[Bug target/101529] [11/12 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_convertvector() and __builtin_shufflevector() at -Og caused by r11-2192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 51741 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51741&action=edit patch which is testing including testcases Full patch which is in testing right now. Added the testcases for t

[Bug c/103104] missing warning about superfluous forward declaration -Wsuperfluous-forward-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103104 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89078] [meta-bug] Improve the gfortran manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89078 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/101529] [11/12 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_convertvector() and __builtin_shufflevector() at -Og caused by r11-2192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Patch which I am testing: My original patch before Dmitrij took it over, actually had the correct behavior and the used a gen_reg_rtx. :(

[Bug target/101529] [11/12 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_convertvector() and __builtin_shufflevector() at -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch which I am testing: diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c index 2c00583e12c..d5b0cb7ae2f 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c

[Bug target/101529] [11/12 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_convertvector() and __builtin_shufflevector() at -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3

[Bug target/101529] [11/12 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_convertvector() and __builtin_shufflevector() at -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/103094] [12 Regression] Incorrect codegen from AArch64 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103094 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/103100] [11/12 Regression] unaligned access generated with memset or {} and -O2 -mstrict-align

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103100 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c++/98401] coroutines: Temporaries passed to co_await sometimes cause an extraneous call to destructor at incorrect address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98401 Michael Theall changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pigman46 at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/103105] [11/12 Regression] ICE iterative_hash_template_arg with concepts and varagrs template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103105 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/12255] [C++98/11/14 only] exception-specification ignored on pointer to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12255 Bug 12255 depends on bug 103092, which changed state. Bug 103092 Summary: Non-throwing function pointer can point to a throwing-function in C++14 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103092 What|Removed

[Bug c++/49332] [C++0x] noexcept ignored on function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49332 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/103092] Non-throwing function pointer can point to a throwing-function in C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103092 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/103105] [11/12 Regression] ICE iterative_hash_template_arg with concepts and varagrs template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103105 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/35930] -pedantic: Check for -std=f95/f2003/f2008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/94404] [meta-bug] C++ core issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404 Bug 94404 depends on bug 95016, which changed state. Bug 95016 Summary: [DR 2082] Referring to parameters in unevaluated operands of default arguments https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95016 What|Removed

[Bug c++/95016] [DR 2082] Referring to parameters in unevaluated operands of default arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95016 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103105] New: [11 Regression] ICE iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.c:1790

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103105 Bug ID: 103105 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.c:1790 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79001] spurious "defined but not used" warning with explicit instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79001 --- Comment #5 from Bernie Innocenti --- clang with -Wunused-function also does not issue a warning for this testcase.

[Bug c++/79001] spurious "defined but not used" warning with explicit instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79001 --- Comment #4 from Bernie Innocenti --- GCC 5.1 does not issue a warning.

[Bug c++/79001] spurious "defined but not used" warning with explicit instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79001 Bernie Innocenti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernie at codewiz dot org --- Comment

[Bug c/103104] New: missing warning about superfluous forward declaration -Wsuperfluous-forward-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103104 Bug ID: 103104 Summary: missing warning about superfluous forward declaration -Wsuperfluous-forward-declaration Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/103092] Non-throwing function pointer can point to a throwing-function in C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103092 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah yes, and I think this is a dup of pr 49332

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 --- Comment #49 from Marek Polacek --- Patch resurrected for GCC 12: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583544.html

[Bug target/38549] [avr] eicall not properly set for > 128K program space

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38549 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug target/38342] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] __attribute__((__progmem__)) not propagated from typedef to data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38342 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #14

[Bug target/26504] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compute_frame_pointer_to_cfa_displacement error for avr target with --with-dwarf2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26504 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #20

[Bug target/71151] [avr] -fmerge-constants and -fdata-sections/-ffunction-sections results in string constants in .progmem.gcc_sw section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #24

[Bug tree-optimization/82944] missing -Wstringop-truncation on strncpy due to system header macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82944 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/90329] Incompatibility between gfortran and C lapack calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #55

[Bug target/77728] [5 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #64

[Bug c++/87137] [8/9 Regression] Non-virtual member function increases struct size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87137 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug c/40366] Array + XOR swap fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40366 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug target/94711] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94711 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug target/94707] [8/9 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94707 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug target/18251] unable to find a register to spill in class `POINTER_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18251 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #43

[Bug c++/43745] [avr] g++ puts VTABLES in SRAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #15

[Bug preprocessor/23479] Implement binary constants with a "0b" prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23479 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #34

[Bug libstdc++/40518] data races when calling std::string::erase() on empty string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40518 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #26

[Bug c++/41437] No access control for classes in template functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #18

[Bug target/94383] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #18

[Bug target/94704] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on s390x/s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94704 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10/11 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #21

[Bug pch/29085] Turning on precompiled header with anonymous namespaces spoils linking.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29085 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug target/96168] GCC support for Apple Silicon (Arm64) on macOS requested

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug c++/11633] [DR 430] g++ does not initialize structures when auto-increment variables are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11633 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug c++/21008] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] [DR515] Access failure in accessing data member of base class from derived template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21008 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #19

[Bug libstdc++/92285] Layout of istreambuf_iterator subobject depends on -std mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92285 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Tim Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timturnerc at yahoo dot com --- Comment #223

[Bug fortran/102817] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_clear_shape, at fortran/expr.c:422 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcf3728abe842922005166d3065fc5fdfea1 commit r12-4967-gbcf3728abe842922005166d3065fc5fdfea1 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: F

[Bug c++/103092] Non-throwing function pointer can point to a throwing-function in C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103092 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||12255 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug ipa/103073] [12 Regression] ICE in insert_access, at ipa-modref-tree.h:578 since r12-4401-gfecd145359fc981b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103073 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f37780372212a7245f0528e46dbeb741316bba1 commit r12-4966-g5f37780372212a7245f0528e46dbeb741316bba1 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Fri

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 103082, which changed state. Bug 103082 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc/poly-int.h:1162:5: runtime error: left shift of negative value -40 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103082 What|Removed

[Bug ipa/103082] [12 Regression] gcc/poly-int.h:1162:5: runtime error: left shift of negative value -40

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103082 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/103082] [12 Regression] gcc/poly-int.h:1162:5: runtime error: left shift of negative value -40

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103082 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cc8ca8da90426f625481195a2127a5e86689bcd commit r12-4965-g9cc8ca8da90426f625481195a2127a5e86689bcd Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Fri N

[Bug fortran/69419] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have real_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5618

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69419 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/69419] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have real_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5618

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69419 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:432ed97b992ccfe93616d5af1fa5c1a7d7aff9ff commit r12-4964-g432ed97b992ccfe93616d5af1fa5c1a7d7aff9ff Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Fr

[Bug tree-optimization/101240] [missed optimization] Transitivity of less-than and less-or-equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101240 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/103103] Incorrect integer optimization omits x < 0 comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103103 --- Comment #3 from Kyryl Melekhin --- Thank you! I figured that this has something to do with being UB behavior with int overflow, however it's strange to find this kind of bug only on 1 compiler, with no possible warnings or idications that s

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Bug 85316 depends on bug 100802, which changed state. Bug 100802 Summary: VRP fails to fold comparison using known value orders https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100802 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/100802] VRP fails to fold comparison using known value orders

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100802 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/103061] [12 Regression] 527.cam4_r miscompiled with -O2 -march=znver1 since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103061 --- Comment #15 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 51740 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51740&action=edit untested patch This should do it. Martin, can you verify this fixes it on your end?

[Bug tree-optimization/101240] [missed optimization] Transitivity of less-than and less-or-equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101240 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at redhat dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/89078] [meta-bug] Improve the gfortran manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89078 Bug 89078 depends on bug 35276, which changed state. Bug 35276 Summary: Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug c/103103] Incorrect integer optimization omits x < 0 comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103103 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Also you can detect this at runtime with -fsanitize=undefined.

[Bug c/103103] Incorrect integer optimization omits x < 0 comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103103 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/100972] Missing error with "implicit none (external)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100972 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Bernhard Reutner-Fischer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1727bb533ede295a3ef2dd494225d27b6d1746aa commit r12-4961-g1727bb533ede295a3ef2dd494225d27b6d1746aa Author: Bernhard Reut

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:452a0afbace650d7c0f2811e2b47e62dcd18e1fd commit r12-4959-g452a0afbace650d7c0f2811e2b47e62dcd18e1fd Author: Sandra Loosemore Dat

[Bug c++/100652] Unexpanded parameter pack in partial specialization of variable template not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100652 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/103103] New: Incorrect integer optimization omits x < 0 comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103103 Bug ID: 103103 Summary: Incorrect integer optimization omits x < 0 comparison Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug tree-optimization/102650] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102650 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod --- I figured running ranger as VRP2 would fix this... but alas, there is some interference :-) After fre5: [local count: 118111600]: # prephitmp_24 = PHI <1(3), 4(2)> d.5_16 = d; if (d.5_16 <= 0)

[Bug tree-optimization/102950] [11/12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk&11.2.0 vs 10.3.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102950 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod --- Im not sure what the pre-ranger trick was, but the shortcoming we have it the following: a.0_1 = a; _2 = (int) a.0_1; _3 = _2 ^ 233; _4 = (unsigned int) _3; b_8 = (char) _3; a = b_8;

[Bug target/100896] --enable-initfini-array should be enabled for cross compiler to Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100896 --- Comment #5 from Fangrui Song --- Ah, ok, my /tmp/glibc-many/src/gcc is at releases/gcc-11 while the fix is for 12.0? Anyway, you may want to clean up gcc/acinclude.m4

