https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101168
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104975
Bug ID: 104975
Summary: ICE in execute, at gimple-harden-conditionals.cc:577
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Your build log shows a line like this:
libtool: compile:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.2.1_p20211127/work/build/./gcc/gccgo
-B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.2.1_p20211127/work/build/./gcc/
-B/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104974
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104974
Bug ID: 104974
Summary: [avx512fp16] Error: operand type mismatch for `vmovw'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach what is inside cpugen.go?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
Bug ID: 104973
Summary: GCC 11.2.1 build failure with Go support (mv: cannot
stat 'cpugen.o': No such file or directory)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
URL: https://bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think the missed optimization is recorded as either PR 79349 or PR 103827.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101895
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And just an FYI. As expected this resolves the regression on our internal
target. Thanks Roger!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104908
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albandil at atlas dot cz
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104972
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #21)
> Deferring to Andrew per comment #19.
That part was fixed already by r12-6061-gd957d250942b13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86722
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c482c28ba4c549006deb70dead90fe8ab34dcbcf
commit r12-7693-gc482c28ba4c549006deb70dead90fe8ab34dcbcf
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90356
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c482c28ba4c549006deb70dead90fe8ab34dcbcf
commit r12-7693-gc482c28ba4c549006deb70dead90fe8ab34dcbcf
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104972
Bug ID: 104972
Summary: Class dummy argument for array of custom types stuck
on -fcheck=bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104968
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Cooper ---
So yes - my experimentation did start from investigating the memory ordering
behaviour of these builtins, based on a thread on LKML.
The pushf in readflags and popf in writeflags have wildly different order
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
--- Comment #51 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8db155ddf8cec9e31f0a4b8d80cc67db2c7a26f9
commit r12-7692-g8db155ddf8cec9e31f0a4b8d80cc67db2c7a26f9
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71319
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741
Bug 85741 depends on bug 77721, which changed state.
Bug 77721 Summary: -Wformat-truncation not uses arg range for converted vars
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79554
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82601
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82608
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
>> > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>> > So, shouldn't we instead of the -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84561
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85650
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88059
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89678
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 90752, which changed state.
Bug 90752 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing the result of string
functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90752
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90752
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90904
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90959
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91076
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91147
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91490
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91848
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92799
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96171
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96963
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101289
Bug 101289 depends on bug 97548, which changed state.
Bug 97548 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression
involving a parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101604
Bug 101604 depends on bug 97548, which changed state.
Bug 97548 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression
involving a parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97631
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99121
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99295
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101665
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104069
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104076
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84318
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83430
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |
Assignee|msebor at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80420
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||85741
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70076
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67872
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41540
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
> > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> > So, shouldn't we instead of the -export-symbols-regex use a version script?
>
> We certainly could,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104969
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> So, shouldn't we instead of the -export-symbols-regex use a version script?
We certainly could, but IIUC this would lose the functionality on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Summary|Optimisation for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971
Bug ID: 104971
Summary: Optimisation for __builtin_ia32_readeflags corrupts
the stack
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00df7ee4474faca91d3460fe78a88e280c6c1126
commit r12-7691-g00df7ee4474faca91d3460fe78a88e280c6c1126
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104966
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38ce4489635f2d65de965af3ec5d5c4adf7762d9
commit r12-7690-g38ce4489635f2d65de965af3ec5d5c4adf7762d9
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d47c0512a265d4bb3ab9e56259fd1e4f4d42c75
commit r12-7689-g1d47c0512a265d4bb3ab9e56259fd1e4f4d42c75
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |siddhesh at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104969
--- Comment #2 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #0)
> The original code is defective a bit as it wrongly assumes that
> (char*)str + (2 * i) is at maximum 'len' big. It's actually len - (2 * i)
> big. But it sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103039
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
unshare_expr doesn't do anything wrong.
The problem is that because of the select we have firstprivate(__tmp_class_a)
clause where __tmp_class_a has type which has struct __class_seltype_A_p *
type. Before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104961
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've reproduced the bug. The mentioned patch is not the cause but a trigger.
The origin of the problem is actually a removal of hard reg propagation before
RA which happened about year ago.
I hope the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970
Bug ID: 104970
Summary: ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2133 since
r12-6480-gea19c8f33a3a8d2b
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|12.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Does libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90 still FAIL?
It does.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94680
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104968
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
This ( https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/591912.html )
proposed patch fixes this ICE, pinged again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Does libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90 still FAIL?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104968
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> > Can't reproduce.
> >
> > It this not fixed by:
> > ...
> > commit 7862f6ccd85a001e4d70abb00bb95d8c7846ba80
> > Auth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104968
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> Can't reproduce.
>
> It this not fixed by:
> ...
> commit 7862f6ccd85a001e4d70abb00bb95d8c7846ba80
> Author: Tom de Vries
> Date: Wed Feb 23 09:33:33 2022 +010
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
The bug also shows in a -flto-partition=max build where the offending function
ends up in ltrans unit 23 (and only this function) which might enable
side-by-side debugging if desired.
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo