[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 --- Comment #11 from Jeff Hammond --- > program foo >use f >integer i >call test(i) > end program > > which specific subroutine is called based on TKR? I understand there is an ambiguity here, but what if I never make this call? Is

[Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679 --- Comment #11 from Kees Cook --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > I sofar refrained from doing this because of the large amount of fallout and > followup changes and I think those are not warranted on the GCC 12 branch. Totally

[Bug target/100603] csky: config/csky/csky.h:402:13: error: comparison of unsigned expression in '>= 0' is always true [-Werror=type-limits]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100603 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/107172] [13 Regression] wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- i386 needs to change (ltu:SI (const_int 1 [1]) (const_int 0 [0])) to (ne:SI (const_int 1 [1]) (const_int 0 [0])) when checking the carry flag. But the mode info isn't passed to TARGET_CANONICALIZE_COM

[Bug c++/107085] __reference_constructs_from_temporary does not detect static up-cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107085 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107085] __reference_constructs_from_temporary does not detect static up-cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107085 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:895dd027d5dda51a95d242aec8a49a6dfa5db58d commit r13-3173-g895dd027d5dda51a95d242aec8a49a6dfa5db58d Author: Marek Polacek Date: W

[Bug rtl-optimization/107182] [13 Regression] Commit r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9d7191f298245063a8f9c3a1bbeff4 breaks profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107182 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Testing a trivial patch now.

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #7) > I think it's in 15.4.3.4.5 Restrictions on generic declarations. > But it's too late for me to decipher what's written there. Tomorrow you'll discover

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #2) > > My MCVE: > > module f > implicit none > > interface test > module procedure test_f08 > module procedure test_f08ts > end interface

[Bug target/107172] [13 Regression] wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 08:42:51PM +, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 > > Mikael Morin changed: > >What|Removed |

[Bug rtl-optimization/107182] [13 Regression] Commit r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9d7191f298245063a8f9c3a1bbeff4 breaks profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107182 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/107183] [10/11/12/13 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107183 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|debug |target Summary|-fcompare-deb

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5) > Both match type "integer", kind "4", rank "0". > > AFAIK, there is no other consideration than TKR to discern which function > to call. Yes, assuming t

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 07:15:59PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > @Steve: I thought there is something in the standard that says how the > resolution (specific then generic) works, but cannot find

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #4 from a

[Bug c++/100134] [modules] ICE when using a vector in a module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100134 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/107038] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow in dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107038 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-10-07 Version|13.0

[Bug tree-optimization/107038] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow in dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107038 --- Comment #8 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- I forgot to mention that I've been building with: gcc/cc1 -o /dev/null ../bogus-stringop-overflow.i -O2 -Werror=stringop-overflow -quiet to reproduce the warning: ../bogus-stringop-overflow.i: In fun

[Bug tree-optimization/107038] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow in dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107038 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13 Regression] Bogus |Bogus -Wstringop-overflow

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug debug/107183] New: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow

tdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-3161-20221007142737-g89228e3985c-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 13.0.0 20221007 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug middle-end/101836] __builtin_object_size(P->M, 1) where M is an array and the last member of a struct fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836 --- Comment #42 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9ad850e86b863c24f6f4f5acf08d49944cc7bbe commit r13-3171-gb9ad850e86b863c24f6f4f5acf08d49944cc7bbe Author: Qing Zhao Date: Fri Oct

[Bug c++/107173] ICE: unspellable token PRAGMA_EOL on type_traits:1446:26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107173 --- Comment #3 from Esa Pulkkinen --- I realize also -E option is necessary for the problem. I tried various flags to enable/disable modules support (e.g. -fmodules-ts), but those seem not to impact the problem, though they impact what happens i

[Bug demangler/97091] Demangling the name of the type of a lambda accepting variadic auto parameters fails

, trunk outputs: 13.0.0 20221007 Z4mainEUlDpT_E_ -> main::{lambda((auto:1)...)#1} So I suppose this can be resolved as fixed for GCC 13.

[Bug target/107181] new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|testsuite |target --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug rtl-optimization/107182] [13 Regression] Commit r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9d7191f298245063a8f9c3a1bbeff4 breaks profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107182 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |rtl-optimization Summary|Com

[Bug target/55522] -funsafe-math-optimizations is unexpectedly harmful, especially w/ -shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522 --- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu --- Dropping crtfastmath.o with -shared makes sense.

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 102851, which changed state. Bug 102851 Summary: Failure to demangle c++ symbol https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102851 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug demangler/102851] Failure to demangle c++ symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102851 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug demangler/97091] Demangling the name of the type of a lambda accepting variadic auto parameters fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97091 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hasse.christoph at cern dot ch --- Comme

[Bug analyzer/105783] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false positive with union and functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105783 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/105783] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false positive with union and functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105783 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f09b99550a3c6cd16f5e9150ebd4b1d87033dcbd commit r13-3168-gf09b99550a3c6cd16f5e9150ebd4b1d87033dcbd Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug c++/107173] ICE: unspellable token PRAGMA_EOL on type_traits:1446:26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107173 --- Comment #2 from Esa Pulkkinen --- Not sure if this info helps reproducing it, but trying to collect info about the environment. I built gcc-13 from version basepoints/gcc-13-2397-g20d30e737ad. % LC_MESSAGES=C /usr/local/bin/g++ -v Using bui

[Bug libstdc++/68606] Reduce or disable the static emergency pool for C++ exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68606 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603073.html

[Bug c++/107173] ICE: unspellable token PRAGMA_EOL on type_traits:1446:26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107173 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/107181] new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jose.marchesi at oracle dot com ---

[Bug bootstrap/107182] Commit r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9d7191f298245063a8f9c3a1bbeff4 breaks profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107182 --- Comment #1 from Franz Sirl --- Created attachment 53677 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53677&action=edit Related GCDA file

[Bug bootstrap/107182] New: Commit r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9d7191f298245063a8f9c3a1bbeff4 breaks profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107182 Bug ID: 107182 Summary: Commit r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9d7191f298245063a8f9c3a1bbeff4 breaks profiledbootstrap Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug testsuite/107181] new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug testsuite/107181] New: new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181 Bug ID: 107181 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107176] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r7-2012-g43aabfcfd4139e4c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug c++/106654] [C++23] P1774 - Portable assumptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106654 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 53675 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53675&action=edit gcc13-pr106654-gimple-wip.patch My current WIP patch for the handling of more complex assumptions. My curren

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Hammond --- Is this ever going to be fixed? I observe that a similar MCVE (below) is compiled without complaint by Intel, Cray and NAG Fortran, so it's almost certainly a lack of support for the standard in GCC. As best

[Bug libstdc++/107180] New: Itanium ABI says to block in the emergency EH buffer if memory cannot be acquired

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107180 Bug ID: 107180 Summary: Itanium ABI says to block in the emergency EH buffer if memory cannot be acquired Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/104433] [modules] Importing and using std::make_shared causes linker errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104433 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 104433, which changed state. Bug 104433 Summary: [modules] Importing and using std::make_shared causes linker errors https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104433 What|Removed

[Bug c++/104433] [modules] Importing and using std::make_shared causes linker errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104433 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edbb2551d156d69a2e337dcd8daa69f2680d57ea commit r13-3163-gedbb2551d156d69a2e337dcd8daa69f2680d57ea Author: Patrick Palka Date: F

[Bug c++/107179] [11/12/13 Regression] requires-expression gives hard error for inaccessible constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107179 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/107115] Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Monakov --- For reference, the previous whacked mole appears to be PR 106187 (where mems_same_for_tbaa_p comes from).

[Bug tree-optimization/107153] [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107153 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/107153] [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107153 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89228e3985c5cdf6be58a3b5b1afcad91e9e3422 commit r13-3161-g89228e3985c5cdf6be58a3b5b1afcad91e9e3422 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/107172] [13 Regression] wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Started with r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e. Disabling DOM with -fno-tree-dominator-opts still causes the crash, so it's not this patch that caused the problem. Fu

[Bug c++/107179] New: requires-expression gives hard error for inaccessible constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107179 Bug ID: 107179 Summary: requires-expression gives hard error for inaccessible constructor Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-va

[Bug tree-optimization/107090] [aarch64] sequence logic should be combined with mul and umulh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107090 --- Comment #4 from vfdff --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > A few issues. > First is: > > if (_26 != 0) > goto ; [50.00%] > else > goto ; [50.00%] > >[local count: 536870913]: > ht_15 = ht_13 + 4294967296; >

[Bug target/55522] -funsafe-math-optimizations is unexpectedly harmful, especially w/ -shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Haley --- This bug has pernicious effects in many more places: https://moyix.blogspot.com/2022/09/someones-been-messing-with-my-subnormals.html Florian is right: at least, GCC should not automatically link crtfastmat

[Bug rtl-optimization/107094] [13 Regression] ICE in require, at machmode.h:297 since r13-2916-gd0b00b63a39108

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107094 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/107153] [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107153 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- OK, so the main issue is that when we parallelize a loop without stores we insert stores and thus would require a loop PHI for the virtual operand plus LC SSA updates. We eventually end up in gen_parallel_

[Bug c++/107178] Diagnosis for colon vs semi-colon in a member function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107178 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)You'd need to change "T > foo():" to "int foo:N" i.e. change the type, remove the parens, and add a > constant f

[Bug c++/107178] Diagnosis for colon vs semi-colon in a member function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107178 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > At least GCC points out the colon and even suggest you started a bitfield > > which is what a colon normally

[Bug c++/107178] Diagnosis for colon vs semi-colon in a member function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107178 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/107115] Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > If we don't want to treat such copies as noop moves, then either we need to > change rtx_equal_p such that it will say MEMs aren't equal if the the alias > set

[Bug middle-end/107115] Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #8) > > We need a solution that works for combine too — is it possible to invent a > > representation for a no-op

[Bug tree-optimization/107176] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- final value replacement: b_lsm.8_26 = PHI with expr: 1 final stmt: b_lsm.8_26 = 1; where (get_scalar_evolution (scalar = b_lsm.8_15) (scalar_evolution = {0, +, 1}_1)) (chrec_apply (varying_lo

[Bug tree-optimization/107172] [13 Regression] wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #33 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:348e46fa8cba960c23170673bfc0c1b4fb384975 commit r13-3148-g348e46fa8cba960c23170673bfc0c1b4fb384975 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #32 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62ec780ac0b4d109f2a3c8c4597cb19a82f6188d commit r13-3147-g62ec780ac0b4d109f2a3c8c4597cb19a82f6188d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: