[Bug c++/107532] New: [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 Bug ID: 107532 Summary: [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/107531] List of references calls destructors, add warning?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107531 --- Comment #2 from nightstrike --- It looks like you're right. The root cause of the problem is that in my non-reduced case, I didn't have a copy constructor, but I had a non-default destructor that was releasing resources twice. So it's clea

[Bug c++/107531] List of references calls destructors, add warning?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107531 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- My bet is on a copy constructor being invoked.

[Bug c++/107531] New: List of references calls destructors, add warning?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107531 Bug ID: 107531 Summary: List of references calls destructors, add warning? Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/107528] constexpr evaluator doesn't check for deallocate of mismatched size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107528 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #1 from Jian

[Bug objc++/61759] [ICE] [objc++] reaching gcc_unreachable in objc_eh_runtime_type at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61759 --- Comment #12 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > *** Bug 107530 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I.e. gcc12 has the same bug too.

[Bug objc++/107530] ICE: in objc_eh_runtime_type, at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.cc:2795

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107530 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Dup of bug 61759 > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 61759 *** I guess then it is worth adding gcc12 to confirmed to fail list there.

[Bug objc++/107530] ICE: in objc_eh_runtime_type, at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.cc:2795

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107530 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc++/61759] [ICE] [objc++] reaching gcc_unreachable in objc_eh_runtime_type at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61759 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vital.had at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/107530] New: ICE: in objc_eh_runtime_type, at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.cc:2795

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107530 Bug ID: 107530 Summary: ICE: in objc_eh_runtime_type, at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.cc:2795 Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19

[Bug c++/107529] New: constexpr evaluator doesn't check for destroyed objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107529 Bug ID: 107529 Summary: constexpr evaluator doesn't check for destroyed objects Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/107528] New: constexpr evaluator doesn't check for deallocate of mismatched size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107528 Bug ID: 107528 Summary: constexpr evaluator doesn't check for deallocate of mismatched size Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/107327] internal compiler error: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:12930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107327 --- Comment #11 from Carlos E --- Created attachment 53829 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53829&action=edit preprocessed file on 10.2 preprocessed with echo '#include ' | gcc -x c - -E

[Bug jit/101491] /usr/local/include/libgccjit++.h conflicts between different GCC installations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491 John Hein changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #53828|install libgccjit*.h under |install libgccjit*.h under descripti

[Bug c++/107527] warning: declaration of ‘void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)’ has a different exception specifier [-Wsystem-headers]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107527 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I thought I had saw this one before. Specifically something related to Darwin.

[Bug c++/107527] New: warning: declaration of ‘void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)’ has a different exception specifier [-Wsystem-headers]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107527 Bug ID: 107527 Summary: warning: declaration of ‘void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)’ has a different exception specifier [-Wsystem-headers] Product: gcc Ve

[Bug debug/100523] [11/12/13 Regression] armv8.1-m.main -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fmodulo-sched -mtune=cortex-a53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100523 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/107500] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 --- Comment #24 from R. Diez --- In case somebody else wants to patch their GCC 12.2, here is the slightly-modified patch for convenience: https://github.com/rdiez/DebugDue/blob/master/Toolchain/Patches/Gcc12EhGlobalsAtexit.patch

[Bug libstdc++/107466] [12/13 Regression] invalid -Wnarrowing error with std::subtract_with_carry_engine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107466 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-11-04 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug target/94604] support for the ETSI basic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94604 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/101491] /usr/local/include/libgccjit++.h conflicts between different GCC installations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491 --- Comment #10 from John Hein --- (In reply to John Hein from comment #9) Oops. s/libgccgit/libgccjit/ in the previous comment.

[Bug jit/101491] /usr/local/include/libgccjit++.h conflicts between different GCC installations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491 John Hein changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rv4chsst7e at liamekaens dot com --- Comme

[Bug target/61593] Support '#pragma mark - foo' on non-Darwin targets (by simply ignoring it without warning)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61593 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5) > It should be pretty easy; in config/darwin.h #pragma mark is registered as > part of the DARWIN_REGISTER_TARGET_PRAGMAS() macro like this: > > if (!flag_prepr

[Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135 --- Comment #18 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Since the fix got installed in 2012 this really should have been fixed from 4.8.0 onwards. Should we really keep this still open or can we close this out ? Ramana

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #53826|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez --- Original TYPE_UNSIGNED patch with leading / trailing suggestions: -2.52% As attached: -3.62% Moving the code out of set_range_from_nonzero_bits back into set_nonzero_bits: -3.7%

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #7) > (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #6) > > (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4) > > 3) It also seems to me that you then only need to add the zer

[Bug tree-optimization/107523] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107523 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Summary|wron

[Bug c++/106644] [C++23] P2468R2 - The Equality Operator You Are Looking For

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106644 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-11-04 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/24537] Non-uglified names inside namespace __gnu_cxx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24537 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Jonathan W

[Bug c++/98940] Implement C++23 language features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940 Bug 98940 depends on bug 102614, which changed state. Bug 102614 Summary: [C++23] P2314R4 - Character sets and encodings https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102614 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/102614] [C++23] P2314R4 - Character sets and encodings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102614 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/107413] Perf loss ~14% on 519.lbm_r SPEC cpu2017 benchmark with r8-7132-gb5b33e113434be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107413 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56958] Spurious set but not used variable warning in empty pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56958 serpent7776 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||serpent7776 at gmail dot co

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 --- Comment #9 from Giuseppe D'Angelo --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Please don't! At least not in the next 9 days. We intend to vote out LFTSv3 > at next week's meeting, there will be no more proposals for LFTS considered.

