[Bug libstdc++/106028] New: std::filesystem::path lacks conversion to native mbs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106028 Bug ID: 106028 Summary: std::filesystem::path lacks conversion to native mbs Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug tree-optimization/106027] New: ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (error: mismatching comparison operand types)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027 Bug ID: 106027 Summary: ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (error: mismatching comparison operand types) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-

[Bug c++/106026] ICE: error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106026 --- Comment #1 from Luke Dalessandro --- Actually, I take back the part about it being invalid code, I'm not sure it's invalid. The godbolt link compiles on clang-14 without error.

[Bug c++/106026] New: ICE: error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106026 Bug ID: 106026 Summary: ICE: error reporting routines re-entered. Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/106025] New: Incorrect optimization at -O2 leads to infinite test execution time

d short var_8, unsigned char *var_355, short *var_371, short var_385) { var_154 = var_1; for (short i = 0; i < (short)max(var_1, min(*var_355, var_8)) + 7; i = var_385) var_401 = *var_371 ? *var_371 : 5; } gcc version 13.0.0 20220618 (479b6f449ee999501ad6eff0b7db8d0cd5b2d28d)

[Bug bootstrap/87858] Building old multilib bootstrap GCC: stage1 32-bit libstdc++ fails to build after building 64-bit libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858 Ed Gar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||edgargar at unam dot mx --- Comment #9 from Ed

[Bug c++/106024] New: ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 Bug ID: 106024 Summary: ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/106012] rsqrtss instruction generated even if -mno-recip specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106012 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug c++/106023] Would like to control the ELF visibility of template explicit instantiations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106023 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||77306 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug fortran/105986] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.cc:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105986 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/105986] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.cc:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105986 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:856a9b8fc2b457963898c539f0db92a1baa0bf27 commit r13-1165-g856a9b8fc2b457963898c539f0db92a1baa0bf27 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: W

[Bug c++/106023] New: Would like to control the ELF visibility of template explicit instantiations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106023 Bug ID: 106023 Summary: Would like to control the ELF visibility of template explicit instantiations Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug tree-optimization/106020] Spurious warnings about stringop overflows only with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106020 --- Comment #6 from Matt Godbolt --- I'm afraid to say I've been unable to make a repro case in the short time I had to try - will get back to this but about to go on vacation (!). That's to say dumping the files from CE and using: CXX=/opt/com

[Bug tree-optimization/106020] Spurious warnings about stringop overflows only with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106020 --- Comment #5 from Matt Godbolt --- Thanks! Understood re: cmake; I wouldn't have picked it but it was the easiest way to repro something on compiler explorer for Howard at the time. I'm sure we can get it down to a smaller cast and a shell scr

[Bug target/88469] [7/8 regression] AAPCS/AAPCS64 - Struct with 64-bit bitfield (128-bit on AArch64) may be passed in wrong registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88469 --- Comment #18 from Jenim --- 003c21e0 <_ZN11cgraph_node11create_edgeEPS_P5gcall13profile_count>: 3c21e0: e24dd008sub sp, sp, #8 3c21e4: e309c130movwip, #37168 ; 0x9130 3c21e8: e340c133

[Bug target/88469] [7/8 regression] AAPCS/AAPCS64 - Struct with 64-bit bitfield (128-bit on AArch64) may be passed in wrong registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88469 Jenim changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jenimjohn at orgs dot com.co --- Comment #17 fro

[Bug middle-end/105998] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:365 with vector arithmetics since r9-1971-g315aa691f486bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE:

[Bug middle-end/105998] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:365 with vector arithmetics since r9-1971-g315aa691f486bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105998 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef662120177d39af5f88ffc622d90bb6ae0ca1d3 commit r13-1163-gef662120177d39af5f88ffc622d90bb6ae0ca1d3 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug tree-optimization/105835] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O1 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105835 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9991d84d2a84355fd3fc9afc89a963f45991bfa9 commit r13-1162-g9991d84d2a84355fd3fc9afc89a963f45991bfa9 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Sat J