https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393
Laryushin Aleksandr <364961 at mail dot ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9715f10c0651c9549b479b69d67be50ac4bd98a6
commit r12-8276-g9715f10c0651c9549b479b69d67be50ac4bd98a6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105376
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105376
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3)
> For this transformation to be correct for DFP, you need a 2 with quantum
> exponent 0. Converting from either integer or binary floating-point 2
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605
--- Comment #6 from HaoChen Gui ---
gcc -O0 -fsignaling-nans -D_WANT_SNAN -lm -o main main.c && ./main
(nan, 3.0), fmin: 3.0, builtin: 3.0, xsmincdp: 3.0, xsmindp: 3.0
(3.0, nan), fmin: 3.0, builtin: nan, xsmincdp: nan, xsmindp: 3.0
(snan, 3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105359
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva ---
pr82748-1.c is another victim of this issue. do_copysign_ld needs to convert
between (64-bit) long double and __ieee128 for __builtin_copysignq, and since
the expanders for these conversions are condition
d LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220426 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104640
--- Comment #3 from Paco Arjonilla ---
(In reply to Paco Arjonilla from comment #2)
Compiler output:
:4:17: error: pasting """_" and "\U00b5m" does not give a valid
preprocessing token
4 | double operator ""_##suffix (long long unsigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105401
Bug ID: 105401
Summary: Improved diagnostics for code from "Labels as Values"
documentation
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:03:54AM +, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #4)
> > You either need to remove the above two lines to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105271
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105271
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39d2411c787493adb1e1ae894cbef161cb7a114f
commit r12-8275-g39d2411c787493adb1e1ae894cbef161cb7a114f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Apr 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105400
--- Comment #2 from Laurent Pinchart
---
Thank you Andrew for the very quick answer!
The original code is available at
https://git.libcamera.org/libcamera/libcamera.git/tree/src/libcamera/base/object.cpp
(the process() function is Object::mess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105400
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is just inlining and there is no way for GCC to know that the method type
will return Type1 rather than Type2 here for the variable b.
The warning is correct but only because of optimizations and such.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #4)
> You either need to remove the above two lines to get a valid program
> or remove the testcase as it's testing processor dependent behavior.
How about changing it to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105400
Bug ID: 105400
Summary: g++-11 regression produces -Warray-bounds false
positive warning with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104470
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105399
Bug ID: 105399
Summary: [12 Regression] -O2/-Ofast -flto ICEs as internal
compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605
--- Comment #5 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I modified the testcase from comment #3 to clear-before and check-after
FE_INVALID exception bit for each operation:
--
$ /opt/gcc-nightly/trunk/bin/gcc -O2 -o xsmindp-test xsmindp-test.c xsmindp.c
-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98417
Rémi Galan Alfonso changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||remi.galanalfonso at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94376
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cuzdav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94624
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ace5d4dab2ab39072b0f07089621a823580f27c
commit r12-8273-g9ace5d4dab2ab39072b0f07089621a823580f27c
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105398
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105398
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105398
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
The patch above changed
- if (TREE_CODE (template_type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE && !is_dependent_type
+ if (TREE_CODE (template_type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE
+ && !uses_template_parms (current_nonlambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105398
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996
Bug 16996 depends on bug 40361, which changed state.
Bug 40361 Summary: Conditional return not always profitable with -Os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40361
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40361
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105398
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022, guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> C99/11 standard
> If just one argument is a NaN, the fmin functions return the other argument
> (if
> both arguments a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105398
--- Comment #1 from Egor Pugin ---
auto f = [](auto &&m) {
enum { _,e3,e2,e1,C4,C3,C2,C1 };
static constexpr int x_coeffs[3][4] = {
{e1,C2,C3,C4},
{e2,C1,C3,C4},
{e3,C1,C2,C4},
};
};
int main() {
f(0);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105398
Bug ID: 105398
Summary: [11/12 Regression][ICE] enum in array in lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
" : "=wa" (rx) : "wa" (d1), "wa" (d0));
printf ("(SNAN, +3.0): %+3.1f %+3.1f %+3.1f\n", rf, rb, rx);
d0 = __builtin_nans ("0");
rf = fmin (d0, d1);
rb = __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (d0, d1);
asm ("xsmindp %0,%1,%2" : "=wa" (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Using host libm routines is a bad idea, that would make the generated code
depend on the host libm and processor. Having a cut-off to avoid constant
folding these functions for n >= 128 m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105376
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
For this transformation to be correct for DFP, you need a 2 with quantum
exponent 0. Converting from either integer or binary floating-point 2
will work for that. However, I note that de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105397
Bug ID: 105397
Summary: Cannot export module initializer symbols with
`-fvisibility=hidden`
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105349
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105289
--- Comment #6 from Michael Steinberg ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4)
> (In reply to Michael Steinberg from comment #2)
> > Created attachment 52851 [details]
> > Working modified partial specialization
> >
>
> I suppose ice-on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Proof of concept:
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
@@ -3296,6 +3296,14 @@ finish_compound_literal (tree type, tree
compound_literal,
if (TREE_CODE (compound_literal) == CONSTRUCTO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
When we are cp_parser_late_parsing_nsdmi for "int y = A{x}.y;" we perform
finish_compound_literal on type=A, compound_literal={((struct B *) this)->x}.