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 53826 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53826&action=edit untested Here's what I tested and we're still around a 3% degradation for VRP.

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #6) > (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4) > > > > > The patch below does this, but it does have a 3% penalty for VRP (though no > > penalty to overall comp

[Bug analyzer/107526] - -Wanayzer-null-dereference false positive with different behaviors when delete unrelated statement “int *e = 0;”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107526 --- Comment #1 from Geoffrey --- And if i compile this case with gcc 11.3, it does not report NPD warning. https://godbolt.org/z/v88PWvs3s seems like a regression problem.

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug analyzer/107526] New: - -Wanayzer-null-dereference false positive with different behaviors when delete unrelated statement “int *e = 0;”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107526 Bug ID: 107526 Summary: - -Wanayzer-null-dereference false positive with different behaviors when delete unrelated statement “int *e = 0;” Product: gcc Version:

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #4) > Sorry, what I meant is, of course there is interest at keeping this code to > compile in pre-C++20 mode, and possibly have the same semantics no matter > w

[Bug c++/107500] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 --- Comment #23 from R. Diez --- Many thanks for the fix. If you backport it to GCC 12.x, I won't be able to complain so much. ;-)

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 --- Comment #4 from Giuseppe D'Angelo --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #0) > > So. ideally, the conversion operators should be using C++20 constraints, but > > of course that's not p

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- And the spec seems wrong as well. The const overload should be constrained for const T being convertible to const element_type*. This should probably not compile: #include struct X { int& operator*()

[Bug tree-optimization/107342] Optimization opportunity where integer '/' corresponds to '>>'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107342 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/107342] Optimization opportunity where integer '/' corresponds to '>>'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107342 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:679be32e66428f0ba81d1c1b55f7bd47f01cb295 commit r13-3688-g679be32e66428f0ba81d1c1b55f7bd47f01cb295 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug c++/107500] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Also, the constraint is wrong for the non-const conversion. It checks for convertibility to const element_type* but should be element_type*.

[Bug libstdc++/107511] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221030 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack of secure_getenv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107511 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107500] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:418999fe382c608facf57f96b53a9cb12d2fdd20 commit r13-3685-g418999fe382c608facf57f96b53a9cb12d2fdd20 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug libstdc++/107511] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221030 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack of secure_getenv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107511 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f505f37a8e5a7646af4038b5c46f72d8a05dc7f0 commit r13-3684-gf505f37a8e5a7646af4038b5c46f72d8a05dc7f0 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug c++/86369] constexpr const char* comparison fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369 --- Comment #11 from Aaron Ballman --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > (In reply to Aaron Ballman from comment #9) > > Doesn't [expr.eq] make it unspecified though? > > Will defer that answer to Jason. > But please have a look at

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4) > > The patch below does this, but it does have a 3% penalty for VRP (though no > penalty to overall compilation). I'm inclined to pursue this route, since > i

[Bug modula2/107524] building html docs from gm2.texi fails due to missing top node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107524 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86369] constexpr const char* comparison fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Aaron Ballman from comment #9) > Doesn't [expr.eq] make it unspecified though? Will defer that answer to Jason. But please have a look at the comment 6 testcase. I strongly hope that constexpr

[Bug c++/86369] constexpr const char* comparison fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369 Aaron Ballman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aaron at aaronballman dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/107500] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 --- Comment #20 from R. Diez --- I had to modify the patch slightly. I guess that union member "unsigned char unused;" was removed after GCC 12.2 was released. But otherwise, the patch does work, at least in my bare-metal scenario. The atexit e

[Bug fortran/69090] Allocatable arrays mishandled in 'omp declare target'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69090 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #8) > Has this been fixed via PR96668 "[OpenMP] Re-mapping allocated but > previously unallocated allocatable does not work", by chance? (Tobias?) I think both exam

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4) > + // Reflect the mask as a simple range. For example, a mask of > + // 0xff00 could be represented as [0,0][0x100, 0x]. > + if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type ())

[Bug libstdc++/107525] New: propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107525 Bug ID: 107525 Summary: propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on its conversion operators Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug modula2/107524] New: building html docs from gm2.texi fails due to missing top node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107524 Bug ID: 107524 Summary: building html docs from gm2.texi fails due to missing top node Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55157] Missed VRP with != 0 and multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55157 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug modula2/103574] race condition in bootstrap build, trunk 20211203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103574 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug modula2/106917] modula-2 fails to bootstrap with the modula-2 branch ,20220912

