https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90428
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106276
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90428
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2582080f19e8fe9c1204dfb6fecf744311f00777
commit r13-1717-g2582080f19e8fe9c1204dfb6fecf744311f00777
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jul 14 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106321
Bug ID: 106321
Summary: False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index
with switch with ranged cases
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106294
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
All compilers I tried (GCC, clang and MSVC) all accept this. There might be a
defect report in this area too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106273
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd3d25d6df1cbd385d2834ff3059dfb6905dd75c
commit r13-1716-gfd3d25d6df1cbd385d2834ff3059dfb6905dd75c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106320
Bug ID: 106320
Summary: [10 regression] build failure (due to view requirement
changes?)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I still get the same failures.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ah, I have quite old versions of the prerequisite libs:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 jwakely jwakely 12 Feb 17 2017 gmp -> ./gmp-6.1.0/
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 jwakely jwakely 12 Feb 17 2017 mpc -> ./mpc-1.0.3/
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 jw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Valgrind shows:
==29655== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV):
dumping core
==29655== Bad permissions for mapped region at address 0x64322A8
==29655==at 0x5D061A4: mpfr_set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 53304
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53304&action=edit
gcc/config.log (gzip compressed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 53303
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53303&action=edit
top-level config.log (gzip compressed)
Odd, I'm using gcc112 as well.
Full configure command is:
/home/jwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106237
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c was actually reported in PR105267.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:517fb1a78102df43f052c6934c27dd51d786aff7
commit r13-1715-g517fb1a78102df43f052c6934c27dd51d786aff7
Author: Steve Kargl
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Seems to work for me (on gcc112); is there a particular machine you tried this
on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106319
Bug ID: 106319
Summary: False positives from -Wanalyzer-va-arg-type-mismatch
on int promotion
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106210
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > Started with r10-3542-g0b92cf305dcf3438.
>
> I think that is when the warning for pure attribute missing started
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #3 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104276
--- Comment #8 from Darrell Wright ---
What about something like a __builtin_overwrite( ptr, size_t ) that tells the
compiler that the range specified will be written. It forms a contract to do
so with the compiler and would allow the memset to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #7)
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6)
> > The patch in comment 2 fixes the issue. It was submitted
> > 13 hours after the initial report.
>
> Steve, if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106318
Bug ID: 106318
Summary: ICE when using 'Range in Ada22 Iterated Component
Association
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
The upcoming floating point ranges (frange) are small enough (one or two words)
that I thought we could get away with streaming them as is to GC for global
ranges (SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO).
We have a mechanism
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Why do you need these structures to be in GC memory anyways?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105960
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100400
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106317
Bug ID: 106317
Summary: deferred-length character array pointer in derived
type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105746
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Martin Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106284
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
Bug 98940 depends on bug 104477, which changed state.
Bug 104477 Summary: [C++23] Implement P2255R2, type trait to detect reference
binding to temporary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106316
Bug ID: 106316
Summary: [OpenMP] Auto "declare target" should honor 'declare
variant' kind(nohost)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a15d3beace26d68561cb3481b70b0bbcb122ca5
commit r13-1714-g9a15d3beace26d68561cb3481b70b0bbcb122ca5
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106284
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a8edfbd37d399d1103d86e134ba0a92f8c873c3
commit r13-1713-g0a8edfbd37d399d1103d86e134ba0a92f8c873c3
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106303
--- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle ---
I think the solution may be similar/related to Richard Biener's fix for PR
target/91522.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106315
Bug ID: 106315
Summary: 7.8% increased codesize on specfp 507.cactuBSSN_r
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106303
--- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle ---
Grr... This problem is at (currently just beyond) the limits of my abilities.
The TImode STV pass uses data flow to split conversion opportunities up into
chains, effectively performing live range splitting,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106183
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Ted_lion from comment #1)
> The subprocedure of comparison
> with old value and waiting for the notification should not be interrupted by
> an operation on same atomic object.
I'm not sure wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314
Bug ID: 106314
Summary: GTY fails on virtual int but not virtual void
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106278
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fd215b03e88baae4e047dcb8dac5daa145dc3b4
commit r13-1707-g2fd215b03e88baae4e047dcb8dac5daa145dc3b4
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106183
Ted_lion changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tedlion_tang at foxmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Created attachment 53302
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53302&action=edit
x.ii.xz
Where I got so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106313
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-07-15
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
Status|WAIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105946
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106313
Bug ID: 106313
Summary: GCC incorrectly compiles code involving concept
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106312
Bug ID: 106312
Summary: jit tests fail on powerpc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105558
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105676
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] Bogus|[12/13 Regression] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[12/13 Regression] B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63400
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #4)
> For CLOCK_REALTIME, the Windows API GetSystemTimeAsFileTime is used.
> GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime is an improved version which provide "the
> highest possible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105746
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105960
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Can we close it now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105969
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106210
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 53301
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53301&action=edit
Unreduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106310
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[12/13 Regregressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106303
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-07-15
CC|
67 matches
Mail list logo