https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110836
--- Comment #2 from Andris Pavenis ---
Warning would allow to detected problem earlier.
Otherwise it could only be detected later in case when affected structure or
class is part of an library and its objects are not created directly inside the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stevenxia990430 at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110837
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-28
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110837
Bug ID: 110837
Summary: ICE on non-friend default operator overloading
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110833
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|14% capacita -O2 regression |[14 Regression] 14%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110836
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|g++ shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110827
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > I'm seeing all code properly instrumented. The coverage I see is
>
> > 1: 27:task foo() {
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110836
Bug ID: 110836
Summary: g++ should report when there is no way to create
structure or class
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110835
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > Which might mean it is an issue in LLVM too ...
>
> Yes the same runtime regression shows up between clang 15 an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110835
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-fsanitize=address causes |[13/14 Regression]
|s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110835
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Which might mean it is an issue in LLVM too ...
Yes the same runtime regression shows up between clang 15 and clang 16. This
should reported upstream to them to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110835
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110835
--- Comment #1 from Ed Catmur ---
Motivation is
https://github.com/boostorg/exception/blob/b039b4ea18ef752d0c1684b3f715ce493b778060/include/boost/exception/detail/exception_ptr.hpp#L550
; the half-reduced code is:
#include
struct S {};
int mai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110835
Bug ID: 110835
Summary: -fsanitize=address causes slowdown from
std::rethrow_exception not called
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
QR_001_July_23.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110788
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108121
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108121
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50fc6ce0cb8edf927ae6117a5484e4d8d52e393e
commit r13-7619-g50fc6ce0cb8edf927ae6117a5484e4d8d52e393e
Author: Gaius Mulley
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110788
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54e54f77c1012ab53126314181c51eaee146ad5d
commit r14-2833-g54e54f77c1012ab53126314181c51eaee146ad5d
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109986
--- Comment #5 from Ivan Sorokin ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> commit r14-2751-g2a3556376c69a1fb588dcf25225950575e42784f
> Author: Drew Ross
> Co-authored-by: Jakub Jelinek
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110782
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Faust :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14dab1a1bcc3f0315e33d166df06520fba409c9b
commit r14-2831-g14dab1a1bcc3f0315e33d166df06520fba409c9b
Author: David Faust
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110784
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Faust :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14dab1a1bcc3f0315e33d166df06520fba409c9b
commit r14-2831-g14dab1a1bcc3f0315e33d166df06520fba409c9b
Author: David Faust
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110834
Bug ID: 110834
Summary: Incorrect format-nonliteral warning when wrapping a
printf-family function using __builtin_va_arg_pack
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108835
--- Comment #9 from Gaius Mulley ---
This looks fixed from the commit trail - can this PR be closed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
It is really hard to make loop splitting to do something.
It does not like canonicalized invariant variables since loop exit condition
should not be NE_EXPR and it does not like when VRP turns LT/GT into NE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110824
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Denis Yaroshevskiy from comment #4)
> Appreciate it.
>
> I'm still going to support gcc11 for the forseable future. Is there some
> easy way you see I can confirm that this is this issue?
> So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109586
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2286745b12070320c8dcc5c75d76dd184cb7645e
commit r13-7616-g2286745b12070320c8dcc5c75d76dd184cb7645e
Author: Gaius Mulley
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110817
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a reduced testcase that does not need -mno-sse or any other option but
fails everywhere:
```
typedef unsigned __attribute__((__vector_size__ (1*sizeof(unsigned V;
V v;
unsigned char c;
int
main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110825
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also this one:
FAIL: gcc.dg/strcmpopt_5.c (internal compiler error: in to_gcov_type, at
profile-count.h:831)
FAIL: gcc.dg/strcmpopt_5.c (test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110833
Bug ID: 110833
Summary: gamess regression on Ice Lake with -Ofast
-march=native between g:1c6231c05bdccab3 (2023-07-21
03:06) and g:bbc1a102735c72e3 (2023-07-23 04:55)
Prod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110832
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
I tested that the profile change makes no difference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|roger at nextmovesoftware dot com |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701
--- Comment #7 from Roger Sayle ---
Patch proposed here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/625532.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
if (bb_loop_depth (best_bb) == bb_loop_depth (early_bb)
/* If result of comparsion is unknown, prefer EARLY_BB.
Thus use !(...>=..) rather than (...<...) */
- && !(best_bb->count * 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85944
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugbjorn at fahller dot se
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 110828, which changed state.
Bug 110828 Summary: union constexpr dtor not constexpr when used in member array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110828
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110755
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e684084a5fa9edaedb1a14e118b966a60e3449b9
commit r13-7615-ge684084a5fa9edaedb1a14e118b966a60e3449b9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110827
--- Comment #4 from Michael Duggan ---
I should be more explicit. The `std::cout` line in the example is just a
placeholder for "does some work here," and this example is specifically the
simplest version of a coroutine I could come up with tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110832
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
This time it seems that there is only one profile change:
commit 645c67f80c6258c1f54ec567f604008adbdb8a04
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Wed Jul 26 08:59:23 2023 +0200
Fix profile_count::to_sreal_scale
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110832
Bug ID: 110832
Summary: 14% capacita -O2 regression between g:9fdbd7d6fa5e0a76
(2023-07-26 01:45) and g:ca912a39cccdd990 (2023-07-27
03:44) on zen3 and core
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831
Bug ID: 110831
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/stack-check-3.c ICEs after
r14-2822-g499b8079a6419b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
Hi,
I trust this email finds you well.
