[Bug tree-optimization/108199] Bitfields, unions and SRA and storage_order_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108199 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #5) > > In: > > > > _1 = src_6(D)->a; > > dst$val_9 = _1; > > _2 = BIT_FIELD_REF ; > > _3 = _2 & 64; > > i

[Bug rtl-optimization/108117] Wrong instruction scheduling on value coming from abnormal SSA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Monakov --- Draft patch for the sched1 issue: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/cf62c3ec-0a9e-275e-5efa-2689ff1f0...@ispras.ru/T/#m95238afa0f92daa0ba7f8651741089e7cfc03481

[Bug c++/108206] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in merge_default_template_args, at cp/decl.cc:1563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108206 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- > % g++-13 -c vph5xonf.cc > vph5xonf.cc:1:11: error: 'WrongType' has not been declared > 1 | template void foo (T1); > | ^ > vph5xonf.cc:2:11: error: 'WrongType' has not been de

[Bug c++/108206] New: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in merge_default_template_args, at cp/decl.cc:1563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108206 Bug ID: 108206 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in merge_default_template_args, at cp/decl.cc:1563 Product:

[Bug fortran/106731] ICE on automatic array of derived type with DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e76cd96950f49ce21246d44780e972d86b2bcdd commit r13-4862-g7e76cd96950f49ce21246d44780e972d86b2bcdd Author: Steve Kargl Date: Th

[Bug c++/108205] New: ICE following "unused parameter" in precondition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108205 Bug ID: 108205 Summary: ICE following "unused parameter" in precondition Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/106731] ICE on automatic array of derived type with DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8) > The simple patch does indeed fix the ICE at compile time. It also > regression tests cleanly. > > I am studying the results of running this test case to be sur

[Bug fortran/106731] ICE on automatic array of derived type with DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/107778] handle_contract_violation should reflect _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107778 --- Comment #10 from W E Brown --- > On Dec 22, 2022, at 6:51 PM, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107778 > > --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- > The master branch has been updated by

[Bug libstdc++/107792] Output of default contract violation handler could be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107792 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ec5fcb6fc79e5bcca23c3fecbaf09d4566cb1d5 commit r13-4861-g8ec5fcb6fc79e5bcca23c3fecbaf09d4566cb1d5 Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ Date:

[Bug libstdc++/107778] handle_contract_violation should reflect _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107778 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ec5fcb6fc79e5bcca23c3fecbaf09d4566cb1d5 commit r13-4861-g8ec5fcb6fc79e5bcca23c3fecbaf09d4566cb1d5 Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ Date:

[Bug c++/108204] pr84973-2.C fails with wrong error on mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108204 --- Comment #2 from nightstrike --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Try with -fno-ms-extensions or try -fms-extension on Linux. Hey, we have a winner! -fms-extension on Linux results in the bad error, and -fno-ms-extensions on mi

[Bug c++/108204] pr84973-2.C fails with wrong error on mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108204 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Try with -fno-ms-extensions or try -fms-extension on Linux.

[Bug c++/108204] New: pr84973-2.C fails with wrong error on mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108204 Bug ID: 108204 Summary: pr84973-2.C fails with wrong error on mingw Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/88322] Implement C++20 library features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322 Bug 88322 depends on bug 104166, which changed state. Bug 104166 Summary: Implement C++20 std::format https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104166 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libstdc++/104166] Implement C++20 std::format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104166 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/104167] Implement C++20 std::chrono::utc_clock, std::chrono::tzdb etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104167 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Time zones committed as r13-4853-g9fc61d45fa15fd Formatting committed as r13-4856-gf99b94865fa629 Still missing std::chrono::parse.

