https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-02
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> This is a pointer to member function with -fms-extensions issue.
>
> I am reducing, the ICE can still be seen on the trunk.
I should mention I was able to repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103300
--- Comment #6 from Zhendong Su ---
Another test likely for the same issue:
[652] % gcctk -O3 small.c; ./a.out
Aborted
[653] % gcctk -O2 -floop-unroll-and-jam small.c; ./a.out
Aborted
[654] % cat small.c
int printf(const char *, ...);
int a[2],
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmx12133 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103525
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103302
--- Comment #8 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 51917
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51917&action=edit
testcase failing with the patch applied
The attached unreduced testcase is failing with the patch applied, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103302
--- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #6)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/585963.html appears
> to no longer hit this error, though I've only inspected the asm output, not
> trie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80521
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The first testcase produces:
:41:8: error: 'ProducerAccess' is not a template
41 | struct ProducerAccess {
|^~
:14:16: note: previous declaration here
14 | friend class Produ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80521
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Both testcases seems to be fixed in GCC 9+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80427
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-04-18 00:00:00 |2021-12-1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103518
--- Comment #4 from Egor Pugin ---
Created attachment 51916
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51916&action=edit
preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> The current top of 6.0 trunk still issues the bogus diagnostic. Confirming
> also with prior versions.
Actually this example is invalid code as DR 1312 (which wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> The current top of 6.0 trunk still issues the bogus diagnostic. Confirming
> also with prior versions.
Note this example is different as it worked in 4.6.4 but t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deaeod at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.5
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103526
Bug ID: 103526
Summary: -fanalyzer considers memcpy()ed and returned pointer
to malloc()ed memory a memory leak
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103510
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The only registers which are saved are the callee saved register IIRC. So you
need to know the ABI.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103510
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Funny there is a comment in the libgcc sources:
/* This will segfault if the register hasn't been saved. */
Which has been there since day 1 of IA-64 ABI exception handling back in
g:52a11cbfcf0cfb32628b6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103525
Bug ID: 103525
Summary: [RISCV] wrong function entry with
-fpatchable-function-entry
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103383
--- Comment #6 from Rich Kujoth ---
I'm not really in a position to change toolchains, so I needed to make it work
with the version of GCC I have. Since the issue is specific to swap16, I made
my own swap16 function that explicitly calls the two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49952
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-02
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103518
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Egor Pugin from comment #0)
> Preprocessed file (315KB):
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/tey8z9mfi123uon/gcc_hang.tar.xz?dl=1
Can you attach this? It should be under the size limit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-02
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug ID: 103524
Summary: [meta-bug] modules issue
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103522
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103302
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/585963.html appears to
no longer hit this error, though I've only inspected the asm output, not tried
to run it yet; can anyone confirm?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
void d(float *a, float b, int c) {
float e;
for (; c; c--, e += b)
a[c] = e;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
Here I assumed that the current cl optimization/option save and restore scheme
wants to keep the global_option/global_option_set same as the one from the
initial option processing. After we parsing all attribut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-02
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103519
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
get_mem_refs_of_builtin_call doesn't handle target-specific builtins.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103520
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa10faa72d8e9e97b6e564f8b0a7b602538d0da0
commit r12-5704-gfa10faa72d8e9e97b6e564f8b0a7b602538d0da0
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Microblaze bswaphi2 |Microblaze bswaphi2 can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> I think we should come up with a better plan in general for "flow sensative"
> warnings really. Maybe only enable them with -O2 and above. But we keep on
> getti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 103483, which changed state.
Bug 103483 Summary: context-sensitive ranges change triggers stringop-overread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102471
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:860c56b5bc356960a4d0445dadc43ceddbe3c7e2
commit r12-5701-g860c56b5bc356960a4d0445dadc43ceddbe3c7e2
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103274
--- Comment #12 from Tomas Kalibera ---
I've tested with GCC 10.3 with R. R can be built and passes its tests (without
the patch, it crashes). Also, I've checked the generated assembly with an awk
script looking for a call instruction immediatel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102881
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
Oops, wrong PR number...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
looks like that this is exactly the same issue as exposed in pr102285.
and the original fix to pr102285 just hide this inconsistent IR issue.
-mno-strict-align exposed this issue again.
So. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:42:44PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
>
> --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Steve Karg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102811
--- Comment #26 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The testcase now compiles with -O2 -mf16c to:
vpxor %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm2
vpblendw$1, %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
vpblendw$1, %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm1
vcvtph2ps %xmm1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102881
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7eb961d83b0eda53aeb1cfaacdc367e1952de613
commit r12-5700-g7eb961d83b0eda53aeb1cfaacdc367e1952de613
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102811
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7eb961d83b0eda53aeb1cfaacdc367e1952de613
commit r12-5700-g7eb961d83b0eda53aeb1cfaacdc367e1952de613
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> Ah yes. Good catch. Are you going to insert the 2 lines
> lower int the file? If so, I think you can considered
> the patch complete and reviewed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
An additional ICE seen on a month old tree is
during GIMPLE pass: veclower2
zbuf.i: In function 'd':
zbuf.i:3:1: internal compiler error: in to_constant, at poly-int.h:504
0xbc9494 poly_int_pod<2u, unsign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 08:26:25PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
>
> --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523
Bug ID: 103523
Summary: [12 Regression] SVE float auto-vect float format
expand failure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103409
--- Comment #13 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> I've fixed the threading slowdown. Can someone verify and close this PR if
> all
> the slowdown has been accounted for? If not, then someone needs to explore
> any
> slowdown unrelated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103513
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103522
Bug ID: 103522
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in
r12-5649
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c
> index 6552eaf3b0c..1b2f5b310a7 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/array.c
> @@ -4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101145
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de3e5aae6c4b540e808c822c1e878b0a3304d09c
commit r12-5699-gde3e5aae6c4b540e808c822c1e878b0a3304d09c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #9 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
disable tree-ccp by adding -fno-tree-ccp cures the ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103127
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103127
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b1ef8b9db964ec2375df29a73d2b1651afe7ea9
commit r12-5698-g5b1ef8b9db964ec2375df29a73d2b1651afe7ea9
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103521
Bug ID: 103521
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93032-mztools.c
broken after r12-5585
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103319
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103310
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53caa4723d8de73fe21e63ba264082f3071b2887
commit r12-5696-g53caa4723d8de73fe21e63ba264082f3071b2887
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103491
--- Comment #4 from Pavel M ---
To: jos...@codesourcery.com
Re: This testcase is incorrect.
Indeed. The F.10.8.3 was misunderstood.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102347
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d683a1b3e89007211a7c800bb61647d8ac42cb6b
commit r12-5695-gd683a1b3e89007211a7c800bb61647d8ac42cb6b
Author: Bill Schmidt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103501
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> I haven't checked the unordered containers yet to see if they have the same
> issue.
This still needs to be done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||allan.chandler at oakton dot
com.a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102471
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from David Malc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103267
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103267
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7dd5b92bbe0944dc27e6175b0df72ed0a7188016
commit r9-9852-g7dd5b92bbe0944dc27e6175b0df72ed0a7188016
Author: Martin Jambor
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94490
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Patch finally posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/585932.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #8 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the minimum option to repeat this failure is "-O1 -mno-strict-align".
The option "-mno-strict-align" is the one that make the difference.
For the following call to .DEFERRED_INIT:
MEM[(int[0:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I have a patch:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/char_traits.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/char_traits.h
@@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ namespace __gnu_cxx _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
{
_GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101912
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103409
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I've fixed the threading slowdown. Can someone verify and close this PR if all
the slowdown has been accounted for? If not, then someone needs to explore any
slowdown unrelated to the threader.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103409
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54ebec35abec09a24b47b997172622ca0d8e2318
commit r12-5694-g54ebec35abec09a24b47b997172622ca0d8e2318
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80548
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4)
> Created attachment 51908 [details]
> untested patch
>
> Like this. It fixes the problem at least for -O2.
Richi responded that the current BB copier won't ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82090
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I never explored the idea, but Bodik has a discussion of recording infeasible
paths in the CFG which would seem to address this issue. He was using the
concept in the context of coverage analysis -- the ide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103127
--- Comment #11 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please see the details of the discussion of the patch for this bug:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg275509.html
as a summary, we decide to exclude OPAQUE_TYPE from auto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102471
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
There's also
https://www.nist.gov/itl/ssd/software-quality-group/other-assurance-tool-test-collections
Currently the only non-Java collection on the list is:
https://sir.csc.ncsu.edu/portal/index.php
Ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82090
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
[from the POC patch]
It seems that every missed thread (due to inability of the threader,
or due to cost restraints) is a potential false positive for the
uninit code. Perhaps what we need is a way to iden
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82090
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 51913
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51913&action=edit
proof of concept to reduce uninit warnings with the path solver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96074
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96074
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103501
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:056551414a328b427c4bf4955b9a3832f344685c
commit r12-5693-g056551414a328b427c4bf4955b9a3832f344685c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: aarch64-*-*
Target: aarch64-*-*
make[3]: Entering directory
'/opt/gcc/gcc-20211201/Build/aarch64-suse-linux/libphobos/libdruntime'
/bin/sh ../libto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103507
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103519
David Long changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dlong at cadence dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103519
Bug ID: 103519
Summary: Address sanitizer check missing for AVX512 masked load
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 103517, which changed state.
Bug 103517 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:242 with -O2
-march=skylake-avx512 since r12-5612-g10833849b55401a5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e625a44f6f3001cea31e0f7c563943ecba92b68
commit r12-5689-g1e625a44f6f3001cea31e0f7c563943ecba92b68
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Macleod ---
Stack frame depth issued should be completely resolved in GCC12 now by patches
for PR 103231 and a follow up for PR 103464.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103464
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103464
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb137e85720654e41db370d952df226654e576a6
commit r12-5688-gcb137e85720654e41db370d952df226654e576a6
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
