[Bug sanitizer/103978] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed with threads and thread canceling with glibc 2.28+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Note clang is fine. clang might be fine because it uses a static libasan.

[Bug sanitizer/103978] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed with threads and thread canceling with glibc 2.28+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Could there be some ordering issues with pthread_key going on? 2.28 added C11 thread.h support which did touch pthread_key too.

[Bug sanitizer/103978] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed with threads and thread canceling with glibc 2.28+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- This is what the trunk gives with full debug info: = ==1230123==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-underflow on address 0x7f69725fedf0 at pc

[Bug c++/103984] [12 regression] Possible maybe-uninitialized false positive on shaderc-2021.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug sanitizer/103978] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed with threads and thread canceling with glibc 2.28+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|--- Known to fail|11.1.0, 11.2.0,

[Bug sanitizer/103978] [11/12 Regression] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_thread.cpp:367 "((ptr[0] == kCurrentStackFrameMagic)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note trunk gives: = ==1==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-underflow on address 0x7f2aac7fedf0 at pc 0x7f2aae9b28e1 bp 0x7f2aac7fedb0 sp 0

[Bug sanitizer/103978] [11/12 Regression] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_thread.cpp:367 "((ptr[0] == kCurrentStackFrameMagic)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.1.0, 10.3.0, 7.1.0,

[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45ddb395187f8f5f278880fe1422d8958ac35da6 commit r12-6513-g45ddb395187f8f5f278880fe1422d8958ac35da6 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 10.2.0, 10.3.0,

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-12 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually there are some ranges on some SSA Names before hand which look like that matter: # RANGE [1, 1]

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- The difference between GCC 11 and GCC 10.3 where the code generation difference really comes into play is vrp2.

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Unsiwtch loops looks the same in GCC 10.3.0 and 11.1.0 so ...

[Bug target/98348] [10 Regression] GCC 10.2 AVX512 Mask regression from GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/98348] [10 Regression] GCC 10.2 AVX512 Mask regression from GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|11.3 --- Comment #26 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug rtl-optimization/94790] Failure to use andn in specific pattern in which it is available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94790 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 f

[Bug target/98348] [10 Regression] GCC 10.2 AVX512 Mask regression from GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348 --- Comment #25 from Hongtao.liu --- backport to GCC11, no suitable for GCC10, so fixed in GCC11/12.

[Bug target/98348] [10 Regression] GCC 10.2 AVX512 Mask regression from GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5e7b9fd184c22464d8724ff748e1f7ce0cd6bce commit r11-9455-gd5e7b9fd184c22464d8724ff748e1f7ce0cd6bce Author: liuhongt Date:

[Bug target/103804] ICE: 'global_options' are modified in local context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103804 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This might be a latent bug in GCC 11 even. The only difference in the IR before unswitch (besides BB reordering) is: GCC 10.x: [local count: 1073741824]: # it$m_pos$x_21 = PHI <0(4), _26(13)> if (it$

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9/10 Regression] |Mi

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable in ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks like it works in GCC 11.1.0.

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] [9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable in ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/103986] New: Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable in ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986 Bug ID: 103986 Summary: Miscompilation with -O2 -funswitch-loops and __builtin_unreachable in ternary operator Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51620] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with private destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51620 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c0f58cd71ec3afcce5abf10c750ec494e88232b commit r11-9454-g8c0f58cd71ec3afcce5abf10c750ec494e88232b Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri D

[Bug sanitizer/102911] AddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: asan_malloc_linux.cpp:46

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102911 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c0f58cd71ec3afcce5abf10c750ec494e88232b commit r11-9454-g8c0f58cd71ec3afcce5abf10c750ec494e88232b Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri

[Bug target/103980] -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- It might be the case Wdouble-promotion is just useless on s390 if you configure your compiler with --enable-s390-excess-float-precision which was only added for GCC11, so basically between GCC 7 and GCC 10.x

[Bug target/103980] -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Host|s390x-*-linux-gnu | Build|s390x-*-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/96707] Failure to optimize right shift+unsigned compare of two variables optimally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96707 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod --- The IL generated is: _1 = x_2(D) >> y_3(D); _4 = _1 <= x_2(D); return _4; All that should be needed is for the right shift operator in range-ops to implement lhs_op1_relation() to indicate that if th

[Bug target/98348] [10 Regression] GCC 10.2 AVX512 Mask regression from GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348 --- Comment #23 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #22) > (In reply to Dávid Bolvanský from comment #20) > > Some small regression (missed opportunity to use vptestnmd): > > > > Current trunk > > > > compare(unsigned int

[Bug libfortran/103985] segfault in finalize_transfer (fbuf_destroy) on (parallel) writing into character / string function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103985 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There could be a lock missing when it comes to the write. I remember in the past there were some issues with writes not being thread safe (maybe they still are not).

[Bug fortran/103695] [12 Regression][OpenMP] affinity clause - ICE: verify_ssa failed since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103695 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug tree-optimization/99755] failure to fold a conditional that's a subset of another expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99755 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod --- we now know the PHI is an equivalence when the other argument is UNDEFINED.: [local count: 268435456]: x_12 = i_8(D) + 1; x_12 : int [3, +INF] Equivalence set : [x_7, x_12]<<--Equi

[Bug target/102239] powerpc suboptimal boolean test of contiguous bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102239 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/103977] [12 Regression] ice in try_vectorize_loop_1 since r12-6420-gd3ff7420e941931d32ce2e332e7968fe67ba20af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103977 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/81953] Code sinking increases register pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81953 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---

[Bug libfortran/103985] New: segfault in finalize_transfer (fbuf_destroy) on (parallel) writing into character / string function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103985 Bug ID: 103985 Summary: segfault in finalize_transfer (fbuf_destroy) on (parallel) writing into character / string function argument Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0

[Bug c++/103984] [12 regression] Possible maybe-uninitialized false positive on shaderc-2021.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/103984] [12 regression] Possible maybe-uninitialized false positive on shaderc-2021.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Keywords|

[Bug c/103980] -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980 --- Comment #5 from Ryan --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Does it happen with a cross compiler or just a native compiler? Not sure what you mean by that. I'm emulating s390x on a Debian 11 amd64 machine via debootstrap: sudo d

[Bug c++/103984] New: [12 regression] Possible maybe-uninitialized false positive on shaderc-2021.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984 Bug ID: 103984 Summary: [12 regression] Possible maybe-uninitialized false positive on shaderc-2021.0 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/103980] -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Possible the way x86 excess precision promotes to long double means this is only an issue for s390 excess precision (if it is an excess precision issue).

[Bug libstdc++/102807] Simple code using ranges::views::keys does not compile with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102807 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unlvsur at live dot com --- Comment #

[Bug libstdc++/103982] std::ranges::subrange does not work for clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103982 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/83079] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug libstdc++/103982] std::ranges::subrange does not work for clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103982 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Reduced testcase: #include void f(int *a, int *b) { auto t = std::ranges::subrange(a,b); }

[Bug c/103980] -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2) > If it's specific to s390, I wonder if it's something to do with excess > precision being enabled by -std=c89 (see commit > a5dd6b69fcbe74c02d4821ac2d

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Bug 85316 depends on bug 68561, which changed state. Bug 68561 Summary: get_integer_range () that handles symbolical ranges https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/68561] get_integer_range () that handles symbolical ranges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Bug 85316 depends on bug 76174, which changed state. Bug 76174 Summary: Missed VRP optimization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/99131] gcc doesn't detect missing comma in array initialisation [-Wstring-concatenation]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99131 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Interestingly, I compiled fedora rawhide with clang and found a whopping 247 cases of this warning across 11 packages.

[Bug c/66322] Linus Torvalds: -Wswitch-bool produces dubious warnings, fails to notice really bad things

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c/103983] -Wswitch-bool seems to do nothing ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103983 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c/103980] -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- If it's specific to s390, I wonder if it's something to do with excess precision being enabled by -std=c89 (see commit a5dd6b69fcbe74c02d4821ac2daf2b8c9f819f6e regarding s390 excess precis

[Bug c/79049] Unknown escape sequence not correctly pointed out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79049 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/103983] New: -Wswitch-bool seems to do nothing ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103983 Bug ID: 103983 Summary: -Wswitch-bool seems to do nothing ? Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/103982] std::ranges::subrange does not work for clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103982 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- clang++ -v clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git af931a51b98f318955fc0bec71f28929e6535619) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug libstdc++/103982] New: std::ranges::subrange does not work for clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103982 Bug ID: 103982 Summary: std::ranges::subrange does not work for clang Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: li

[Bug target/103981] powerpc64le: Wrong code generated for vec_cntlz_lsbb, vec_cnttz_lsbb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103981 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target|

[Bug target/103981] New: powerpc64le: Wrong code generated for vec_cntlz_lsbb, vec_cnttz_lsbb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103981 Bug ID: 103981 Summary: powerpc64le: Wrong code generated for vec_cntlz_lsbb, vec_cnttz_lsbb Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/65253] add -Wmemsize-comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65253 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #3) > > Also happens in fedora rawhide, package gshutdown. > > Also package openbox. And package wise2.