[Bug libstdc++/108200] std::format fails on AIX due to __float128 not being supported by std::to_chars for -maix64 -mlong-double-128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108200 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- And I've just added a few more at r13-4856-gf99b94865fa629 FAIL: 20_util/duration/io.cc (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: 20_util/duration/io.cc compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: std/time/

[Bug c++/108203] Format string checking with __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108203 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/105730] [12/13 Regression] Issue with commit - Allow std::condition_variable waits to be cancelled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105730 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee4af2ed0b7322884ec4ff537564683c3749b813 commit r13-4857-gee4af2ed0b7322884ec4ff537564683c3749b813 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug c++/108203] New: Format string checking with __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108203 Bug ID: 108203 Summary: Format string checking with __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libstdc++/108200] std::format fails on AIX due to __float128 not being supported by std::to_chars for -maix64 -mlong-double-128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108200 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|std::format fails on AIX|std::format fails on AIX

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:794af0d00b7086c9f0493f3a1aaac644e1fd50f6 commit r13-4851-g794af0d00b7086c9f0493f3a1aaac644e1fd50f6 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug libstdc++/108200] std::format fails on AIX due to __float128 not being supported by std::to_chars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108200 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid,

[Bug target/108189] anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 --- Comment #11 from James Hilliard --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The error is correct at least for C before C23. Can you clarify where exactly in the C23 specification that this will be allowed?

[Bug c/108201] Warning about conversion from unsigned int to unsigned int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ada/108202] New: [13 Regression] Many new acats fails on 32bit Darwin hosts.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108202 Bug ID: 108202 Summary: [13 Regression] Many new acats fails on 32bit Darwin hosts. Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/108201] New: Warning about conversion from unsigned int to unsigned int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108201 Bug ID: 108201 Summary: Warning about conversion from unsigned int to unsigned int Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/108199] Bitfields, unions and SRA and storage_order_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108199 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #5) > In: > > _1 = src_6(D)->a; > dst$val_9 = _1; > _2 = BIT_FIELD_REF ; > _3 = _2 & 64; > if (_3 != 0) There is only 2 accesses going on in the above IR

[Bug libstdc++/108200] New: std::format fails on AIX due to __float128 not being supported by std::to_chars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108200 Bug ID: 108200 Summary: std::format fails on AIX due to __float128 not being supported by std::to_chars Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c/108194] GCC won't treat two compatible function types as compatible if any of them (or both of them) is declared _Noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108194 --- Comment #6 from Petr Skocik --- (In reply to Petr Skocik from comment #5) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > > Invalid as mentioned in r13-3135-gfa258f6894801a . > > I believe it's still a bug for pre-c2x __typeof. > While it i

[Bug tree-optimization/108199] Bitfields, unions and SRA and storage_order_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108199 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel --- In: _1 = src_6(D)->a; dst$val_9 = _1; _2 = BIT_FIELD_REF ; _3 = _2 & 64; if (_3 != 0) src, dst and the BIT_FIELD_REF carry storage order flags which result in either bswaps being emitted or, in

[Bug middle-end/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 --- Comment #9 from Filip Rak --- Hello, I have no idea if this is important, but marking cplx_t constructors as constexpr causes that code can be successfully compiled. Best regards!

[Bug tree-optimization/108199] Bitfields, unions and SRA and storage_order_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-22 Summary|Bitfields

[Bug middle-end/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- verify_gimple_in_seq_2 could get the same worklist handling too.

[Bug tree-optimization/108199] Bitfields and storage_order_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108199 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel --- Moving the local definition of dst out of the function to global scope prevents the store from getting eliminated. union DST dst; As expected the store is still in the FRE dump: _1 = src_6(D)->a; ds

[Bug c++/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 54151 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54151&action=edit patch which should fix/improve -fno-checking case Note the formating on the code needs to be fixed but this sh

[Bug tree-optimization/108199] Bitfields and storage_order_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108199 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64 Build|

[Bug c++/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, |

[Bug tree-optimization/108199] Bitfields and storage_order_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108199 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel --- Created attachment 54150 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54150&action=edit Testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/108199] New: Bitfields and storage_order_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108199 Bug ID: 108199 Summary: Bitfields and storage_order_attribute Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optim

[Bug testsuite/107046] [13 Regression] Recent FP range work causing inf-2 to be miscompiled on rx-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107046 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yes. I should have changed the state on this BZ a few weeks back.

