 0; }" > conftest.c
```
We should do:
```
echo "#include " > c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
See e.g.:
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/PRE31-C.+Avoid+side+effects+in+arguments+to+unsafe+macros
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10593492/catching-assert-with-side-effects
cppcheck:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
Bug ID: 44
Summary: RFE: could -fanalyzer warn about assertions that have
side effects?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #6 from Zebediah Figura ---
(In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/5969976.Bvae8NF9fS@polaris/
>
> Again, I'm not sure what you're try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94866
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94866
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dd73f0f00f454a05552b008a1d56560bd3f1d4a
commit r14-3471-g6dd73f0f00f454a05552b008a1d56560bd3f1d4a
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
_22 = *iter_57;
if (_22 >= 0)
goto ; [90.00%]
else
goto ; [10.00%]
[local count: 860067200]:
_76 = (long long unsigned int) _22;
_15 = sum_31 + _76;
goto ; [100.00%]
...
[local cou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Looks like you don't have the 32-bit headers installed. See
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#gnu_stubs-32.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But I don't know why -fno-deduce-init-list only affects the diagnostic for one
of the function templates.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43
--- Comment #2 from Paul Eggert ---
Created attachment 55790
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55790&action=edit
asm code that's 38% faster on my platform
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43
--- Comment #1 from Paul Eggert ---
Created attachment 55789
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55789&action=edit
asm code generated by gcc -O2 -S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think r0-112851-g15694fdd6d84db changed the diagnostic by making
-fno-deduce-init-list the default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43
Bug ID: 43
Summary: [missed optimization] unlikely code slows down
diffutils x86-64 ASCII processing
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss ---
This is fairly new, something after 4aa14ec7d5b25722e4d02c29c8c1e22dcc5a4915
("MATCH: [PR09] Fix bit_ior(cond,cond) when comparisons are fp") may have
caused this, since I was able to build mesa just 12 h
;action=edit
compressed unreduced testcase
gcc version 14.0.0 20230824 (experimental)
721f7e2c4e5eed645593258624dd91e6c39f3bd2
g++ -m32 -O2 -march=znver4 -c gcc-14-mesa-aco-ice.ii
during GIMPLE pass: vect
../mesa-/src/amd/compiler/aco_insert_waitcnt.cpp: In function 'void
aco::insert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41
Bug ID: 41
Summary: Compiling gcc-13.2.0 on Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS, problem
asm-generic/errno.h
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-08-24 00:00:00 |
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
Bug ID: 40
Summary: wrong error message
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.5.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39
palmer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-24
Ever confirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39
Bug ID: 39
Summary: RISC-V: improve scalar constants cost model
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong code at -O2/3 since |[12/13/14 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38
Bug ID: 38
Summary: views::zip_transform is underconstrained for empty
range pack
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #15 from Manuel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37
Bug ID: 37
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3 since r12-1000-g6924b5e6bd3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110973
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fkastl at suse dot cz,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #8 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Confirmed. All the failures I reported are fixed in trunk. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jose E. Marchesi :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:721f7e2c4e5eed645593258624dd91e6c39f3bd2
commit r14-3470-g721f7e2c4e5eed645593258624dd91e6c39f3bd2
Author: Jose E. Marchesi
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Hohmann ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
I see. I did not think about the possibility of inlining functions. Could you
elaborate how this would affect the proposed goal? Naively I would assume that
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8)
> patch posted
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628231.html
Yay! I stand ready to revert my ugly cover-up.
I'll even give the posted pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36
Bug ID: 36
Summary: ICE in RISC-V test case since r14-3441-ga1558e9ad85693
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111096
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #7)
> Would it make sense to document this somewhere? Or did I just miss it? :-)
Possibly, but I've no idea where. It's too target-specific to put under the
gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105899
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbdc0e0d0042ae16aa4d09ceb52c71e746d9139d
commit r14-3469-gbbdc0e0d0042ae16aa4d09ceb52c71e746d9139d
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105899
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46cb27e56f36f23cb277f8a5beae05235af05768
commit r14-3467-g46cb27e56f36f23cb277f8a5beae05235af05768
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105899
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bad0eeb5573e52c4b7b51546ecffcb17f46eda3
commit r14-3468-g2bad0eeb5573e52c4b7b51546ecffcb17f46eda3
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105899
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d99d73c77d1e9cca5938134b4e6e068945cf50b1
commit r14-3466-gd99d73c77d1e9cca5938134b4e6e068945cf50b1
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105899
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:603bdf906af6d42ce0dabee86efc1e0aec0f1900
commit r14-3464-g603bdf906af6d42ce0dabee86efc1e0aec0f1900
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105899
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ae07a7203dd24f90e49d025046e61ef90a9fd18
commit r14-3463-g0ae07a7203dd24f90e49d025046e61ef90a9fd18
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105899
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ef89c5c2f52a2c47fd26845d1f73e20b9081fc9
commit r14-3462-g5ef89c5c2f52a2c47fd26845d1f73e20b9081fc9
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35
Bug ID: 35
Summary: Add ECF_MALLOC for BUILT_IN_GOMP_ALLOC
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110339
Bug 110339 depends on bug 110354, which changed state.
Bug 110354 Summary: [C++26] P2587R3 to_string or not to_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110354
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110357
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589
Peter Frost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at pfrost dot me
--- Comment #14 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Bug 44209 depends on bug 106537, which changed state.
Bug 106537 Summary: GCC doesn't support -W[no-]compare-distinct-pointer-types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
Jose E. Marchesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110034
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Thank you for providing the test case.
To be honest I don't see why assigning to hr3 to r134 is better.
Currently we have the following assignments:
hr9->r134; hr3->r173; hr3->r124
and the related pref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
Bug ID: 34
Summary: Sections for static data declared in functions with
section attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abf915193fbf725bb359e6936e10dcc282eb94cc
commit r14-3460-gabf915193fbf725bb359e6936e10dcc282eb94cc
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33
Bug ID: 33
Summary: SLP of scatters not implemented
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97807
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
I can reproduce this, but only with -mfloat-abi=soft.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Bug ID: 32
Summary: Function redeclaration in local scope breaks constant
expression evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/577577.html for the
attempt to move x86 to the internal-fn representation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=02
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7564fe98657ad5ede34bd08f5279778fa8698865
commit r14-3458-g7564fe98657ad5ede34bd08f5279778fa8698865
Author: Paul Dreik
Date: Th
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