Our Organization hiring the best and the brightest talent in the industry. We
hire individuals with a strong sense of pride in their performance, team
spirit, and a desire to excel. To provide our clients with Professional,
Quality and value added service
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110828
--- Comment #2 from Björn Fahller ---
If I write it in the same way in a function, it compiles.
consteval auto f()
{
return S{}.f();
}
constexpr auto b = f();
However, if I break it into a constexpr object S s; and return s.f(), it does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71065
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:081e25d3cfd86c4094999ded0bbe99b91762013c
commit r14-2826-g081e25d3cfd86c4094999ded0bbe99b91762013c
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110725
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:081e25d3cfd86c4094999ded0bbe99b91762013c
commit r14-2826-g081e25d3cfd86c4094999ded0bbe99b91762013c
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110781
Jose E. Marchesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55642|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108046
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2022-12-10 00:00:00 |2023-07-27
--- Comment #4 from Jonath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108046
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50bc490c090cc95175e6068ed7438788d7fd7040
commit r14-2825-g50bc490c090cc95175e6068ed7438788d7fd7040
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172
--- Comment #52 from Shaohua Li ---
*** Bug 107257 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Shaohua Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110809
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e811edea309b2097e23cde48ee6fb6467a9094d
commit r13-7614-g8e811edea309b2097e23cde48ee6fb6467a9094d
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110828
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110827
--- Comment #3 from Michael Duggan ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I'm seeing all code properly instrumented. The coverage I see is
>
> -:1:#include
> -:2:#include
> -:3:
> -:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1c072a1c3411a6fe29900750b38210af8451eeb
commit r14-2821-gd1c072a1c3411a6fe29900750b38210af8451eeb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110788
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
> kmovw %edx, %k0
> vpbroadcastmw2d %k0, %xmm1
>
> instead of
>
> vpbroadcastw%edx, %xmm1
>
It's not vpbroadcastw, it's
movzwl %dx, %ecx
vpbroadcastd%ecx, %xmm0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92335
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 64031, which changed state.
Bug 64031 Summary: (un-)conditional execution state is not preserved by PRE/sink
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64031
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54056
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110197
--- Comment #8 from Matt Godbolt ---
Fantastic: thanks everyone!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110197
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a426b91b27e28985f47d16827a532fbc28c09bd7
commit r14-2820-ga426b91b27e28985f47d16827a532fbc28c09bd7
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110197
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110830
Bug ID: 110830
Summary: -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false negative
due to use-after-free::supercedes_p.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17)
> Interestingly even with -mno-sse we somehow have a shift for V2QImode.
This is implemented by a combination of shl rl,cl and shl rh,cl, so no XMM
registers are n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110788
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #0)
> I suppose it could also be a missed optimization in REE since I think
> the HImode regs should already be zero-extended?
No, only SImode moves have implicit zero
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Interestingly even with -mno-sse we somehow have a shift for V2QImode. When
a scalar shift by precision is in the IL (for example via veclower) then
it's CCPs bit value tracking that makes it zero, if that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109814
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #10)
> (In reply to lesto fante from comment #9)
> > In pure freestanding, I would expect smart pointer and at least parts cmath
> > to work; the compiler offer m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79700
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110766
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110829
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00c806ea70406e6e67170e51095533dcb8a20cf8
commit r13-7613-g00c806ea70406e6e67170e51095533dcb8a20cf8
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110829
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41482832ad0aeaa0e4ae2f8d2beff17023cd00bf
commit r14-2816-g41482832ad0aeaa0e4ae2f8d2beff17023cd00bf
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110799
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:064a4ec9d7107c8278a759cb61dc161548c846ee
commit r13-7612-g064a4ec9d7107c8278a759cb61dc161548c846ee
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110766
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7004272e9b16e801eb856a991930d81e9c501532
commit r13-7611-g7004272e9b16e801eb856a991930d81e9c501532
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110829
Bug ID: 110829
Summary: [13/14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr56837.c
scan-tree-dump-times optimized "memset ..c, 68,
16384.;" 1
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110824
--- Comment #4 from Denis Yaroshevskiy ---
Appreciate it.
I'm still going to support gcc11 for the forseable future. Is there some easy
way you see I can confirm that this is this issue?
So that I don't create more duplicates?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110524
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 110824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110824
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110828
Bug ID: 110828
Summary: union constexpr dtor not constexpr when used in member
array
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109927
--- Comment #22 from Sam James ---
Thanks for your help.
We've had this in production since 26th May and no complaints (but a lot of
happy customers who couldn't build 12 or earlier 13 versions):
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gcc-patches.git/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110755
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #13 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110725
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #11 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110640
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #15 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110269
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109685
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Neumann ---
> GCC 13.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 13.3.
the bug should be closed as fixed, the bug fix is already in the 13.2 branch.
(I do not have permissions to do that, though).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110251
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo