[Bug fortran/106771] [OOP] ICE with PACK intrinsic, in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106771 --- Comment #5 from federico --- My bad, the SEGFAULT is my mistake, I've made a half-baked example that does not work. Here's the fixed one: module test implicit none type::t integer, allocatable :: iloc(:) contains

[Bug c++/106713] [11/12/13 Regression] Coroutine regression in GCC 11.3.0: if (co_await ...) crashes with a jump to ud2 since r12-3529-g70ee703c479081ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713 Pablo Busse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-bugzilla at decltype dot org --- Com

[Bug c++/106775] New: [11/12 regression] Subscipt operator with array rvalue inside brackets returns lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106775 Bug ID: 106775 Summary: [11/12 regression] Subscipt operator with array rvalue inside brackets returns lvalue Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/106017] [PowerPC] No array-to-pointer conversion for MMA accumulator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0, 11.0, 12.0, 13.0 Stat

[Bug target/106017] [PowerPC] No array-to-pointer conversion for MMA accumulator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3927bd9f9150576f2905c8930732c419f1850fca commit r10-10966-g3927bd9f9150576f2905c8930732c419f1850fca Author: Peter Bergner

[Bug target/106017] [PowerPC] No array-to-pointer conversion for MMA accumulator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f494a85f0bf653c3128b376c1abf821a27748c11 commit r11-10227-gf494a85f0bf653c3128b376c1abf821a27748c11 Author: Peter Bergner

[Bug c++/106774] warning about comparison to true/false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106774 --- Comment #2 from Frank Heckenbach --- This should cover all cases mentioned: void t (bool a, int i, float e, double f) { // Boolean literal comparisons if (a == true) // better: if (a) return; if (a == false) // better: if (!a)

[Bug c++/106774] warning about comparison to true/false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106774 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew P

[Bug c++/106774] New: warning about comparison to true/false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106774 Bug ID: 106774 Summary: warning about comparison to true/false Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/60523] Warning flag for octal literals [-Woctal-literals]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60523 Frank Heckenbach changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de --- Comment #

[Bug target/106017] [PowerPC] No array-to-pointer conversion for MMA accumulator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22ff125247ff5328ad4544aef939d491618d714d commit r12-8726-g22ff125247ff5328ad4544aef939d491618d714d Author: Peter Bergner

[Bug c/106773] New: libbpf: failed to find BTF info for global/extern symbol 'bpf_link_fops'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773 Bug ID: 106773 Summary: libbpf: failed to find BTF info for global/extern symbol 'bpf_link_fops' Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/106712] Incorrect propagation of C++11 attributes to subsequent function declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106712 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/106712] Incorrect propagation of C++11 attributes to subsequent function declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106712 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98973354b8690f01e06b9f36106e786fd94ac7a3 commit r13-2256-g98973354b8690f01e06b9f36106e786fd94ac7a3 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fr

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #16 from matoro --- I also observed this issue on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu, with gcc 12.2.

[Bug target/106745] segfault in bpf_core_get_sou_member_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106745 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Faust : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b504149d2c92ddfcfab62ea6d1ed49ae72493e38 commit r13-2255-gb504149d2c92ddfcfab62ea6d1ed49ae72493e38 Author: David Faust Date: Mon A

[Bug libstdc++/106766] zip_view::_Iterator/_Sentinel's operator- use make_unsigned_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106766 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/106771] [OOP] ICE with PACK intrinsic, in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106771 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to federico from comment #3) > Right: here is a version where the object is initialized: > > https://godbolt.org/z/o566cPG8P > > I also see that for the versions that compile (e.g., 1

[Bug fortran/106771] [OOP] ICE with PACK intrinsic, in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106771 --- Comment #3 from federico --- Right: here is a version where the object is initialized: https://godbolt.org/z/o566cPG8P I also see that for the versions that compile (e.g., 11.1.0), there's a weird SEGFAULT error at this line: eleme

[Bug fortran/106771] [OOP] ICE with PACK intrinsic, in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106771 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Playing a little, I found that the issue might be related to the elemental function isa. The following dumb replacement function isa(this,i) class(t), intent(in) :: this integer, inte

