[Bug target/107581] ICE on sparc-leon-uclibc during go build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107581 --- Comment #3 from Marc Poulhiès --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #1) > This crash appears to be fairly deep in the middle-end. Nothing has changed > recently in the Go frontend. Has this crash just started appearing, or is > th

[Bug target/107581] ICE on sparc-leon-uclibc during go build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107581 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |12.2.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Bie

[Bug c++/107579] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.4 Keywords|

[Bug target/107585] [13 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2288 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107585 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target See Also|

[Bug rtl-optimization/107585] New: [13 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2288 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107585 Bug ID: 107585 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2288 at -O Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: norma

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 --- Comment #12 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- Richard has clarified here (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605386.html) that backporting is not required.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85099] [meta-bug] selective scheduling issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85099 Bug 85099 depends on bug 99347, which changed state. Bug 99347 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549 since r9-6859-g25eafae67f186cfa https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347

[Bug rtl-optimization/85410] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #5 from An

[Bug rtl-optimization/99347] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549 since r9-6859-g25eafae67f186cfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/105215] IA64: ICE on openssl-1.1.1n in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.cc:4549 -O3 -g3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105215 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This is not a dup of bug 85410 as there is no loop there.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85099] [meta-bug] selective scheduling issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85099 Bug 85099 depends on bug 101086, which changed state. Bug 101086 Summary: ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu with "-ftracer -fvar-tracking-assignments -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling -fschedule-insns": in create_block_for_bookk

[Bug rtl-optimization/101086] ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu with "-ftracer -fvar-tracking-assignments -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling -fschedule-insns": in create_block_for_book

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101086 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/85410] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/107538] std::pow(10, std::complex(NaN, 1)) aborts with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/107580] std::vector parameter cannot be inferred with -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107580 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug c++/107363] Wrong caret location for "redundant move in return statement" and nvo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107363 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/95414] Wrong debug info for argc at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95414 --- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang --- Hi, @Richard Biener I updated gcc to the latest trunk version and found that this bug seems have been fixed in the following trunk version. $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 13.0.0 20221107 (experimental) I was wond

[Bug c++/107363] Wrong caret location for "redundant move in return statement" and nvo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107363 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b305793b985f4d3e0032b04d446b8baabcb3e8b7 commit r13-3822-gb305793b985f4d3e0032b04d446b8baabcb3e8b7 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fr

[Bug target/107540] [13 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in memory_operand(rtx_def*, machine_mode) (recog.cc:1834) with -flive-range-shrinkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107540 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed in GCC13.

[Bug target/107540] [13 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in memory_operand(rtx_def*, machine_mode) (recog.cc:1834) with -flive-range-shrinkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107540 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:916bec9a05ea522c81381e0c93590d46965d9c7b commit r13-3821-g916bec9a05ea522c81381e0c93590d46965d9c7b Author: liuhongt Date: Mon Nov

[Bug c++/107584] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107584 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/107584] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107584 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > GCC 7 is not supported anymore and this doesn't crash with supported > versions. Also the reduced testcase started to be accepted in GCC 12.

[Bug c++/107584] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107584 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/107571] Missing fallthrough attribute diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107571 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote: > And looking at the C wording in n2596.pdf, seems it is different again: That's a very old version. N3054 is the most rec

[Bug c++/107584] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107584 --- Comment #2 from Viktor Shepel --- Created attachment 53857 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53857&action=edit testcase

[Bug c++/107584] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107584 --- Comment #1 from Viktor Shepel --- Hi Required items are below. #1. exact version of GCC 7.5.0 #2. system type $lsb_release -a Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS Release:18.04 Codename: bionic #3. optio

[Bug c++/107584] New: internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107584 Bug ID: 107584 Summary: internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3023 Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 --- Comment #54 from Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer --- Many thanks for finally fixing this!

[Bug c++/105221] [10/11/12/13 Regression] gcc rejects true ? [](auto) noexcept {} : [](int) {} in C++17+ (works for C++14)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105221 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc rejects true ? [](auto) |[10/11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug c++/105221] gcc rejects true ? [](auto) noexcept {} : [](int) {} in C++17+ (works for C++14)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105221 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||c++-lambda Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/105236] failed lookup of alias with alias template of dependent template parameter containing lambda in unevaluated context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105236 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||107430 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug target/107304] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.cc:220 with -march=tigerlake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed

[Bug analyzer/101962] Analyzer NULL false positive with pointer manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101962 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9bbcee450deb0f561b096924a3f148369333e54c commit r13-3819-g9bbcee450deb0f561b096924a3f148369333e54c Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug c++/107571] Missing fallthrough attribute diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107571 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/107583] New: Missing fixit for struct members (e.g. time_t, missing include)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107583 Bug ID: 107583 Summary: Missing fixit for struct members (e.g. time_t, missing include) Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/107571] Missing fallthrough attribute diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107571 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug c++/107571] Missing fallthrough attribute diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107571 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Apparently this is https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2406 which we probably never implemented.