[Bug target/107609] ice in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 with _mm_prefetch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107609 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ice in extract_insn, at |ice in extract_insn, at

[Bug target/107609] ice in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107609 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/106515] [13 regression] gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-int-1.c fails after r13-1937-g5df04a7aa837a1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106515 --- Comment #6 from Jose E. Marchesi --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Fixed I assume. Yes indeed. Sorry about leaving all these bugs in the "open" state. Only recently I managed to get my bugzilla accounts consolidated in a

[Bug middle-end/106257] [13 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_unreachable, at builtins.cc:5189 since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106257 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > This got fixed since r8-6656-g6d3aa24cd6535dcf. > > This does not make sense since it only started at r13-1204-gd

[Bug middle-end/106257] [13 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_unreachable, at builtins.cc:5189 since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106257 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > This got fixed since r8-6656-g6d3aa24cd6535dcf. This does not make sense since it only started at r13-1204-gd68d366425369649 ...

[Bug c++/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 --- Comment #4 from Filip Rak --- This is Windows system, not Linux :(

[Bug bootstrap/106482] [12/13 Regression] bootstrap of 12.1.0 using 4.8.2 fails with C++ errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106482 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/106482] [12/13 Regression] bootstrap of 12.1.0 using 4.8.2 fails with C++ errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106482 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e09c1d71d23d4c17f035577b318b873960db1d8 commit r12-9009-g6e09c1d71d23d4c17f035577b318b873960db1d8 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug bootstrap/106482] [12/13 Regression] bootstrap of 12.1.0 using 4.8.2 fails with C++ errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106482 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b97c33fbd28e74a206c81c96a9b0b9fa3c8545d6 commit r13-4847-gb97c33fbd28e74a206c81c96a9b0b9fa3c8545d6 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug testsuite/106227] [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/loc-prune-4.C fails after r13-1506-g069f46c71e9432

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106227 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 106262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug testsuite/106262] [13 regression] test case g++.dg/modules/loc-prune-4.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106262 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/106363] [13 Regression] [modules] ICE using-declaration of imported name in the same namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106363 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/106482] [12/13 Regression] bootstrap of 12.1.0 using 4.8.2 fails with C++ errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106482 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/102222] ICE on s390 (internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- what's your ulimit -s ?

[Bug target/107609] ice in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107609 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/105832] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- With --param=max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=17 -O3 the call to 'foo' is gone since r8-910-g10bc8017a3028c29.

[Bug testsuite/106515] [13 regression] gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-int-1.c fails after r13-1937-g5df04a7aa837a1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106515 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106717] [13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in get_len, at tree.h:6247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106717 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/106982] [10/11 Regression][OpenACC] ICE incorrect sharing of tree nodes with nested reduction / .GOACC_REDUCTION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106982 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/106982] [10/11 Regression][OpenACC] ICE incorrect sharing of tree nodes with nested reduction / .GOACC_REDUCTION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106982 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.2.1 |12.2.0 Known to work|

[Bug sanitizer/106998] [10/11/12/13 Regression] libsanitizer PATH_MAX not defined for linux new targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106998 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Is this meanwhile resolved or upstream reported?

[Bug libgomp/107041] [13 Regression] C '-Wenum-int-mismatch' diagnostic for OpenACC 'acc_on_device'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107041 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Using a specific builtin enum type in builtins is indeed difficult.

[Bug testsuite/107046] [13 Regression] Recent FP range work causing inf-2 to be miscompiled on rx-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107046 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107114] [13 Regression] Failure to discover range results in bogus warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107114 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/107138] [12/13 regression] std::variant triggers false-positive 'may be used uninitialized' warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107138 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Last reconfirmed

[Bug testsuite/107220] [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-19.c fails after r13-3212-gb88adba751da63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107220 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/107809] gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107809 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/107809] gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107809 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4a320f1ee4c76f09f95bdc583b90a9b049bbba0 commit r13-4846-gd4a320f1ee4c76f09f95bdc583b90a9b049bbba0 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug testsuite/107809] gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107809 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- It looks like SPARC should support vec_perm with VIS2, but it's not clear whether that's enabled. The testcases definitely lack an effective target check for the required permute which is a whole vector sh

[Bug c++/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 --- Comment #2 from Filip Rak --- Hi :) Don't think so, it's 40GB RAM machine. Besides that - please look here: https://godbolt.org/z/W7cdvfqvY Best regards!

