https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109011
--- Comment #19 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 54678
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54678&action=edit
gcc13-pr109011-3.patch
Fix an ICE when gimple_call_lhs (call_stmt) is NULL in
vect_recog_ctz_ffs_pattern, recog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] co_await
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109149
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55278
--- Comment #32 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does anyone understand the state of this bug report? Is the performance back up
in recent releases?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like this was fixed in GCC 12:
[local count: 344921666]:
# _30 = PHI <-1(12), 0(17)>
tbuf ={v} {CLOBBER(eol)};
return _30;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #68 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107630
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54676|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107630
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
--- Comment #42 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> Shorter testcase, compilable and to the point. We are not able to CSE
> the b1 && ... && b8 sequence because we produce control-flow for it
> during gimplific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107630
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
--- Comment #22 from Avi Kivity ---
This is wonderful, thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea4dd8f512979db247c54d6b41377bb73699bcd7
commit r13-6702-gea4dd8f512979db247c54d6b41377bb73699bcd7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea4dd8f512979db247c54d6b41377bb73699bcd7
commit r13-6702-gea4dd8f512979db247c54d6b41377bb73699bcd7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109097
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109097
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79aaba0a71f34ac1ac2c4cec907ff74740a6cf1a
commit r13-6701-g79aaba0a71f34ac1ac2c4cec907ff74740a6cf1a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109094
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79aaba0a71f34ac1ac2c4cec907ff74740a6cf1a
commit r13-6701-g79aaba0a71f34ac1ac2c4cec907ff74740a6cf1a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108933
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also note the arm fix will be very similar to what was done for aarch64 just I
have no way to test the change so I didn't implement it ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108933
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109151
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109151
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|sanitizer |c
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109151
Bug ID: 109151
Summary: UBsan misses a divide-by-zero
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f1711ef3486b0727ccf6b5aabddda5c7d986457
commit r13-6700-g8f1711ef3486b0727ccf6b5aabddda5c7d986457
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109150
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109150
Bug ID: 109150
Summary: std::fill should use __gnu_cxx::__is_scalar overloads
for all scalars
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106945
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82ca86233da61e868a91b6132191148230d56ab0
commit r12-9266-g82ca86233da61e868a91b6132191148230d56ab0
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104332
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21139744aff3a9cb751f046755abb02ece5b3dcf
commit r12-9265-g21139744aff3a9cb751f046755abb02ece5b3dcf
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6)
> ifort rejects this code, gfortran and cft compile but trigger the runtime
> abort, pgf90 compiles and runs without abort.
Actually that code has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109149
Bug ID: 109149
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr108950.c from
r12-9262-gf4e4108dd00508 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #9)
> Besides intrinsic types -> class(*), we should also check check
> type(t) -> ('class(t)' and 'class(*)')
I've opened pr109148 for related tests and i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109148
Bug ID: 109148
Summary: ICE with explicit-/assumed-size arrays and CLASS
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu ---
REG_EQUIV is added by IRA:
if (DF_REG_DEF_COUNT (regno) == 1
&& note
&& !rtx_varies_p (XEXP (note, 0), 0)
&& (!may_trap_or_fault_p (XEXP (note, 0))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #19)
> .DEFERRED_INIT has
>
> insn 259 261 297 4 (set (reg/f:DI 144)
> (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 19 frame)
> (const_int -32 [0xffe0]))) 241 {*lea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
Iain, do you want to attach your WIP here so someone else can finish it up? Or
do you expect to finish it within the next month?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
.DEFERRED_INIT has
insn 259 261 297 4 (set (reg/f:DI 144)
(plus:DI (reg/f:DI 19 frame)
(const_int -32 [0xffe0]))) 241 {*leadi}
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 19 fra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:901edd99b44976b3c2b13a7d525d9e315540186a
commit r13-6698-g901edd99b44976b3c2b13a7d525d9e315540186a
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109113
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 54674
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54674&action=edit
gcc13-pr109113-tests.patch
I started writing tests related to this PR before running into the above issue,
wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109113
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I can reproduce all the way down to gcc-4.7.4, gcc-4.6.4 doesn't support
-mcpu=niagara4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[10/11/12 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109050
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94af33aa4da07269cb4a6645da9f7ddf8d1bad69
commit r12-9264-g94af33aa4da07269cb4a6645da9f7ddf8d1bad69
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94af33aa4da07269cb4a6645da9f7ddf8d1bad69
commit r12-9264-g94af33aa4da07269cb4a6645da9f7ddf8d1bad69
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96059
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Which means that the following (untested) patch might be the correct fix:
diff --git a/gcc/ipa.cc b/gcc/ipa.cc
index 5c15b60a603..c2d94163dc2 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa.cc
+++ b/gcc/ipa.cc
@@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ wal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1ebe3f7f9c14e66df2ae56138c495cad33c7ee4
commit r12-9263-ga1ebe3f7f9c14e66df2ae56138c495cad33c7ee4
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be20dcc359bcc4677c5b9ce011d3cd7b4ce94a64
commit r13-6697-gbe20dcc359bcc4677c5b9ce011d3cd7b4ce94a64
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96059
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
...and Honza correctly guessed that it is ICF that merges the two functions
(virtual and non-virtual) and that is how we ended up in the situation that the
devirtualizing machinery returns a non-virtual funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96059
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #7)
> With -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mcpu=niagara4 a bisect between 9.5.0 (good) and
> 10.4.0 (bad) found
