[Bug target/106577] [13 Regression] during RTL pass: subreg3 ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -mavx since r13-2006-ga56c1641e9d25e46

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106577 --- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle --- Patch proposed: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/599663.html

[Bug libstdc++/106611] std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible returns wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106611 --- Comment #3 from Nikolas Klauser --- I did some more digging and it looks like nobody can agree on what the right result is. This is the result of the question whether the listed operation on struct S { noexcept(false) = default; } is noexc

[Bug libstdc++/106611] std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible returns wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106611 --- Comment #2 from Nikolas Klauser --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > The noexcept specifier is wrong, but is ignored. The implicitly defined copy > constructor is noexcept, so the trait gives the right answer. static_assert(!

[Bug libstdc++/106611] std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible returns wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106611 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The noexcept specifier is wrong, but is ignored. The implicitly defined copy constructor is noexcept, so the trait gives the right answer.

[Bug libstdc++/106611] New: std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible returns wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106611 Bug ID: 106611 Summary: std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible returns wrong result Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug tree-optimization/106593] [13 Regression] ICE in range_on_path_entry, at gimple-range-path.cc:164 since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b4d950

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106593 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vsevolod.livinskiy at gmail dot co

[Bug tree-optimization/103035] [meta-bug] YARPGen bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035 Bug 103035 depends on bug 106605, which changed state. Bug 106605 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in range_on_path_entry, at gimple-range-path.cc:164 with -march=skylake-avx512 -O3 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106605 Wha

[Bug tree-optimization/106605] [13 Regression] ICE in range_on_path_entry, at gimple-range-path.cc:164 with -march=skylake-avx512 -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106605 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/106606] Internal compiler error with abstract derived type using recursive class() components.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106606 Johann Andreas Weber changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johaweb at hotmail dot com --- C

[Bug libstdc++/106610] New: elements_view::iterator::iterator_category invokes the operator*() && of the underlying iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106610 Bug ID: 106610 Summary: elements_view::iterator::iterator_category invokes the operator*() && of the underlying iterator Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/106609] New: [SH] miscompilation of loop involving noreturn call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106609 Bug ID: 106609 Summary: [SH] miscompilation of loop involving noreturn call Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/106576] Finalization of temporaries from functions not occuring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/21137] Convert (a >> 2) & 1 != 0 into a & 4 != 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21137 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/106608] [12 Regression] std::optional requires unavailable dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106608 Egor Pugin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egor.pugin at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/106608] [12 Regression] std::optional requires unavailable dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106608 --- Comment #1 from Egor Pugin --- Update links. === We've tried to build Telegram Desktop with GCC 12 and got such error: http://paste.mva.name/co36VoGr.txt There is a struct A { vector b; }, where B is a declared, but not defined struct:

[Bug rtl-optimization/106594] [13 Regression] sign-extensions no longer merged into addressing mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106594 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization Assignee|unass

[Bug libstdc++/106608] New: [12 Regression] std::optional requires unavailable dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106608 Bug ID: 106608 Summary: [12 Regression] std::optional requires unavailable dtor Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug libstdc++/106607] New: Regex integer overflow on large backreference value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106607 Bug ID: 106607 Summary: Regex integer overflow on large backreference value Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/106434] [12/13 Regression] Spurious -Wnull-dereference when using std::unique_copy() since r12-5187-g1ae8edf5f73ca5c3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106434 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is a compiler bug, not a library bug, and a reduced testcase will fail before r12-5187 because it was already latent in the compiler.

[Bug c++/106434] [12/13 Regression] Spurious -Wnull-dereference when using std::unique_copy() since r12-5187-g1ae8edf5f73ca5c3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106434 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Josh Marshall from comment #2) > How involved should I be on this? You can ignore it.