[Bug target/110776] [14 Regression] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken after r14-2490 with ICE rs6000.cc:5069 building libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776 --- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > I think apart from the consideration what a single element vector > is compared to a scalar, a more to-

[Bug c++/110798] New: The reusult of sizeof operator followed with an 'unsigned typedef-ed generic integer' type is alway 4 bytes（except char）

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110798 Bug ID: 110798 Summary: The reusult of sizeof operator followed with an 'unsigned typedef-ed generic integer' type is alway 4 bytes（except char） Product: gcc Ver

[Bug target/110776] [14 Regression] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken after r14-2490 with ICE rs6000.cc:5069 building libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776 > > Kewen Lin changed: > >What|Removed |Added > -

[Bug c++/110797] New: GCC rejects std::template same_as form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110797 Bug ID: 110797 Summary: GCC rejects std::template same_as form Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/110776] [14 Regression] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken after r14-2490 with ICE rs6000.cc:5069 building libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-darwin |powerpc-darwin, |

[Bug target/110776] [14 Regression] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken after r14-2490 with ICE rs6000.cc:5069 building libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug target/103605] [PowerPC] fmin/fmax should be inlined always with xsmindp/xsmaxdp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54ce3cbd285d453b954c281bb3ad38bee2f65330 commit r14-2758-g54ce3cbd285d453b954c281bb3ad38bee2f65330 Author: Haochen Gui Date: Tue J

[Bug modula2/110174] Using illegal constraints for builtin return_address gives ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110174 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4637cbed3f23095b98962b41063380c4ab9eda9 commit r14-2757-gc4637cbed3f23095b98962b41063380c4ab9eda9 Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Tue

[Bug tree-optimization/93044] extra cast is not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93044 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/625379.html

[Bug target/110796] builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thanks for the quick response! (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Does pr91323.c fail on arm? No, all its tests pass: PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O0 (test for excess errors) PAS

[Bug target/110796] builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does pr91323.c fail on arm?

[Bug middle-end/110796] New: builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796 Bug ID: 110796 Summary: builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/110795] Bad code gen for vector compare booleans

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110795 --- Comment #2 from Steven Munroe --- Also fails with gcc11/12. Also fails with Advance Toolchain 10.0 GCC 6.4.1. It might fail for all version between GCC 6 and 13.

[Bug target/110795] Bad code gen for vector compare booleans

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110795 --- Comment #1 from Steven Munroe --- Created attachment 55627 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55627&action=edit Main and unit-test. When compiled and linked with vec_divide.c will verify if the divide code is correct or not

[Bug c/110795] New: Bad code gen for vector compare booleans

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110795 Bug ID: 110795 Summary: Bad code gen for vector compare booleans Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/71065] Missing diagnostic for statements between OpenMP 'target' and 'teams'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71065 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e31fe431b08b0302e1fa8a1c18ee51adafd41df commit r14-2754-g2e31fe431b08b0302e1fa8a1c18ee51adafd41df Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Mo

[Bug fortran/110725] [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.cc:10897

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110725 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e31fe431b08b0302e1fa8a1c18ee51adafd41df commit r14-2754-g2e31fe431b08b0302e1fa8a1c18ee51adafd41df Author: Tobias Burnus Date: M

[Bug libstdc++/110653] Support std::stoi etc. without C99 APIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31c3b67dfc6e67773d13260bc38b833663698b74 commit r14-2753-g31c3b67dfc6e67773d13260bc38b833663698b74 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug modula2/110174] Using illegal constraints for builtin return_address gives ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110174 --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- Created attachment 55625 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55625&action=edit Proposed fix Here is a patch for gcc-14 which exhibits the same bug. Will apply to git once a full bootstrap h

[Bug tree-optimization/110794] New: FAIL: g++.dg/pr99966.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump-not vrp1 "throw"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110794 Bug ID: 110794 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/pr99966.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump-not vrp1 "throw" Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/110780] aarch64 NEON redundant displaced ld3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110780 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.or

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > Created attachment 55623 [details] > x86_64 testcase > > Here is a x86_64 testcase which shows the issue is not just with i686 but > also with int128 and x86_6

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55623 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55623&action=edit x86_64 testcase Here is a x86_64 testcase which shows the issue is not just with i686 but also with int128 and

[Bug tree-optimization/110755] [13/14 Regression] Wrong optimization of fabs on ppc64el at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110755 --- Comment #10 from Aurelien Jarno --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Created attachment 55616 [details] > gcc14-pr110755.patch > > Updated patch. Thanks. I have just tested it, and I confirm it fixes the reported issue.