[Bug tree-optimization/105832] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > With r13-3897-gbe2c74fdcd0e8d66 get: > gcc pr105832.c -c -O3 -fdump-tree-optimized=/dev/stdout --param > max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=17 > > > ;; Function

[Bug modula2/108142] Many empty directories created in the build directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108142 --- Comment #6 from Gaius Mulley --- Created attachment 54149 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54149&action=edit m2 remove empty directories from top build (using mkinstalldirs) The same patch as before but now using mkinsta

[Bug c++/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-22 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/108197] [12/13 Regression] -Wstringop-overread emitted on simple boost small_vector code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108197 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|c++

[Bug c/108060] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBsan missed an out-of-bound bug at -O0 since r7-1900-g8a1b7b7fd75a3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/105832] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- W

[Bug modula2/108142] Many empty directories created in the build directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108142 --- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley --- Ah thanks, I'll change all uses of mkdir -p to $(mkinstalldirs).

[Bug ipa/80899] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Devirtualization causes incorrect code generation with placement new in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #18 from Martin Liška --- F

[Bug c++/108198] G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Host||x86_64-w64-mingw32 Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/108166] [12 Regression] Wrong code with -O2 since r12-8078-ga42aa68bf1ad745a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108166 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] Wrong|[12 Regression] Wrong code

[Bug middle-end/106257] [13 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_unreachable, at builtins.cc:5189 since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106257 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (

[Bug rtl-optimization/108193] [13 Regression] ICE in do_SUBST, at combine.cc:700

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108193 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/108166] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O2 since r12-8078-ga42aa68bf1ad745a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108166 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c17adfb5d08e34da7a7f234dfc2ed1f0aaadaa9 commit r13-4845-g5c17adfb5d08e34da7a7f234dfc2ed1f0aaadaa9 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug rtl-optimization/108193] [13 Regression] ICE in do_SUBST, at combine.cc:700

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108193 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cb5d7cdbab8e5f8359764ef5f62d93c2bc88552 commit r13-4844-g0cb5d7cdbab8e5f8359764ef5f62d93c2bc88552 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug libstdc++/104731] 27_io/filesystem/iterators/error_reporting.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104731 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d176d5b3e734cac0ab1e613c3f1bbe48c0bab81a commit r11-10434-gd176d5b3e734cac0ab1e613c3f1bbe48c0bab81a Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/107814] [10/11 regression] experimental/filesystem/iterators/error_reporting.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107814 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d176d5b3e734cac0ab1e613c3f1bbe48c0bab81a commit r11-10434-gd176d5b3e734cac0ab1e613c3f1bbe48c0bab81a Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug tree-optimization/108068] [10/11/12/13 Regression] decimal floating point signed zero is not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Created attachment 54147 > --> https://

[Bug c++/108198] New: G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 Bug ID: 108198 Summary: G++ fails to compile large 2D array initializer. Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/107451] [11/12 Regression] Segmentation fault with vectorized code since r11-6434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Summary|[11/12/13 Regr

[Bug tree-optimization/107451] [11/12/13 Regression] Segmentation fault with vectorized code since r11-6434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107451 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b2cf5041460859ca4f58e5da1308b7ef9129d8b commit r13-4843-g7b2cf5041460859ca4f58e5da1308b7ef9129d8b Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/108068] [10/11/12/13 Regression] decimal floating point signed zero is not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 54147 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54147&action=edit gcc13-pr108068.patch So like this instead? Untested so far.

[Bug tree-optimization/108068] [10/11/12/13 Regression] decimal floating point signed zero is not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 54146 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54146&action=edit gcc13-pr108068.patch Overnight I've successfully bootstrapped/regtested this, but given your comment that migh

[Bug c++/108197] New: -Wstringop-overread emitted on simple boost small_vector code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108197 Bug ID: 108197 Summary: -Wstringop-overread emitted on simple boost small_vector code Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug modula2/108142] Many empty directories created in the build directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108142 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think pretty much nothing but m2 uses mkdir -p directly, other makefiles use $(mkinstalldirs) (unless only a single directory needs to be created, for that mkdir dir is fine).