[Bug fortran/106771] [OOP] ICE with PACK intrinsic, in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106771 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/91213] Missed optimization: (sub X Y) -> (xor X Y) when Y <= X and isPowerOf2(X + 1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91213 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to rdapp from comment #6) > What's the mechanism to get range information at RTL level? The only related > thing I saw in (e.g.) simplify-rtx.cc is nonzero_bits and this does not seem > to be propag

[Bug libstdc++/106772] atomic::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool if used platform wait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106772 Thomas Rodgers changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/106748] [13 Regression] ICE in ix86_avx256_split_vector_move_misalign, at config/i386/i386-expand.cc:743 since r13-2111-g6910cad55ffc330d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106748 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/106714] Incorrect casts in macros in amxtileintrin.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106714 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/106748] [13 Regression] ICE in ix86_avx256_split_vector_move_misalign, at config/i386/i386-expand.cc:743 since r13-2111-g6910cad55ffc330d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106748 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60d1d296b42b22b08d4eaa38bea02100c07261ac commit r13-2253-g60d1d296b42b22b08d4eaa38bea02100c07261ac Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Aug 26 10

[Bug target/106714] Incorrect casts in macros in amxtileintrin.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106714 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:511df912133f56dbd460326b5df1e15e06204e4e commit r12-8725-g511df912133f56dbd460326b5df1e15e06204e4e Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu

[Bug c++/106761] [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-*_b.C test cases fails after r13-2158-g02f6b405f0e9dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106761 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/61677] False positive with -Wmaybe-uninitialized (predicate analysis, VRP)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61677 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.0 Last reconfirmed|2014-07-03 00:0

[Bug c/106765] [12/13 Regression] ICE (invalid code) in tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in create_tmp_from_val, at gimplify.cc since r12-7222-g3f10e0d50b5e3b3f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106765 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/56654] uninit warning behaves erratically (always executed block, "is" vs "may", order when walking uses)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/54554] fails to warn for uninitialized var within loop always taken at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54554 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.0 Last reconfirmed|2012-09-12 00:0

[Bug tree-optimization/47386] Wrong warning: ‘w.dim[2].stride’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47386 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.2.0 --- Comment #4 from Richard Bien

[Bug c/106764] ICE on invalid code in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have error_mark in gimplify_call_expr, at gimplify.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106764 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/106765] [12/13 Regression] ICE (invalid code) in tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in create_tmp_from_val, at gimplify.cc since r12-7222-g3f10e0d50b5e3b3f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106765 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/106760] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have template_decl in get_fndecl_argument_location, at cp/call.cc:7801

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106760 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-29 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug middle-end/47307] Uninitialized in this function: warning for initialized, no warning for uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47307 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 47307, which changed state. Bug 47307 Summary: Uninitialized in this function: warning for initialized, no warning for uninitialized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47307 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/101573] uninitialized warning could not appear correclty in -O0 optimisation level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||phresnel at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/43361] missing uninitialized warning without optimization (-O0) (PHI in always_executed basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43361 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 43361, which changed state. Bug 43361 Summary: missing uninitialized warning without optimization (-O0) (PHI in always_executed basic block) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43361 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 34721, which changed state. Bug 34721 Summary: Output statements fool the -Wuninitialized option https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34721 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/34721] Output statements fool the -Wuninitialized option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34721 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/19430] taking address of a var causes missing uninitialized warning (virtual PHI with MEM)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/31279] Uninitialized warning for call-by-reference arguments with known intent(in)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31279 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- The original testcase hides everything behind array descriptors, even with unrolling and vectorization disabled we end up with [local count: 214748368]: parm.0.data = &alist[0]; parm.0.offset = -1;

[Bug middle-end/19430] taking address of a var causes missing uninitialized warning (virtual PHI with MEM)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-05-03 18:04:44 |2022-8-29 --- Comment #37 from Richard

[Bug target/106768] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_finifsh, at dwarf2out.c:31350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106768 --- Comment #2 from Johann Taferl --- I'm very sorry, but I do not know how to debug the compiler it self. I only download the toolchain form the ARM homepage. I was glad to get all work as it is. Any suggestions how I might be of help?

[Bug libstdc++/106772] atomic::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool if used platform wait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106772 --- Comment #1 from Mkkt Bkkt --- libc++ implementation do it. msvc stl of course too.

