https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|constant not optimized /|constant not optimized /
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|7.1.0 |
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #46 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this came up on twitter the other day:
https://twitter.com/rep_stosq_void/status/1461635511009828864
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103343
Bug ID: 103343
Summary: Invalid codegen when comparing pointer to one past the
end and then dereferencing that pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103342
Bug ID: 103342
Summary: [OPENMP]Missing barrier for linear clause within loop
simd construct which not directly contained by
parrellel construct
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81847
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.5.0
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103052
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce2dbf943ac8ffefe048016ac3abfd3b6a4518d4
commit r12-5434-gce2dbf943ac8ffefe048016ac3abfd3b6a4518d4
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103052
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0e99d5bb741d3db74a67d492f47b28217fbf88a
commit r12-5433-ga0e99d5bb741d3db74a67d492f47b28217fbf88a
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101541
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Mine, let me try to figure out the best way to fix this.
Basically the patterns starting with:
/* abs/negative simplifications moved from fold_cond_expr_with_co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103341
Bug ID: 103341
Summary: ICE type of variable instantiation constrained on
template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103340
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> Only __gnu_cxx::new_allocator is usable in constant expressions.
And __gnu_cxx::malloc_allocator.
Making the others work isn't difficult.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103217
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Dominique Martinet from comment #4)
[...snip...]
Thanks for re-testing it, and the new test cases.
> (What do you prefer to move forward -- I've tried reopening the bug but you
> really fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103226
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103226
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7950c96ca667ddaab9d6e894da3958ebc2e2dccb
commit r12-5432-g7950c96ca667ddaab9d6e894da3958ebc2e2dccb
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Nov 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks for the explanation! If you have other suggestions to make things less
wrong they'll be welcome.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103335
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-20
Target|powerpc64-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305
Pekka S changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kaps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103331
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neroden at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkorb at gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from X
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102117
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
--- Comment #9 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
> ... fixing this problem properly.
> I just loked into thi again and we already have code that preserves
> propagates bits on pointer pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64135
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Another option would be to drop the base class from std::allocator when
> configured to derive from new_allocator, and just inline that code into
> std::alloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
--- Comment #8 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
>
> --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
> (In reply to hubicka from comment #5)
> > > I like the idea of transformation phases better
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103340
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103340
Bug ID: 103340
Summary: constexpr std::string is incompatible with
--enable-libstdcxx-allocator
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328
--- Comment #17 from Avi Kivity ---
Created attachment 51843
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51843&action=edit
valid-code reproducer (compiles with -O0)
Uploaded a valid-code reproducer (if you don't mind warnings). Compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102872
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder if we should just do this:
(for neeq (ne eq)
(simplify
(neeq (convert:s @0) integer_zerop@1)
(with
{
tree inside_type = TREE_TYPE (@0);
tree outer_type = TREE_TYPE (@1);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31531
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26645|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103220
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103220
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74faa9834a9ad208e34f67b08c854c20b0fcfe92
commit r12-5430-g74faa9834a9ad208e34f67b08c854c20b0fcfe92
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sa
35 matches
Mail list logo