[Bug target/100896] --enable-initfini-array should be enabled for cross compiler to Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100896 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/103058] [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_static_chain_flags, at gimple.c:1669 when building 527.cam4_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- So the problem in this case really isn't fortran bug, but somewhat weird iteraction between visibility predicates. In particular we make binds_to_current_def to return false if symbol can be discarded and ca

[Bug ipa/103099] [12 Regression] ICE tree check: expected ssa_name, have debug_expr_decl in split_function, at ipa-split.c:1397 since r12-4920-g1ece90ffa9ce63b4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103099 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103058] [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_static_chain_flags, at gimple.c:1669 when building 527.cam4_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- Minimal reproducer: $ cat x.f90 SUBROUTINE quick_sort(list) REAL, DIMENSION (INOUT) :: list CALL quick_sort_1(1, SIZE(list)) CONTAINS RECURSIVE SUBROUTINE quick_sort_1(left_end, right_end) INTEGER right_en

[Bug target/103066] __sync_val_compare_and_swap/__sync_bool_compare_and_swap aren't optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103066 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't know what the assembly code does sorry, but it's not permitted to store to the 'expected' value unless the atomic variable is not equal to it. It looks like this would update the 'expected' value u

[Bug ipa/103083] [10/11/12 Regression] Wrong code due to ipa-cp's value range propagation since r10-5538-gc7ac9a0c7e3916f1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103083 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Just for the record, the problem is the ancestor jump function being used to model two things - pointer plus which originates from ADDR_EXPR of component reference and also C++ casts which checks whether param

[Bug tree-optimization/103093] [12 Regression] ICE in get_imports, at gimple-range-gori.cc:221 since r12-4788-gcb596fd43667f92c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103093 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/86389] execute FAILs with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- Since the vector_subscript testcase seems indeed to be frontend issue triggered by -fipa-pta (and soon by modref). I wonder if we should have fortran bug tracking this or change component here?

[Bug tree-optimization/103093] [12 Regression] ICE in get_imports, at gimple-range-gori.cc:221 since r12-4788-gcb596fd43667f92c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103093 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f6dd5de33912c261a5003150212c290165ac1b6 commit r12-4948-g1f6dd5de33912c261a5003150212c290165ac1b6 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/102943] [12 Regression] Jump threader compile-time hog with 521.wrf_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98244c68e77cf75f93b66ee02df059f718c3fbc0 commit r12-4947-g98244c68e77cf75f93b66ee02df059f718c3fbc0 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug fortran/103058] [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_static_chain_flags, at gimple.c:1669 when building 527.cam4_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058 --- Comment #10 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058 > > --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- > And WPA cgraph dump tells: > > quick_sort_1.1/213 (quick_sort_1) @0x774c2550 > Type:

[Bug tree-optimization/103102] [12 Regression] pr81175.f fails since r12-4946-ga79fe53d6ce6074d083e925b6b19773e45817405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103102 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-05 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/103102] New: [12 Regression] pr81175.f fails since r12-4946-ga79fe53d6ce6074d083e925b6b19773e45817405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103102 Bug ID: 103102 Summary: [12 Regression] pr81175.f fails since r12-4946-ga79fe53d6ce6074d083e925b6b19773e45817405 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/86389] execute FAILs with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/103101] testsuite/gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 fails with -fipa-pta (apparently due to dom bug)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103101 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/103101] testsuite/gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 fails with -fipa-pta (apparently due to dom bug)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103101 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libbacktrace/89262] [libbacktrace] dwarf5 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89262 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --

[Bug middle-end/103101] New: testsuite/gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 fails with -fipa-pta (apparently due to dom bug)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103101 Bug ID: 103101 Summary: testsuite/gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 fails with -fipa-pta (apparently due to dom bug) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/96661] configure:16984: error: unsupported system, cannot find Fortran int kind=16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96661 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad5aa4937edcb97d9c7a59223bd3de01bdff4e0c commit r11-9210-gad5aa4937edcb97d9c7a59223bd3de01bdff4e0c Author: John David A

[Bug c++/99801] Address sanitizer false positive with pointer to member function.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99801 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug target/99780] ICE in verify_curr_properties, at passes.c:2152

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99780 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/100393] [9/10/11 Regression] Very slow compilation of switch statement with thousands of cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100393 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/100393] [9/10/11 Regression] Very slow compilation of switch statement with thousands of cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100393 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95c7ef9fbcf2c4b760c296fae597f093b6ee9aaa commit r11-9209-g95c7ef9fbcf2c4b760c296fae597f093b6ee9aaa Author: Martin Liska D

[Bug libgomp/96661] configure:16984: error: unsupported system, cannot find Fortran int kind=16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96661 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db89d474ad812e57895cb8866ebaeedad0cc3e3f commit r12-4945-gdb89d474ad812e57895cb8866ebaeedad0cc3e3f Author: John David Anglin Da

[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:858d7ee1a0cd97c01d844ea73ab81918da738344 commit r12-4944-g858d7ee1a0cd97c01d844ea73ab81918da738344 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

  1   2   3   >