https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110769
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110766
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d07504725973ccdec78929a09dc13e5ebd9472f6
commit r14-2736-gd07504725973ccdec78929a09dc13e5ebd9472f6
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jul 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
>
> --- Comment #20 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108626
--- Comment #9 from Jiang An ---
See also CWG2753.
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2753.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104095
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #2 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110786
Jose E. Marchesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110785
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110786
Bug ID: 110786
Summary: bpf: make use of the V4 byte swap instructions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110785
Bug ID: 110785
Summary: Incorrect return type deduction for const auto with no
return statement
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110784
Bug ID: 110784
Summary: bpf: make use of the V4 sign-extended move
instructions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110783
Bug ID: 110783
Summary: bpf; make sure of V4 signed division/modulus
instructions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110782
Bug ID: 110782
Summary: bpf: make use of the V4 sign-extended load
instructions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110781
Bug ID: 110781
Summary: bpf: make use of the V4 long-range jump instruction
(jal/gotol)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110780
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nate at thatsmathematics dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Compile the following with gcc 14.0.0 20230723 on aarch64 with -O3:
#include
void CSI2toBE12(uint8_t* pCSI2, uint8_t* pBE, uint8_t* pCSI2LineEnd)
{
while (pCSI2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110779
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110779
Bug ID: 110779
Summary: SysClock can not read the clock
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98433
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #8 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110699
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.4|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72825
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109598
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110699
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110750
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
... but it *does not* FAIL in my powerpc64le testing with Nvidia Tesla V100
(but *does* FAIL with powerpc64le Nvidia Quadro GV100 in the same way as it
does for x86_64 originally reported here).
27 matches
Mail list logo