https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109591
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #4 from Rich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #47 from rusty at rustcorp dot com.au ---
Civility please.
We're all trying to find a path to improve things here. But accept that the
conversation on this issue is only a weak indication of consensus.
As Andrew Pinski says "people
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109566
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #3)
> I get this error also for -mcpu=power3, ..., -mcpu=power10.
I get the ICE only in 32-bit mode, the 64-bit mode works:
powerpc-rtems6-gcc -O2 -mcpu=power10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109566
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|powerpc: unrecognizable |powerpc: unrecognizable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101096
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109592
--- Comment #2 from Feng Wang ---
(In reply to Feng Wang from comment #1)
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I have modified some code according to your suggestion.
> In simplify-rtx.cc I add below part in canonicalize_shift:
> if ((code == ASHIFTRT)
>
Hello friend,
This is Lin from China Guangdong rijinsheng hardware products co., LTD(Dongguan
sunrise hardware products co., LTD). We have been specializing in the
production of fastener froming tools for 15 years.
Our screw molds offer top-quality materials and reliable durability, with fast
de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108812
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af55b56c748b86a2c7e88c3c484dcb2c8602ce7a
commit r11-10650-gaf55b56c748b86a2c7e88c3c484dcb2c8602ce7a
Author: Haochen Gui
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109592
Feng Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wangfeng at eswincomputing dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109011
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8311c26757657fe8ffa28ca1539d02d141bb8292
commit r14-182-g8311c26757657fe8ffa28ca1539d02d141bb8292
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109602
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Second who sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the first place.
Third these I thought was only done for maintenance mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109602
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 99% sure this patch is not portable at all. In that not all env supports
--unset.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109602
Bug ID: 109602
Summary: Import Gentoo msgfmt patch ?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #46 from Andrew Church ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #45)
> But there is no general agreement at all. If clang behavior agreed with gcc,
> then there would be consensus here. In fact gcc behavior is older than clang
> be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #45 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Church from comment #44)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #43)
> > That is not the consensus, no. "Consensus" does not mean doing what the
> > unthinking masses shout.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #44 from Andrew Church ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #43)
> That is not the consensus, no. "Consensus" does not mean doing what the
> unthinking masses shout.
Merriam-Webster disagrees:
con.sen.sus
1 a: general ag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109476
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #43 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Andrew Church from comment #40)
> My rationale for changing the default behavior is that the wider community
> consensus, as evidenced by things like the C++ (and C2x) [[nodiscard]]
> speci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109500
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61615
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62a4f2fb356cab8cfebfeeac2895b657c32b8dd4
commit r12-9467-g62a4f2fb356cab8cfebfeeac2895b657c32b8dd4
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99982
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62a4f2fb356cab8cfebfeeac2895b657c32b8dd4
commit r12-9467-g62a4f2fb356cab8cfebfeeac2895b657c32b8dd4
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108010
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:767d85d69f3d3f718f2a294f8e03be3a8aa65c4b
commit r12-9466-g767d85d69f3d3f718f2a294f8e03be3a8aa65c4b
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109601
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
jump2 (which is after RA) does this for aarch64:
Forwarding edge 2->3 to 5 failed.
verify found no changes in insn with uid = 11.
Edge 2->4 redirected to 5
scanning new insn with uid = 47.
Replacing insn 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109601
Bug ID: 109601
Summary: Useless branch not eliminated when writing to a union
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99195
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b13c59c835f92b353ef318398e39907cdeec4fa
commit r14-178-g3b13c59c835f92b353ef318398e39907cdeec4fa
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105753
--- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to User99627 from comment #14)
> (In reply to fiesh from comment #13)
> > * While you failed to provide anything meaningful to the bug report (your
> > code snippet is not self-contained valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109600
--- Comment #3 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
Broken binary packages are still in repo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109600
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109600
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109600
Bug ID: 109600
Summary: 13.0.1-0.15.fc39: missing #include
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109593
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5830953a446959c5d8d9b569ffcd3e3bb16a06dc
commit r14-174-g5830953a446959c5d8d9b569ffcd3e3bb16a06dc
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109593
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109593
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #8)
> Does this fix the problem on the reporter's side?
Looks good to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109585
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Carla/sord miscompiled with |[10/11/12/13/14 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #42 from Andrew Church ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #41)
> Could you send it to the gcc-patches mailing list please? (Even if it is a
> PoC).
Sent as requested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109585
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94379
--- Comment #2 from Petr Skocik ---
Excellent!
For optional super extra coolness, this might work (and clang doesn't do this)
with statement expressions too so that statement expression-based macros could
be
marked warn_unused_result through it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109585
--- Comment #15 from Hector Martin ---
The prior repro was too complex and depended on other environmental stuff (some
other people couldn't repro it on arm64 either), so please ignore it. If the
reduced repro triggers the issue, it's the same b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #41 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Church from comment #40)
> Created attachment 54906 [details]
> POC patch to add -Wunused-result=strict
>
Could you send it to the gcc-patches mailing list please? (Even if it is a
PoC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109585
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109597
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
45 matches
Mail list logo