https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104672
Bug ID: 104672
Summary: C++ frontend failing when function pointer argument
types contain a parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104666
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Same ICE exists for
__builtin_ia32_blendvpd
__builtin_ia32_blendvps
__builtin_ia32_blendvpd256
__builtin_ia32_blendvps256
__builtin_ia32_pblendvb128
__builtin_ia32_pblenddvb256
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104666
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> So builtins are registered in the beginning, but isa checking is during
> pass_expand, and gimple folding is between them, maybe we should restrict
> builtin gimple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104610
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
Don't worry about vzeroupper.
It's ok to have vzeroupper.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104610
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> ix86_gen_scratch_sse_rtx was added to prevent combine from changing
> store of vector registers with constant value to store of constant
> value. You can change ix86_g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104663
--- Comment #3 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
Also -O3 is 50% faster which sounds unreasonable.
-O2 with GCC12 is 75% slower than -O3 for GCC 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103353
--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha ---
*** Bug 101323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101323
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104666
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
So builtins are registered in the beginning, but isa checking is during
pass_expand, and gimple folding is between them, maybe we should restrict
builtin gimple folding under their required target.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104671
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Nicholas Piggin from comment #1)
> The comment in recent binutils.git commit cebc89b9328 sheds some more light
> on this and possibly provides a workaround in binutils for the errant
> .machine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104671
--- Comment #1 from Nicholas Piggin ---
The comment in recent binutils.git commit cebc89b9328 sheds some more light on
this and possibly provides a workaround in binutils for the errant .machine
directive.
The referenced gcc bug #101393 looks l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104671
Bug ID: 104671
Summary: -Wa,-m no longer has any effect
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104666
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #9 from Nicholas Piggin ---
And upstream gas still doesn't even warn with -many!!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #8 from Nicholas Piggin ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7)
> > GCC already passes -m to the assembler though.
>
> That mostly is historic.
So? I was pointing out the compiler already tells the assembler what
instr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh dear, yes, wrong patch. I'll attach the right one in a few hours.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103196
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104640
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98202
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104434
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104434
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aee1adf2cdc1cf4e116e5c05b6e7c92b0fbb264b
commit r12-7364-gaee1adf2cdc1cf4e116e5c05b6e7c92b0fbb264b
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104335
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104256
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102719
pc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Catching exception by const |[C++17+] Catching exception
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104664
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104665
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104657
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Müllner ---
Creating hard-wired object references might be a solution, but there is a lot
of existing code out there, that would need to be patched (including all the
hassle with support for old and new compilers).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84519
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104657
--- Comment #4 from Christoph Müllner ---
Thanks for mentioning the volatile pointer method.
However, the pragma-solution results in better code (fewer instructions and
does not require a valid stack pointer).
I've used the code below to see wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102232
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104670
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104434
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
OpenBLAS issue filed as https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/3543
suggesting the use of __attribute__((const)) on LAPACKE_lsame.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104610
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-23
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth ---
EWRONGPATCH? I'll give it a whirl on both 11.3 and 11.4 then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
--- Comment #25 from Andrew Cooper ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #24)
> (In reply to Andrew Cooper from comment #23)
> > Apologies for the delay, but I do now have a working prototype of Xen with
> > CET-IBT active, using the current ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104670
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to krzysio.kurek from comment #0)
> Compiled with `-std=c++20`
> Past stable releases of GCC report "confused by earlier errors, bailing out"
> without crashing instead.
Right. That means it was a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|11.0|
Summary|[11] LE implementatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104670
Bug ID: 104670
Summary: ICE when using decltype of a lambda returning a struct
inside of a struct
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104668
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89408
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Case labels are required to be integer constant expressions. In most
cases where an integer constant expression is required, something that
isn't an integer constant expression but folds t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104619
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104619
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:251061b82852bdebc6f13510b415ecb73a2f80ae
commit r10-10474-g251061b82852bdebc6f13510b415ecb73a2f80ae
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104619
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d86949f5f55dbe0eb6f3044366101605882cd58e
commit r11-9618-gd86949f5f55dbe0eb6f3044366101605882cd58e
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104515
--- Comment #4 from GBE ---
The commit that make this issue affect "basic types" as well:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=e443d821386
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104657
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102976
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104663
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
My bet is this is because the vectorizer is enabled now at -O2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-23
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
Bug ID: 104669
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in is_function_default_version,
at attribs.cc:1219
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104668
Bug ID: 104668
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in lookup_attribute_spec, at
attribs.cc:425
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667
Bug ID: 104667
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104666
Bug ID: 104666
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at
stor-layout.c:537
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #27 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 104655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdcea7c1ef6586bb1eb0144b741969748cbd780b
commit r12-7363-gcdcea7c1ef6586bb1eb0144b741969748cbd780b
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9675ecf7f9b340f93c68cf22280f5975a902
commit r12-7362-g9675ecf7f9b340f93c68cf22280f5975a902
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89408
Stephen Kell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||srk31 at srcf dot ucam.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
Nicholas Piggin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||npiggin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #25)
> In my opinion, code that deliberately uses invalid pointers (e.g., hardwired
> addresses) should be explicitly annotated, e.g., by some attribute. This
> approa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101246
--- Comment #7 from Lance Fredrickson ---
So this is the patch I'm using to build gccgo for uclibc arm.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lancethepants/tomatoware/master/patches/gcc/0006-fix-libgo-uclibc-ng.patch
In a seperate discussion you m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104665
--- Comment #2 from monad at posteo dot net ---
The full code including headers is:
#include
#include
#include
void serialize_le(std::byte* __restrict dst, const std::uint32_t* __restrict
src)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 32; ++i, ++src)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This fixes the abi check FAIL on Solaris 11.3, I don't have access to 11.4 to
try it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104665
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Please include the full code here, including the #include directives. Not just
a link to godbolt.org.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104665
Bug ID: 104665
Summary: Failure to recognize memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #25 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #24)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> > The warning is by design.
>
> That just means the design is bad. Especially in the embedded world, using
> memor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 52501
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52501&action=edit
Patch to fix abi-check on Solaris 11.3
This patch changes the version of the std::from_chars symbols from
G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237
--- Comment #13 from Chengnian Sun ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Because -fcompare-debug tells the driver to compile the TU twice, once
> without and once with -gtoggle, and compare the result.
> So, if there is a difference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Rainer, is an executable linked against libstdc++.so.6.0.29 on Solaris 11.3
expected to work on an 11.4 machine with libstdc++.so.6.0.30?
With a #ifdef kluge in config/abi/pre/gnu.ver we can make the new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
dcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-7361-20220223135143-gfdc46830f1b-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220223 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103037
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
More reduced testcase - the min() obfuscation is to avoid recognizing a
MIN_EXPR before jump threading gets the chance to disrupt it. A GIMPLE unit
testcase for
PRE is difficult since we are not supporting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
But:
--- gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc.jj2022-02-11 00:19:22.432063254 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc 2022-02-23 16:16:25.873557626 +0100
@@ -5218,7 +5218,11 @@ visit_reference_op_call (tree lhs, gcall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
But
--- gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc.jj2022-02-11 00:19:22.432063254 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc 2022-02-23 16:07:36.697893998 +0100
@@ -5218,7 +5218,11 @@ visit_reference_op_call (tree lhs, gcall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103926
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-23
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Jason Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jasonadamses at protonmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104663
Bug ID: 104663
Summary: A 50% C-Ray regression in GCC 12.0 for ADL at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104434
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
On rereading
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html
I think that "pure" isn't strong enough for the above example: the result of a
pure function is allowed to change between inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104644
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104644
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdc46830f1b793dc791099acfadc3f0f8cc24c0e
commit r12-7361-gfdc46830f1b793dc791099acfadc3f0f8cc24c0e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104662
Bug ID: 104662
Summary: arm: ice in simd_valid_immediate
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104656
Jose E. Marchesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jose.marchesi at oracle dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104661
Bug ID: 104661
Summary: Catching exception by const value when
exception-object has lvalue-reference constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
--- Comment #7 from Paul Menzel ---
Thank you for the analysis. Excuse my ignorance, but the referenced bug
(possible dup) says it’s a regression in GCC 11, but it does not show up here
with GCC 11. Are more issues tracked in bug 99578?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104655
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #5)
> Created attachment 52498 [details]
> Preprocessed file `build/bootblock/cpu/x86/lapic/lapic.i` with `-save-temps`
>
> Sorry for not sharing the file in the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