[Bug c/103980] -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Build||s390x-*-linux-gnu Keywords|

[Bug c/103980] New: -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980 Bug ID: 103980 Summary: -Wdouble-promotion triggers on s390x when it shouldn't. Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/103973] x86: 4-way comparison of floats/doubles with spaceship operator possibly suboptimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103973 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps add a new starship3 optab for it and pattern recognize it in gimple_isel? Though that would most likely handle just the 0, -1, 1, 2 case that <=> emits and not say other constants that one could get

[Bug preprocessor/96935] [9 Regression] ICE in subspan, at input.h:69

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96935 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0, 11.1.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/103973] x86: 4-way comparison of floats/doubles with spaceship operator possibly suboptimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103973 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug bootstrap/103974] [12 Regression] ICE in ira_flattening building libstdc++ with r12-6415-g01f3e6a40e72

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103974 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug bootstrap/103974] [12 Regression] ICE in ira_flattening building libstdc++ with r12-6415-g01f3e6a40e72

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103974 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db8d94a0570dc1f3de10c9eb9fe6e91df804272b commit r12-6490-gdb8d94a0570dc1f3de10c9eb9fe6e91df804272b Author: Richard Sandiford D

[Bug tree-optimization/99966] Bounds check not eliminated by assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99966 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/103979] asm goto is not considered volatile with output operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103979 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|asm goto is not considered |asm goto is not considered

[Bug c++/101681] PMF comparison to nullptr is not considered a constexpr inside a template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101681 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|PMF comparison to nullptr |PMF comparison to nullptr

[Bug libstdc++/103726] --disable-hosted-libstdcxx (freestanding C++) does not provide as what standard requires

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103726 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b35f02ed599a70cce752e3cb544a7c9f808fce8 commit r12-6489-g8b35f02ed599a70cce752e3cb544a7c9f808fce8 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug target/103861] [i386] vectorize v2qi vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103861 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:820ac79e8448ad6c631e1387ba51a93dcf2b4e89 commit r12-6488-g820ac79e8448ad6c631e1387ba51a93dcf2b4e89 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Tue

[Bug c++/101597] [12 Regression] ICE in pretty-printer formatting an OBJ_TYPE_REF since r12-2132-ga110855667782dac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101597 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101597] [12 Regression] ICE in pretty-printer formatting an OBJ_TYPE_REF since r12-2132-ga110855667782dac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101597 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef9462581076218d2370fabb09c39d2c83814b9a commit r12-6487-gef9462581076218d2370fabb09c39d2c83814b9a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c/103881] Wconversion false positive when using |= and &= with two rvalues in binary op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103881 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20e4a5e573e76f4379b353cc736215a5f10cdb84 commit r12-6486-g20e4a5e573e76f4379b353cc736215a5f10cdb84 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c/101537] -Wconversion false positive in ternary and |=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20e4a5e573e76f4379b353cc736215a5f10cdb84 commit r12-6486-g20e4a5e573e76f4379b353cc736215a5f10cdb84 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/103831] non-dependent call to non-static member function not rejected ahead of time when there are dependent bases and no 'this'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103831 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0378f563b0321c44c4a9c98cf46d2a22b9160f76 commit r12-6485-g0378f563b0321c44c4a9c98cf46d2a22b9160f76 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/103964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] OVS miscompilation since r0-92313-g5006671f1aaa63cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103964 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- typeof (and sizeof and alignof and decltype in C++) should be well defined, it is unevaluated context, it doesn't evaluate it in any way (ok, sizeof on VLAs is an exception), just cares about the type (size

[Bug libstdc++/103726] --disable-hosted-libstdcxx (freestanding C++) does not provide as what standard requires

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103726 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, we can't remove them, because then they can't be used by C++17 code.