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106917 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug modula2/92146] gm2: the brig, fortran, go and D frontends are missing lang_register_spec_functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92146 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug modula2/92147] gm2: modula-2 fails to build on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92147 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug c++/107358] [13 Regression] i686-linux: Since r13-3290-g98e341130f8798 code fails to build libjxl-0/7.0 (vector float code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107358 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/106981] [10 Regression][OpenACC][OpenMP] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 with '#pragma omp/acc atomic capture'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106981 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 |[10 |Regression][Open

[Bug debug/106261] [10 Regression] ICE in output_call_frame_info, at dwarf2out.cc:943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106261 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug rtl-optimization/106032] [10 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] wrong|[10 Regression] wrong code

[Bug other/89863] [meta-bug] Issues in gcc that other static analyzers (cppcheck, clang-static-analyzer, PVS-studio) find that gcc misses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 Bug 89863 depends on bug 71324, which changed state. Bug 71324 Summary: liboffloadmic/runtime/offload_env.cpp:316]: (style) Redundant condition https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71324 What|Removed |A

[Bug other/71324] liboffloadmic/runtime/offload_env.cpp:316]: (style) Redundant condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71324 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/89788] trunk/liboffloadmic/runtime/emulator/coi_host.cpp:175]: (error) Null pointer dereference (missed -Wnull-dereference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89788 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i?86-intelmic | CC|

[Bug c/41041] Documentation: -fwide-exec-charset defaults to UCS-4/UCS-2, not UTF-32/UTF-16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41041 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- SOmething like this: --- a/gcc/doc/cppopts.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/cppopts.texi @@ -318,9 +318,10 @@ supported by the system's @code{iconv} library routine. @opindex fwide-exec-charset @cindex character set,

[Bug fortran/69090] Allocatable arrays mishandled in 'omp declare target'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69090 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/41041] Documentation: -fwide-exec-charset defaults to UCS-4/UCS-2, not UTF-32/UTF-16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41041 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Assignee|unassigned at g

[Bug c++/107500] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 Sebastian Huber changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br

[Bug c++/107358] [13 Regression] i686-linux: Since r13-3290-g98e341130f8798 code fails to build libjxl-0/7.0 (vector float code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107358 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57da0797a73f32c879bca77e121a4f55fcc57ce1 commit r11-10363-g57da0797a73f32c879bca77e121a4f55fcc57ce1 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/106981] [10/11/12 Regression][OpenACC][OpenMP] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 with '#pragma omp/acc atomic capture'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106981 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01b894bc8a59691cc1d8dc29936635c8cfb8aed7 commit r11-10359-g01b894bc8a59691cc1d8dc29936635c8cfb8aed7 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/105774] Bogus overflow in constant expression with signed char++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105774 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11a37955860f8573570aaf8d9fb0b6e02a3d4d5a commit r11-10362-g11a37955860f8573570aaf8d9fb0b6e02a3d4d5a Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/106721] Error: invalid character '<' in mnemonic since r13-2122-g86c0d98620ee3a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106721 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edf40e86344c407cadca769a6496905a0ec31e48 commit r11-10358-gedf40e86344c407cadca769a6496905a0ec31e48 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/107001] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.cc:4017 since r9-3941-g28567c40e2c7c88e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107001 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8693cafd8975364ef9b409c18ddfc233e66345d8 commit r11-10360-g8693cafd8975364ef9b409c18ddfc233e66345d8 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/106032] [10/11 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe6e8a09a5338c0acda23ab2d3ef4433fb83637f commit r11-10354-gfe6e8a09a5338c0acda23ab2d3ef4433fb83637f Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/106261] [10/11 Regression] ICE in output_call_frame_info, at dwarf2out.cc:943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106261 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:904b0d0418077c1fe2c3ab328002bba40c6b0271 commit r11-10356-g904b0d0418077c1fe2c3ab328002bba40c6b0271 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/106144] wide_int shifted_mask() and mask() do not agree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106144 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d853d49202a3b9fdaade64a6d5f920304c2b38d commit r11-10355-g4d853d49202a3b9fdaade64a6d5f920304c2b38d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/106030] [13 Regression] ice in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4026

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9b72d8d03134813d5fa84cffb190027fd29f6d6 commit r11-10353-gd9b72d8d03134813d5fa84cffb190027fd29f6d6 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libgomp/106045] Incorrect testcase in libgomp.c/target-31.c at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106045 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:732e2315e6782bfc93241027f01cd3dfbdb5269c commit r11-10352-g732e2315e6782bfc93241027f01cd3dfbdb5269c Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/107521] clang rejects invalid code in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107521 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- And e.g. https://godbolt.org/z/qfzTT5jna from that PR is I think clearly a clang bug, not a grey area, neither string literal is evaluated there multiple times.

[Bug c++/107521] clang rejects invalid code in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107521 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/107488] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in cppunit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107488 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Thank you! cppunit-1.15.1 now builds fine with your fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/107523] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

-trunk --enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 13.0.0 20221104 (experimental) [master r13-3645-gfabe470b244] (GCC) [523] % [523] % gcctk -Os small.c; ./a.out [524