[Bug libstdc++/106772] New: atomic::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool if used platform wait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106772 Bug ID: 106772 Summary: atomic::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool if used platform wait Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/106579] ieee_signaling_nan problem in fortran on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106579 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87a07e96dc4e6849ab6ac0b1ceeb5a19aebee9d6 commit r12-8724-g87a07e96dc4e6849ab6ac0b1ceeb5a19aebee9d6 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/106579] ieee_signaling_nan problem in fortran on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106579 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5d4e67e764fb157404142cfc8d2bc4436fcf0f5 commit r12-8723-gc5d4e67e764fb157404142cfc8d2bc4436fcf0f5 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/106721] Error: invalid character '<' in mnemonic since r13-2122-g86c0d98620ee3a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106721 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0784ef5e2a7ea72614aa600dccb29e926e46bab6 commit r12-8722-g0784ef5e2a7ea72614aa600dccb29e926e46bab6 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/106590] [12/13 Regression] x86-64 miscompilation starting with r12-8233-g1ceddd7497e15d w/ mtune=skylake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106590 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:030063c43f30a2335d3c03182df0beb82d003816 commit r12-8720-g030063c43f30a2335d3c03182df0beb82d003816 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/106771] New: [OOP] ICE with PACK intrinsic, in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106771 Bug ID: 106771 Summary: [OOP] ICE with PACK intrinsic, in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7328 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status:

[Bug target/106770] PPCLE: Unnecessary xxpermdi before mfvsrd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106770 --- Comment #2 from Jens Seifert --- vec_extract(vr, 1) should extract the left element. But xxpermdi x,x,x,3 extracts the right element. Looks like a bug in vec_extract for PPCLE and not a problem regarding unnecessary xxpermdi. Using assembly

[Bug preprocessor/106767] Failure to detect recursive macro calls due to _Pragma(pop_macro)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106767 --- Comment #5 from Alexey Izbyshev --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Is there a public specification of the Microsoft extension and how it is > supposed to behave with recursion or is the recursion behavior specified > by the C

[Bug target/100869] z13: Inefficient code for vec_reve(vector double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100869 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cdebe087619329facf19ba849d4d489a9a933e2 commit r13-2248-g8cdebe087619329facf19ba849d4d489a9a933e2 Author: Robin Dapp Date: Fri Jun

[Bug testsuite/106680] Test gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-4.c fails on 32-bit BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106680 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/106768] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_finifsh, at dwarf2out.c:31350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106768 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Component|c++

[Bug preprocessor/106767] Failure to detect recursive macro calls due to _Pragma(pop_macro)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106767 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/106764] ICE on invalid code in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have error_mark in gimplify_call_expr, at gimplify.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106764 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- fuzzing source is going to turn up a lot of error-recovery cases - while somewhat interesting they will inevitably be very low priority since GCC has mechanisms to present the user with a nicer error messag

[Bug c/106762] incorrect array bounds warning (-Warray-bounds) at -O2 on memset()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106762 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/106761] [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-*_b.C test cases fails after r13-2158-g02f6b405f0e9dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106761 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-29 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106757] [12/13 Regression] Incorrect "writing 1 byte into a region of size 0" on a vectorized loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106757 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The unroller has code to put unreachable()s in paths like those but it's imperfect.

[Bug c++/106756] [13 Regression] Overbroad friendship for nested classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106756 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Summary|Overbroad frie

[Bug target/106682] Powerpc test gcc.target/powerpc/pr86731-fwrapv-longlong.c fails on power8, passes on power9/power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106682 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/106770] PPCLE: Unnecessary xxpermdi before mfvsrd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106770 --- Comment #1 from Jens Seifert --- vec_extract(vr, 1) should extract the left element. But xxpermdi x,x,x,3 extracts the right element. Looks like a bug in vec_extract for PPCLE and not a problem regarding unnecessary xxpermdi.

[Bug target/106770] New: PPCLE: Unnecessary xxpermdi before mfvsrd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106770 Bug ID: 106770 Summary: PPCLE: Unnecessary xxpermdi before mfvsrd Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targ

[Bug middle-end/91213] Missed optimization: (sub X Y) -> (xor X Y) when Y <= X and isPowerOf2(X + 1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91213 rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org --- C