[Bug rtl-optimization/108681] [13 Regression] gcc hangs compiling opencv/channels_combine.cpp for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108681 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Target|

[Bug ipa/108679] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-02-06 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/108677] wrong vectorization (when copy constructor is present?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108677 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/108675] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/*printf.c when stdio.h includes definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108675 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- These tests are known to be a bit awkwardly implemented to check for optimizations done ... There might be a better way to provide definitions of fprintf, but is it possible to short-circuit those definiti

[Bug tree-optimization/108667] Spurious "may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108667 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Yes, having the original code as well would be nice.

[Bug analyzer/108661] [13 Regression] -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positive seen in haproxy's sink_rotate_file_backed_ring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108661 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug debug/108656] [12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2 -fno-ipa-pure-const -fno-tree-dce --param early-inlining-insns=0 since r12-5236

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108656 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- In general we avoid disallowing attribute combinations that at least in theory make sense. pure/const are about memory side-effects while returns_twice is about control flow, so in this regard I don't see

[Bug bootstrap/42566] Bootstrap fails in stage3 building the libstdc++ PCH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42566 Sergey Fedorov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vital.had at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/61638] "warning: multi-line comment" unclear and has false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61638 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jack Adrian Zappa from comment #9) > > Suggest fix is to either: > > 1. Change the phase where this warning/error/ignored is tested so that the > #pragma GCC diagnostic is honour

[Bug preprocessor/61638] "warning: multi-line comment" unclear and has false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61638 Jack Adrian Zappa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/108681] [13 Regression] gcc hangs compiling opencv/channels_combine.cpp for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108681 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Summary|gcc hangs compi

[Bug middle-end/108681] gcc hangs compiling opencv/channels_combine.cpp for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108681 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 54411 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54411&action=edit unreduced Testcase

[Bug c++/108681] New: gcc hangs compiling opencv/channels_combine.cpp for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108681 Bug ID: 108681 Summary: gcc hangs compiling opencv/channels_combine.cpp for aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug libstdc++/94810] std::cout segmentation fault in __attribute__((constructor)) function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94810 --- Comment #13 from Murugesan Nagarajan --- @Andrew, Thank you for updating current bug id: 94810 Old bug reported: On: Mon 27-Apr-2020 09:44:52 PM UTC Old Bug URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug c++/107461] [12/13 Regression] ambiguity error for friend with templated constexpr argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107461 --- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka --- hb-aat-layout.cc.i and the comment #9 test should be accepted on trunk again now, backport to the 12 branch to follow. The comment #7 testcase I think is invalid because GCC incorrectly accepts the substit

[Bug c++/107461] [12/13 Regression] ambiguity error for friend with templated constexpr argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107461 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31924665c86d47af6b1f22a74f594f2e1dc0ed2d commit r13-5707-g31924665c86d47af6b1f22a74f594f2e1dc0ed2d Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug other/108662] Cast between incompatible function types in libiberty/physmem.c under MinGW-W64/MSYS2 on Windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108662 --- Comment #1 from Jan Dubiec --- Created attachment 54410 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54410&action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug libstdc++/108672] [13 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H, _b.C, _c.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108672 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug fortran/108450] [12/13 Regression] ICE in sort_actual, at fortran/intrinsic.cc:4380 since r12-5793-g689407ef916503b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108450 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/108592] In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|

[Bug fortran/108592] In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d042f118798ae0648b45f97e63b0e5ab7c82c8ef commit r13-5705-gd042f118798ae0648b45f97e63b0e5ab7c82c8ef Author: Harald Anlauf Date: M

[Bug fortran/108450] [12/13 Regression] ICE in sort_actual, at fortran/intrinsic.cc:4380 since r12-5793-g689407ef916503b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108450 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32502d82a5b54ca5b8e524df9fcad851727dc54a commit r12-9108-g32502d82a5b54ca5b8e524df9fcad851727dc54a Author: Mikael Morin Da

[Bug fortran/108680] New: Wrong DTIO arguments with -fdefault-integer-8

if I combine gfortran `-fdefault-integer-8`. The behaviour is the same with the current git version as well as with GCC release 11.3, so the problem has been around for some time. $ /opt/gcc-git/bin/gfortran --version | head -n 1 GNU Fortran (GCC) 13.0.1 20230205 (experimental) $ /opt/g

[Bug tree-optimization/108677] wrong vectorization (when copy constructor is present?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108677 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Is the confusing part is the fmaddsub instruction?

[Bug fortran/108609] New test case gfortran.dg/pr108527.f90 in r13-5479-g22afa4947584c7 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e60e9124543fd002f3e6dad8172cff8aa1b24b3 commit r12-9107-g1e60e9124543fd002f3e6dad8172cff8aa1b24b3 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:511928102dc9fa3f9c377e01f9bfb605b4995a61 commit r12-9106-g511928102dc9fa3f9c377e01f9bfb605b4995a61 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug tree-optimization/108677] wrong vectorization (when copy constructor is present?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108677 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/108678] Windows on ARM64 platform target aarch64-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108678 --- Comment #2 from Brecht Sanders --- I would love to give it a go if only I knew where to add the support. I actually got a Windows on ARM device hoping I could figure it out, bit it looks I will need tome help. The "Unknown tune used in --

[Bug ipa/108679] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108679 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|--

[Bug fortran/108502] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.cc:1295

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.5 Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98 since r13-4394-g3832c6f7e672e76b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/108453] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:5361 since r6-3704-g2b3f52a2d0fb22ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b66a0f2fecb4dc1ac5960ff5d630ab8f672b4106 commit r10-11198-gb66a0f2fecb4dc1ac5960ff5d630ab8f672b4106 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/106209] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.cc:2132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106209 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b523b58690c84b04cc9695d2d652611beb6f28ca commit r10-11197-gb523b58690c84b04cc9695d2d652611beb6f28ca Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/108421] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108421 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:068fce9743ec9f3181c189cb8d03a982ca30eb7e commit r10-11194-g068fce9743ec9f3181c189cb8d03a982ca30eb7e Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4bb7751af090736fb4a3bd7278d7094f35e02e4 commit r10-11196-gd4bb7751af090736fb4a3bd7278d7094f35e02e4 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/108502] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.cc:1295

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108502 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c67d76171e87d3ce364400684a654712047058b1 commit r10-11195-gc67d76171e87d3ce364400684a654712047058b1 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98 since r13-4394-g3832c6f7e672e76b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b14dcf0c99fab065e11ec87984475580b649edeb commit r10-11193-gb14dcf0c99fab065e11ec87984475580b649edeb Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/108453] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:5361 since r6-3704-g2b3f52a2d0fb22ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:841e585ad936624f2d080512a9f6244b49e71969 commit r10-11192-g841e585ad936624f2d080512a9f6244b49e71969 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug target/108678] Windows on ARM64 platform target aarch64-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108678 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I have not seen anyone step up to patch GCC for aarch64-mingw yet. Most aarch64 developers don't use Windows at all. There is some support being worked on for aarch64 darwin (Mac OS) though.

[Bug target/108678] Windows on ARM64 platform target aarch64-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108678 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement See Also|

[Bug c/108679] New: ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108679 Bug ID: 108679 Summary: ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c/108678] New: Windows on ARM64 platform target aarch64-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108678 Bug ID: 108678 Summary: Windows on ARM64 platform target aarch64-w64-mingw32 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/108677] New: wrong vectorization (when copy constructor is present?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108677 Bug ID: 108677 Summary: wrong vectorization (when copy constructor is present?) Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/108676] template parameters are misprinted in function signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108676 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Sorokin --- I added a broken link to godbolt, here is a valid one: https://godbolt.org/z/EE5eezW1r

[Bug c++/108676] New: GCC prints function signature incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108676 Bug ID: 108676 Summary: GCC prints function signature incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++