https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_US.U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105559
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 11 May 2022, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105559
>
> --- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
> Thanks for the fast work. Less than 2.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105576
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105576
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note integer here does allow for pointers as that is still an integer value
internally.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105576
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Isn't the i constraint the one you want to be portable:
>
> ‘i’
> An immediate integer operand (one with constant value) is allowed. This
> includes symbolic co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105576
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Isn't the i constraint the one you want to be portable:
‘i’
An immediate integer operand (one with constant value) is allowed. This
includes symbolic constants whose values will be known only at assembly ti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105576
Bug ID: 105576
Summary: x86: Support a machine constraint to get raw symbol
name
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
--- Comment #7 from Lu Yahan ---
pipeline00 and pipline01 is tar.gz file and split into two part
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105414
HaoChen Gui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101168
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
Lu Yahan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52963|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
Lu Yahan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52961|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
Lu Yahan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52959|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
--- Comment #3 from Lu Yahan ---
Created attachment 52961
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52961&action=edit
piplein00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
--- Comment #2 from Lu Yahan ---
Created attachment 52960
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52960&action=edit
pipelein.tar.gz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
--- Comment #1 from Lu Yahan ---
Created attachment 52959
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52959&action=edit
pipeline.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
Bug ID: 105575
Summary: Segment when riscv64-g++ compile .cc
Product: gcc
Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105514
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105514
chenglulu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from chenglulu ---
(I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105574
--- Comment #1 from Ruihan Wang ---
Created attachment 52958
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52958&action=edit
Preprocessed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105574
Bug ID: 105574
Summary: Internal compiler error when co_yield a r-value vector
of non-POD type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||105312
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Confirmed: if I apply that patch, 11.3.0 works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> This seems to have been fixed in GCC 12 -- I can reproduce with
> --target=sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu with GCC 11, but not GCC 12.
If that is the case, it most l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #4 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, it's likely something even more fiendish than that.
What encodings are you using? (i.e: locale -a)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
It occurs with -mcpu=native or -mcpu=niagara4 but not if I drop that.
```
$ for t in param target; do cmd="gcc -Q -O2 --help=$t"; diff -U0 <(LANG=C $cmd)
<(LANG=C $cmd -mcpu=niagara4); done
--- /dev/fd/63 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
Bug ID: 105573
Summary: ICE when building numpy on SPARC64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100413
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:988fbc636639621dadc5cecbe77aa3f9aefedefb
commit r12-8368-g988fbc636639621dadc5cecbe77aa3f9aefedefb
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104605
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
error: 'uintptr_t' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'uintmax_t'?
The bug still exists in GCC 13.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
The problem seems to exist before git revision 82a4c5c704433249, dated about a
month ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49566
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Does this still need to be in WAITING?
.
real5m20.276s
user5m8.801s
sys 0m0.880s
$ /home/dcb/gcc/results/bin/gcc -v 2>&1 | fgrep exp
gcc version 13.0.0 20220511 (experimental) (5b2a24ebfc0b2b4c)
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88459c3965e2a2f62ab4d4c8b2ac8460b1a15c33
commit r13-332-g88459c3965e2a2f62ab4d4c8b2ac8460b1a15c33
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105571
Bug ID: 105571
Summary: Spurious "set but not used" on static constexpr local,
used in lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d79958a50eb5419ebb9baa5ef880aabeef05467
commit r9-10157-g6d79958a50eb5419ebb9baa5ef880aabeef05467
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105570
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d79958a50eb5419ebb9baa5ef880aabeef05467
commit r9-10157-g6d79958a50eb5419ebb9baa5ef880aabeef05467
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105569
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Actually this is probably a better fix; I don't suppose we want to issue
warnings for the compiler-generated POINTER_PLUS_EXPRs.
--- a/gcc/cp/class.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/class.cc
@@ -518,6 +518,8 @@ build_base_pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dc86f716fe6087f1cf786d69c0c6f3f5af810f0
commit r13-331-g4dc86f716fe6087f1cf786d69c0c6f3f5af810f0
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103672
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105230
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0acdbe29f66017fc5cca40dcbd72a0dd41491d07
commit r13-330-g0acdbe29f66017fc5cca40dcbd72a0dd41491d07
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105542
Brad Richardson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||everythingfunctional@proton
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101194
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fcedef529c7564b6485ab2893c08865798a66ec
commit r10-10716-g5fcedef529c7564b6485ab2893c08865798a66ec
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105569
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 99700, which changed state.
Bug 99700 Summary: [10 Regression] uninitialized variable accepted as a
constant expression in C++ 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99700
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99700
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|11.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95986
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105570
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Oops, I was just testing the backports on x86_64-linux.
The fix itself is generic, and thus IMHO worth the backport, so I think the
options are kill the testcase on the branch, or just stop using -mcpu=power
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95982
Bence Kodaj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95986
Bence Kodaj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105570
Bug ID: 105570
Summary: new test case gfortran.dg/pr102860.f90 uses invalid
option
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95986
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.3.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105569
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|-Waddress warns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105569
Bug ID: 105569
Summary: -Waddress warns on dynamic_cast
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105559
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
Thanks for the fast work. Less than 2.5 hours from reported to fixed
for a bug that hadn't been found for a couple of years.
I should also mention that this bug was produced from code produced by csmith,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105355
palmer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103911
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39099827b0f731b5f2da696f6f580156c8a7819c
commit r11-9979-g39099827b0f731b5f2da696f6f580156c8a7819c
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105565
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 103455, which changed state.
Bug 103455 Summary: [9 Regression] internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p
since r9-713-gd9338471b91bbe6e1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103455
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103455
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104225
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100288
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100288
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99885
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.0|9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99885
Bug 99885 depends on bug 83476, which changed state.
Bug 83476 Summary: [9 Regression] Template argument deduction fails with
reference template parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83476
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83476
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103455
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d1c151bc1f4a3231f62dc3af758fb7a19f8f904
commit r9-10156-g3d1c151bc1f4a3231f62dc3af758fb7a19f8f904
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4df77364f7fd9ce88c012843fff124346e4d3c06
commit r9-10155-g4df77364f7fd9ce88c012843fff124346e4d3c06
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104225
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4df77364f7fd9ce88c012843fff124346e4d3c06
commit r9-10155-g4df77364f7fd9ce88c012843fff124346e4d3c06
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99885
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6432e17960799509c48df6b500a8d069110980b
commit r9-10154-gc6432e17960799509c48df6b500a8d069110980b
Author: Patrick Palka
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83476
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6432e17960799509c48df6b500a8d069110980b
commit r9-10154-gc6432e17960799509c48df6b500a8d069110980b
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105565
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
I suspect the changes to cxx_eval_call_expression and/or
cxx_eval_constant_expression caused these functions to use more stack space per
recursive call, and this marginal increase was enough to overflow the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105565
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> Seems we're hitting a stack overflow due to the excessive recursion, same
> with Clang. Not sure if we can realistically do much about that..
Not sure, either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105565
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105566
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I welcome that, please send it to gcc-patches mailing list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105539
--- Comment #9 from Qing Zhao ---
> It's a conditional uninit use which we do not warn on early by design
> (for the fear of too many false positives, that is).
Okay.
>
>> 2. the ccp optimization deletes the if (z) statement completely:
>>
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
--- Comment #3 from Bruno Haible ---
Created attachment 52955
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52955&action=edit
Patch to document also --with-zstd-include and --with-zstd-lib
Hi Martin,
The patch you added is pretty minima
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105568
Bug ID: 105568
Summary: Superfluous --jobserver-auth= check taints further
diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105564
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init to -Wtrivial-auto-var-init is just a single letter
> change, addition of trailing = is a single letter addition, so guess the
> distance i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Bug ID: 105567
Summary: [13 regression] bootstrap failure on arm due to bogus
constructor warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70090
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:546c6210eb08f583ee4f53a0fd7886b6c958c7fa
commit r13-325-g546c6210eb08f583ee4f53a0fd7886b6c958c7fa
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105566
Bug ID: 105566
Summary: new test case ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105563
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105565
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105565
--- Comment #1 from chenzhipeng ---
Comment on attachment 52954
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52954
isPrimeConstexpr for 1073741789 compiled successfully but 2147483647 fail
>#include
>
>using LL = long long;
>
>constexp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105565
Bug ID: 105565
Summary: [11 Regression] constexpr function with bigger
integral cause internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105561
--- Comment #3 from Sascha Wilde ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I wonder if you can get a backtrace from gdb for the crash? When you add -v
> to the failing command you should see cc1plus being invoked, trace on that
> comma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Created attachment 52953 [details]
> Precompiled testcase
>
> This .ii is based on the gcc-12 code, but with some tweaks to compile with
> gcc-10.
This a-r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 52953
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52953&action=edit
Precompiled testcase
This .ii is based on the gcc-12 code, but with some tweaks to compile with
gcc-10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The fact that -fno-lifetime-dse silences the warning seems to confirm it's that
commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105469
--- Comment #14 from Rémi Coulom ---
Thanks for investigating the bug.
Can you recommend a workaround at this point?
I don't want to tell users of the library to change their compilation options,
so I tried this in class Client_Data:
#ifdef _
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
