[Bug other/98375] [meta bug] GCC 12 pending patches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98375 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/98525] potential error in expand_call_inline error handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98525 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- successfully_inlined = expand_call_inline (bb, stmt, id, to_purge); maybe_remove_unused_call_args (cfun, stmt); /* This used to return true even though we do fail to inline in some

[Bug middle-end/98548] missing warning on strcmp with a nonstring member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98548 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/69289] Compiling without --profile-generate causes longer execution time (-O3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69289 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Known to work|

[Bug c++/89870] C++ suggest header for abort()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89870 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Depends on|

[Bug c++/89055] wrong location with macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89055 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong location with |wrong location with macros

[Bug c++/103659] Declared function template can be deleted later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103659 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Dup of bug 90703. The only reason I knew there was a dup is because I just saw it today when I was going through the C++ bug reports. So I was not doing any mag

[Bug c++/90703] `=delete` accepted on a second declaration of the same function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90703 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/103659] Declared function template can be deleted later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103659 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103659] New: Declared function template can be deleted later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103659 Bug ID: 103659 Summary: Declared function template can be deleted later Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/87429] Strange overload resolution with decltype in template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87429 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection See Also|

[Bug c++/85493] decltype can use deleted constructor and deleted template function in template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85493 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 10.3.0, 7.2.0 Known to work

[Bug c++/86697] decltype for lambda capture gives wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86697 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/81202] Concept parsing error for default template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81202 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Full testcase: #include #include template constexpr bool IsPtrC=std::is_pointer_v&&(std::is_same_v ||std::is_same_v>); template concept IsPtrC2=IsPtrC; template using TEST=int; int main(int argc,char*argv

[Bug c++/103534] [12 regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow warning with std::string concatencation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e8067041d1d69da02bd7578f58abc11eb35a04b commit r12-5906-g2e8067041d1d69da02bd7578f58abc11eb35a04b Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/91622] Compiler internal error DJGPP GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91622 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 68858, which changed state. Bug 68858 Summary: Cannot use fold expression in requirements with two parameters packs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68858 What|Removed |Adde

[Bug c++/68858] Cannot use fold expression in requirements with two parameters packs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68858 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61726] Ambiguous overload resolution with inherited op()s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61726 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||12944 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/78722] noexcept and function pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78722 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/101962] Analyzer NULL false positive with pointer manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101962 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/103562] Jitted code produces incorrect result when returning 3-member struct from internal function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103562 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1250dcee74985eaeacae3b85e5ec78937225d322 commit r11-9375-g1250dcee74985eaeacae3b85e5ec78937225d322 Author: David Malcolm

[Bug analyzer/101962] Analyzer NULL false positive with pointer manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101962 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de0656f98640a57cd9dfdb090264afaa06ba46cc commit r11-9374-gde0656f98640a57cd9dfdb090264afaa06ba46cc Author: David Malcolm

[Bug middle-end/103614] Modulo equality optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103614 --- Comment #1 from getchar_gnu at hotmail dot com --- Not sure if related, but something like x%13==8 && x>17 && x<146 can also reduce some code

[Bug c++/96207] GCC accepts "delete" function definition inside a class member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96207 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/86430] ambiguous overload?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86430 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Known to fail|

[Bug c++/90529] suggest struct or class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-05-20 00:00:00 |2021-12-10 Severity|normal

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #6 from Andr

[Bug c++/82171] Cant use std::declval in concept testing map operator[]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82171 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/89367] Constexpr expression is not constexpr in template, but is constexpr in non-template.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89367 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/97077] Missed loop unrolling with range for over initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97077 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-09-17 00:00:00 |2021-12-10 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c++/87680] Small program produces 160 meg .o file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87680 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/103483] context-sensitive ranges change triggers stringop-overread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483 --- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor --- The warning for the test case in comment #12 isn't directly related to ranges: it's issued simply because the invalid statement is in the IL and not eliminated by DCE (the secret functions don't let it). Si

[Bug inline-asm/98096] Inconsistent operand numbering for asm goto with in-out operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98096 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Nick Desaulniers from comment #5) > Was it ever consider that the behavior should be changed, rather than > documented? Seems like changing an already documented and released feature seems wrong

[Bug inline-asm/98096] Inconsistent operand numbering for asm goto with in-out operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98096 --- Comment #5 from Nick Desaulniers --- While the changes to gcc/stmt.c and the second asm goto statement in gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr98096.c in https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=72d78655a91bb2f89ac4432cfd6374380d6f9987

[Bug jit/103562] Jitted code produces incorrect result when returning 3-member struct from internal function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103562 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Should be fixed by the above commit on trunk for gcc 12. Probably should backport this; keeping this open until that's done.