[Bug libstdc++/103726] --disable-hosted-libstdcxx (freestanding C++) does not provide as what standard requires

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103726 --- Comment #17 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16) > This is the first time anybody has pointed out it's missing, that's why it's > still missing. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/freestanding Btw ciso646, cstdali

[Bug libstdc++/103726] --disable-hosted-libstdcxx (freestanding C++) does not provide as what standard requires

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103726 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is the first time anybody has pointed out it's missing, that's why it's still missing.

[Bug libstdc++/103726] --disable-hosted-libstdcxx (freestanding C++) does not provide as what standard requires

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103726 --- Comment #14 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > Fixed on trunk. What about source_location? --- Comment #15 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > Fixed on trunk. What about sour

[Bug libstdc++/103726] --disable-hosted-libstdcxx (freestanding C++) does not provide as what standard requires

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103726 --- Comment #14 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > Fixed on trunk. What about source_location?

[Bug tree-optimization/103964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] OVS miscompilation since r0-92313-g5006671f1aaa63cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103964 --- Comment #12 from Ilya Maximets --- > (In reply to Ilya Maximets from comment #7) > > One thing that is not clear to me is if the following code has an UB or not: > > > > struct member* pos; > > struct ovs_list start; > > > > po

[Bug tree-optimization/103964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] OVS miscompilation since r0-92313-g5006671f1aaa63cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103964 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Ilya Maximets from comment #10) > Doesn't sound very intuitive. I guess, it's easier to just add a NULL > pointer > check after the loop, i.e. ovs_list_insert(pos ? &pos->elem : &start, ...).

[Bug tree-optimization/103964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] OVS miscompilation since r0-92313-g5006671f1aaa63cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103964 --- Comment #10 from Ilya Maximets --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > (In reply to Ilya Maximets from comment #7) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > > > What is the reason why OVS (and kernel) doesn't use 2 variable

[Bug fortran/97390] [OpenACC] 'async' clause on 'data' construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW Assignee|tschwinge at gc

[Bug c/103979] New: asm goto is not considered volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103979 Bug ID: 103979 Summary: asm goto is not considered volatile Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/103891] clang-13 fails to compile libstdc++'s std::variant>: error: attempt to use a deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103891 --- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich --- That allowed me to build mold-1.0.0 with clang-13 + libstdc++. Thank you!

[Bug tree-optimization/103961] [12 Regression] gcc-12 apparently miscompiles libcap's cap_to_text() function since r12-6030-g422f9eb7011b76c1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103961 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/103961] [12 Regression] gcc-12 apparently miscompiles libcap's cap_to_text() function since r12-6030-g422f9eb7011b76c1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103961 --- Comment #17 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Siddhesh Poyarekar from comment #16) > Should be fixed with that patch. May I close this or wait for confirmation > from the reporter? I can no longer reproduce the original issue.

[Bug sanitizer/103978] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_thread.cpp:367 "((ptr[0] == kCurrentStackFrameMagic)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-11 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug sanitizer/103978] New: AddressSanitizer CHECK failed ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_thread.cpp:367 "((ptr[0] == kCurrentStackFrameMagic)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 Bug ID: 103978 Summary: AddressSanitizer CHECK failed ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_thread.cpp:367 "((ptr[0] == kCurrentStackFrameMagic)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x

[Bug middle-end/77608] missing protection on trivially detectable runtime buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608 --- Comment #8 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- The test case for pr 103961 exposed a flaw in my patch, where assuming wholesize isn't always safe or at least would need more careful consideration. I need to think this through some more.

[Bug tree-optimization/103961] [12 Regression] gcc-12 apparently miscompiles libcap's cap_to_text() function since r12-6030-g422f9eb7011b76c1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103961 --- Comment #16 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- Should be fixed with that patch. May I close this or wait for confirmation from the reporter?

[Bug other/103617] Debugging gcc: can't use 'pp' command for irange

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103617 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod --- Is this actually a bug? I don't believe wide_int works either? PP doesn't work with class instances... (gdb) p lh.lower_bound(0) $3 = { = {val = {-2147483648, 18992502, 140737232043872, 140737233406440,

[Bug middle-end/70090] add non-constant variant of __builtin_object_size for _FORTIFY_SOURCE and -fsanitize=object-size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70090 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06bc1b0c539e3a60692d7432d15e701c38610f80 commit r12-6482-g06bc1b0c539e3a60692d7432d15e701c38610f80 Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar

  1   2   >