[Bug bootstrap/58720] FreeBSD 4.8 bootstrap fails due to missing stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58720 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/102285] New flag -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero causes crash in pr82421.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Because the variable doesn't need to be addressable. OK, so the issue is likely that we're probing the lhs with EXPAND_WRITE but when we expand the memset we end up with using expand_expr_addr_expr_1 with

[Bug other/102550] libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 --- Comment #8 from cqwrteur --- arm/arm Get Outlook for Android From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 2:12:28 AM To: unlv...@live.com Subject: [Bug other/10255

[Bug bootstrap/58274] libiberty/stack-limit.c: bootstrap failure due to missing FreeBSD header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58274 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/102548] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with cdecl attribute on a builtin function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/102547] [11/12 Regression] g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/102546] [12 Regregression] Missed Dead Code Elimination regression (trunk vs 11.2.0) at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #2) > By VRP1 we seem to be calculating the following: > > (f_8 << f_8) && (f_8 == 0) > > This would fold to false, which would elide the foo(): > > [local coun

[Bug middle-end/102518] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: einline in gimplify_modify_expr at -O2 since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102518 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.0 Summary|[11/12 regress

[Bug middle-end/102518] [11/12 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: einline in gimplify_modify_expr at -O2 since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102518 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a7f20ed26416b56df6f3c8240f3c65a5715b17d commit r12-4031-g3a7f20ed26416b56df6f3c8240f3c65a5715b17d Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug bootstrap/58719] libgcc/enable-execute-stack-mprotect.c: bootstrap failure due to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58719 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu

[Bug tree-optimization/102542] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-3876-g4a960d548b7d7d94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102542 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102542 > > Aldy Hernandez changed: > >What|Removed |Adde

[Bug other/102550] libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- configure:3409: /home/cqwrteur/myhome/arm_build/cross/gcc/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/cqwrteur/myhome/arm_build/cross/gcc/./gcc/ -B/home/cqwrteur/cross/arm-none-eabi/arm-none-eabi/bin/ -B/home/cqwrteur/cross/arm-none

[Bug other/102550] libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 --- Comment #6 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51528 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51528&action=edit libssp configs configs

[Bug other/102550] libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you attach the config.log from the libssp directory?

[Bug other/102550] libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > How did you configure and invoke make? > Was newlib installed already or you building a combined tree? of course it is installed. no it is completely separate. Even

[Bug other/102550] libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51527 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51527&action=edit config file

[Bug other/102550] libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/102544] GCN offloading not working for 'amdgcn-amd-amdhsa--gfx906:sramecc+:xnack-'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102544 miko at predsci dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miko at predsci dot com --- Co

[Bug other/102550] libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- libc is newlib-cygwin

[Bug other/102550] New: libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102550 Bug ID: 102550 Summary: libssp cannot find size_t. they do not include stddef.h Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/102539] [11/12 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positive, invalid location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102539 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Ah, that's very clever! Thank you!

[Bug tree-optimization/71520] Missing cross-jumping of switch cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71520 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug c/35501] Wrong value returned from const int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35501 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |c --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---

[Bug tree-optimization/52611] ia64-hp-hpux11.31, internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52611 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/102546] [12 Regregression] Missed Dead Code Elimination regression (trunk vs 11.2.0) at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Summary|Missed Dead Cod

[Bug c++/102548] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with cdecl attribute on a builtin function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|gc

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 102539, which changed state. Bug 102539 Summary: [11/12 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positive, invalid location https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102539 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/102539] [11/12 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positive, invalid location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102539 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/102385] [12 Regression] ICE: in single_pred_edge, at basic-block.h:350 under "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse -fno-tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 101580 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/101580] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101580 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/102385] [12 Regression] ICE: in single_pred_edge, at basic-block.h:350 under "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse -fno-tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 102387 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/102387] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102387 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/102385] [12 Regression] ICE: in single_pred_edge, at basic-block.h:350 under "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse -fno-tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug tree-optimization/102387] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102387 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suochenyao at 163 dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/102385] [12 Regression] ICE: in single_pred_edge, at basic-block.h:350 under "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse -fno-tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/102387] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102387 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 101897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/101897] [12 Regression] ICE: crash since r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101897 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/102542] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-3876-g4a960d548b7d7d94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102542 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #2) > I think this is a problem elsewhere. Right which is why I said this is most likely the same issue as reported on the earlier bug 102385 (and its many dups).