[Bug jit/103562] Jitted code produces incorrect result when returning 3-member struct from internal function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103562 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2f4b4b76cdd0a4150e82e69fae4a70c54b523d2 commit r12-5903-ga2f4b4b76cdd0a4150e82e69fae4a70c54b523d2 Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug c++/79493] Bad diagnostic when referring to inner type that does not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Known to work|

[Bug c++/88493] Inconsistent error messages for unknown types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88493 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/88118] GCC keeps unnecessary calls to new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88118 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > Fixed in GCC 10 by r10-2105-gcb50701ec2c7a (I found a slight missed > optimization but I will file that as a seperate issue). The slight missed optimization is d

[Bug c++/88118] GCC keeps unnecessary calls to new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88118 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/102958] std::u8string suboptimal compared to std::string, triggers warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102958 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Let's focus on the missed-optimization issues in this PR, and address the broader diagnostic issues in PR 103483.

[Bug middle-end/103483] context-sensitive ranges change triggers stringop-overread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug c++/88118] GCC keeps unnecessary calls to new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88118 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement See Also|

[Bug c++/38172] warn_unused_result does not work with structs not containing a copy constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15) > Can the bug be marked as resolved? Not exactly with an empty struct we warn twice. That is take: struct MyClass{}; typedef struct MyClass MyClass; MyClass Bar2(

[Bug fortran/103606] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297 since r9-3324-g2b03b800d866d345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug analyzer/103658] missing -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value at -O1 and below for an array access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103658 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Actually, what I was really after is trying to see if the analyzer would print the conditionals involved in the subscript expressions. But in the simple test case in comment #0 there are no conditionals. Th

[Bug c++/58950] Missing "statement has no effect"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950 --- Comment #26 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #25) > (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6) > > For: > > > > void f(){ > > int i = 2; > > (i+i); > > } > > This case is fixed on the trunk: > > : In functi

[Bug c++/58950] Missing "statement has no effect"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #25 from And

[Bug analyzer/103658] New: missing -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value at -O1 and below for an array access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103658 Bug ID: 103658 Summary: missing -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value at -O1 and below for an array access Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c++/86870] Declaration disambiguation is too greedy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86870 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC, clang, MSVC and ICC all reject it.

[Bug ipa/103601] [12 Regression] ICE in insert_kill, at ipa-modref-tree.c:84 since r12-5244-g64f3e71c302b4a13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103601 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103606] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297 since r9-3324-g2b03b800d866d345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/92053] Compilation fails or succeeds depending on the optimization flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92053 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Last reconfirmed|2021-

[Bug c++/78217] Duplicate decls handling with auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lebedev.ri at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/85932] GCC incorrectly rejects mismatch of types, instead of retrying after type deduction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85932 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/103623] [12 Regression] error: unable to generate reloads (ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4132), or error: insn does not satisfy its constraints (ICE in extract_constrain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103623 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/103645] Gimplifier does not remove empty struct stores in a few cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug objc/103639] [11/12 Regression] switch case with break in fast enumeration loop generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103639 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 CC|

[Bug target/103657] GCC can no longer catch EH on x86_64-w64-mingw32 hosted 64 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103657 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28682

[Bug tree-optimization/103647] constant array comparison not always folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103647 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/103647] constant array comparison not always folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103647 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- well f should be optimized to return true while g should be optimized to return false.

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3459ef2e9f9cd4d3ed64c9bc44282534a24987b8 commit r11-9372-g3459ef2e9f9cd4d3ed64c9bc44282534a24987b8 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug gcov-profile/100788] Internal compiler error related to #line macros(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Known to work|

[Bug gcov-profile/100788] Internal compiler error related to #line macros(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andre.schackier at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug gcov-profile/103651] Using "#Line 0" in a function with "-coverage" crashes the compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103651 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103607] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/103657] GCC can no longer catch EH on x86_64-w64-mingw32 hosted 64 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103657 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- D:\hg\fast_io\tests\0017.error>g++ -o error error.cc -Ofast -std=c++2b -s -march=native -I../../include -lntdll -fuse-ld=lld D:\hg\fast_io\tests\0017.error>error errc:no_such_file_or_directory clang++ -o error

[Bug c++/103657] GCC can no longer catch EH on x86_64-w64-mingw32 hosted 64 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103657 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- D:\hg\fast_io\tests\0017.error>g++ -o error error.cc -Ofast -std=c++2b -s -flto -march=native -I../../include -lntdll D:\hg\fast_io\tests\0017.error>error D:\hg\fast_io\tests\0017.error>clang++ -o error error.c

