https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #3 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
For the sake of completeness, debian/ubuntu ships libgfortran.a (read, the
static library) from gfortran-11, so I can get this reproducer work if
compiling with -static-libgfortran.
I also manually r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #2 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
ubuntu does not ship libgfortran.so from gfortran-11.
I tried on a RedHat box, and the issue only occurs when
- I compile with gfortran-11
- *and* I force libgfortran-12
(so if i use the same gfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
Bug ID: 108056
Summary: backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104958
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
A C++ example with lamdbas which shows the same issue here (the IR is basically
the same):
int outer;
auto fn1(int val = 0){
return [&]{
outer = val; // invalid
};
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ozixtheorange at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104077
Bug 104077 depends on bug 106508, which changed state.
Bug 106508 Summary: Extra warnings with lambda captures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106508
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106508
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The first case you use default capturing as reference, therefor this will be
captured just fine.
The second case is similar to:
struct f1{int *a;};
struct f1 f(int t)
{
struct f1 t1 = {&t};
return t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae4438537fbc2ed04f3b0fb32d4e02b0ed6977a1
commit r13-4595-gae4438537fbc2ed04f3b0fb32d4e02b0ed6977a1
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-December/058613.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998
--- Comment #8 from James McKelvey ---
Okay I backed out the fix to t-cygwin-w64 and tried to build again with
--disable-multilib and stil got the "no dirname" error. So that fix is
definitely needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 07:37:06PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> (In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> > This patch prevents the ICE.
>
> The patch is mostly good, but does not set the errmsg vari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108052
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note clang also rejects the double case just as GCC does and accepts the int
case too.
MSVC accepts both the int and double case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108055
Bug ID: 108055
Summary: d: Undefined reference to nested lambda in template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108054
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Statement expressions are an extension after all. Gcc could define it any way
it wants.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108054
Bug ID: 108054
Summary: C2X auto with structs
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108053
Bug ID: 108053
Summary: std::visit_format_arg should hide __int128 and other
extensions behind a handle
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998
--- Comment #7 from James McKelvey ---
That fix let the build proceed until it hit a #error much later. See 108011.
Cygwin seems to be removing support for 32-bit, so although multilib has built
for years, it won't anymore. That's my take.
I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108052
Bug ID: 108052
Summary: forward-declared constexpr variable template unusable
in constexpr context
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108051
Bug ID: 108051
Summary: Missing array-bounds warning when not using -ftracer
flag
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Doesn't even need to be a template that's imported. Two or more overloadable
functions will trigger the ICE as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
Bug ID: 108050
Summary: d: internal compiler error: in visit, at
d/imports.cc:72
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to James McKelvey from comment #5)
> This works:
>
> $ diff gcc/config/i386/t-cygwin-w64~ gcc/config/i386/t-cygwin-w64
> 2c2
> < MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 64
> ---
> > MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 64 32
I gue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608262.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7676235f690e624b7ed41a22b22ce8ccfac1492f
commit r13-4594-g7676235f690e624b7ed41a22b22ce8ccfac1492f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108049
--- Comment #1 from Jens Seifert ---
Sample above got compiled with -march=z196
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108049
Bug ID: 108049
Summary: s390: Compiler adds extra zero extend after xoring 2
zero extended values
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108046
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107949
--- Comment #3 from Jens Seifert ---
*** Bug 108048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108048
Jens Seifert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108048
Bug ID: 108048
Summary: PPCLE: gcc does not recognize that lbzx does zero
extend
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #17)
> Please consider backporting
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99576, this is a subtle code
> generation bug.
Noted, that a back-port is needed, unfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 105373, which changed state.
Bug 105373 Summary: miscompile involving lambda coroutines and an object
bitwise copied instead of via the copy constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047
Bug ID: 108047
Summary: ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108046
Bug ID: 108046
Summary: The dot in the floating-point alternative form has
wrong position
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Miles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85952
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.3.0, 8.1.0
Target Milestone|---
44 matches
Mail list logo