[Bug target/107304] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.cc:220 with -march=tigerlake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb08940b30bd50c6e860bb8ac72d6f2ce7c1b25d commit r10-11076-gbb08940b30bd50c6e860bb8ac72d6f2ce7c1b25d Author: H.J. Lu Date: We

[Bug target/78643] [6 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78643 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb08940b30bd50c6e860bb8ac72d6f2ce7c1b25d commit r10-11076-gbb08940b30bd50c6e860bb8ac72d6f2ce7c1b25d Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed

[Bug libstdc++/107580] std::vector parameter cannot be inferred with -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107580 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is expected this is why there was a need for the new implementation of std::string and why there was a new ABI. the old std::string is not C++11 compatiable at all. I suspect this is a won't fix

[Bug target/107304] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.cc:220 with -march=tigerlake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304 --- Comment #25 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c97c6569c826731910459812e3608255962dab78 commit r11-10370-gc97c6569c826731910459812e3608255962dab78 Author: H.J. Lu Date: We

[Bug target/78643] [6 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78643 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c97c6569c826731910459812e3608255962dab78 commit r11-10370-gc97c6569c826731910459812e3608255962dab78 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed

[Bug analyzer/107582] - -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positive using pthread_cond_timedwait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107582 dimitri at ouroboros dot rocks changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #53852|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/78643] [6 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78643 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0138ebcd482c71f55d74eb9fa533fbb54a4391d6 commit r12-8899-g0138ebcd482c71f55d74eb9fa533fbb54a4391d6 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed

[Bug target/107304] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.cc:220 with -march=tigerlake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0138ebcd482c71f55d74eb9fa533fbb54a4391d6 commit r12-8899-g0138ebcd482c71f55d74eb9fa533fbb54a4391d6 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed

[Bug fortran/106731] ICE on automatic array of derived type with DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Commen

[Bug analyzer/107582] - -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positive using pthread_cond_timedwait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107582 --- Comment #2 from dimitri at ouroboros dot rocks --- I've run into a weird false positive for the analyzer that seems to only occur with pthread_cond_timedwait. Compile the test file using gcc -c -fanalyzer test_if_else_pthread.c This will w

[Bug analyzer/107582] - -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positive using pthread_cond_timedwait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107582 --- Comment #1 from dimitri at ouroboros dot rocks --- Created attachment 53853 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53853&action=edit failing test case

[Bug analyzer/107582] New: - -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positive using pthread_cond_timedwait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107582 Bug ID: 107582 Summary: - -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positive using pthread_cond_timedwait Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug fortran/107576] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:6193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107576 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/107581] ICE on sparc-leon-uclibc during go build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107581 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/107579] ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 --- Comment #4 from Jean-Michaël Celerier --- Adding an explicit "member..." to the lambda capture, e.g. [&, member...] makes it work

[Bug c++/107579] ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 --- Comment #3 from Jean-Michaël Celerier --- It worked in 11.2 and started failing in 11.3. Short repro: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/GYYbrTdxh #include template constexpr void for_each_field(T&& value, F&& func) { using namespace boost:

[Bug go/107581] New: ICE on sparc-leon-uclibc during go build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107581 Bug ID: 107581 Summary: ICE on sparc-leon-uclibc during go build Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug c++/107579] ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 --- Comment #2 from Jean-Michaël Celerier --- Clang and MSVC compiles the same thing correctly

[Bug c++/107579] ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 --- Comment #1 from Jean-Michaël Celerier --- Created attachment 53851 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53851&action=edit bug report provided by -fbug-report

[Bug fortran/107577] [13 Regression] ICE in find_array_spec, at fortran/resolve.cc:5008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107577 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/107580] New: std::vector cannot be brace initialized with -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107580 Bug ID: 107580 Summary: std::vector cannot be brace initialized with -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/107579] New: ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 Bug ID: 107579 Summary: ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- GCC lacks an equivalent for Clang's -Wdeprecated-non-prototype, right?

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #11 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to David Brown from comment #9) > Could -Wstrict-prototypes be added to -Wall, or even considered enabling by > default? The next C standard will make "void foo()" mean the same as "void > foo(vo

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- (In reply to David Brown from comment #9) > Could -Wstrict-prototypes be added to -Wall, or even considered enabling by > default? The next C standard will make "void foo()" mean the same as "void > foo(void)",

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #9 from David Brown --- Could -Wstrict-prototypes be added to -Wall, or even considered enabling by default? The next C standard will make "void foo()" mean the same as "void foo(void)", like in C++, which makes the scope for confusi

[Bug middle-end/106123] ICE in walk_tree_1, at tree.cc:11243

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106123 --- Comment #2 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- simplified testing case: [opc@qinzhao-ol8u3-x86 106123]$ cat t.C struct T { T () {}; virtual ~T () {}; int t; }; struct S : virtual public T { int a; void foo (); }; template struct U { U () {}

Domain Name Inquiry (Important)