[Bug libstdc++/70472] is_copy_constructible>>::value is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70472 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > Created attachment 55622 [details] > Reduced C testcase > > This reduces the previous testcase and forces the overlap ... Oh and changed it to be able to compi

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55620|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot com

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- When this is split: (insn 12 11 18 2 (set (reg:DI 0 ax [87]) (rotate:DI (mem:DI (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg:SI 0 ax [orig:89 x0 ] [89]) (const_int 8 [0x8])) (sy

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55621 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55621&action=edit almost reduced all the way

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55620 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55620&action=edit semi-reduced testcase Here is a reduced testcase which also fails on the trunk.

[Bug target/110792] [13 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- It seems like it is one of these which is causing the miscompile: const uint64_t s0 = WHIRL_S[get_byte<0>(x0)]; const uint64_t s1 = WHIRL_S[get_byte<1>(x1)]; const uint64_t s2 = WHIRL_S[get_byte<2>(

[Bug target/110792] [13 Regregression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.2 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/109938] ((a^c) & b) | a is not opimized to (b & c) | a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109938 Drew Ross changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drross at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug c/110789] Internal Compiler Error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110789 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lezoch --- I built a new gcc with --disable-avx2: bash-5.2# gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.2.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configure

[Bug middle-end/109986] missing fold (~a | b) ^ a => ~(a & b)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109986 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a3556376c69a1fb588dcf25225950575e42784f commit r14-2751-g2a3556376c69a1fb588dcf25225950575e42784f Author: Drew Ross Date: Mon J

[Bug middle-end/110791] [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110791 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|rtl-optimization

[Bug c/110789] Internal Compiler Error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110789 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lezoch --- I have a complete buildLog and there is NO  -march=native I'm just rebuilding now with --disable-avx2 Have to build on R9 because on Zeut gcc reports 'internal error' again !!! On 2023-07-24 11:04, ars

[Bug fortran/110725] [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.cc:10897

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110725 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/110793] regression in optimizing unused string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110793 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > For all optimization levels. I mean for all C++ standards.

[Bug ipa/110793] regression in optimizing unused string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110793 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Brad Richardson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||everythingfunctional@proton

[Bug ipa/110793] regression in optimizing unused string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110793 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Comp

[Bug rtl-optimization/110791] [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110791 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan --- Tha

[Bug c++/110793] regression in optimizing unused string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110793 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Barry Revzin from comment #0) > Notably, 13.1 C++20 and C++23 also compiles to just xor. > Probably because we don't use the extern template declarations for C++20.

[Bug c++/110793] New: regression in optimizing unused string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110793 Bug ID: 110793 Summary: regression in optimizing unused string Product: gcc Version: 13.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/110783] bpf; make sure of V4 signed division/modulus instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110783 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/110783] bpf; make sure of V4 signed division/modulus instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110783 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jose E. Marchesi : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4be3919fb75e3d2a4d2bb80ba33c14e0973bc08f commit r14-2749-g4be3919fb75e3d2a4d2bb80ba33c14e0973bc08f Author: Jose E. Marchesi Dat

[Bug target/110787] [14 regression] ICE building SYSTEM.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/110790] [14 Regression] gcc -m32 generates invalid bit test code on gmp-6.2.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110790 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/110791] [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110791 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.4 Keywords|

[Bug target/110792] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-07-24 Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/110791] [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110791 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Wi

[Bug target/110792] New: GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 Bug ID: 110792 Summary: GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/110790] [14 Regression] gcc -m32 generates invalid bit test code on gmp-6.2.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110790 --- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich --- The change fixed `gmp` and `mpfr` test suites on `i686-linux` for me. And also a `grep` testsuite on `x86_64-linux`. Thank you!