When digesting this initializer, we call get_nsdmi whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104640
Paco Arjonilla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pacoarjonilla at yahoo dot es
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105383
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 52886
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52886&action=edit
a bit different testcase
A bit different testcase, a bit different flags:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -Os -fnon-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105386
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] Tuple in |[11 Regression] Tuple in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105289
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE on |[11 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105289
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102307
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103662
--- Comment #24 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
Thanks a lot!
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105386
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6a48401da51e9042b6f0822d532b3b472492658
commit r12-8270-gb6a48401da51e9042b6f0822d532b3b472492658
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Oops, sorry Martin, missed you ASSIGNED this to yourself.
If you have your fix for this, go ahead with it, if you don't, I can test mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, the bug is clearly in asan_redzone_buffer::emit_redzone_byte.
The off == offset case is handled correctly, but the other case is valid only
if the gap is bigger such that we need to flush in between.
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
>
>:
> bufp_2 = &buf;
> if (&buf != bufp_2)
> goto ; [INV]
> else
> goto ; [INV]
>
>:
> __builtin_free (bufp_2);
>
> and for the stm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105364
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the bug is visible in -fdump-rtl-expand-details dump:
Partition 2: size 40 align 16
c
Partition 1: size 8 align 8
b
Partition 0: size 4 align 4
a_1
Partition 3: size 4 align 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105364
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd4acb8cd9e45fd35664baa5b0a3150e479aae32
commit r12-8269-gcd4acb8cd9e45fd35664baa5b0a3150e479aae32
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It should use "YZ" as constraint (Y is DS-mode, Z is X-mode). The predicate
should probably be lwa_operand ("lwau" does not exist, that's the irregularity
this predicate is for).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-26
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
Assignee|rguenth at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103013
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 10.4 and 11.4 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We are calling tree_vec_extract with bitsize 32 but a QImode boolean type.
ICK.
(gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt (stmt)
_8 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_6, _7, { 3.0e+0, 3.0e+0, 3.0e+0, 3.0e+0 }>;
$15 = void
(gdb) p debug_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103911
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression]
|std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c8f58be95d666e08221447d43d84782e1e6fb95
commit r10-10578-g5c8f58be95d666e08221447d43d84782e1e6fb95
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102048
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcd1fc4900fd101f8fa22883b6ac31e6f7601373
commit r10-10576-gdcd1fc4900fd101f8fa22883b6ac31e6f7601373
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100153
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60da20c0cdfb6df11bce054ba82b71a0a24a1bd9
commit r10-10575-g60da20c0cdfb6df11bce054ba82b71a0a24a1bd9
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103013
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba2baf20356befbba6c8d83bbb3676cfee7e146f
commit r10-10574-gba2baf20356befbba6c8d83bbb3676cfee7e146f
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:436891d97aef6d7a8e107d2d3e02e8ca4c52a51a
commit r10-10571-g436891d97aef6d7a8e107d2d3e02e8ca4c52a51a
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:436891d97aef6d7a8e107d2d3e02e8ca4c52a51a
commit r10-10571-g436891d97aef6d7a8e107d2d3e02e8ca4c52a51a
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02b601ad7ea06460e7bc42d7251e895d9031bc6e
commit r10-10570-g02b601ad7ea06460e7bc42d7251e895d9031bc6e
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103650
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24eb54cc3b564f2bfa6d7e2fa26ddc82c8b2dc18
commit r10-10569-g24eb54cc3b564f2bfa6d7e2fa26ddc82c8b2dc18
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103911
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b596c35a4ed0143e84422449020296b43a655de7
commit r10-10560-gb596c35a4ed0143e84422449020296b43a655de7
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103853
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93d720f0ec7651e6a402dda33553817c1ad14ded
commit r10-10559-g93d720f0ec7651e6a402dda33553817c1ad14ded
Author: Pavel I. Kr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
Bug ID: 105396
Summary: missed stack-buffer-overflow by -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hmm, in my cross-arm build I get
>
> > ./cc1plus -quiet t.c -I include -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve -mfloat-abi=hard
> > -O
> cc1plus: error: target CPU does not s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105390
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105375
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105375
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb6f6f638a547f0330cc7940c5389039b59e4e76
commit r11-9936-geb6f6f638a547f0330cc7940c5389039b59e4e76
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105395
Bug ID: 105395
Summary: Invalid reload of atomic operation
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105382
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Looks like the analyzer is assuming that all of the different
_Coro_resume_index values are possible at each entry to f(f()::_Z1fv.Frame*),
but AIUI that value is expressing which basic block the coroutine i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394
Bug ID: 105394
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE
during GIMPLE pass: veclower2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105386
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393
Laryushin Aleksandr <364961 at mail dot ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
@item @code{nowait} clause in @code{taskwait} directive @tab N @tab
is certainly in our tables.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393
Bug ID: 105393
Summary: A simple for loop becomes an infinite when -O1/2/3
used
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