[Bug c++/102548] gcc segmentation fault in cc1plus (with repro case)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- reduced almost all the way: typedef decltype(sizeof(0)) size_t; struct tm; extern "C" size_t __attribute__((__cdecl__)) strftime(char * __restrict__ _Buf,size_t _SizeInBytes,const char * __restrict__ _Format

[Bug c++/102548] gcc segmentation fault in cc1plus (with repro case)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-30 CC|

[Bug c++/102548] gcc segmentation fault in cc1plus (with repro case)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- apinski@xeond:~/src$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/gcc cmTimestamp.ii -m32 -S E:/Programming/Source/msys2/MINGW-packages/mingw-w64-cmake/src/cmake-3.21.2/Source/cmTimestamp.cxx: In lambda function: E:/Programming/Sour

[Bug middle-end/102285] New flag -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero causes crash in pr82421.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285 --- Comment #12 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- with the following change, I can resolve the ICE: [opc@qinzhao-ol8u3-x86 gcc]$ git diff diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c index 70ce6a4d5b8d..b07026165075 100644 --- a/gcc/tr

[Bug c++/102535] __is_trivially_constructible rejects some trivial cases in aggregate initializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102535 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9845c52db38f15740861435f38f7e5ad8a8de2ec commit r12-3997-g9845c52db38f15740861435f38f7e5ad8a8de2ec Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/95567] Defaulted virtual <=> has the wrong behavior, vtable is checked when it should not be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95567 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6bca2e631b54f992c058ca8e445b45e9816690b commit r12-3995-gb6bca2e631b54f992c058ca8e445b45e9816690b Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug debug/102534] RFE epilog is not reliably a statement with inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102534 --- Comment #4 from Ben Woodard --- There continues to be an instruction after the completion of the inlining, the next instruction in the sequence, At the time when the inlining occurs why can’t the .loc 1 6 1 be placed there as part of the pro

[Bug c++/102547] [11/12 Regression] g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547 --- Comment #4 from Bob Steagall --- I have applied this tentative change to line 23436 of gcc/cp/pt.c from the gcc-11.2.0 source tarball, and can confirm that the test case compiles for me. The code I was working on also compiles, links, and a

[Bug middle-end/102285] New flag -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero causes crash in pr82421.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285 --- Comment #11 from David Binderman --- (In reply to qinzhao from comment #10) > 2734 /* The heuristic of fold_builtin_alloca_with_align differs git blame says: 13e49da934e9 (Tom de Vries 2011-10-07 12:49:49 + 2732)

[Bug middle-end/102549] Incorrect optimization if argument is SNAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102549 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/102051] [coroutines] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102051 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug middle-end/102285] New flag -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero causes crash in pr82421.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285 --- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- commented the following transformation in tree-ssa-ccp.c: 2733 #if 0 2734 /* The heuristic of fold_builtin_alloca_with_align differs before and 2735after inlining, so we don

[Bug c++/98056] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.c:9862 since r11-2183-g0f66b8486cea8668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||victor.burckel at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/101144] Coroutine compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101144 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org Resoluti

[Bug c++/102547] [11/12 Regression] g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/99575] [coroutines] unexpected move when co_awaiting a nonmoveable object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99575 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug c++/99575] [coroutines] unexpected move when co_awaiting a nonmoveable object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99575 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/102043] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/102547] [11/12 Regression] g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 CC|

[Bug c++/102547] g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ppalka at gcc do

[Bug c++/93320] internal compiler error: in is_base_type, at dwarf2out.c:12987

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93320 Luke Dalessandro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldalessandro at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug middle-end/102285] New flag -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero causes crash in pr82421.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285 --- Comment #9 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- the direct cause of the ICE is because: MEM[(int[0:D.1993] *)&fb.3] = .DEFERRED_INIT (16, 2, 1); in the above, the fb.3 is in REG instead MEM: 8451 gcc_assert (MEM_P (result)); (g

[Bug fortran/101327] ICE in find_array_element, at fortran/expr.c:1355

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/101327] ICE in find_array_element, at fortran/expr.c:1355

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3ad4c45d128c1f4a69f86116a36312aa593554c commit r9-9751-ge3ad4c45d128c1f4a69f86116a36312aa593554c Author: Harald Anlauf Da

[Bug c/102549] Incorrect optimization if argument is SNAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102549 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note also from the docs: This option is experimental and does not currently guarantee to disable all GCC optimizations that affect signaling NaN behavior.