Hello G95! I hope you are doing well I am Mashood Ali The domain name (g95.org) has expired and going to be deleted soon. I want to buy this domain name from you so that I can make a programming website out of it. I am offering you USD$400(negotiable) for the domain name. If you agree with my of

[Bug tree-optimization/107561] [13 Regression] g++.dg/pr17488.C and [g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C -m32] regression due to -Wstringop-overflow problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107561 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug other/107578] [13 regression] r13-3761-ga239a63f868e29 causes excess errors for g++.dg/pr71488.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107578 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug other/107578] New: [13 regression] r13-3761-ga239a63f868e29 causes excess errors for g++.dg/pr71488.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107578 Bug ID: 107578 Summary: [13 regression] r13-3761-ga239a63f868e29 causes excess errors for g++.dg/pr71488.C Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug libstdc++/63746] i/o fragmentation inside basic_filebuf::xsputn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63746 --- Comment #8 from Pawel Sikora --- hi, nice to see a final gcc fix. gl&br, pawel.

[Bug libstdc++/63746] i/o fragmentation inside basic_filebuf::xsputn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63746 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107574] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check in cp_fold_convert with ptr to member field cast inside a class not completed and inherent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection See Also|

[Bug c++/107574] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check in cp_fold_convert with ptr to member field cast inside a class not completed and inherent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug libstdc++/63746] i/o fragmentation inside basic_filebuf::xsputn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63746 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f1519eef5cbdcea2f18445852f5482798e3936a commit r13-3815-g3f1519eef5cbdcea2f18445852f5482798e3936a Author: Charles-François Natali

[Bug c++/107574] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check in cp_fold_convert with ptr to member field cast inside a class not completed and inherent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug c++/107574] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have integer_type in cp_fold_convert, at cp/cvt.cc:613

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107574 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/107576] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:6193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107576 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/107577] [13 Regression] ICE in find_array_spec, at fortran/resolve.cc:5008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107577 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/107577] New: [13 Regression] ICE in find_array_spec, at fortran/resolve.cc:5008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107577 Bug ID: 107577 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in find_array_spec, at fortran/resolve.cc:5008 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/107576] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:6193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107576 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, |

[Bug fortran/107576] New: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:6193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107576 Bug ID: 107576 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:6193 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug c++/107575] New: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.cc:2605

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107575 Bug ID: 107575 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.cc:2605 Product: gcc

[Bug c++/107574] New: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have integer_type in cp_fold_convert, at cp/cvt.cc:613

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107574 Bug ID: 107574 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have integer_type in cp_fold_convert, at cp/cvt.cc:613

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- So: --- gcc/range-op-float.cc.jj2022-11-06 11:56:27.138137781 +0100 +++ gcc/range-op-float.cc 2022-11-08 18:13:18.026974667 +0100 @@ -1280,9 +1280,10 @@ foperator_abs::op1_range (frange &r, tre

[Bug c++/107555] Never constructed object destroyed during exception handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Boris Kolpackov from comment #6) > I was under the impression that only something runnable would be useful, but https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need > if all that's need is a preprocessed translat

[Bug c++/107555] Never constructed object destroyed during exception handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug fortran/107489] Insufficiently deep allocate/copy for simple assignment of derived types with recursive components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107489 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug analyzer/107573] New: RFE: analyzer handling of strtok

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107573 Bug ID: 107573 Summary: RFE: analyzer handling of strtok Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Before the 1281 // Then add the negative of each pair: 1282 // ABS(op1) = [5,20] would yield op1 => [-20,-5][5,20]. 1283 r.union_ (frange (type, 1284real_value_negate (

[Bug target/107568] Bootstrap failure on macOS 12.6 (monterey)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107568 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |target --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug tree-optimization/68097] We should track ranges for floating-point values too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68097 Bug 68097 depends on bug 24021, which changed state. Bug 24021 Summary: VRP does not work with floating points https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/24021] VRP does not work with floating points

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Bug 85316 depends on bug 24021, which changed state. Bug 24021 Summary: VRP does not work with floating points https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Under debugger I see unordered_gt::op1_range coming up with: [frange] double [-Inf, 1.79769313486231570814527423731704356798070567525844996599e+308 (0x0.f8p+1024)] which looks right. But then fop

[Bug tree-optimization/24021] VRP does not work with floating points

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021 --- Comment #27 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d96a286992a0fd9ecdd6a58cd9a413c8c49f477 commit r13-3812-g9d96a286992a0fd9ecdd6a58cd9a413c8c49f477 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > __builtin_isfinite (x) is implemented as > ~UNGT_EXPR, DBL_MAX>. > So, if we have: > _3 = ABS_EXPR ; > _4 = _3 u> 1.7976931348623157081452742373170435679807

[Bug middle-end/107389] Always propagate __builtin_assume_aligned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107389 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/107389] Always propagate __builtin_assume_aligned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107389 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7899582a059a9d8c25bfff305cd236d219dc4f20 commit r13-3810-g7899582a059a9d8c25bfff305cd236d219dc4f20 Author: Richard Biener Date:

  1   2   >