[Bug c++/103657] New: GCC can no longer throw EH on x86_64-w64-mingw32 hosted 64 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103657 Bug ID: 103657 Summary: GCC can no longer throw EH on x86_64-w64-mingw32 hosted 64 bits Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/103656] make install-strip -j cannot find x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip for canadian compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103656 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- rm -rf /home/cqwrteur/canadian/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libexec/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/12.0.0/install-tools rm: cannot remove '/home/cqwrteur/canadian/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libexec/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/12.0.0/install-to

[Bug target/103656] New: make install-strip -j cannot find x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip for canadian compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103656 Bug ID: 103656 Summary: make install-strip -j cannot find x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip for canadian compilation Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug fortran/103607] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b1dae4d33285643c5f51d828aa6f31ffbfc33b7 commit r9-9863-g8b1dae4d33285643c5f51d828aa6f31ffbfc33b7 Author: Harald Anlauf Da

[Bug fortran/103607] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45cbfabe01878c3efd8b24f3fef06baf48983308 commit r10-10330-g45cbfabe01878c3efd8b24f3fef06baf48983308 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug libstdc++/103655] New: "x" does not exist on windows and dos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103655 Bug ID: 103655 Summary: "x" does not exist on windows and dos Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug jit/103562] Jitted code produces incorrect result when returning 3-member struct from internal function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103562 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from David Malc

[Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb6a1ebb8585b85879735d0d6df9535885fad165 commit r12-5900-gbb6a1ebb8585b85879735d0d6df9535885fad165 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug libgcc/103654] cannot correctly catch C++ exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103654 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/103654] cannot correctly catch C++ exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103654 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- g++ -o error error.cc -Ofast -std=c++23 -s -flto -march=native

[Bug libgcc/103654] cannot correctly catch C++ exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103654 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51972 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51972&action=edit assembly gcc generates

[Bug libgcc/103654] cannot correctly catch C++ exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103654 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51971 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51971&action=edit Preprocessor file

[Bug libgcc/103654] cannot correctly catch C++ exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103654 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unlvsur at live dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug libgcc/103654] New: cannot correctly catch C++ exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103654 Bug ID: 103654 Summary: cannot correctly catch C++ exceptions Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug c++/103653] GCC rejected int x = 0; auto(x); in C++23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103653 康桓瑋 changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/103653] New: GCC rejected int x = 0; auto(x); in C++23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103653 Bug ID: 103653 Summary: GCC rejected int x = 0; auto(x); in C++23 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/103534] [12 regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow warning with std::string concatencation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/103534] [12 regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow warning with std::string concatencation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- We discussed before (e.g., in PR 93971) the idea of annotating std::string with some attribute telling the optimizer the internal pointer doesn't alias with anything except for the this->_M_local_buf or the r

[Bug c++/103534] [12 regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow warning with std::string concatencation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- So it seems that this warning did find a real issue with the library, but one that was hard to connect to the actual wording of the message (and didn't affect the original testcase). In particular, "specifi

[Bug c++/103534] [12 regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow warning with std::string concatencation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 51970 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51970&action=edit libstdc++ fix

[Bug c++/103534] [12 regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow warning with std::string concatencation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/86976] [meta-bug] Issues with std::time_get, std::time_put etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86976 Bug 86976 depends on bug 86967, which changed state. Bug 86967 Summary: time_get fails to parse abbreviated weekday with %A format string https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86967 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libstdc++/86967] time_get fails to parse abbreviated weekday with %A format string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86967 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/79833] std::put_time has the wrong values for 2 digit years

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79833 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/103646] -O2 -mstackrealign and inline-asm with ebp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103646 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFI

[Bug libstdc++/45896] [C++0x] Facet time_get not reading dates according to the IEEE 1003 standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug gcov-profile/103652] New: Producing profile with -O2 -flto and trying to consume it with -O3 -flto leads to ICEs on indirect call profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103652 Bug ID: 103652 Summary: Producing profile with -O2 -flto and trying to consume it with -O3 -flto leads to ICEs on indirect call profiling Product: gcc Version: 1

[Bug libstdc++/71367] std::time_get does not implement 'r' or 'p'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug libstdc++/86976] [meta-bug] Issues with std::time_get, std::time_put etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86976 Bug 86976 depends on bug 78714, which changed state. Bug 78714 Summary: std::get_time / std::time_get::get does not accept full month name in %b https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78714 What|Removed |

[Bug libstdc++/78714] std::get_time / std::time_get::get does not accept full month name in %b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78714 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/71367] std::time_get does not implement 'r' or 'p'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:982a2c9b7866558039df61b0596caad57c94c8c4 commit r12-5899-g982a2c9b7866558039df61b0596caad57c94c8c4 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fr

  1   2   3   >