[Bug libstdc++/59769] please add ios_base::__noreplace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59769 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-30 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c/102549] Incorrect optimization if argument is SNAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102549 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think you need -fsignaling-nans

[Bug c++/102547] g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99710] coroutines: co_yield and co_await should only be allowed in suspension context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99710 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- #include struct task { struct promise_type { std::suspend_always initial_suspend(); std::suspend_always final_suspend() noexcept; task get_return_object(); void return_void

[Bug c++/99710] coroutines: co_yield and co_await should only be allowed in suspension context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99710 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-30 CC|

[Bug fortran/98490] Unexpected out of bounds in array constructor with implied do loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/98490] Unexpected out of bounds in array constructor with implied do loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97a5a41dbfef1722fdaf4dc979e8b9c274b4404d commit r9-9750-g97a5a41dbfef1722fdaf4dc979e8b9c274b4404d Author: Harald Anlauf Da

[Bug fortran/82314] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:6972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82314] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:6972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a70195d7da49fe793ce3eb0e839b9ceea96c97a commit r9-9749-g3a70195d7da49fe793ce3eb0e839b9ceea96c97a Author: Harald Anlauf Da

[Bug fortran/82314] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:6972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39b948a8f404aa0bfb632d7b26bb0692b18f60c9 commit r10-10156-g39b948a8f404aa0bfb632d7b26bb0692b18f60c9 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug c/102549] New: Incorrect optimization if argument is SNAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102549 Bug ID: 102549 Summary: Incorrect optimization if argument is SNAN Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b19bbfb1482505367dd19ae4ab1ea19e36802b6a commit r12-3993-gb19bbfb1482505367dd19ae4ab1ea19e36802b6a Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug c++/102548] New: gcc segmentation fault in cc1plus (with repro case)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548 Bug ID: 102548 Summary: gcc segmentation fault in cc1plus (with repro case) Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f653f612a95ab9d54e005fba7ac6bb40ec14ffb9 commit r10-10155-gf653f612a95ab9d54e005fba7ac6bb40ec14ffb9 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0212bcfc31a938d4b2f247dc42f75b1d523bb1ef commit r11-9047-g0212bcfc31a938d4b2f247dc42f75b1d523bb1ef Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug tree-optimization/102546] Missed Dead Code Elimination regression (trunk vs 11.2.0) at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- > What I fail to see is how "a" got removed entirely from the IL, making this > scenario possible: > > if (!(a >= d || f)) > foo(); What I meant to say is that I don't understand how "a" got

[Bug tree-optimization/102540] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r12-476-gd846f225c25c5885

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- To elide the foo(), _2 must be non-zero on the 2->3 edge dominating the call. Interestingly, a.0_1 is non-zero on the 2->3 edge, and we have: _2 = (unsigned int) a.0_1 but somehow we have no knowledge of

[Bug target/89954] missed optimization for signed extension for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com Target M

[Bug target/89954] missed optimization for signed extension for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f4459c478b1c09e4b5e7d629fbf46d2a4fe4560 commit r12-3991-g6f4459c478b1c09e4b5e7d629fbf46d2a4fe4560 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Thu S

[Bug tree-optimization/102546] Missed Dead Code Elimination regression (trunk vs 11.2.0) at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/71703] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [OOP] ICE in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:643e8f4ee3a2a59a9b96fbcd1ffa8bacbda5b383 commit r12-3990-g643e8f4ee3a2a59a9b96fbcd1ffa8bacbda5b383 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: T

[Bug fortran/84007] [OOP] ICE with SAME_TYPE_AS and CLASS(*) entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84007 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:643e8f4ee3a2a59a9b96fbcd1ffa8bacbda5b383 commit r12-3990-g643e8f4ee3a2a59a9b96fbcd1ffa8bacbda5b383 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Th

[Bug d/102476] d: Options -fmain and -fno-druntime do not work together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102476 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/102476] d: Options -fmain and -fno-druntime do not work together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102476 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d46a29d919058fb383d19fe35c234fab58286f71 commit r12-3985-gd46a29d919058fb383d19fe35c234fab58286f71 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Fri S

[Bug c++/102547] New: g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547 Bug ID: 102547 Summary: g++ 11. ICE with NTTPs and partial specialization Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/102542] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-3876-g4a960d548b7d7d94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102542 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/96517] ICE in is_this_parameter when accessing constexpr method of a field inside coroutine lambda (with optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96517 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/102363] source_location in await_transform has function_name referring to internal coroutine funclet rather than source-level function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102363 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-30 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/93642] [Coroutines] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8070 using co_return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93642 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org Resolutio

[Bug libstdc++/94033] [10 Regression] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 Bug 94033 depends on bug 94197, which changed state. Bug 94197 Summary: __is_constructible gives an access error https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94197 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/94197] __is_constructible gives an access error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94197 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/101355] incorrect `this' in destructor calls when compiling coroutines with ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101355 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---

[Bug c++/102535] __is_trivially_constructible rejects some trivial cases in aggregate initializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102535 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/101355] incorrect `this' in destructor calls when compiling coroutines with ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101355 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/102545] [modules] inlining constexpr is required yet it should not be.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102545 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/102545] [modules] inlining constexpr is required yet it should not be.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102545 --- Comment #1 from Emily Leyland --- Good question, there seems to be some debate. From en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constexpr, A constexpr specifier used in a function or static data member (since C++17) declaration implies inline.

  1   2   >