https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103113
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114
Bug ID: 103114
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in build_complex, at tree.c:2470
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103113
Bug ID: 103113
Summary: Bad error message with multiply indirect pointer to
struct
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103102
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
--- Comment #5 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103102
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(gdb) p type
$14 =
(gdb) p maskt.typed.type
$13 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103102
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
#1 0x013013a2 in maybe_gen_insn (icode=CODE_FOR_nothing, nops=3,
ops=0x7fffd500) at /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/optabs.c:7871
7871 gcc_assert (nops == (unsigned int) insn_data[(i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103102
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
gfortran.dg/pr101267.f90 ICEs similar to gfortran.dg/pr81175.f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103102
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100592
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80519
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|if(p)free(p) with -Os |optimize if(p)free(p) with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 97752, which changed state.
Bug 97752 Summary: incorrect address to inherited object in constexpr context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97752
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven.vanderschoot@nextlev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103070
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6078eb7452aa89cb9aeecac30932b58967389459
commit r12-4974-g6078eb7452aa89cb9aeecac30932b58967389459
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103070
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6078eb7452aa89cb9aeecac30932b58967389459
commit r12-4974-g6078eb7452aa89cb9aeecac30932b58967389459
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sat N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] Incorrect |[12 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103106
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Hi,
This is a rather strange thing, which suspiciously looks like bug. I have a
file like this:
```
export module engine.memory : align_type;
export import engine.core;
export I32 get_5()
{
return 5;
}
export namespace engine::memory
{
enum class AlignType : I32
{
align_1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103112
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-06
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102928
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-06
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103112
Bug ID: 103112
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_descriptor_field for
gfortran.dg/coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 caf single
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103111
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So if I add:
if (savepath->s_sz <= 0) __builtin_unreachable();
Before the check/setting of ->n. I get no warning.
If I unconditional set n to 0 rather than checking to see if it is greater than
0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103111
Bug ID: 103111
Summary: bogus stringop overflow warning
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102727
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103110
--- Comment #6 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Thanks for the explanation! I reported Clang bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52434
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103110
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Fedor Chelnokov from comment #4)
> Actually you changed the example, and if T is void, then T{} is ill-formed.
> But I do not see how it relates to the original program.
I know I changed the ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103110
--- Comment #4 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Actually you changed the example, and if T is void, then T{} is ill-formed. But
I do not see how it relates to the original program.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103110
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-06
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103110
--- Comment #2 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
I think the program must be equivalent to
```
struct S {
operator auto() const { return 2; }
};
int main() {
S s;
[[maybe_unused]] int d = s;
}
```
and `auto` here is deduced from `return 2` a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103110
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is a bug in clang as GCC, ICC (EDG) and MSVC all reject the code
for the same reason.
GCC even warns about it:
:3:14: warning: use of 'auto' in member template conversion operator
can never be d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103107
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96517
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||visual2017cpp at hotmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103110
Bug ID: 103110
Summary: templated operator auto is ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103109
Bug ID: 103109
Summary: madd not used for multiply add on POWER9
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102715
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df2135e88a8f78c853b35246ad426b01b6d08378
commit r12-4973-gdf2135e88a8f78c853b35246ad426b01b6d08378
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103108
Bug ID: 103108
Summary: compiler ICE for lambda coroutines that captures this
when optimization is used
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103005
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Röver ---
I think the source of the problem is function
__fold_input(const simd& __x)
in simd_math.h
this function should return values between -pi/4 and pi/4 but doesn't for the
big argument. E.g for
29850643931
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103005
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Röver ---
I think the source of the problem is function
__fold_input(const simd& __x)
in simd_math.h
this function should return values between -pi/4 and pi/4 but doesn't for the
big argument. E.g for
29850643931
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103066
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Macieira ---
You're right that emitting more penalises those who have done their job and
written proper code.
The problem we're seeing is that such code appears to be the minority. Or,
maybe put differently, the bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 103061, which changed state.
Bug 103061 Summary: [12 Regression] 527.cam4_r miscompiled with -O2
-march=znver1 since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103061
What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103061
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103061
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4856699eeb2809c50930bafe341a96470877195d
commit r12-4971-g4856699eeb2809c50930bafe341a96470877195d
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103105
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
-r12-4968-20211106001624-g851dff042a2-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211106 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103106
Bug ID: 103106
Summary: PPC: Missing builtin for P9 vmsumudm
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58798
--- Comment #11 from Olaf van der Spek ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10)
> Updating the title accordingly.
The title doesn't reflect the original issue anymore, should a new issue be
filed for that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103061
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #15)
> Created attachment 51740 [details]
> untested patch
>
> This should do it. Martin, can you verify this fixes it on your end?
Yes, it does! Thanks a lot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103105
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 103073, which changed state.
Bug 103073 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in insert_access, at
ipa-modref-tree.h:578 since r12-4401-gfecd145359fc981b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103073
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103073
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> > I'd prefer existing ordering relative to alphabetical: the list produced by
> > GCC is mostly ordered first by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9968
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
64 matches
Mail list logo