>
> 6271dd984d7f920d4fb17ad37af6a1f8e6b796dc is the first ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109083
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 54673
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54673&action=edit
first try
Another approach would be to treat the expressions as different for the
*_specializations hash table
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson ---
With -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mcpu=niagara4 a bisect between 9.5.0 (good) and
10.4.0 (bad) found
6271dd984d7f920d4fb17ad37af6a1f8e6b796dc is the first bad commit
commit 6271dd984d7f920d4fb17ad37af6a1f8e6b7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81323
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 109147 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109147
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109147
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81323
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or the ranger could do it itself, similarly to how it handles .ASSUME, but
without actually querying anything but the global range of the return value if
any. Though, doing that in the range means that we wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81313
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109147
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81323
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another testcase from a different PR:
__attribute__((noinline)) static int
foo (int a, int b)
{
return a == b;
}
int
bar (int a, int b)
{
return foo (a, b) != 0;
}
__attribute__((noinline)) static int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109147
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Isn't this a dup of bug 81323 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109147
Bug ID: 109147
Summary: Missing IPA-VRP for return values
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #34 from Svante Signell ---
This is incredible. Now Debian forgot to add the spilt-stack patch for GNU/Hurd
for gcc-13 (1:20230315-1). But it shouldn't be needed, it should have been
upstreamed a long time ago. The patch is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109116
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||107430
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
template
using data_type = decltype([](){return 1;}());
template
auto get_precision(T v) {
auto tmp = *(data_type *)&v;
return tmp;
}
Clang and MSVC accept this with C++20, though I'm not sure if it's re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson ---
With -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mcpu=niagara4 the ICE reproduces with gcc-10.4.0 but
not with gcc-9.5.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109146
--- Comment #1 from David Spickett ---
Correction. https://godbolt.org/z/fW5nsWE5e shows the issue when "!=" is used,
the previous link used "==" instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109146
Bug ID: 109146
Summary: Tail call prevention in frame-address.c is not correct
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105909
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Perhaps via 3.58 notification object:
https://docs.oasis-open.org/sarif/sarif/v2.1.0/os/sarif-v2.1.0-os.html#_Toc34317894
which: "describes a condition encountered during the execution of an analysis
tool wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109083
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We don't instantiate in that case, just look up a specialization which might be
or might not be later instantiated (which is when it is diagnosed).
One way to fix this would be to drop locations from the exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109135
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:35:41AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109135
>
> --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107396
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I currently have 2.36.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109072
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109083
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I wonder why we instantiate from unused_function (but don't diagnose) at all?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
Bug ID: 109145
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c from
r13-6624-geb337d28c32b1b fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109113
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And C++ ICEs on this starting with r8-4783-gd68ddd2b35078ab61f164b268b
(again, accepts the g case).
C++ used to ICE on
struct C i = { .e = { { .b = 0, .c = { 1 } }, f } };
since that revision but since r8-53
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
> readreal.mod requires the input file testnumber to be in the same directory as
> the executable invocation.
>
> Or manually create a text file c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109144
Bug ID: 109144
Summary: d: Closure fields don't get same alignment as local
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
--- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
readreal.mod requires the input file testnumber to be in the same directory as
the executable invocation.
Or manually create a text file containing:
cat << EOF > testnumber
12.3456
EOF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109113
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96164
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryan.burn at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68608, which changed state.
Bug 68608 Summary: [concepts] ICE with explicit class instantiation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68608
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68608
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
--- Comment #2 from steve02081504 ---
Created attachment 54672
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54672&action=edit
cpp file
Here's the pre-processed file you want,hope it helps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109130
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
I can't reproduce that. on a Neoverse-N1 I see between those two commits:
./bench-compare.sh 2fc55f51f99 bad177e8487
A 1457 files
D 0 files
M 0 files
Extracted 'loose/2fc55f51f99:2fc55f5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
--- Comment #6 from stu t ---
Thank you for looking into this! :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 regression] ICE |[11/12 regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ccbf162511b896672a72934c3cafd37a42d6438
commit r13-6692-g5ccbf162511b896672a72934c3cafd37a42d6438
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58538
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40c1352c5a4530350012d6a922435cf491663daa
commit r13-6694-g40c1352c5a4530350012d6a922435cf491663daa
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104107
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
commit r13-6693-g3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
commit r13-6693-g3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
commit r13-6693-g3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109143
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109143
Bug ID: 109143
Summary: PTA compile-time hog with many calls
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107453
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-15
Ever confirmed|0
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