[Bug target/110787] [14 regression] ICE building SYSTEM.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110787 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f66753ef48f37729a88735ae1a2bf2d2558e69f commit r14-2743-g9f66753ef48f37729a88735ae1a2bf2d2558e69f Author: Roger Sayle Date: Mon J

[Bug target/110790] [14 Regression] gcc -m32 generates invalid bit test code on gmp-6.2.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110790 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f66753ef48f37729a88735ae1a2bf2d2558e69f commit r14-2743-g9f66753ef48f37729a88735ae1a2bf2d2558e69f Author: Roger Sayle Date: Mon J

[Bug rtl-optimization/110791] [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110791 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug rtl-optimization/110791] [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110791 --- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1) > Isn't this a UB? > > while (p >= path && *p != '/') > p--; > > This will cause p to become "&main::path[0] - 1". C23 6.5.6p9: In this case, with the input gi

[Bug rtl-optimization/110791] [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110791 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/110791] New: [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110791 Bug ID: 110791 Summary: [12/13/14 Regression] arm: Wrong code with -Os -march=armv8.1-m.main Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/110783] bpf; make sure of V4 signed division/modulus instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110783 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at g

[Bug target/110790] [14 Regression] gcc -m32 generates invalid bit test code on gmp-6.2.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110790 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot com

[Bug target/110790] New: [14 Regression] gcc -m32 generates invalid bit test code on gmp-6.2.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110790 Bug ID: 110790 Summary: [14 Regression] gcc -m32 generates invalid bit test code on gmp-6.2.1 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/110787] [14 regression] ICE building SYSTEM.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110787 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle --- > I'm bootstrapping with --enable-languages=all to investigate what's going on. > I'll revert the patch once I (or anyone) can confirm that this r

[Bug target/110787] [14 regression] ICE building SYSTEM.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110787 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot com --- Co

[Bug target/110786] bpf: make use of the V4 byte swap instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110786 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/110789] Internal Compiler Error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110789 Arsen Arsenović changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/110786] bpf: make use of the V4 byte swap instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110786 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jose E. Marchesi : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1e34551e4d6e259ab3bd0c9aba4fa1f0c448214 commit r14-2741-gf1e34551e4d6e259ab3bd0c9aba4fa1f0c448214 Author: Jose E. Marchesi Dat

[Bug c/110789] Internal Compiler Error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110789 Peter Lezoch changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55617|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/110789] Internal Compiler Error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110789 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug jit/100096] libgccjit.so.0: Cannot write-enable text segment: Permission denied on NetBSD 9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100096 --- Comment #30 from Sascha Wilde --- Anything else I should test?

[Bug target/107199] AVX512 fully masked loop vectorization needs extract_last pattern for vectorization of live variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #1

[Bug c/110789] New: Internal Compiler Error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110789 Bug ID: 110789 Summary: Internal Compiler Error: Illegal instruction Product: gcc Version: og12 (devel/omp/gcc-12) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/110788] New: Spilling to mask register for GPR vec_duplicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110788 Bug ID: 110788 Summary: Spilling to mask register for GPR vec_duplicate Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 107093, which changed state. Bug 107093 Summary: AVX512 mask operations not simplified in fully masked loop https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107093 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/107093] AVX512 mask operations not simplified in fully masked loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107093 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/110787] [14 regression] ICE building SYSTEM.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110787 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I am also seeing go failures.

[Bug target/110787] [14 regression] ICE building SYSTEM.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110787 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug target/110787] New: [14 regression] ICE building SYSTEM.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110787 Bug ID: 110787 Summary: [14 regression] ICE building SYSTEM.def Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/110777] [14 Regression] ice: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/110766] [13 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in gimple_phi_arg_def_from_edge, at gimple.h:4699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110766 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] ICE on |[13 Regression] ICE on

[Bug tree-optimization/110766] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in gimple_phi_arg_def_from_edge, at gimple.h:4699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110766 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb132cdfb204bc12851eb1d5852eef6f03c13af3 commit r14-2737-gfb132cdfb204bc12851eb1d5852eef6f03c13af3 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/110777] [14 Regression] ice: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50b5feaa94c26d01fed13f1119f025ae2bc75d2b commit r14-2738-g50b5feaa94c26d01fed13f1119f025ae2bc75d2b Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/110755] [13/14 Regression] Wrong optimization of fabs on ppc64el at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110755 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55594|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/110755] [13/14 Regression] Wrong optimization of fabs on ppc64el at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110755 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Actually looking at IEEE754, the fix should be limited to +- operations, not +-*/. Because only for +- IEEE754 has: "When the sum of two operands with opposite signs (or the difference of two operands with l